Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, May 9th, 2024 - 100 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Steve Albini has died.
Fantastic audio engineer who always got a great drum sound. Dave Grohl never sounded better than on In Utero.
Lucky enough to see Shellac play at The Kings Arms. A delayed but incredible show.
Too young.
https://pitchfork.com/news/steve-albini-storied-producer-and-icon-of-the-rock-underground-dies-at-61/
"Nicola Willis rules out austerity Budget"
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/516357/darkest-before-the-dawn-nicola-willis-rules-out-austerity-budget
Well..thats good news for her kids. The movies and icecream still be coming…
National, through Luxon and Willis, is talking a lot about "social investment". This was the magical tool Bill English talked a lot about.
It sounds very good at press conferences and pre-budget meetings, conveying a sense of compassionate conservatism, but in reality nothing actually transpires from it in terms of concrete action.
Of course that Nat "social investment" is mainly targeting specific groups. Their "social network", aka landlords, business people, etc; ….
The rest of us….belts tightened
Social Investment = providing another opportunity for rich people to extract wealth from everyone else. Usually.
If Bill English had placed money into the Cullen-Robertson Fund (now over $70B), it would have now been worth over $100B.
His decision not to to invest, cost us at least $10B and that is net of debt cost.
That said, there was the option of a 1% surcharge on employee and employer into the Fund to finance it without debt, or use of a budget surplus.
A bit late now, given it is/was a generational tool to afford the 2030-2050 cost of super to the taxpayer.
It now has two purposes
2030-2050 generate revenue for the government and if (and where) possible do so in way that contributes to our infrastructure needs.
True, also Imagine what the super fund would be worth had Muldoon and the National party not made the worst economic decision in NZ history and scrapped it.
I have no idea how these people are held up as good economic managers when they just butcher long term economic stability for short term growth.
True, also Imagine what the super fund would be worth had Muldoon and the National party not made the worst economic decision in NZ history and scrapped it.
I don't agree. It was a burden on both workers and employers – at least kiwisaver is voluntary – and the larger employer contributions would probably have impacted on wages. And there were also other problems. Latecomers and non working wives would have needed top ups. Whatever one thinks of Muldoon his National Super seems preferable.
It would have changed my future massively, while my kiwisaver is healthy after 13 years, I've been working full time in nz for 32 years,I'd love to know what the stash would have looked like if muldoon had fucked off.
Still no sign of the strong Opposition we were promised… https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/05/08/persistent-green-party-scandals-delay-caucus-reset/
Perhaps the independent investigation is up against privacy law? Hard to get facts on employee exploitation if the law deems it private enterprise, huh? Capitalism's exploitation of employees has been part of normalcy for centuries. In theory a Green capitalist could do better, but only if authentic. Meanwhile a reshuffle ought to at least produce a semi-plausible allocation of duties.
The thing to keep in mind is repositioning to take advantage of any sudden govt collapse: the team needs to seem ready to re-enter govt on the basis of competence. Rewarding Genter for inept public relations seems a bad start in this direction – better to use someone else who can cope with the pressure.
we don't know what the pressure is in this case.
Dennis-Genter has had 13 impressive years in parliament. One dumb act, carried out under provocation, does not alter this track record.
Read my TS posts yesterday.
She has established a pattern of bad behaviour via four different people: one Nat minister and one councillor (both male) and two of her constituents (both female). All four have featured in multiple media reports recently. You don't need death by a thousand cuts to do the damage, you just need a persistent pattern that folks notice.
The arm-grab struck me as an extremely dodgy political tactic. It wasn't reported as an assault: the shopkeeper commented on how unusual the behaviour was though. Perhaps the Greens will go with the JAG arm-grab as their favoured new method of impressing voters. Not deterring her would send the message that they hope it'll trend on social media as the latest form of left-wing activism…
Wow Dennis you are really buying in to this MSM beat up. Just to repeat my posts from yesterday:
1. "Don't believe everything you read. Van der Kaay writes for the so-called "Democracy Project" run by Bryce Edwards.
Edwards has for many years consistently criticized parties from the Left while acting as an apologist for the Right.
The Greens have had 3 unfortunate events.
Kaay’s article is not worth a hill of beans."
2. "Come off it gsays. Genter has been in parliament 13 years behaving, to my knowledge, impeccably.
Then she gets het up because Doocey yells lies at her (completely ignoring the real spending facts on roading) so she crosses the aisle to show him the actual numbers in the report.
