Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:30 pm, March 28th, 2022 - 42 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Huge congratulations to Jane Campion for her Best Director win.
Good on so many levels.
Sweet !
I recalled this morning one of the best quips ever delivered on the Standard. It relates back to round 2012 or thereabouts, with a scandal involving Rachael Pullar and Nick Smith . Someone adroitly pointed out how 2 pullars were involved. Rachael Pullar and Nick pullar.
The slap was what most guys would have wanted to do.
fortunately most guys wouldn't
Your catholicism shows up in your sexest statement here,hang your head in shame.!!
Irony much?
Much irony,their,fixed that statement for you.If I failed to take your meaning,please do spell that out.
Do you think a man who slaps another man in the face for alleged sexist comments about his wife (and/or daughter?) is a sexist?
Do you think someone who allegedly approves of and/or admirers that slap is a sexist?
Do you think insulting somebody else’s religion or religious convictions is in any anyway helpful in calling out their alleged sexist comment? Why the need to pull religion into it other than to hit out?
1/ yes
2/ yes
3/yes. Theirs hundreds of years of sexism in that and other religions,this chap Advantage does the same most days of the week here on TS,or is it he's an untouchable,but unlike a leper for argument sake,(a sad infliction)I've had to wad though to much diatribe before I figured out his hypocrisy and misogyny wasn't an online show,that's all.
Ok, thanks for answering those questions.
Your third answer is problematic for me as Moderator here on TS. Ad is a regular contributor here as commenter and as Author. As such, we don’t condone personal attacks and insults aimed at him. However, this doesn’t make him “untouchable”, which is a ludicrous statement because it is demonstrably not true that anybody here is untouchable.
Whether you dislike or disagree with his comments and/or Posts is not the issue. The issue is that you made it personal by lashing out with a low and discriminatory comment about his personal faith. The issue is also that you took the opportunity to lash out for much more than his one single comment about that slap at the Oscars. If you want to wage a war at any individual here on TS you’ll run into one major unmovable obstacle and you won’t like it. You can address the content and substance of comments here any time and as much as you like, but not use personal attacks as your weapon of choice. I’m doing you a courtesy by giving you this advice. Please take it on board.
Just to follow up on the Herald report posted this afternoon by the Alien…
You can read the full report there at the live Ukraine war update page at the Financial Review – scan down to almost half-way to spot it
The original report used by the Telegraph seems to have been sourced from this global news site: https://newsrme.com/en/about-us
I discovered that by googling the logo that shows up on this two minute spoken report of the elimination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCyUJEsAwKU
Warning: loud irrelevant piano music has been added to the audio, presumably to deter anyone with good taste…
"its reputation forged at Stalingrad and in the liberation of Poland from the Nazis.".
I find the comment about the "liberation" of Poland offensive. In 1939 Poland was overrun from the west by Germany and from the east by the USSR. They country was then occupied by both the invaders. Who was worst was debatable but many Poles would have, as some Poles who were there at the time have told me, chosen the USSR as the worst.
Regardless, the "liberation" of Poland was merely the replacement of one set of occupiers by another, who they didn't get rid of for another 45 years. "Liberation" my a**s.
Well said. I spent some time in Poland (and other parts of Eastern Europe) a few years ago, and I was struck by the keen sense of history of the Polish people. I got the feeling they would not react well to anyone else trying to 'liberate' them.
Liberation my arse. It was the fourth Soviet invasion of Poland.
Guardian reports about why that immense Russian tank convoy headed for the capital of Ukraine ground to a halt a couple of weeks ago:
Flying a Russian helicopter in Ukraine must be a terrifying prospect given the effectiveness of stinger missiles and the like that the Ukranians possess, as this video shows:
Being in Ukraine is a terrifying prospect.
https://twitter.com/shaunwalker7/status/1507866466208686080
https://twitter.com/MrKovalenko/status/1507869689606778884
Having watched the video of Mariupol I'd be really upset to hear that any leading political leader would suggest that whoever is responsible for the destruction should lose their job.
Maybe any political leader who suggests whoever is responsible for the chaos should lose their job, should instead lose their own job.
Now, let's talk about sanity.
And these are the Russian speaking people he came to "liberate".
U.S co.Lockheed makes the attack helicopters…and U.S joint venture Raytheon/Lockheed make the missiles to …shoot them ..down..business is great…the s/p and divys are fantastic.
All done in the best…possible…taste!
so… footage looks odd to me for some reason, can't find it anywhere else.
But regardless of whether the footage is ARMA3/Squads or genuine footage of some helicopter variant out of the Kamov helicopter factories getting absolutely mothered by Ukrainian MANPADS, claiming that Lockheed makes kamov helicopters for the Russian military is a very special claim indeed.
Except I have not made that claim.
What I said is accurate and easily verified.
"the" attack helicopters.
In reply to a video where russian helicopters are allegedly shot down.
I merely made the error of giving you the credit that your comment bore some relevance to the comment to which it was a reply.
