This will be the third election since the site started. I merely start escalating the length of times for repeat bans as an inducement for people to find their better behaviour in the election year. It is amazing how some of the inter-election bickering diminishes as the ban length steadily rises towards “after the next election”.
I try to go for the whole subtle approach..
lprent
Yeah right
In response to Jono Hutchinson reporting on a comment on mine on this site, Lynn Prentice with the help of others has engaged in a character assassination of myself.
This character assassination probably springs from Lynn’s insecurity that left commentary departing from the Labour Green political script will be picked up by the media.
As part of this character assassination Lynn Prentice has let Qot a poster on this site make comments slandering me as a inveterate liar. Fair enough I suppose. But if I try and defend myself by asking her and others who attack my integrity to provide just one example to back up their accusations. Lynn censors my comment.
It seems that on this site you have the right to be attacked but no right to defend yourself.
This character assassination launched on me is obviously building up to justify a complete ban to prevent me making comments during the run up to the elections next year.
Lynn Prentice himself has called me delusional and accused me of lying. He has also accused me of twisting his words. It is not my fault that he has changed his testimony since I first commented on them.
As it looks likely that I will be banned from commenting on this site during the elections. I have decided to put up the debate here. And let the readers decide whether it is justified, or not.
Lynn. Whether or not it can be proved that Shearer shouted out “We will be having a review”. I know what I heard. (And saw) Your supporters are not even saying that I am mistaken. You let them call me a liar, letting them attack my integrity at will. When I challenge them to show just one example of this, which you know they can’t, you blank it out. In this you are colluding with those who are trying to paint me as a liar. These are the actions of a bully.
I know that you are hostile to my attempt to make climate change an election issue, which by all accounts indicate it will not be. To this end you are trying to use a minor dispute to attack my integrity and ultimately to shut me out, so that you can happily have your election coverage and debate in peace, free to ignore climate change. Don’t deny it you have already expressed this view. It is, “Politics 101″. not to expend political capital on this one issue, you said.
I can see the writing on the wall. Go ahead disgrace yourself.
In my opinion we should be expending every form of capital we have to defeat this menace.
In this ongoing debate between you and me, it doesn’t surprise me that you take David Shearer’s side against David Cunliffe. In my opinion David Cunliffe is the only parliamentarian who has taken climate change seriously.
I thought Cunliffe’s contribution was dignified and sincere while Shearer’s was churlish and uncalled for. You disagree. I suppose we all make our own bed and have to lie in it. Live then, with an administration that will permit the continuation of climate change and the collection of metadata against its citizens, you will have done your part to bring it about.
Now I’m aware that you have been avoiding this next question. There would have been NO reason for him to tell Cunliffe to hew to the party line then – because Cunliffe had already finished doing exactly that. Basically you appear to be both illogical and delusional on this point which has been raised by others and you have not addressed
That’s the crux of the matter TRP. If Shearer was saying exactly what Cunliffe was saying why did he need to so rudely interject it?
And by the way, there were a number of other people who have confirmed they heard David Shearer say “We will be having a review”. Notice the full stop. This was after Cunliffe said our leader has promised a review and “this law must not, will not and can not stand”. Shearer’s unmissable message is “WE WILL BE HAVING A REVIEW’ full stop. And no, heartfelt “this bill cannot stand” nonsense will be tolerated.
It looks to me that we are in line for another tragic sell out.
It is cross over. Takes time to write comments and read other comments. I had the same irritation about telling you repeatably to read the update at the end of my post
The major nuisances imo on The Standard open mike (which users are fortunate to have going by many other blogs) for me are ranked thus:
• over long pieces
• boring others who use some of their valuable time visiting and contributing here
• being at variance with any recognisable version of political reality
• posting the same crappola once too often
So I end up automatically skating over about a dozen regulars but stopping and reading every word from about the same number who write pithy relevant comments.
Tiger Mountain
You could be criticising me I think. So my defence for longer items –
. over long pieces – I will often copy some of a longer piece that makes good points that are relevant, and then I put the links so others can read the rest for themselves, if…
. boring – they don’t think the subject is boring. And not everything can be absorbed on any given day but is still important to others.
. being at variance…with political reality – What is it? Can reality be
definitely established? And could I and others survive the actuality which might
be entirely lacking in hope for something better. Endless chewing of cuds of trivia though just becomes boring when it seems to be fantasy fiction. One hopes of course that it is.
. posting the same crappola once too often.
My thing is that it would be a better world if we applied more carrot and less stick, more
community kindness and less rule-driven judgementalism, more care for parents and help for them so there were less distressing results of wrong doing, and concentrating on happy families working together etc etc I get repetitive about this. But seeing it seems obvious to me and is not a new idea but continues to be resisted by policy makers and policy followers, I think it does need holding up continuously as a worthwhile and achievable goal.
And I don’t think short sharp comments show much thinking. They are more just acknowledgments and reactions from people who know about the matter. Sometimes a mere agreement with a well-written comment, or a pithy, funny, clever, heartfelt or whatever one is good.
But to inform on a thought at least a few words are needed, a bit of explanation to fill out the opinion etc. People who know what they are talking about or trying to present the matter in a new way make the thread interesting. I choose my favourites but also look at the thought lines of others, and soon find those who I consider haven’t got joined up synapses and skip them. And the ones that are obviously RWNJ spoilers I enjoy applying some well-rounded phrases as they usually seem no more than naughty children throwing stones to annoy while at the same time being prepared to impact and hurt.
Boring is in the mind of the interpreter …what bores one will not bore another …and divergence is good ….so bring on all those boring old farts and right wingers and vulgarians and lets have some fun! ( too many smart people can be mind numbing)
Also I like Jenny and what she has to say ….so keep going Jenny ….keep fighting for Cunliffe ….and whatever happened to Xstasy ?
Thanks Chooky
I know I do a few long ones but not all about the same thing though. Jenny is very focussed and long. I have to skip – I haven’t the time. Diversity is good, but focus is important and Jenny’s can be excellent but I like detective stories for a long read.
I like obsessive compulsives myself…and Climate Change is important to be harped on about ( that said I would also be interested in those HAARP conspiracy stories my American friend used to go on and on about until she went off the internet…ha ha) ….Labour Leadership cant be let go of either ….someone has to keep at it like a Rotweiller with a bone!….WATCH DOGS are the answer. I am rather partial to conspiracy theories and Sci fi myself for a longer read.
No, I was asking you to put up evidence, a timeline, anything to examine your claims. After all there were a pile of mics, cameras, and people at that meeting – surely you’d be able to find some kind of support. Something that was so clearly lacking when you made the assertion in the first place and that fool Hutchison wrapped a story around it.
When you did I looked at it with the results I reported. I see you haven’t dealt with that at all in this comment. Have you even listened to that video’s audio track? Or did gathering evidence get lost in your obsessional drive to put your own spin and unsupported assertions on events.
Basically I think that your assertions about what Shearer said are outright fantasy
Jenny, out of mole hills mountains are made, your claims about what Dave,(the incumbent),said or didn’t say to the other Dave,(not the incumbent), and in what manner he said it, including that Dave(the incumbent) was trying to Bully Dave(not the incumbent) have become in terms of what has occurred since farcical,
Having read parts of this ‘debate’ what i have so far ascertained is that you will not answer even the most simple of questions, ‘were you in the hall when the interjection by Dave(the incumbent) was made and if so where in the hall were you’,
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
i can assure you that Climate change is and will be an election issue, do you know why, the Green Party will be standing in that election, full stop,
You don’t seem to accept the criticisms leveled at you, no big thing i certainly struggle to do the same, however this morning’s calling for martyrdom of yourself takes the farce to new heights,
Yeah exactly, the amount of vitriol and invective leveled at Dave(the incumbent), would scorch what remains of the natural hair off of the head of the Slippery little Shyster we have as Prime Minister if leveled at Him,(leaving Him with only a large patch of soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey called Brucie)…
You do realise that John Key already wears a toupée? All that fretting about who he ripped of as an investment banker I guess. Didn’t realise they made toupées from the “soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey” though.
Well said. bad12. Her refusal to state whether she was actually there and if so, where in the hall totally undermined her credibility in my eyes.
But re your request that she identify her posts on climate change, Jenny has put up many comments seeking to make climate change the only issue (usually the first post on Open Mike). In many of these posts, Jenny has at the same time claimed that the Greens have sold out on climate change and attacked them for this supposed sell-out. I gave up reading any of Jenny’s comments on this issue long ago.
Yeah i have read a number of these comments from jenny and commented on the odd occasion about Her little obsession,
Read paragraph 2 of Her little effort today and there is a direct accusation that LPrent is attacking Jenny over the ‘Dave interjection’ because LPrent does not like what Jenny has previously commented on about ‘climate change/election issue’, blah blah and on She goes,
Such Machiavellian Bull-s**t simply does my head in where the is no proof offered to back up such an assertion,
i have no reason what-so-ever to be a Dave(the incumbent) supporter, in fact after the ‘sickness bene on the roof speech’ exactly the opposite, but, give the bloke a ‘fair go’, the training wheels will definitely come off if Labour decide to keep Him as leader and He becomes the Prime Minister but it wont be ummmm aaah that he will be roasted over should this occur…
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
That would be the same LPrent who has written and commented extensively on AGW in these very pages, both promoting good science and knowledge of the realities of AGW and combating CC deniers and idiots.