In an obvious, coordinated and probably made-up hit National drags up a witness to another episode where a passionate JAG meets an anti-cycleway (code for National/ACT voter) person who claims (unproven, no witnesses) she too was yelled at by JAG. Note: Nobody would offer to video a meeting where they were yelling at a constituent.
It was a very dumb thing to do to cross the aisle and JAG should get a sanction from the privileges committee for this-presumably they will take into account the previous 13 years of not doing this. Note: apparently crossing the aisle is not against the rules.
I don't see the relevance of Doocey's mental history (you are clutching at straws here). If you are fit to be in parliament you are fit to be part of the rough and tumble. In this case he bears some of the blame by yelling obvious lies in the first place. Maybe this will teach him to stick to yelling the truth."
3. "gsays-I didn't gloss over anything. The Kerekere bullying happened well over a year ago which is not anywhere close to the period I am commenting on above in relation to Kaay's biased article.
I commented on the three relatively current events that the MSM media seems to be trying to portray as a pattern, where nothing could be further from the truth.
If we are to start going back a couple of years there are National MP misdemeanors as long as my arm."
My understanding is that Bryce Edwards is highly regarded by all sides in the political debate.
It is also interesting that the owners of any business in Wellington that have had a disagreement with the current mayor or Green Party mp face bullying from random people online. This suggests to me that there are a number of toxic people on the left. We should have nothing to do with this type of behaviour.
David-there have been plenty of posts on TS over the years criticising Edwards' negative stance towards the Left in his writing and in his appearances on The Panel, Checkpoint, Morning Report etc.
I am sure he is held in high regard by members of the current government for this reason.
Incidentally my description of migrant exploitation as “a bad look” is, on reflection poor. I should have said “unacceptable behaviour”.
Disagreement is perfectly acceptable and should be welcomed. Unless you have a tendency towards being an authoritarian…
Bryce has been a joke for years.
Complaints upheld …
Complaint about RNZ use of Bryce Edwards article upheld « The Standard
And past forecasts so wrong he should not be taken seriously by anyone.
We are in a period of great political volatility – the New Zealand election is far from decided | Bryce Edwards | The Guardian
Todd Muller’s beige persona might not be a bad thing in the battle against Jacinda Ardern | Bryce Edwards | The Guardian
and many more examples, if you care to read up on them.
Or they harangued an MP buying flowers for a dying friend and were triumphalist about her bloc losing the government benches. Or when the MP was out in public not in an official capacity.
It’s a bit like asking Destiny church about the gay marriage advocates.
Edwards is a stooge whose stuff and his mates stuff happily appears on The Platform and whose use of the university emblem I find interesting at best.
And let’s not be too harsh on Matt Doocey- being completely wrong about say giving landlords money making rents go down or how many beds at $1.9 million a prison will have or if something is funded or not is ministerial under Luxon.
I think he's good.
He's published in the Herald, his university has the Democracy Project with people like Adams and his compendium of the week in politics includes right wing commentator quotes and links.
He would have to be very very good to rise above the associations …
A former Alliance guy who repudiates anything Jim Anderton might have campaigned for reflexively, unless it can be used to castigate current left wing politicians for being too focused on identity issues as well social justice.
Does that accurately describe the current Labour Party?
Dentistry eventually, last manifesto so all bets are off.
Only problem for Dr Bryce is that doesn’t pay well, so further we will go. The angry occupation at parliament mixed with aggressive online misogyny for Dame Jacinda Ardern was pretty similar to what Sir John Key struggled through, according to Dr. Bryce. That plays well on the Platform. Where they’ve removed themselves from Press Council oversight, so they can…?
Are you suggesting the Green Party leadership is buying into the "MSM beat up" as well through initiating an internal disciplinary process.
Or do you think you might be out on a limb here in downplaying behaviour which we on the left at least, don't tolerate?
James-I think the Greens will undertake an honest appraisal of JAG's behaviour in the house.
She will get a verdict "don't do it again" and a slap on the wrist.
Personally I applaud her passion-she had had enough of being told that the last 6 years had been under a patently hopeless and economically illiterate government, where in fact that is what we have now.
What might Dennis be up to – maybe he's thinking of doing a
runnerTrotterHe was once a Green man … but not now that the next generation are in charge … these days everyone – especially women are so young and know not how to behave …
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/a4vnuv/old_generations_complain_about_the_next_one_since/
Trotter on the left, Du Fresne and Plunkett on the right.
What is this, Kiwblog style, ganging up on a woman MP moment?