It does.
Not sure of the type of helicopter in the vid,nor are you by the sound of it,but I know Zelensky was requesting stingers,and the Taleban,loved using them too.
My comment was perhaps too subtle…a co makes helicopters and also the missiles to…destroy them.
I'm not sure the video is real. But I doubt the Russians are flying too many american military helicopters, if it is.
Lots of companies make lots of things. That's irrelevant to whether the life of a Russian helicopter pilot is destined to be long and fruitful, though.
You may find the comment replied to, mentions 'stingers',and therefore my comment is indeed ………relevant.
I'm not sure you know what that word means.
No surprise there!
You are 'not sure' about lots…
''I'm not sure the video is real.'
'
I'm not sure you know what that word means.'
The world is an uncertain place, made only more uncertain by the existence of those who would mislead and those who aren't as smart as they think they are.
One thing is becoming obvious – tanks and helicopters are more vulnerable to attack and destruction during modern warfare.
Here's one reason why. This beast of a plane could have halted Russia's advancement into the Ukraine.
clickbait article – a few upgrades, but nothing like the thumbnail. Mostly just rehashing A10 porn.
USAF is probably still trying to kill the A10 by claiming the F35 is just as good or better at lobbing 500lb bombs. Fair call on that, but it's too fragile and expensive to do anything other than lob bombs from high up, and uses a huge amount of fuel to stay on call in the area so it can lob bombs when needed.
That's true about the thumb nail. But the Warthog has spoken for itself. It is the most feared plane for ground attack. And the clip shows one of the upgrades is new missiles for dog fights, or avoiding such. Given the hog is no speed king, this is an important upgrade.
The air force has accepted these upgrades as acceptable and its planned service life is expected to be extended to 2035.
Only because the USAF were tugged on the leash by congress and senate. They're doing the minimum possible, after hoping the wing issue would solve the problem for them.
The A10 is approaching 50 years old. It's not just the wings that are an issue, and the advantage the F35 has is integrated sensors and its avionics.
[image resized]
Very effective propaganda Red, reminiscent , probably deliberate, of second world war caricatures of villainy.Mainly to rally and fortify the British public
But where is the serious diplomacy we now need if we are to avoid a short WW3 culminating in the end of history(which does not resemble Fukuyama's)
I think the Russian invasion, which is having terrible impacts on the civilian population , as all wars do, is the end result of years of non diplomacy.I'm sorry, I know you feel the US has overall been a force for good in the world, but I feel , their unipolar supremacy has been at the expense of any true development of diplomacy.After all, why bother with it if your military and economic power is unrivalled?I think Lavrov is a skilled and erudite diplomat, crucial for instance in getting the Obama era JCPOA agreement over the line, but he's had no similar counterpart in the US or UK to deal with , and forget about the Europeans
https://thescrum.substack.com/p/infantile-imperialism?s=r
You have allowed your anti-American bias to run too far – your moral compass has flipped off it's pivot. Whatever charm, erudition or strongman energy he projects, he is a despot. And one with a long track record of brutal suppression of his opponents that the West has largely turned a blind eye to until now it is too late.
Or as one ex-Navy veteran said to me recently – a leopard never changes its spots, although it may have rolled in the mud. He is a psychopath with nuclear weapons. The late Chris Hitchens understood Putin years ago.
He also understood and defended the US attack on Iraq, not sure I would take his views on Putin as anything more than his personal view.You can agree with it or not.
My post was about the need for diplomacy in the world.
You're just doubling down and paraphrasing the foolish remarks of Biden , which is a surprise to me, I consider you to be a fair and thoughtful commentator, not given to the conventional groupthink we see so often .I do understand the distress seeing the effects of war close up, a rarity in the case of American wars, or Israeli attacks on the Gaza for instance.Who could not hate this war and wish it was over .
Blustering and hatred and vilification of a leader is not going to cut the mustard, we need serious diplomacy
Let me try to downsize the problem to something that might be less abstract. A local gang in your town have determined that having a law abiding neighbour next door is threatening to their security and ability to be as obnoxious as they please.
So they invade their neighbour, and burn, rape and murder their way through the place in defiance of every norm of human decency.
Would you propose that the police open a 'diplomatic dialog' with the gang leader?
My post was about the need for diplomacy in the world.
So – as Russia's losses mount, suddenly diplomacy is their aim/was always their aim. Had they succeeded in their decapitation attempt, all the West's diplomatic overtures would have gone for naught – as did their considerable efforts prior to the invasion. All their entreaties fell on deaf ears. But since it turns out that Putin does respect Mr Stick, why would anyone offer him the carrots he turned his nose up at.
I'm very happy for there to be a diplomatic solution – given that Russia pays reparations. The owners of the $10 billion worth of confiscated aircraft probably want some kind of recompense also.
Exactly – better put than I managed. Too many people who cannot tell the difference between diplomacy and appeasement.
In “Marfa Posadnitsa,"' ( and the Novograd problem)