LOLZ weka, it’s probably time to resort to the rolly eyes icon, Jenny seems to formulate Her comments in the same vein as the wing-nuts do except from a left perspective,
i have a giggle reading some of them and occasionally comment to Her but like a lot of others tend to go yawn and keep scrolling when it’s the same thing over and over…
I find all this stuff symptomatic of trying to paint Shearer in a good light.
The guy is not only a total failure as a leader, he also represents the right wing of Labour.
The substantial difference between the two statements on Thurs night is clear go me.
The future leader Cunliffe made a statement that opposed the Bill outright, taking an implicit repeal position (Must not, cannot and will not stand) not dependent on the review.
Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.
“Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.”
Yeah, nah. Cunliffe said there would be a review, Shearer (allegedly) said there would be a review. That’s it, no contradiction between them at all. Unless, of course, you have the evidence Jenny has failed to provide …
No, of course you don’t have evidence. There were hundreds of people in the hall, a host of big and little cameras and not a single recording of Shearer contradicting Cunliffe. Because it didn’t happen.
I also attended the meeting, and because I was standing on the left hand side and out of view of the stage, spent most of my time watching the crowd.
Posted on the David dynamic on the Daily Blog the next day. Would’ve refrained if I knew what a dissection the interaction would have resulted in.
From my perspective – at the hall – and with full view of all three Davids:
David Cunliffe did not know that David Shearer had arrived, and stood up to speak because the mike and attention were directed to him, as he had been there since the beginning front and centre. He did not appear to be aware of Shearer during his answer, because Shearer was out of direct sightline, and Cunliffe was skillfully addressing the crowd and not the questioner alone.
David Shearer made tentative but silent moves to answer the question, but as usual in a meeting – since attention was already directed to the front – had little chance of being noticed. When a review was mentioned (and I too thought it was Shearer) – the tone seemed supportive rather than corrective or aggressive, but since I don’t know Shearer’s personality and communication skills intimately – my take is completely personal. In the appreciation following Cunliffe’s “it will not stand!” most people missed it – and also – missed the opportunity to notice Shearer and ask for further clarification.
The interaction, while interesting, was typical of what happens during any informal meeting, and happened in the space of a couple of minutes.
red rattler, AND, the next day clarified that interjection by stating that there will be a full review and we will change the legislation based upon that review,
i can assure you that Climate change is and will be an election issue, do you know why, the Green Party will be standing in that election, full stop,
Well said bad12. Despite the mainstream media ignoring anything to do with anthropogenic climate change (that means it’s man made), there has been some recent serious developments that should mean climate change is once again on the agenda.
As much as these current events about who’s the biggest liar in parliament are entertaining, not much of that performance is going to compare when the effects of climate change start costing us the entire worlds GDP.
Ground-breaking analysis has found that the likely cost of methane emissions as Arctic permafrost melts is 60 trillion dollars (39 trillion pounds) globally, nearly equalling the 70 trillion dollar (46 trillion pound) value of the global economy in 2012.
The dire warning of an “economic time-bomb” comes from the first ever calculation of the potential economic impact of a scenario which some scientists consider increasingly likely – that the unprecedented thaw will trigger the release of methane from the East Siberian Sea in the polar region.
Although the sea holds only a fraction of the Arctic’s vast methane reserves, experts from the universities of Cambridge in England and Erasmus in Rotterdam, Holland warned that even the release of that relatively small proportion of the area’s methane could result in climatic catastrophe around the world.
In that case, politics will truly become the entertainment branch of industry, and the politicians “performance” will be all too horribly inadequate.
Pretty good support ratio. And since Labour’s policy is in line with Mana and the Greens a thumbs up for all those parties to continue along this vein.
Given the higher income and asset owning profile of The Herald it seems like Labour has picked the right policy. But they’ve got to get out there and sell it right and sell it hard!
Looks like Granny didn’t like the results of that poll. It’s been replaced with another poll likely to give a more comforting result for their Tory masters..
TV3 News, your pro govt news channel, according to a commenter on this stuffed article says that TV3 did apologise last night for their bold error on Saturday night’s news where they stated that bottles had been thrown at the Palmy GCSB protest when in fact they hadn’t.
I guess if they get their tip off’s from random emails that contain no photographic evidence and they don’t bother to verify the claim, then they are willing to say anything as long as it is sensational and frames the mighty anti GCSB movement as just another flakey protest.
I missed the news last night, did anyone see the apology? Must have been a sheepish one.
Also on that Saturday bulletin they “misrepresented” the truth in regards to the gates at parliament and access for the protesters With repressed mirth they talked about protesters climbing over the closed gates when there was a gate open nearby. The reality was the immediate entrance was closed and 1000’s had to squeeze through the small side gate.
All this on top of the- you-know -what Jonolism story last week (see Jenny at post #1) it looks like they have a real agenda to pursue.
Just as well John Campbell is there to shine a light
Hi, Rosie, I did see it. Very short and a fair way into the bulletin, unlike the original item. Though, to be fair to them, they were pretty open about the nature of the mistake and promised to do better. So I’m confident there will be no more Jonolism on TV3 till, ahhhh, 6 O’clock tonight.
and Anonymous bringing down around 11 National Party websites today, it’s all going off lately. Our voices are getting louder and stronger. Soon the media will have to acknowledge the legitimacy of the grievances of NZ citizens and stop being apologists for the govt………….might be a naive view, but you never know!
That is the thing, generally speaking the Slater/Farrar sewer racism is to loath Polynesians, but worship Chinese. This seems to be because they can only see the the world in terms of fearful, Manichean objectification.
Plus if it wasant for China, neo-liberalism would have fallen over long ago. Capitalists need that huge pool of slave workers in China.
Every boardroom in the world should have a picture of Deng Xiaopeng up in it. He did more than Reagan, Thatcher, Douglas, Hawke, Keating, Mulroney, Tebbit, Lawson, Lamont, Howe, Douglas, Prebble, Lange, Volker, Clinton, Summers, et al ever did for neo-liberal capitalism.
The Labour party if in government will implement a policy of banning sales of residential houses to people who live overseas and not in NZ.
John Key says this will be in breach of a number of free trade agreements.
Therefore the free trade agreements restrict the ability of our Parliament to pass what laws it wishes – i.e. they directly affect our sovereignty.
The people of NZ have never agreed to have our Parliament restricted in such a way.
The free trade agreements are therefore invalid.
This has been apparent for some time but always ignored. NZ’s Parliament has no ability to enter into any FTA which attempts to limit our voting rights or sovereignty.
large areas of China are polluted by industrial and agricultural carcinogens. Avoid. Also China is in the middle of a massive unsustainable debt fuelled residential property bubble.
Two reasons Chinese might want to trade in their local property for NZ property.
No because their local laws don’t allow for private property even for their own citizens. Just the same as our local laws can be whatever we want. Like we insist on clear titles for instance which is a rarity in most countries.
My understanding of it is..
The FTA says (broadly) that kiwis seeking to do doing business in China are treated no worse than any other investor from any other country and not treated any different to their own citizens. There are various exemptions to that.
That means that it is reasonably hard to lease property in China. But that is largely because it is just hard to find suitable places there. It is usually more of a pain getting stuff past border controls or even figuring out how to deal with the distribution networks. At least that is what people I know doing business there say. They often go through distributors in HK even now.
Similarly we can put largely whatever restrictions we want on purchasing property. However we cannot give other citizens from countries better access than we give the Chinese or the aussies and depending on how the FTA’s are written some other countries..
Foreign buyers are not completely banned, from my reading of the policy, and feel free to correct me if i have got this wrong,
Foreign buyers who are not resident in New Zealand can buy land and build upon it within a year, i assume that they then have a year to sell that property or become resident,
i doubt whether any Government we have an FTA with will object to that, the Labour policy simply attempts to shut out foreign speculators buying existing houses…
Yes and there doesn’t seem to be an explanation around that exception. Why would that exemption be any use? I don’t buy the “adds to the housing stock” argument.
vto, but it would add to the housing stock, IF foreign investors are prepared to buy land and build upon it they are entitled to make an amount of profit from selling that house to a person resident in New Zealand,and pay any tax due i might add,
The whole ban on foreign residents buying existing property isn’t a big deal in my opinion and will probably result in demand shrinking by 2-5%, i see no negative in the policy for New Zealands residents and citizens,
The only small niggle i have is that with the Australians being exempt from the proposal we may find that while British and Asian speculators are driven out of the market that the demand from Australian speculators grows as their dollar value and higher wage rates will then make them the ‘wealthiest buyers’ and having British and Asian buyers with more wealth than them may yet prove to have held that Australian speculation in our housing market in check to a certain extent…
Well yes I suppose it could add to the housing stock…. but it kind of defeats the purpose of the policy as foreigners will simply look to get their bolthole by building new rather than buy existing. Overall the effect could be pretty similar to the current result, pre-policy.
2-5% is a significant chunk in my experience. Vary the demand side by that amount and it will have an effect. But also bear in mind that affordable housing requires a multi-pronged solution – this is one of them prongs.