FACT CHECK
The Johnston Street shop is in the Wellington Central electorate, they approached the then Auckland based list MP in Midland Park about a letter the MP sent to Lester Mayor of Wellington 5 years earlier (this while Genter was Associate Minister of Transport – a position they did not hold at the later time). Google up on Reddit if you want a commentary about stuff the MSM do not publish.
An arm grab is not a political tactic, it is a reaction to having her time in a park disturbed.
Have the police ever prosecuted an arm grab as an assault?
PERSPECTIVE
If you think it was wrong for Genter to approach the City Councillor while he was engaged otherwise, what about the Johnston shopowner disturbing a list MP in a park and the flower shopowner doing it to the MP when she pops in to buy flowers on visiting the hospital nearby? Nick R covered the interface with other members of the public (former customers).
Genter has said she will no longer engage with angry people, but will just walk away. More generally MP's should just hand out a card when living their personal lives. After all list MP's are not experts in conflict de-escalation but advocates for their party policies and on becoming an electorate MP have to determine how to manage being available to offer assistance to constituents in a safe way.
Good facts there SPC-thanks for that.
Of course the reasons for the concerted attacks on Genter and the Greens are:
She's going to have a quiet life then in this electorate at the moment.
Very clear she is inexperienced at what happens in electorate offices
People in the electorate just don't pop by to say 'hi, well done and how are you?'
They go there usually because they often feel they cannot get any further following the process and need a spanner thrown into the works to disrupt it, to have the problem defined differently etc. You can get tears to laughter and everything between including anger, in an electorate office.
She would have already met people in the electorate office. No problems as far as anyone knows.
People go to have a situation dealt with, not to argue policies. Though they can provide feedback as to impact of policy.
The presence of others and the focus on being in the workplace provides it’s own discipline.
So why the focus on 'Genter has said she will no longer engage with angry people, but will just walk away. '
She will get angry people in her electorate offices, how does the de-escalation differ here from out and about. Seems a bit of a strange distinction. It sounds more that she does not want to talk about or be exposed to thinking that is not similar to her own. That actually won't work if she is to be a welcoming and competent MP adept at handling issues of concern when in an office or out and about.
Because it was what she said – as to being approached by angry people while she is not at work as MP.
An MP can ask those who get angry in the office to leave. And there are others about.
Being willing to be hassled in public when out and about in their personal life is not a required part of the job. And being exposed to different opinion is a known when becoming a politician.
Being approached by people while out and about is a known fact of life for all MPs. Many take pains to keep some private time that does not involve being out and about publically. MPs who frequent popular local areas so-called 'privately' where MPs usually are keen to be seen such as markets, galas, walking down popular local streets etc have only themselves to blame if a naughty member of a public approaches them. Especially if said member of the public is annoyed.
I been with MPs who have been approached by people while they are at concerts, films, theatre, sports, even after funerals, at tangi Most are happy with a brief chat and a card with the electorate secs name/phone number on it to arrange an appt, I have been with MPs when they have had an impromptu 'clinic' at a restaurant private table/place & once in a sports club rooms as they were so concerned at what they were hearing/worried about their constituent.
The MP I was with usually got the person's name and contact details and sometimes, once back at the office, would phone, email, write a letter acknowledging the contact and reiterating the contact details.
"Hard to get facts on employee exploitation if the law deems it private enterprise, huh?
Not at all. If the allegations go to migrant exploitation, then my understanding is they go to potential criminal activity under the Immigration Act. There is no-where to hide in that case. I'm not a Green Party supporter, but I am prepared to accept the investigation may be constrained by factors well beyond their control.
If the allegations are true, so not on brand …
Darleen Tana no longer appears on the Green Party website so they may have already made a decision regarding her. However James Shaw still appears so maybe not yet updated.
The NZ Initiative with Johnson at the wheel while colluding with the Minister of Ed, has succeeded in running the NZ education "reform."
Laura Walters outlines how the capture came about:
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/05/08/meet-the-man-behind-the-governments-education-policy/?utm_source=Newsroom&utm_campaign=4346ab0c8e-Daily_Briefing+09.05.2024&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_71de5c4b35-4346ab0c8e-95522477&mc_cid=4346ab0c8e&mc_eid=88a3081e75
Atlas Network holds up the sky so that capitalism can reign.
If it did not do this the people might have human dominion, sustain the earth as a habitat for life and build a society not driven by personal greed along the golden brick road to their multi-million dollar weekend "bach".
