Written By:
advantage - Date published:
8:00 am, October 5th, 2017 - 17 comments
Categories: film, Media, video -
Tags:
I have seen things you wouldn’t believe.
The original Blade Runner movie really meant something. Filmed in 1982 but set in 2019, it held a conservative and melancholy core now recognisable to those of the hard right and hard left alike: the civil order is sliding down the pyramidic sides of all-powerful corporations, the law and its enforcement is emptied of all but commercial imperatives, and life is a cruel and joyless struggle at ground level. The metropolis has chopped whole languages into crude Esperanto. The setting showed our entire realm never seeing daylight inside ceaseless misty rain.
It was a production that changed whole subsequent classes of film. It was so studied in liberal arts courses in the 1980s and 1990s that the name was shorthand for high modernist decline. Our entire signifying order held in one rotting, clotted, nostalgic word: decay.
We can look back now and revel in its pessimism. Older orders are indeed declining, but at no great speed. Languages are altering in dominance, but calmly. Commodified organ exchanges and android robotics exist, but we’re a ways from cheaply manufacturing spare parts or spare slaves. In the new version it is conspiracy, rather than weakened juridical order, which undercuts and trips any remnant government. It didn’t work as a profound political critique of the world, and it doesn’t now.
There are some important shifts between the two films. Masculinity is shifting, from where risk and physical damage can be redeemed through valour to redemption within darkly constrained choices, to one where secret knowledges are passed from old man to young, women run the police force, and romance is less brutalized.
But let’s not mistake the formal power of either of them. Both the first and new versions are two of the best-ever artworks in cinematic history.
You should see the first one first, since the new one expands on all points from there and its visual and thematic homage is as dependent as it is deep.
The earth itself has turned, as we are brought away from the city limits to great deserts scattered with peripheral human detritus. The cracked leather jackets of film noir detectives turn into philosophers warning us of where we are headed, and there’s not much place for ordinary human kindness to be seen.
You will want more from it because it implores your imagination to conceive of an entire moral universe and to recognize ourselves and our foibles without mockery. It takes us seriously and grandly as a species. Both films tell us that the best of what we were is gone, there is little common will or capacity left to redeem what is left, and perhaps all there is left is to allow us to live longer as an entire species by expanding who is defined as human.
Revel in them all. See it at the biggest, widest screen you can.
This is mastery of the form like David Lean did them, and has more formal beauty, audacity, and wit than Christopher Nolan’s best. Villeaneuve’s realm orchestrates by kaleidascope thousands of our cultural tropes and then stabilises them in scene after scene inside a moral core: to test the deep value of defining what are human lives, and why in this universe we alone have such complex imaginative consciousness of which we are justifiably proud, so jealous, so destructive.
Yes and plenty of scifi grounds itself in what people can relate to which gives the yarn a credibility in peoples minds that enhances the uptake.
This allows the visuals to be artful and groundbreaking IMO as Luc Bessan appears to have done again in Valerian.
Another of Phillip K dick’s dystopian stories is ‘The Man in the High Castle’, well worth a look about a potential future if Japan/Germany won WW2.
TC, Yes, yes to Man in the High Castle, loved that series, hoping for a 3rd season.
Good post Ad thanks for the review am more than a little bit excited about seeing the new Blade Runner film.
Amazon approved a 3rd season a preview is already out
Woo hooo that should always happen and just has 😀 Thanks TC, looking forward to it.
That sounds like an interesting mini series and I must look up the author on fishpond for my wet season reading material.
Just brought the book The Man in the High Castle along with SS Great Britain.
So what’s it about?
Pay your 20 bucks mate
You CANnot be fucking serious.
Try the critical aggregator:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com
All the main critics give you glimpses of what it’s about.
Mind you if you’re a Millennial you may find it too taxing and fall asleep.
Looking forward to the movie.
Your last sentence was a bit overboard – mate do you realise how utterly big the universe is? Humans aren’t the peak.
Think on this. Dinos ruled for 200million years. Humans for just over 200 thousand. How far have humans evolved over that time? You seriously believe dinos didn’t evolve? Their brains stayed walnut sized? Sadly too many people are human centric. ☺
Too true. We should be humble rather than filled with narcissistic ego.
The centuries run on and we go round in circles. In the 1960s the wise men of NZ government talked about professionals in universities positing things they didn’t want to hear as being [useless theorists] in ‘ivory towers’. That is wilful ignorance and we are good at that. We should be more aware of the Johari window and less
convinced we know it all.
Harrison Ford, contra his reputation as a grumpy old man, is hilarious:
Will be interesting to see if it lives up to the standard set by the original. Thx for the review.
The making of blade runner original doco is well worth a look.
Ridley Scott had huge pressure on him with an impatient studio over time and money. He came through to deliver a masterpiece.
Any chance of a url ?