And I have seen with my own few eyes the very real bidding out of young families by a foreign buyer. And this is the other benefit of such a policy…
… it creates more ownership within the community and that makes a community stronger.
The family that was outbid went back to renting, with its attendant greater transience and weaker strength. Eventually they moved away.
The policy has two very positive features;
1. Drives down capital values. High capital values only benefit banks.
2. Leads to stronger ownership etc within the community as opposed to more transient renters.
vto, no not from my reading of the proposal, non residents can buy land and build on it but cannot hold either the built on land or bare land for more than a year,
The only bit of that i am unsure of is the total actual time they can hold the land, i am going to assume that they have just the 1 year to build and sell, that’s more positive ‘investment’ than allowing non-residents to buy existing houses and then hold them until the price has risen to a point where they are happy to sell and take the profit for doing nothing…
“It should be an outright ban on foreign ownership of anything in NZ.”
That really is a brave call. It would be fascinating to try. So you mean literally that New Zealansd would have zero foreign direct investment? That has never been acheived in modern times by any nation. But I guess we could be the first.
OK. If you ban all incoming FDI, won’t you need to ban all New Zealand outgoing FDI because otherwise you will run out of capital?
Nope. Two reasons:
1.) The government can create more money.
2.) I expect other countries to do the same.
Are you going to ban imports too or is that still OK?
I didn’t mention trade but generally I’m supportive of it. It needs regulating of course else we end up with society becoming worse off as we’ve seen over the last few decades.
If Shearer gets into trouble with this housing policy banning foreigners he should not get defensive, rather he should attack harder. Show some mettle, show some aggression, take a fight directly to Key and make it hostile. Accuse Key of being a racist. Accuse Key of being deceptive and a liar. And don’t back down.
Shearer should have done this with the bad man ban too.
sheesh CV, if that is so then he should be outski. Is Shearer scared of everyone and everything? Is the Labour Party similarly scared like scaredy cats?
I don’t buy that if it is the reason for his slipper-wearing approach to every issue. If the right wing media are hostile then he should still stand up and not back down to them too.
Like Irishbill says on that other post, middle NZ are not stupid. And where they go the media will generally go too.
After all, why is Shearer there? He only has one life like most of us (apparently) so why doesn’t he grab it by the balls? To be or not to be …….. surely
sheesh CV, if that is so then he should be outski. Is Shearer scared of everyone and everything? Is the Labour Party similarly scared like scaredy cats?
Not scared of their own dissenting MPs and party members
OK I confess I can’t demonstrate that the MSM is left wing. I take it back.
I am sure that the MSM is stupid, produces mostly rubbish, and is (with a few exceptions) not worth reading. I think because I find it irritating, I have a tendency to assume it is left wing, but I see now that is unfair of me. So I withdraw and apologise.
+1. Your comments are usually worth reading srylands. I may not always agree with them but at least you explain your reasoning well, even when you are taking the piss.
Ah you have just been reading the fools at KiwiBlog and Whaleoil. While some journos may be left leaning, their bosses running the few remaining media companies are most definitely not – they’re mostly interested in money. And generally you make money by sucking up to the lowest possible common denominator.
That lower standard usually equates to talkback, comments on whaleoil, reality TV, paul henry, and seven#. In other words absolutely convinced of their own moral rectitude despite the occasional lapses into fornication, fighting, bigotry, racism, and beating on the missus while absolutely paranoidly certain that everyone else is getting a better deal out of life than they are. And too stupid or lazy to look stuff up.
Seen a mirror lately?
(I do so love it when someone gives me the straight line..)
I listened to a great episode of the Food Programme (mp3, 13MB 28 mins.) from BBC Radio 4 yesterday, covering food poverty. You can read the programme blurb here.
Food insecurity is a growing issue in the UK, linked with inadequate social welfare, lack of transportation and exacerbated by benefit “reforms”. Similar issues are faced by many New Zealanders as we have seen from the food in schools issue in recent months.
Frustrating time listening to a Mr Wall of an Auckland Real Estate firm attacking Shearer on Morning Report, accusing him of racism, xenophobia and basically not having a clue with the new policy for sales of housing to non-resident foreigners..
Mr Wall talked about NZ being built on immigration when he should have known that the Labour policy cøncerned overseas, non-resident owners. He did not know that similar laws were current in several countries but pronounced on how hard the new law would be to enforce “because in most of the cases he dealt with (20 per year, high end sales) he didn’t even know who the parties in the deal were.” Several times he said that he “didn’t know about that” but still continued to make comments.
How did they ever pick him for his ability to add to our sum general knowledge?
Finally there were two good comments from listeners who heard the same self-serving ignorance both of Labour’s policy and the outside world.
My God……..I recognise the guy……..one of those mouthy know it all (according only to blatant self-interest and sense of superiority) yuppie pricks. Vanity !!!!
LOL – thanks for the Denizen link. What a dork! He must have been down on real estate sales and desperate for income.
I initially got angry at that RNZ interview – and then decided that if I was looking to buy real estate in Auckland, Wall would immediately go on my “don’t touch with a barge pole” list – as slimy, ignorant and untrustworthy. Talk about how not to sell yourself!
RNZ pridefully holds itself as the centre of mature, technically informed expression. That is becoming more of a laugh everyday.
Who the hell in RNZ devised to have a Mr Wall from Wall Real Estate vent his self-interested spleen about policy concerned with foreign non-resident buyers ? Any bets that Mr Wall is a mate or a mate of a mate of someone in RNZ who could jack it up for Mr Wall and his ilk ?
His company deals extensively with the very people the policy is concerned about. Oh no, the policy is all racist shit according to the patently self interested Mr Wall. A policy he’d expect to hear from the racist Invercargill taxi rider he spits, in his mock rounded vowels.
RNZ has allowed Mr Wall to publicise himself as the go-to man when/if such a policy is implemented. It is outrageous that RNZ presents that sort of contribution from the likes of Mr Wall as expert, well-informed, uninterested.
Well done RNZ. Dumbing down is the order of the day.
That one is hardly worth the effort of raising the spittle to direct His way, when asked about the fact that Kiwi’s cannot buy property in China the liquid excrement flowed,
”Oh i don’t know what goes on in China” says He, jesus doesn’t such utter sh*t make you see violent shades of red…
North
Don’t concentrate your spleen on our only public broadcasting service that still is standing after the right-wing earthquake. If there’s something wrong mention it but don’t drop s..t from a great height. Someone in government may be listening and the next thing we know, is that Radionz is being downsized because the public find it unsatisfactory – and it’ll all be your fault! Then we’ll all be sorry. I have the feeling that the gubmint often runs on anecdote when it matches the direction they would like to take.
Listen to some other sites (commercial or student) and let us know how they are. That would be interesting as I don’t do that much. By the time that the good vibes from advertisements for elkhorn nostrums or whatever have been heard a few times it’s goodbye from me.
If I don’t like things on Radionz I’ll probably let them know and why. Why don’t you do the same instead of dissing them so strongly.
I CANNOT agree that my comment – “RNZ……becoming more of a laugh everyday” (the wheeling in of sham commentators I mean, obviously), nor my suspicions as to how/why Mr Wall was asked to comment/rant in the first place, nor my sardonic thanks to RNZ for the brilliance of its impartial, informative invitees (not)…..amounts to venting my spleen or dropping shit from a great height.
I AM NOT about to take seriously your fear that my comment may activate the dark forces to cancel RNZ.
I AM NOT about to take your direction to listen to “other sites (commercial or student)” and report back to you, firstly because I can’t handle the constant inane guffawing one finds on such “sites”, and secondly because you don’t seem to have expended the effort to do so yourself.
I AM about to ignore the busybody in you. You who misrepresents how I said what I said, and then, just by the way, fails to venture any view on the question.
If then it’s a case of my styles your riles…….tough. Rile away !
The deadline for submissions re the consitiutional review is the 31st (tomorrow).
Does anyone know for sure, if that means today is the last day to get one in, or tomorrow is the last day to submit?
Really don’t have much time today (shouldn’t be here….)
“Send your submission
Please send us your submission by 5pm 31 July 2013.
You can make a submission in a number of ways:
Make a submission online
Fill out the quick submission form and post it to us.
Email a submission to constitutionalreview@justice.govt.nz with “CAP submission” in the subject line. You can attach documents to your email.
Or you can post a submission to:
Cheers VV.
Youre a champion.
I’ve only got a rough outline and I really need to sit down and spend a couple of hours on it.
Time I’ve got tomorrow but not today.
A Herald-poll shows that the majority of respondents support the children of Beneficiaries being included in the Working for Families Tax Credit scheme,
Admittedly only a small poll of 700 but a small ray of light nonetheless,” If beneficiaries want working for tax credits they can get a job”, those words which finally severed any desire for me to either support or vote for Labour,
Just how much denigration can the children of beneficiaries be expected to weather, tax their meager income for spurious reasons, directly cut their meager income for even more spurious reasons, then deny them income from a government redistribution where hand over heart that government dared suggest that the children of families with $60,000 of income were more deserving,
Indulging in the above doesn’t make ‘bad parents’, indulging in the above makes bad parenting a f**king government policy…
O would go along with that – you just have to recognize that some people are not worth much (professionally) – you have a $1 skill – you can sell it for $1.