While only a few can share in the dream of being one of the well to do elite – offering a change to the way children read provides the sort of hope that just maybe one of the children of the common folk might win the hunger games – and sing long enough to see off the snakepit (the hissing of the losers, such as the once champion knights of the realm and now cellar dwellers).
So, they're trying the old 1990s trick again:
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/516371/government-to-introduce-compulsory-work-seminar-for-job-seeking-beneficiaries
Sounds reasonable but it didn't work out in practice last time and I suspect it won't again. In fact it turned into a witch-hunt against people who, through no fault of their own, had been flung on the scrap heap during a time when job opportunities were scarce.
Remember the woman, Christine Rankin with the very short, low-cut dresses that left nothing to the imagination? Are they going to drag her out of retirement to do their dirty work again? (sarc)
As a former qualified Public Servant who was amongst those cast out back then, I received a letter demanding I attend a seminar on:
"How to dress and look smart for a job interview."
They received a reply which left them in no doubt my feelings on the subject – at least as it applied to me. I heard no more from them and never attended the seminar. 👿
Those who have lost employment should get 6 months to sort their job search out themselves (and register for temp work – use different ones for different work categories).
After 6 months, a processing (including notification of training providers available) for transfer to the Work Broker (stuff like industry apprenticeship and or work experience opportunities etc – they are the ones in contact with employers).
The W and I requirements are about initiating the unemployed into an accountability regime. Doing it to laid off PS workers is obnoxious and is presumably supposed to usher in a reign of fear among those still employed in the PS.
National wants the unemployed to run the treadmill of W and I oversight of their job search – all while the pool of the unemployed grows – this ensures employers have more power relative to their existing workers (wages suppressed while rents rise will cause a run on food banks of the like we have not seen – back in the 1990's people fled to Oz to escape it).
My remembrance of the formation of Work and Income back in Oct 1 1998 was the requirements of the unemployed to go to Job Clubs run by external providers (religious groups who wanted those on welfare to bend their knee to Jesus).
Having to attend that seminar would make sense only if you were laid off for being scruffy – which itself would be an insufficient reason for the layoff. So they were clowns obviously, probably with an inbuilt bias towards thinking that unemployed people have only themselves to blame.
Bang on AB. Their ignorance was astounding. Despite the government "restructuring the work force” (that was the description of the day), they assumed the unemployed were rough living layabouts who wanted to live off the welfare teat for the rest of their lives.
I was actually looking after my elderly mother who was in her 90s, but that didn't stop them sending a surveillance team to our address to check out the situation. I was one of many people who had that experience. It was humiliating and insulting.
How long is that seminar, and will (unwoke no-frills) food be laid on for the laid off?
Hmm, ‘Seymour says’ could be a fun game for the well-heeled.
Seymour Says is a children’s game for three or more players.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Says
The NZ public school system is where woke foods go to die!
It’s been wonderful to watch ACT leader enact a principle in education that should be extended.
The government should use its size to buy things, including money, in bulk at a considerably cheaper rate in order to provide a more inexpensive service for New Zealanders, particularly those in its poorer communities.
Imagine this principle in housing!
Or water infrastructure! Imagine, using the mass of large water districts being able to attract world class water infrastructure specialists and get discounts on hardware!
""As someone who makes kids' lunchboxes every day, I wouldn't be able to fill my kids' lunchboxes with good quality healthy food for $3 a day," Labour leader Chris Hipkins said. ".
Really? Who actually believes that Hipkins carries out this activity every day? Do the children even live with him all the time?
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/05/students-to-receive-sandwiches-and-fruit-under-overhauled-school-lunches-programme-not-woke-sushi-david-seymour.html
I wonder how many pieces of sushi you get from an average sizes woke?
Is egg sushi woke? How about sausage meat sushi? Is the vinegar woke or the rice? How about if it isn’t served by sn Asian person?
Does that mean the 14 cities with St Pierre’s are infected hives of villainous wokeness?
I am left wondering how one can centralise the bulk buying of sandwiches and distribute them fresh around the country each day.
And the cheapest canned fruit is that which comes with sugar in water – and is not a food I would want children to consume. It is the fruit version of the salt and sugar ladden canned food that is also a danger to health (what next noodles with salt and another dodgy additive).
ACT reinvents the 1970s NZ Railways lunch of hard cheese and crackers. And a good mug of black tea with sugar…now to reinvent railways too…
I am left wondering how one can centralise the bulk buying of sandwiches and distribute them fresh around the country each day.
I suspect in the same way that cafe's across the country order packaged sandwiches and serve them fresh.
