Daily review 03/10/2024

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, October 3rd, 2024 - 11 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

11 comments on “Daily review 03/10/2024 ”

    • Anne 1.1

      Beat me to it.

      How on earth did this woman think she could get away with it. 😮

    • joe90 1.2

      The old counter views….

      (1/6)

      @REasther

      I am not a public health scientist, but it strikes me as noteworthy that several of the supposed "articles" that Costello used to support her position on heated tobacco products appeared in a journal run by a famously "predatory" publisher MDPI 1/N

      https://xcancel.com/REasther/status/1841718991779144146

      • SPC 1.2.1

        International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

        According to the Journal Citation Reports the journal had a 2021 impact factor of 4.614, ranking it 100th out of 279 journals in the category "Environmental Sciences" and 71st out of 203 journals in the category "Public, Environmental & Occupational Health"

        In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. The very prestigious journal Nature had an impact factor of 69.504 in the year 2021.

      • mpledger 1.2.2

        Predatory publishers are really awful beasts. It costs an incredible amount to publish in top journals ($US12,290 for one open access article in Nature) so there is bit of money to be made by dodgy publishers with the huge pressure on academics to publish.

    • Georgecom 1.3

      I was sitting on the john this morning and discovered a roll of "independent advice".

  1. ianmac 2

    If Costello can "earn" a $250million rebate on that "evidence" then the Cabinet must be very, very stupid.

    And it probably will be left un-challenged because this lot dumps lots of crooked activity, laughs and walks away untouched.

  2. adam 3

    Oh look the slippery slope has begun, with act pushing to expand the slaying people by the state.

    How scummy have we got as country. Next we will be like Canada killing disabled and the poor wholesale. Under the the guise of economic problems for the state.

    https://jacobin.com/2024/05/canada-euthanasia-poor-disabled-health-care

  3. mpledger 5

    An interesting thing I saw in one of the census reports was that Wellingtonians has the lowest levels of working from home in the 2013 and 2018 censuses but were fourth in the 2023 census. So, for all Nationals talk, Wellingtonians are really not much different to everyone else in WFH now. You would think National would like their beuracrats taking up less rental space (all that money saved) but those (business) landlords have to be appeased.

    Anyway, it a figure just over half way down the page – https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/2023-census-population-dwelling-and-housing-highlights/

The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.