Actually you point out a weakness in Lanthanide’s comment. What one is paid is not a reflection on what they are worth. If this is so, the person looking after, for example, your sick mother in hospital, or someone growing food that you eat, would be considered worth less than a lying and cheating fraudster in the financial system commanding oodles of bonuses whilst undermining the entire functioning of our society.
However, is there anyone working who doesn’t deserve to be paid wages or a salary that covers their living costs?
It appears that rather a lot of employers think this is o.k.
O would go along with that – you just have to recognize that some people are not worth much (professionally) – you have a $1 skill – you can sell it for $1.
Sure, as long as you recognise that some employers are so shit, workers should be paid bonuses for putting up with their BS.
Fair enough – I agree on that point. My wife works for the Auckland Council and they are terrible – she deserves more for putting up with them (Not that she will get it mind).
But at lease we have been able to agree that some people simply do not have skills that are worth much and are compensated as such.
You can wish all you like but if workers are paid more than their marginal output value the business goes bust.
You must have no experience in running a business. I can tell you that the equaion is simple. Some workers produce more than otehrs but at the margin there will be a worker who is producing marginally more than his/her wages. If wages are regulated upwards beyond that break even point that worker has to go.
Probably because once you’ve read more than one or two simplistic libertarian Hayek/Friedman internet raves, it becomes hard to go back to such a trite view of the world.
Something is clearly wrong with the way we do things, working out new ways that have better results will never be solved by continuing to believe that old answers are working.
If a country continues to follow rubbish notions of what can and can’t be done, then, Srylands, they go bust like America, Greece, Britain, Ireland and New Zealand (we are all in massive debt are we not?) or become dependant on power-grabbers who have an obsession with gaining materially and whom have very little concern for the wellbeing of people.
If someone is growing carrots, and the owner can’t afford to pay him or her a living wage, then put the price of the carrots up, Noddy.
No, wait, I have an idea, we can’t put the price of carrots up because we have decided we can’t (or people won’t buy them for that price) so we will just put the workers wages down.
…Oh, what? the worker can’t afford to pay rent and food? I know we will give him handouts. Or better yet we will give him a loan to buy his own house. That way the workers will feel wealthier than they really are and won’t complain!
….Oh what? the worker can’t afford to pay back the debt?
~ Oh I know we will just borrow off other countries to cover up the little problem
…Oh What?? That didn’t work?
~Oh I know, we will bundle the debts up into little packages and sell them as AA investments
…Oh What?? people aren’t repaying their mortgages and the banks have gone bust?
~Oh I know, we will get the workers to pay for the bailout ….
The reason that wages are low is because employers want more profit than is possible. Or perhaps technology has lead us into this place of not-enough-profits-for-neccesities. Or perhaps it is that those with capital prefer to speculate on futures markets (thereby raising the prices falsely). Perhaps we need to change the way we organize ourselves.
The invisible hand can go and fuck itself for a start.
“We can’t put the price of carrots up because people won’t buy them for that price.”
Stop growing carrots. Sell house in Levin. Buy vineyard in Martinborough. Make wine. Run cool concerts in summer. Incentivise workers with profit sharing scheme. Everyone is happy.
Import carrots from Tasmania.
All the workers applaud by an invisible hand-clap 🙂
Well I might have agreed with you had you left out the bit about importing the carrots from Tasmania. If people won’t buy the carrots at a decent price and haven’t land to grow them themselves then they can jolly well go without.
I’m unsure what makes you think that the invisible hand has any time for niceties such as applauding…(perhaps the same notion that leads you to believe the invisible hand sorts our organizational problems out for us….)
but…but…Colonial Viper…you missed something there…
People go hungry (or into debt) so that some others may experience the freedom to do what they want regardless [of whether they are screwing anyone else]…especially they should be able to make as big a profit as their heart’s desire, and that is what is really important now, isn’t it?
Self interest properly understood would mean that the wealthy elite would not let things get too out of balance. The example of the French Revolution should not be so far from their minds, for instance. The wealthy elite enabled Roosevelt to act during the Depression, making significant concessions to the masses, while essentially saving the system of capitalism.
Unfortunately what we have now amongst the elite is self interest misunderstood.
They’ll bury themselves and us with them over the next 20-30 years.
PS a lot of these “rich” people are going to find themselves very poor in the coming years, as their paper wealth becomes worthless for exchange for real goods and services.
@ C.V
Although I understand what you are getting at, and the form of self interest you speak of is certainly healthier than the narrow self interest that has come to be the rule of the day, I really don’t think that a society that believes in an organizing principle of self interest is going to get far.
Societies come together for the benefits that mutual help and cooperation provides. Trying to ignore cooperation and turn the main organizing principle into one of self interest is never going to get far because it goes against the reality of why we clump together in the first place (or more scientifically speaking; that we are a ‘social animal’); i.e. working in groups leads to a better quality of life for the whole tribe; if this wasn’t the case, people wouldn’t bother.
Surely a far more productive organizing principle is to focus on the very qualities that leads to the intended aim–a better quality of life–not those that lead us to pull apart?
I really don’t think that a society that believes in an organizing principle of self interest is going to get far.
In olden times people believed that what was good for their nation was good for themselves. Eg. “For King and Country”. In earlier times they believed in the good of their tribe, their clan, etc.
These days the Left has become so intellectually and rationally clever that there is little remaining for people to believe in.
these City bankers are being handsomely rewarded for bringing the global financial system to the brink of collapse. While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.
For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.
For a salary of between £50,000 and £12 million, top advertising executives destroy £11 of value for every pound in value they generate.
We estimated, however, that for every £1 they are paid [hospital cleaners], over £10 in social value is generated.
For a salary of between £75,000 and £200,000 tax accountants destroy £47 of value for every pound in value they generate.
Our model projects that for every £1 of value spent on wages, £12 of value will be generated.
See, I’m quite happy for people to be paid what they’re worth but the rich won’t like it because they’d owe the rest of us billions of dollars.
+1 all it does is artificially subsidize employers much a like the accomodation supplement subsidizes and therefore inflates rent. I’d imagine that if supplements wern’t propping up the rental market an investment property would become a whole lot more unattractive. I’d dare say it would take more heat out of the housing market than investor retsrictions…
Aha, also interest payments can be deducted from PAYE so why wouldn’t the middle class pile into ‘investment housing’ en masse with such subsidies,
Don’t tho expect Labour to change any of that, they are after-all fighting with National for a slice of that middle classes vote and good luck to them,
National wont touch Working for Families either in spite of the Slippery little Shyster when in opposition venting fit to burst a blood vessel that WfW is ‘Communism’…
This is the real issue; ensuring people are paid a wage they can live on.
I will add though, that if NZ is going to move into supplementing wages with welfare, as it appears to be doing, then NZers need to be clearly informed and realise the extent of this welfare and drop the whole stigma of receiving welfare.
If governments are going to support landlords and employees by supplementing their requirement to charge higher rents than people can afford and wages that people can’t afford, then governments are going to have to quit the whole anti-welfare memes that they consistently encourage in order to get votes.
If governments persist in ensuring that those on welfare are obligated to feel shame for receiving help, (and as Cricklewood pointed out this help immediately transfers into support for businesses and landlords) then governments need to also ensure that employers and landlords are made to feel obligated to provide wages and ask for rents that are affordable without requiring governments to make up the shortfall.
In my opinion the issue of ‘welfare costs’ needs to be transformed into an issue of ensuring good jobs are available to all. This is the most positive and effective way of clearing up the matter for all NZers.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts: “….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
I agree thoroughly and have been realising lately that the belief that one is worth more when one is paid more is really a problem for social cohesion. I also think it is hard for humans to not believe that they are worth more when paid a lot more than others.
Trouble is, this is a false belief, noone is worth more just because they are paid more. Every human is worth the same, unless perhaps a human who is doing a great deal of good for others, in which case, perhaps they are worth more…to society at least.
As the information you have shared points out most astutely; some of the people providing the most important services are paid the least and some who are destroying our society are being paid the most. Kind of scuppers the idea that a person is worth more depending on the pay they happen to receive.
Agreed. And part of the problem is the “neoliberal” propaganda that private profit-focused businesses contribute more to society than than public sector work. Also undervalued is most of the work that cares for, educates, helps, heals and nurtures people.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts: “….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
Two current issues need a great deal more transparency – the GCSB legislation and the Trans- Pacific Partnership negotiations, writes Gerald McGhie.
[ From an earlier Herald articile : “Gerald McGhie is a former career diplomat who served as ambassador to Moscow and Seoul, High Commissioner to Port Moresby and Commissioner in Hong Kong. Now retired, he is a past director of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs and was chairman of the New Zealand chapter of Transparency International.”
Penny, i detect from the double post a level of anger, so much so that you have been unable to delete one of them,
Your question is self evident, coz it’s His blog and he can, just as in the final analysis LPrent can give someone a spanking here at the Standard for behavior one day and ignore the same behavior from another the next,
Bomber probably got sick of some of your more Loooooong efforts at posting a comment, i quite often do here on the Standard and simply skim such efforts as i scroll my way down the page…
Question Time today – should be interesting after the two week break and what has happened in that time.