Supply and distribution would be local – as the current system is
Yes, but the 'buying' or ordering sounds like it's going to be through a central portal.
Have had experience of Nelson Hospital food over these past few months which is trucked from Christchurch – over 400kms. It is inedible, including the sandwiches.
If Seymour is worried about uneaten/wasted food now, he's going to get a shock. Or maybe that's the plan – make it inedible so they can cancel the whole program.
Government is damn inconvenient. It’s much better to spin a few fables, lip synch the classics and go to a think tank for lunch. No skimping there!
Please ask St David what makes sushi ‘ woke’? Is it the way tuna and salmon is sometimes race-mixed in the same $5 set? We need this important list of woke foods so we don’t accidentally feed them to our children!
We need to ask St David are St. Pierre’s sushi, which features stores in 14 Kiwi cities or the many smaller family owned sushi stores woke? Does this mean ACT will boycott them too?
Is all Asian food woke? Or for example are jandals woke? That’s Japanese sandals btw. Are noodles okay? How about rice without vinegar? Is it still woke if it’s in a rice pudding? What about the same fish, but in a casserole?
Kumara has to be woke right? Surely we must only eat sweet potato in the ACT party? A Maori name and staple of around a 1000 years?
We can’t risk wokeness seeping into our food and so into our bodies and being! Please ask St David and find out!
"Who actually believes that Hipkins carries out this activity every day?"
Maybe it just means Chris Hipkins doesn't understand economies of scale?
No, the issue would be getting supply without retail mark up.
Or do you know of a machine that makes sandwiches?
It's the mark-up where some of the economies of scale are made.
Labor-intensive industries like making sandwiches have limited economies of scale. Therefore the savings that enable the $3 cost must in part come from selecting less labour-intensive options such as packaged and tinned food.
These offerings will be less appealing to kids than things made fresh, hot and locally, even if the numbers suggest that they are roughly nutritionally equivalent.
That's the point of course: make them unappealing, drive up waste, point at the waste, shake your head in dismay that such "dumb stuff" was ever done in the first place, cancel the whole scheme, then announce mission accomplished. For some people, malice is more satisfying if it's stretched out a bit.
"These offerings will be less appealing to kids than things made fresh, hot and locally,"
Do you have any evidence for that?
"make them unappealing, drive up waste"
You mean more unappealing and more waste than the old scheme? Seems unlikely.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/05/07/when-it-comes-to-free-school-lunches-how-much-waste-can-we-live-with/
It’s like the government based its decisions contrary to the evidence.
My local Area School, roll of 220, age 5 to 18, has very a successful lunch program supplied by one of our local cafes.
The owners have 2 children at the school, age 6 and 8 so they know what children will eat.
The favourite meal is sushi !!! followed by butter chicken, and bolognaise with orzo !!! rather than spaghetti to make it easier to eat. All very woke items in a small rural town in the South Island.
Any unused meals are donated to local needy families so there is very little waste.
The cafe in conjunction with the school, have sessions where a class will help prepare and serve the meal of the day. The cafe is a short walk from the school so the meals are delivered by trolley.
This has morphed into a Masterchef competition over the school holidays as part of Boredom Busters. Some of the winning recipes have become part of the school lunch menu.
Those are anecdotes, like these:
"Some o'f it just really isn't nice and I've often looked at it myself and thought, yuck!" Ollie's indifference towards the school lunches is not unique, with large amounts of food waste allegedly being thrown out each day across the region.
Intermediate student, Naki, said his Northland school had been receiving school lunches for around a year and a half. He claimed the lunches were hit and miss, with students often complaining about lunches being 'gross, stale, soggy, dry and tasting yuck'.
'Large amounts of food waste' thanks to lunches in schools programme – NZ Herald
As to evidence, Treasury provided that last year. They found:
1. As many as 10,000 lunches a day are left over.
2. that there was no evidence of impacting attendance or benefiting ākonga Māori
https://thestandard.org.nz/daily-review-08-05-2024/#comment-1999130
This is no anectdote.
The wastage was less than in overseas programmes and thus quickly effective. Did Treasury note that?
Given the greater number of Maori in the schools receiving the food I'll call the no evidence of benefiting akonga Maori line wildly misleading and a quote taken out of reasonable context.
The Herald quote demonstrates their disposition to use right wing talking points as headlines.
That is an anecdote.
"The wastage was less than in overseas programmes and thus quickly effective. "
Based on 2 examples. Your reference above also included this:
However, another contractor argued that 4.5% still represented quite a lot of money. “I would say 2-3% of waste is reasonably acceptable,” they said. “I believe if you gave [the school lunches contracts] to the right people, that percentage would come down. It could probably get down to 2%.”
