Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:11 pm, October 21st, 2016 - 4 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
Daily review is also your post.
This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Don’t forget to be kind to each other …
Has this happened anywhere else? The possibility of human error in deciphering ballot marks and tabulating results would seem to be quite sufficient reason for a recount:
https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/central-otago/laws-secures-seat-rivals-recount-bid-rejected
I hope I’m not just speaking out of distaste for the prospect of Laws as an ORC. But if closeness of result is; “not reasonable grounds”, for a recount, then what is?
Weird (isn’t there a recount happening up north on a close result?), and depressing (Laws on the ORC, fuck).
And we had the Waitakere recount that first had Bennett win and the Carmel Sepuloni and then Bennett all of which was done on the closeness of the count.
So, yeah, I’d say that the judge is wrong on this one.
She was useless at her job. She failed at everything she attempted to implement as well as a publicly humiliating herself & those involved in a few PG’s from staff along the way.
Doing the dishes on the Marae & translation at hui (yet to be confirmed) is probably where she excels but other than that, good riddens. NoMorePay!