Shearer has his usual – twice (1 and 11) and Peters also has one at Q6. Norman is still on the “Dunne” case(Q2), and Parker is on ‘house price’ duty (Q4). Hipkins is going to give us another’Minister of Education’ moment; and Eugenie Sage is on water safety/quality.
The rest are Nat Patsy questions.
Questions to Ministers
1.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
2.Dr RUSSEL NORMAN to the Prime Minister: Did his Chief of Staff, Wayne Eagleson, advise Parliamentary Service that United Future Leader Hon Peter Dunne had agreed to cooperate with the Henry inquiry and had consented to releasing his electronic phone logs; if so, why?
4.Hon DAVID PARKER to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by his statement that “High house prices matter because many New Zealanders spend a large portion of their incomes on housing and that has helped fuel household debt and contribute to damaging imbalances in the economy”?
6.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
7.EUGENIE SAGE to the Minister for the Environment: What percentage of sites identified as a river in the Suitability for Swimming indicator report released yesterday were categorised as “Very Good” or “Good” and therefore were safe for swimming?
9.CHRIS HIPKINS to the Minister of Education: Does she agree with the Minister of Finance that “The Government is focusing on ensuring that every teacher put in front of our children is competent”?
11.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
?
Pretty hard hitting stuff all round, but especially from Shearer.
Why is it that the Greens, with far less parliamentary experience, almost always seem to do far better in parliament? Are Labour actually trying?
By bringing up their housing policy, all Shearer and Parker did is open themselves up to Key etc making disparaging remarks, as nice soundbites for the MSM Fran Mold may be back in the fold, but there was so much more they could have been winning hits on but …………………
Alan Ray designer of CTV building has taken legal action to stop surveillance of his professional background. Ask the GCSB they’ll know. What a cheek. Its wonderful how these bare-faced scammers as he was, though within the law, can evade taking responsibility.
I remember that he was known for designing buildings so they just achieved building requirements, therefore being efficient no doubt (utilizing a particular commodity or product with the least waste of resources or effort) which is usually judged in NZ as being cheapest.
A very engaging NZ expert spoke on Radionz this morning. He is into DNA sequencing and tracing evolution through tests that can be done. Very interesting. Says NZ is very important and that we and the Galpagos Islands are important sites in the world. Though he can’t get funding in NZ and we don’t seem enough about our environmental history and present situation to support needed study. So he’s working in Australia. He says that the kiwi is originally Australian!!
Dna sequencing expert interesting insightful http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon
Tuesday 30/7/13
Feature Guest – Professor Alan Cooper (27′ 54″ )
10:07 Director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of
Adelaide. Alan’s a former Wellingtonian who is leading groundbreaking research which uses ancient DNA to record and study evolutionary processes in real time, especially those associated with environmental change.
He says that many clever talented people come from NZ but can’t get work or funding. And I started thinking yes, we came, we saw, we conquered the land and over-ran Maori and have settled into taking what we wanted that we could sell. We are pragmatic, we are ‘practical’, we have ‘common sense’.
We don’t have a real love for our country or each other in society or it would pervade government as well. We are happy if we can get lots of money together, live in a gated community and rumble about the lazy b..s unemployed and the over-fertile women looking to the government to carry their responsibilities.
The country was developed as a land speculation scam where people either came out of desperation from a Britain in recession, enticed here with extravagant promises and unreal scenarios of being in the tropics of the South Pacific, or sold land that hadn’t even been made available by Maori, or if it had, had not been formalised and paid for.
And we were unable to find a working system between landowning farmers, business and unions just as we were reaching a more advanced state of development. Which had largely been achieved through the experience overseas from WW2 and the more sophisticated refugees and new wave of immigrants after the war. Then came defensive reaction to Britain joining the EU and fear that we would be locked out of replacement markets for our primary produce. So we dropped all our protections to show our sincerity and determination to have free borders and dropped the country in a huge cow pat.
Along came neo liberalism, the right wing jumped right in and are prepared to go to jackboot stage as they seek to mould a country to their own personal wishes and interests. Now we have dropped our progressive tax system and brought in high GST that impacts on nearly all financial transactions, and apart from the most wealthy, the middle class are squeezed and the poorer get the toothpaste tube when it is almost flat.
And no hope for better economic management from either major political party which would return us to an enterprising nation having employment for us all which would automatically produce better conditions – that is the final nail in the coffin.
Andrea Vance’s phone records were given by Datacom to Henry inquiry without request and Henry sent them back !!! carter apologises … question time in the house in 20 mins shd be fun !!
A new age friend of mine (yeah, I know), made the statement recently that the problem with protesting against something is that it is inherently negative and doesn’t say what one actually wants. I generally find these kinds of statements to be idiotic and existing in a vaccum that is disconnected from political reality, but I do take the point that being anti- something without being pro- something can be a problem sometimes (depending on context). On the other hand, sometimes you just have to stand up and say fuck off.
I was thinking about it more today and realised that most activists I know and follow do seem to know what they want as much as what they trying to stop. And the more I think about it the more I am struggling to see protests that have been important to me where we were fighting against something without there being a clear sense of fighting for something as well.
So I thought I would ask. When you are protesting something are you thinking about what you want as much as what you don’t want? Am particularly interested in how activists have seen this over time as specific issues have been addressed and then things have moved on.
Any examples of purely ‘anti’ protests?
I’d also like to know to what extent the whole negative/positive thing gets discussed as strategy in activist circles. Is the whole anti/pro dichotomy a complete nonsense?
Weka, I think it entirely depends on what the situation is, and that there doesn’t necessarily need to be a flip side, what one desires, as an alternative, to what one doesn’t desire. You talk about a dichotomy and as humans I wonder if we often fall into the trap of dichotomous thinking. If you don’t want this then you must want that, kind of thinking.
Why must we justify our objection to something by introducing a nice and positive counter solution to make others feel better about what we do? (I’m thinking of your new age friend here) Sometimes the only thing that needs to be said is “No”. Of course we always need to fully understand why we fight for a certain outcome otherwise it is a meaningless effort.. I’d be surprised that anyone wouldn’t have a full grasp of the holistic value of what they are objecting to as they are marching along and chanting. But then again I have met serial protesters while out a protest. I was speaking with another woman a couple of years ago who said she hadn’t seen me out before. I replied, that I can’t get to everything and like to save my energy for a real and focused fight. We also have differing empathies and allegiances. I wondered if this person was more like a rent-a-crowd stand in, “what ever’s going, I’m in” kind of thing. Maybe this is an example of being purely “anti” without giving much thought to why, and what is beyond. I believe this example is an exception and most folks out protesting have a firmer grasp of their issue than this.
During some protests the “positive” speaks for itself alongside the “negative” and are interwoven. Oppose the GCSB bill?/ (Negative) You want to retain your most basic right to privacy. (Positive) Look at all the placards in the photo’s online. Those two themes appeared equally in the protesters forms of expression.
Can’t speak for strategy discussion in activists group,(in recent years at least) just my observations. As it is I am unavoidably surrounded by folks not of my ilk, right wingers, non voters and the odd new ager and the odd ultra conservative religious person. I find they will always make the same kind of statement as your friend. I agree that they “exist in a vacuum that is disconnected from political reality” . I find these kinds of statements infuriating for many reasons but the main one is that because this ignorance and judgement about protesting means for they are enabling the “enemy” for want of a better word. Inaction of the masses leads to the loss of democracy. So you know what I reckon, keep doing what you do and don’t be sidetracked by those who would make believe you’re “negative and therefore that’s a problem” because you make a stand.
I was anti-tour and pro-equality, I was anti-foreshore and seabed legislation and pro-Māori rights, I am anti-exploitation and pro-environment. I don’t think the anti bit undermines the pro bit, they both co-exist. They have a relationship and are both entwined and you can’t have one without the other. In other words being anti-something is not possible without being pro-something even if at the time we don’t express it as such or aren’t even conscious of it. For me it is part of the fabric of existence and the dichotomies are inherent within the system, and manifested as a human attribute much like the almost automatic ability to catagorise or anthropomorphise what we experience around us.
Anti-anti democracy – and ‘everything’ that flows from anti democratic tendencies in society. And as two negatives make a positive 🙂
Less trite answer? I think if some future vision isn’t borne in mind and modes of organising built around values of that future vision (eg, always pushing more democratic means of organising while resisting authoritarian habits), then protest becomes (sometimes) winning battles against the backdrop of a war that will inevitability be lost.
(Over 21 ‘dislikes’ – so must have jammed a few buttons on full! 🙂
MEDIA ALERT: Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright:
“Will National Party MP Nikki Kaye do the right thing and vote against the GCSB Bill?
“Over 500 signatures have been collected, in Auckland Central, for a petition to National MP for Auckland Central Nikki Kaye, which says:
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
We, the undersigned, call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, we hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage our families, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
“These petitions are now with the overnight courier, destined for Parliament, and should arrive in time for the National caucus meeting, which, as I understand it, should be meeting at 10am, Tuesday 30 July 2013.”
“If there is ONE thing that politicians understand – it is VOTES!