Perhaps if the previous government had cared enough to measure the waste themselves (Government out to lunch on school sammie count | Waikato Times) the result might have been better.
No, the result of a survey of schools is not an anectdote.
The source of the “quotes”.
You are referring to a survey. Of 50 schools, out of around 2,500. And there is no data reported about the % of waste, just commentary.
And again your 'overseas programs' data is 2 countries.
The evidence from NZ's program is that we have considerable waste that the government seemed to not even be concerned to measure. This new program delivers more lunches at less cost.
How many days a week would he have to make kids' lunchboxes in order to have a fair idea that $3/day is a stretch? Can this determination be made only if you do it every day?
I wouldn't know how many days it would take.
Chippie claims that he makes his kids lunches every day though. Isn't it amazing that he does such a thing? Frankly I think his story is b**s intended to make him look like a man of the people.
I don't know what Hipkins meant as his statement is capable of two interpretations. One, which seems more likely, is that he 'every day' makes a lunch box for kids. Every day, of course, would exclude holidays, weekends and I would suggest actually means 'most days' as even the best of us did not make our kids' lunch boxes every day.
"As someone who makes kids' lunchboxes every day, I wouldn't be able to fill my kids' lunchboxes with good quality healthy food for $3 a day," Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.
However, it could mean this. "When I put myself in the position of someone who makes kid's lunch boxes every day, I wouldn't be able to fill my kids' lunchboxes with good quality healthy food for $3 a day."
I've just costed my lunch. 4 slices bread, 1 banana, 2 slices cheese, peanut butter, 1 feijoa. About $2.50. But, I didn't include delivery costs, packaging or labour. I didn't include a cup of tea and what would a slice of feijoa cake be worth?
Shared parenting – his turn with the kids.
Profit.
Good point, aj. The profit for me was a cheap, home-made lunch.
I didn't mention the pie I had for morning tea, though, after a walk with friends. The pie was non-woke except for the filling which had decidedly woke Italian truffle cheese. Woke is tasty as well as tasteful, after all.
I have eaten school lunches in Japan on occasions where the parents made a small contribution and the children and teachers ate together. Good food, with an emphasis on variety and calorific intake.
Mrs Mac1 has eaten in French schools where subsidised school lunches were made by professional chefs, served at tables from platters with full dining etiquette, green beans often, a meat and other vegetables, banana and yoghurt for dessert.
A nation and people are defined by their culture. Part of that is food, manners, sharing, table companionship. New Zealand is still growing ours with new immigration. Our small town has restaurants and food outlets that are French, Italian, Brazilian, Pasifika, Thai, Turkish, Indian, Mexican, Chinese, Cambodian, Japanese, Argentinian, plus fast foods in American and English styles.
Very woke. Very tasty. Very much part of who we are, as a community, diverse and interesting……..
Yes. Every day. Imagine that. Even weekends, when his kids don't even go to school. Even Christmas day.
To address your point in a manner less commensurate with the stupidity of how you appraised Hipkins' statement, however: no, I shouldn't find it particularly amazing if Hipkins made his children's lunches daily.
You’re repeating yourself.
It’s a sign. Should get it checked you know.
I do believe alwyn has spammed the same thing 3 times now. Not how a discussion goes.
More aggressive and nasty tin ear behaviour. I know that parents are there to have fixed needs so that they can be forced into high childcare costs, high housing costs and high medicine costs, but it’s the glee at others misfortune that is particularly a turn off. I’m sure Chippy never intended his marriage to finish, but it did and I’m sure he’s doing his best, along with the other households across the country in similar situations.
You should bloody pull your head in and listen to what Winston said on the matter.
Remember the woman, Christine Rankin with the very short, low-cut dresses that left nothing to the imagination? Are they going to drag her out of retirement to do their dirty work again?
It is so misogynistic to constantly and solely blame Christine Rankin for that period, let alone fall into the idiot SSC criticism of her appearance, when it was George Hickton who introduced all the types of things like seminars post his dodgy work previously at the employment service. It has never been clear to me why he gets off scot free and she gets all the flack. Just another way in which women are treated so much worse than men.
There's really good archival history about what went on during this time when I was a much, much younger advocate. Sometimes it is worth reminding ourselves of all those involved – politicians as well……..