My very strong recommendation is that as many people as possible, email all National MPs, Peter Dunne (now ‘Independent’), and the DEFENDANT – ACT Party Leader and MP for Epsom, John Banks, who supported the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill, at it’s first reading, and urge them NOT to support this Bill, ” says Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright.
A party vote was called for on the question, That the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill be reported back to the House by 26 July 2013, and that the Intelligence and Security Committee have authority to meet at any time while the House is sitting (except during oral questions), during an evening on a day on which there has been a sitting of the House, and on a Friday in a week in which there has been a sitting of the House, despite Standing Orders 188 and 191(1)(b) and (c).
Ayes 61 New Zealand National 59; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.
Noes 57 New Zealand Labour 33; Green Party 13; New Zealand First 7; Maori Party 3; Independent: Horan.
Motion agreed to.
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
I call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, I hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage my family, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
It is the result of investigations about the Ahmed Zaoui case, and the background we have never been told. It apparently raises significant questions about our intelligence services:
he documentary feature film Behind The Shroud is scheduled to broadcast for the first time on New Zealand television on FaceTV and Sky channel 83 on Monday August 5 at 8pm.
Behind The Shroud was researched and directed by me [Manning] and was produced over a seven year period.
Behind The Shroud reveals for the first time secret testimonies of witnesses who appeared before the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security’s secret hearings into the Ahmed Zaoui case.
This testimony is highly relevant today as we all debate how we as New Zealanders can all take a role in resisting gross abuses against our civil liberties and the excessive use of the State’s intelligence agency powers.
The frequency of the double saved comments is increasing damnit. I actually have a fix for it (full MD5 to replace the existing check, increased size of the recent comment queue, an increased timeout, and flushing to auto-mod if it times out).
BUT I coded it into a plugin designed for wordpress 3.6 – which last time I looked had just made it to RC2….. Ummm. wait I think..
Can’t find any comment on it above……………Geoffrey Palmer on Campbell Live. A powerful statement. Had “Churchillian” flashing across my head a coupla times. Which surprised me.
So, so significant. He gave a clear, stern admonishment to New Zealand that democracy and our rights are under threat.
Let’s see the ShonKey Python response – the level of response will say SO much.
In a Vaudeville moment I see ShonKeyPython giving Jamie-Lee Ross his next gig ???
Yes. I watched Palmer on Campbell Live. He was very good. Very clear. Good journos everywhere would’ve been nodding their heads in agreement. So would most of the viewers I expect.
His awkward dancing at a Pacific Islands forum did him in. Times have changed. John Key’s awkward dancing just seems to generate smiles, and even his planking probably increased his poll support. 🙂
Some of us have worthless share certificates to remind us.
It begs the question how this individual has been allowed to get near the finance markets since…
Allan Hawkins was apparently sentenced for six (6) years for 7 charges of fraud and conspiracy in 1993.
That’s an example of what I complained of a day or so ago – (I was referring then to ShonKey Python and the MSM, especially television) – they’re fucking around with the nation’s psyche, our democracy, our values.
Sadly that sort of stuff is business as usual in the public sense now. Our morals have been deadened.
April 30 was going to be the day we’d be calling Mum from London to wish her a happy birthday. Then it became the day we would be going to St. Paul's at Evensong to remember her. The aim of the cathedral builders was to find a way to make their ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Can’t remember the last book by a Kiwi author you read? Think the NZ government should spend less on the arts in favor of helping the homeless? If so, as far as Newsroom is concerned, you probably deserve to be called a cultural ignoramus ...
Eric Crampton writes – Grudges are bad. Better to move on. But it can be fun to keep a couple of really trivial ones, so you’re not tempted to have other ones. For example, because of the rootkit fiasco of 2005, no Sony products in our household. ...
A new report warns an estimated third of the adult population have unmet need for health care.Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāHere’s the six key things I learned about Aotaroa’s political economy this week around housing, climate and poverty:Politics - Three opinion polls confirmed support for PM Christopher Luxon ...
Today is May the fourth. Which was just a regular day when my mother took me to see the newly released Star Wars at the Odeon in Rotorua. The queue was right around the corner. Some years later this day became known as Star Wars Day, the date being a ...
Buzz from the Beehive Much more media attention is being paid to something Winston Peters said about former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr than to a speech he delivered to the New Zealand China Council. One word is missing from the speech: AUKUS. But AUKUS loomed large in his considerations ...
Is the economy in another long stagnation? If so, why?This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be ...
The annual list of who's been bribing our politicians is out, and journalists will no doubt be poring over it to find the juiciest and dirtiest bribes. The government's fast-track invite list is likely to be a particular focus, and we already know of one company on the list which ...
In the weeks after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Southern Israel I wrote about the possible 2nd, 3rd and even 4th order effects of the conflict. These included new fronts being opened in the West Bank (with Hamas), Golan … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – It is one of the oldest truisms that there is never a good time for MPs to get a pay rise. This week’s announcement of pay raises of around 2.8% backdated to last October could hardly have come at a worse time, with the ...
David Farrar writes – Newshub reports: Newshub can reveal a fresh allegation of intimidation against Green MP Julie-Anne Genter. Genter is subject to a disciplinary process for aggressively waving a book in the face of National Minister Matt Doocey in the House – but it’s not the first time ...
The Treasury has published a paper today on the global productivity slowdown and how it is playing out in New Zealand: The productivity slowdown: implications for the Treasury’s forecasts and projections. The Treasury Paper examines recent trends in productivity and the potential drivers of the slowdown. Productivity for the whole economy ...
Winston Peters’ comments about former Australian foreign minister look set to be an ongoing headache for both him and Luxon. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for subscribers features co-hosts and , along with regular guests on Gaza and ...
These puppet strings don't pull themselvesYou're thinking thoughts from someone elseHow much time do you think you have?Are you prepared for what comes next?The debating chamber can be a trying place for an opposition MP. What with the person in charge, the speaker, typically being an MP from the governing ...
The land around Lyme Regis, where Meryl Streep once stood, in a hood, on the Cobb, is falling into the sea.MerylThe land around Lyme Regis, around the Cobb that made it rich, has always been falling slowly but surely into the sea. Read more ...
Buzz from the Beehive Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters was bound to win headlines when he set out his thinking about AUKUS in his speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. The headlines became bigger when – during an interview on RNZ’s Morning Report today – he criticised ...
The Post reports on how the government is refusing to release its advice on its corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law, instead using the "soon to be publicly available" refusal ground to hide it until after select committee submissions on the bill have closed. Fast-track Minister Chris Bishop's excuse? “It's not ...
As pressure on it grows, the livestock industry’s approach to the transition to Net Zero is increasingly being compared to that of fossil fuel interests. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / Getty ImagesTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above ...
The New Zealand Herald reports – Stats NZ has offered a voluntary redundancy scheme to all of its workers as a way to give staff some control over their “future” amidst widespread job losses in the public sector. In an update to staff this morning, seen by the Herald, Statistics New Zealand ...
On Werewolf/Scoop, I usually do two long form political columns a week. From now on, there will be an extra column each week about music and movies. But first, some late-breaking political events:The rise in unemployment numbers for the March quarter was bigger than expected – and especially sharp ...
David Farrar writes – The Herald reports: TVNZ says it is dealing with about 50 formal complaints over its coverage of the latest 1News-Verian political poll, with some viewers – as well as the Prime Minister and a former senior Labour MP – critical of the tone of the 6pm report. ...
Muriel Newman writes – When Meridian Energy was seeking resource consents for a West Coast hydro dam proposal in 2010, local Maori “strenuously” objected, claiming their mana was inextricably linked to ‘their’ river and could be damaged. After receiving a financial payment from the company, however, the Ngai Tahu ...
Alwyn Poole writes – “An SEP,’ he said, ‘is something that we can’t see, or don’t see, or our brain doesn’t let us see, because we think that it’s somebody else’s problem. That’s what SEP means. Somebody Else’s Problem. The brain just edits it out, it’s like a ...
Our trust in our political institutions is fast eroding, according to a Maxim Institute discussion paper, Shaky Foundations: Why our democracy needs trust. The paper – released today – raises concerns about declining trust in New Zealand’s political institutions and democratic processes, and the role that the overuse of Parliamentary urgency ...
This article was prepared for publication yesterday. More ministerial announcements have been posted on the government’s official website since it was written. We will report on these later today …. Buzz from the BeehiveThere we were, thinking the environment is in trouble, when along came Jones. Shane Jones. ...
New Zealand now has the fourth most depressed construction sector in the world behind China, Qatar and Hong Kong. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 8:46am on Thursday, May 2:The Lead: ...
Hi,I am just going to state something very obvious: American police are fucking crazy.That was a photo gracing the New York Times this morning, showing New York City police “entering Columbia University last night after receiving a request from the school.”Apparently in America, protesting the deaths of tens of thousands ...
Winston Peters’ much anticipated foreign policy speech last night was a work of two halves. Much of it was a standard “boilerplate” Foreign Ministry overview of the state of the world. There was some hardening up of rhetoric with talk of “benign” becoming “malign” and old truths giving way to ...
Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”.As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy.Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
The Government is again adding to New Zealand’s growing unemployment, this time cutting jobs at the agencies responsible for urban development and growing much needed housing stock. ...
With Minister Karen Chhour indicating in the House today that she either doesn’t know or care about the frontline cuts she’s making to Oranga Tamariki, we risk seeing more and more of our children falling through the cracks. ...
The Labour Party is saddened to learn of the death of Sir Robert Martin, a globally renowned disability advocate who led the way for disability rights both in New Zealand and internationally. ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and enhanced cooperation in the Pacific with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during her first official visit to New Zealand today. "New Zealand and Germany enjoy shared interests and values, including the rule of law, democracy, respect for the international system ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today. Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says. “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
Good evening – Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Genterwocky After a hard days marching, Sir Doocey calls in at the Village Tavern For a pint of ale and a pork pie. The grim villagers stare at him. “Do not be travelling on the forest road,” warns a crusty old beak. “And why is that, antique peasant?” Grins Sir ...
Political conferences after a party returns to power are usually a chance for some healthy, even unhealthy backslapping. Yet National Party president Sylvia Wood’s address to its mainland representatives on Saturday hardly contained the unalloyed delight that one might have expected following National’s escape from the wilderness of opposition. Yes, ...
Comment: Almost half the world is voting in national elections this year and artificial intelligence is the elephant in the room. There are genuine fears AI-generated or AI-edited deepfakes will potentially manipulate election outcomes not just in the US and UK, but critically in countries such as India. For that ...
Ahead of the reality franchise’s return to New Zealand, allow us to introduce the eight brides and grooms. Chuck on a veil and tie back your man bun, because it’s time to say “I do” to a new season of Married at First Sight NZ. The reality TV “social experiment” ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Norton, Professor in the Practice of Higher Education Policy, Australian National University Every year on June 1, student debt in Australia is indexed to inflation. In 2023, high inflation pushed the indexation rate to 7.1%, the highest since 1990. This ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Changes in the May 14 budget will cut the student debt of more than three million people, wiping more than $3 billion from what people owe. The government will cap the HELP indexation rate ...
Asia Pacific Report The prosecutor’s office at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has appealed for an end to what it calls intimidation of its staff, saying such threats could constitute an offence against the “administration of justice” by the world’s permanent war crimes court. The Hague-based office of ICC Prosecutor ...
By Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific desk A women’s union in New Caledonia has staged a sit-in protest this week to support senior Kanak indigenous journalist Thérèse Waia, who works for public broadcaster Nouvelle-Calédonie la Première, after a smear attack by critics. The peaceful demonstration was held on ...
New Zealand Food Safety is monitoring overseas recalls of Indian packaged spice products manufactured by MDH and Everest due to concerns over a cancer-causing pesticide. ...
By Stephen Wright and Stefan Armbruster of BenarNews Fiji’s ranking in a global press freedom index has jumped into the top tier of countries with free or mostly free media after its government last year repealed a draconian law that threatened journalists with prison for doing their jobs. Fiji’s improvement ...
We might be in Invercargill but all anyone can talk about is Gore. Specifically, Salford Street. That’s where three-year-old Lachlan Jones lived, south of the centre of town, between the A&P Showgrounds and the Mataura River. Roughly 1.2 km away from the single level home he lived in with his ...
MONDAY I lined up the latest round of civil servants from city hall against the wall, and signalled for the firing squad to drop their rifles. I stepped up onto a wooden crate to look at the office workers in the eye. But that didn’t feel right, so I found ...
Keen hiker and second-year MSc student Liam Hewson wears two hats when he’s in the great outdoors. “The scientist in me appreciates nature and goes, ‘Oh, there’s that thing and there’s another thing,’ but then the tramper and the outdoorsy person in me thinks, ‘Cool bush.’” Born and bred in ...
After a long and illustrious career as a goal kicker, Dan Carter’s favourite way to unwind is… kicking goals. Why can’t he get enough of it? And what it’s like to watch him do it for an hour straight? A semicircle of people wielding cameras and phones has formed in ...
Dame Susan Devoy takes us through her life in television, including late night ER debriefs, her proudest CTI moment and the show she watches in secret. Quite aside from her four world champion squash titles, Dame Susan Devoy will likely go down in history as one of the best Celebrity ...
Hera Lindsay Bird reveals the best places in Ōtepoti to score more for your apocalypse-prep book hoard.Sometimes I get the feeling I’ve been killed in a car crash, and this second half of my life is just the brain unspooling itself, like one of those episodes of a hospital ...
ThreeNow’s new murder mystery series takes us on a dark, damp journey into the Australian wilderness.This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. High Country is ThreeNow’s new Australian eight-part crime drama, set in a remote part of the Victorian highlands. It tells ...
Introducing a new way to read The Spinoff every weekend. After nearly 10 years of being an online magazine, we’re finally embracing the weekend liftout. Despite our best efforts to convince you otherwise, writers and editors at The Spinoff don’t work weekend. It is through the sheer power of technology ...
Tip one: let yourself be nurtured by this big old man. Tip two: don’t ask him to adopt you. So, you’ve arrived at your first session with a new therapist. He tells you to make yourself comfortable and you opt for the tweed armchair, hoping it makes you look like ...
I didn’t know books could open you back up; that there were books that stayed with you, where reading was like a chemical event. I knew nothing.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.Not too long ago, I was listening to the American ...
Former Olympic swimmer James Magnussen has already started training for the Enhanced games, though says he won’t start taking performance enhancing substances until about nine months out from the competition. The Australian world champion was the first athlete to be announced by Enhanced, but he says the organisation has had ...
Everyone thinks he’s dead. Every day they expect his body to be washed up along the coast. Most likely up Karitane way, the way the tide’s running. But nobody’ll be too surprised if his body’s never found. Even in death he wouldn’t have wished for such attention. He would have ...
Council members voted 21 to 4 in favour of Ahluwalia returning to the Laucala campus following a much-awaited meeting in Vanuatu this week. It comes as USP and its two unions — the Association of the University of the South Pacific Staff (AUSPS) and the Administration and Support Staff Union ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nicola Henry, Professor & Australian Research Council Future Fellow, Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University Shutterstock Following an emergency meeting of the National Cabinet this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced a raft of measures to tackle the problem ...
Analysis - A poll showing the opposition is more popular than the government raises questions, politicians go through their 'trial by pay rise' and a Green MP loses her cool in the debating chamber. ...
The entire stretch of Tokomaru Bay on the East Coast will be subject to a joint customary marine title for two hapū, and extending up to four miles out to sea. A High Court judge has found the two groups, who during the case settled a dispute over boundaries for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Hall, Lecturer, Media & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University A longstanding feud between TikTok and Universal Music Group seems to have finally reached an end, with both parties signing a deal that will see Universal-backed music returned to the social media ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Siobhan O’Dean, Postdoctoral Research Associate, The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney After several highly publicised alleged murders of women in Australia, the Albanese government this week pledged more than A$925 million over five years ...
Political parties have now fully disclosed the donations they received last year - with National getting more than double the cash of any other party. ...
A Pacific regionalism expert has called out New Zealand's Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters for withholding information from the public on AUKUS military pact. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Richard de Grijs, Professor of Astrophysics, Macquarie University Bruno Scramgnon/Pexels All systems are “go” for tonight’s launch of China’s next step in a carefully planned lunar exploration program. Placed on top of a powerful Long March 5 rocket, the Chang’e 6 ...
National returned a massive donation the day after a Newsroom story linked the donors to a property being investigated for operating unlawfully as a migrant workers’ hostel. The party’s 2023 donation filings, released on Friday, show it returned a $200,000 donation from Buen Holdings on August 23. That was the ...
Pacific Media Watch New Zealand has slumped to an unprecedented 19th place in the annual Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index survey released today on World Press Freedom Day — May 3. This was a drop of six places from 13th last year when it slipped out of its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joshua Black, Political Historian and Administrator Officer, Australian Historical Association, Australian National University Australia has had its fair share of public record-keeping controversies in recent years. Some have been mere farce, as in the case of two formerly government-owned filing cabinets (containing ...
Heavenly Culture, World Peace, Restoration of Light (HWPL), a United Nations-affiliated organization dedicated to fostering peace through civilian-led initiatives, has issued a statement in response to the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. ...
A poem by Tessa Keenan, from AUP New Poets 10. Mātou These days we are a photograph; one of a farm strewn with cows that used to be bright harakeke or swamp. The kids point at it and say the sun sits behind a smudge (left by someone at Christmas); ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan (Faber & Faber, $25)The masterful Irish writer ...
Marriage and civil union statistics record the number of marriages and civil unions registered in New Zealand each year, and divorce statistics record the number of divorces granted in New Zealand each year. Key facts Marriages and civil unions In ...
Marriage and civil union statistics record the number of marriages and civil unions registered in New Zealand each year, and divorce statistics record the number of divorces granted in New Zealand each year. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lennon Y.C. Chang, Associate Professor of Cyber Risk and Policy, Deakin University Taiwan stands out as a beacon of democracy, innovation and resilience in an increasingly autocratic region. But this is under growing threat. In recent years, China has used a variety ...