Class war – it never changes.
http://www.jobsletter.org.nz/jblindex.htm
Back in the day, Canon Bob Lowe had a bit of a reputation as an after dinner speaker – he liked good food, wine and women – and this was his way of affording it all.
He once wrote of the 1990's era in one of his newspaper columns.
SCENE
Unemployed single men who liked women but were poor and under a tough W and I regime (and they had religious groups operating as agents).
Then the application of the market rents for state houses and a lot of older single women – some former, some current solo mothers – needing boarders to stay in the better quality state houses.
Also at the time there was a fear of home invasions by unemployed men looking to steal stuff because the low UB income.
He wrote a column about being about being a man who liked seeing naked women on the street (he was using the example of Jezebel – out the Samaria palace window – defenestration – to be eaten by dogs in the street. Homeless women and men without wives).
He then posed as hearing a hiss on his ear (law of guilt religion joke) – being warned that he fit a profile of interest to the police. A man who did not belong in the neighbourhood with the better state houses.
An Auckland magazine also had a short story about a Michael Collins on the run and looking to hide in the basement of an older woman – gimme shelter).
Thus in those times – short skirts big hearings (dobbing in solo mothers) (and profiling watch on their entrapment of unemployed single men looking for shelter – or vice versa if the single man owned a home).
CR was of the time, and its culture.
Dear Alwyn.
With regard to your completely inappropriate comment on Chris Hipkins and his children.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
His life outside of Parliament is none of your business and it was out of line.
Just stop it.
You are a twit.
Except that Chris Hipkins introduced his children into the conversation when he said "As someone who makes kids' lunchboxes every day, I wouldn't be able to fill my kids' lunchboxes with good quality healthy food for $3 a day," Students to receive sandwiches and fruit under overhauled school lunches programme, not 'woke' sushi – David Seymour | Newshub
Willis' efforts to wean kids off Tip Top are admirably healthy – wishing her well
I’m not sure what Willis’s children have to do with this?
What do Willis' “children have to do with this“? That depends. If "this" refers to the free food in schools programme, then probably very little.
Well lunches in schools is what this is about, right? Not tip top & DVD's?
This thread kicked off (@9) with Ffloyd's response to alwyn's comments at @7, and @7.5.1 which contained this insight:
Cutting to the chase, frankly I think that Willis' story ("And kids, this means…") is b**s intended to make her look like a woman of the people.
https://thestandard.org.nz/this-is-what-happens-when-you-give-landlords-a-big-tax-cut-1/#comment-1993392
Ah. I thought it kicked off at https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-09-05-2024/#comment-1999191! All good.
In the lower cost Oz, the guesstimate is $4.
https://news.flinders.edu.au/blog/2022/08/16/parents-back-introduction-of-school-meals-in-australia/
So the topic is nutrition. And the cost of fresh local produce. And a low wage, high cost economy. And the speed National moved to make it worse. No fair pay agreements. No discounts on fresh produce.
Still, keep up your nasty, nasty instincts. It’s doing wonders for Chippy’s polls. He does nothing and they get better by comparison that he’s never celebrated sacking journalists or questioning someone’s parenting skills or their personal relationships.
Matiu Rata reads comics redux. Give them cigarettes before fruit, huh.
The comment you are replying to was not about nutrition. It was about the appropriateness of commenting on a political leaders own comments about his family.
No, it was clearly about the cost of nutrition that Hipkins was speaking about.
He was making a point about the cost of nutrition and that he knew about it because he had personal experience.
Look, if you’re worried because Chippy knows what a block of cheese costs and what a starting police salary is, don’t fail reading comprehension also.
Or do, because as I mentioned above the combination of obsessive behaviour, malevolent glee and a lack of knowledge or interest in the issue at hand and the way it will change people’s lives is driving the current polling across a multitude of sectors.
You replied to my comment. Which had nothing to do with ‘nutrition’. If you want to comment about the broader discussion of lunches in schools, reply to one of those comments.
As Traveller has pointed out, it was Hipkins who mentioned the children. It was also Hipkin's claim I was talking about, not his children activities.
Those who have been following the cycle ways spinoff to the JAG story will be interested that this lack of meaningful consultation/allegations of predetermination is not shared only by the people of the southern suburbs.
https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350267619/residents-boycott-council-consultation-saying-outcomes-pre-determined?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0DuSlGP9CKYHkeRS3AO9_hRng5HxebPuCgASEliKy3Faj83q0HJnHWxig_aem_AcOMvLqCdZswTDl3BDRusyp8QFriSig43AvziBILFIVBTDDGuzVdUIOu8FRJnhGcKxiADe5yz9PevxQRsVS5V59t
This is in relation to consultation on the Wellington City Long Term Plan.
There comes a time when busy and committed people say 'stop, I cannot be bothered going any further.'
It is easy to see how to alleviate the cycnicism about WCC consultation.
A back to basics approach on consultation is to go about it with an open mind and be prepared to change one's mind or compromise. I have looked at the precis of many of the submissions to the WCC prepared by consultants experienced in this. I see few problems with this competent work.
The problems seem to arise at Council level. The councillors block vote in a party political way as if they are unaware that if they keep affirming a party line despite a weight of consultation, they may come close to or are acting in a pre-determined manner. We have about 5 'thoughtful' councillors but of course they are in the minority.
Hence my long held view that there is no place for party political parties in local government. Although there have been other times when quasi national political parties have held sway the councillors themselves seemed to act for their constituents and the city itself rather than following some nationally determined agenda.
The 'whipping' to stymie the thought that goes to making the city bright,vibrant and working has seen puzzling line-ups. The most recent example of this was the support for a 'welfare' bailout for Reading/Warner Brothers of $36m including from Geordie Rogers, the youngest councillor from a heavily student-oriented area of Wellington.
I don't know but bailing out 'da man'/big business was the furtherest thing on my mind when that age, too busy against Vietnam, Women's issues and the Springbok tours I guess. To be honest it would be the furtherest thing on my mind to support 'da man'/big business or the Reading welfare fund these many years later.
Of an even bigger concern is the damaging effect that this can/will/does have on the general state of democracy. The immediate concern is that even fewer people will vote in local elections, and there's bugger-all buffer there as it is.
In the same way that residents are giving up on the consultation process, it's becoming more likely they'll give up voting as well. Which makes complete sense really- since our elected representatives refuse outright to represent us, then why bother anymore?
I admit to being very tempted not to vote for the first time in my life, such is my cynicism, anger and despondency in general. Although I'm seriously considering voting for someone on the Right, in an attempt to vote out my ward councillor and the mayor. For me to vote RW, that's how bad the feeling here is.
Yes Kay. My feelings exactly.
Yet it is so solvable with goodwill and paying attention to the basics of consultation. It does not need to be this way and to cause this distrust. Of course with us in our communities and feeling that we are the only ones this is happening to it was an amazing feeling to read that Wadestown had chosen to fight back. Brooklyn too I understand.
Though if people don't point out the folly of what they are doing they (WCC) will then say they have a mandate to do it…..we can see how mandates so-called have been twisted with this Coalition.
Your feeling about voting right or not voting at all mirrors the split second thought that flashed through my mind that it might not be a bad thing to have Simeon Brown put a Commissioner in to take over from a lame dog council.
I don’t think it would be a good thing (but don’t really know) but it is a fair old mess on many fronts at the moment.
Isn't it a bit unfair to hang all the responsibility for this state of affairs on one's elected representatives? I don't follow such issues very closely (lack of time), but I get the distinct impression that it's council bureaucrats who make many of the real decisions, and that councillors who try to interfere with their cosy little arrangements are often likely to be met with non-cooperation, obstruction and downright hostility.
From the billionaire CEO of Palantir which
Alex Karp, who
we have this statement with regard to the student protests and encampments in support of the Palestinian struggles in Gaza:
Which of course would threaten the existence Palantir and the ability of Karp and the many like him to maintain their status as billionaires.
This turning of the narrative also found expression in conversation between Mitt Romney and Anthony Blinken.
Not to mention of course the new definitions of anti-semitism now enshrined in law that equate criticism of Israel with criminal behaviour in the land of the free (sarc). (Also the UK, France and Germany)
And of course,
The battleground has now been identified. The future of the Palestinian struggle is now centered on the US student population.
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/empire-managers-explain-why-this
The anthem has been written and video produced. Its a stunner!
https://twitter.com/macklemore/status/1787616471738368099
I like to think that J R R Tolkien would be horrified at having one of his LOTR names associated with and besmirched by this kind of activity. The idea of having to trademark it to prevent such misuse, or even the need for it, would never have occurred to him. Pity.
Here’s the low down-super cringy boomer coolness! For ideas that are equally. ‘Trackless trams’ are bendy buses that don’t carry enough people and still need a corridor. Flying foxes and sky cubes! I really begin to hate these people. Apparition will be next. Same principles of thought required.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350270865/auckland-council-receives-ideas-trackless-trams-urban-cable-car-resolve-transport