In this excerpt from her new memoir, Dame Susan Devoy remembers her turn as star contestant on the 2022 season of Celebrity Treasure Island. The most anxious time of every day was pre-elimination, when you knew this could be your final day on the show. I felt such contradictory emotions, ...
A week that began in triumph ended in an all-too-familiar disaster for the Green Party. Duncan Greive asks if there’s something in the mission that breaks its best and brightest. A long, strange week for the Green party began with a fantastic poll result. On one level this is hardly ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Vanuatu’s former prime minister and opposition MP Ishmael Kalsakau has stepped down — just two days after he confirmed he was the rightful opposition leader. Kalsakau, MP for Port Vila, confirmed to ABC’s Pacific Beat, and the Vanuatu Daily Post on Thursday that he ...
What’s to blame for the coalition’s choppy start? Six months in, and the mojo meter is in the doldrums. A new poll would put National out of power and sees its leader, Chris Luxon, sliding in popularity. How much is it about policy, how much coalition management and a perception ...
The striking report goes far beyond the proposed repeal of the Oranga Tamariki Act’s Treaty of Waitangi provision, and its impact should be felt far beyond the unique circumstances of the claim it addresses. Earlier this week, the Waitangi Tribunal released an interim report on the government’s proposed repeal of ...
The world has been experiencing a productivity slowdown, from which New Zealand has not been exempt. COVID-19 temporarily boosted labour productivity, but more recently, productivity has retreated. The overall trend since 2007 has been one of slow productivity ...
What’s more wasteful than spending $315k on syrup and machine maintenance? Trying to drum up a controversy about it.Cast your mind back to the pre-pandemic idylls of 2019. A “rat” was a disgusting rodent and not a self-administered plague test; the sixth Labour government was in power; and the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Monash University Ken stocker/Shutterstock In the wake of numerous killings of women allegedly by men’s violence in 2024, thousands of Australians have joined rallies across the country to demand action ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Henry Cutler, Professor and Director, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University Oleg Ivanov IL/Shutterstock Waiting times for public hospital elective surgery have been in the news ahead of this year’s federal budget. That’s the type of non-emergency surgery ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Konstantine Panegyres, McKenzie Postdoctoral Fellow, Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne Amna Artist/Shutterstock One of the earliest descriptions of someone with cancer comes from the fourth century BC. Satyrus, tyrant of the city of Heracleia on the Black Sea, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Rose, Professor of Sustainable Future Transport, University of Sydney LanaElcova/Shutterstock Electric vehicles are often seen as the panacea to cutting emissions – and air pollution – from transport. Is this view correct? Yes – but only once uptake accelerates. Despite the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Giselle Natassia Woodley, Researcher and Phd Candidate, Edith Cowan University There is widespread agreement Australia needs to do better when it comes to gender-based violence. Anger and frustration at the numbers of women being killed saw national rallies over the weekend and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Graham, Lecturer in Economics, University of Sydney Mark and Anna Photography/Shutterstock As home ownership moves further out of reach for many Australians, “rentvesting” is being touted as a lifesaver. Rentvesting is the practice of renting one property to live ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sukhmani Khorana, Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, UNSW Sydney Netflix The new season of Heartbreak High is garnering mixed reviews. Critics are writing about the racy story lines, comparing it to other coming-of-age series about teenage relationships and ...
Bob Carr intends to launch legal action against Winston Peters and Julie Anne Genter is facing a second allegation of bullying. Both sucked the air out of an announcement on education, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in ...
In 1995, Sally Clark went out on her own in a bold and unorthodox attempt to join an illustrious group of equestrian riders conquering the world. In the days of glovebox road maps, brick cell phones, and the hit song How Bizarre, Clark refused to follow Sir Mark Todd, Blyth ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ben Beaglehole, Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago niphon/Getty Images The number of people accessing medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Aotearoa New Zealand increased significantly between 2006 and 2022. But the disorder is still under-diagnosed and ...
Yeah right
In response to Jono Hutchinson reporting on a comment on mine on this site, Lynn Prentice with the help of others has engaged in a character assassination of myself.
This character assassination probably springs from Lynn’s insecurity that left commentary departing from the Labour Green political script will be picked up by the media.
As part of this character assassination Lynn Prentice has let Qot a poster on this site make comments slandering me as a inveterate liar. Fair enough I suppose. But if I try and defend myself by asking her and others who attack my integrity to provide just one example to back up their accusations. Lynn censors my comment.
It seems that on this site you have the right to be attacked but no right to defend yourself.
This character assassination launched on me is obviously building up to justify a complete ban to prevent me making comments during the run up to the elections next year.
Lynn Prentice himself has called me delusional and accused me of lying. He has also accused me of twisting his words. It is not my fault that he has changed his testimony since I first commented on them.
As it looks likely that I will be banned from commenting on this site during the elections. I have decided to put up the debate here. And let the readers decide whether it is justified, or not.
Jenny
30 July 2013 at 4:11 am
Lynn. Whether or not it can be proved that Shearer shouted out “We will be having a review”. I know what I heard. (And saw) Your supporters are not even saying that I am mistaken. You let them call me a liar, letting them attack my integrity at will. When I challenge them to show just one example of this, which you know they can’t, you blank it out. In this you are colluding with those who are trying to paint me as a liar. These are the actions of a bully.
I know that you are hostile to my attempt to make climate change an election issue, which by all accounts indicate it will not be. To this end you are trying to use a minor dispute to attack my integrity and ultimately to shut me out, so that you can happily have your election coverage and debate in peace, free to ignore climate change. Don’t deny it you have already expressed this view. It is, “Politics 101″. not to expend political capital on this one issue, you said.
I can see the writing on the wall. Go ahead disgrace yourself.
In my opinion we should be expending every form of capital we have to defeat this menace.
In this ongoing debate between you and me, it doesn’t surprise me that you take David Shearer’s side against David Cunliffe. In my opinion David Cunliffe is the only parliamentarian who has taken climate change seriously.
I thought Cunliffe’s contribution was dignified and sincere while Shearer’s was churlish and uncalled for. You disagree. I suppose we all make our own bed and have to lie in it. Live then, with an administration that will permit the continuation of climate change and the collection of metadata against its citizens, you will have done your part to bring it about.
Jenny
28 July 2013 at 10:06 pm
That’s the crux of the matter TRP. If Shearer was saying exactly what Cunliffe was saying why did he need to so rudely interject it?
And by the way, there were a number of other people who have confirmed they heard David Shearer say “We will be having a review”. Notice the full stop. This was after Cunliffe said our leader has promised a review and “this law must not, will not and can not stand”. Shearer’s unmissable message is “WE WILL BE HAVING A REVIEW’ full stop. And no, heartfelt “this bill cannot stand” nonsense will be tolerated.
It looks to me that we are in line for another tragic sell out.
Oops! I missed the date stamp on Lynn’s comment showing that it was made after I had addressed the question he accuses me of avoiding.
It is cross over. Takes time to write comments and read other comments. I had the same irritation about telling you repeatably to read the update at the end of my post
🙄
Come and see the violence inherent in the system! I’m being repressed!
Popcorn for breakfast!
The major nuisances imo on The Standard open mike (which users are fortunate to have going by many other blogs) for me are ranked thus:
• over long pieces
• boring others who use some of their valuable time visiting and contributing here
• being at variance with any recognisable version of political reality
• posting the same crappola once too often
So I end up automatically skating over about a dozen regulars but stopping and reading every word from about the same number who write pithy relevant comments.
+1
Tiger Mountain
You could be criticising me I think. So my defence for longer items –
. over long pieces – I will often copy some of a longer piece that makes good points that are relevant, and then I put the links so others can read the rest for themselves, if…
. boring – they don’t think the subject is boring. And not everything can be absorbed on any given day but is still important to others.
. being at variance…with political reality – What is it? Can reality be
definitely established? And could I and others survive the actuality which might
be entirely lacking in hope for something better. Endless chewing of cuds of trivia though just becomes boring when it seems to be fantasy fiction. One hopes of course that it is.
. posting the same crappola once too often.
My thing is that it would be a better world if we applied more carrot and less stick, more
community kindness and less rule-driven judgementalism, more care for parents and help for them so there were less distressing results of wrong doing, and concentrating on happy families working together etc etc I get repetitive about this. But seeing it seems obvious to me and is not a new idea but continues to be resisted by policy makers and policy followers, I think it does need holding up continuously as a worthwhile and achievable goal.
And I don’t think short sharp comments show much thinking. They are more just acknowledgments and reactions from people who know about the matter. Sometimes a mere agreement with a well-written comment, or a pithy, funny, clever, heartfelt or whatever one is good.
But to inform on a thought at least a few words are needed, a bit of explanation to fill out the opinion etc. People who know what they are talking about or trying to present the matter in a new way make the thread interesting. I choose my favourites but also look at the thought lines of others, and soon find those who I consider haven’t got joined up synapses and skip them. And the ones that are obviously RWNJ spoilers I enjoy applying some well-rounded phrases as they usually seem no more than naughty children throwing stones to annoy while at the same time being prepared to impact and hurt.
+1 Rosetinted….and I am being supportive of you
Boring is in the mind of the interpreter …what bores one will not bore another …and divergence is good ….so bring on all those boring old farts and right wingers and vulgarians and lets have some fun! ( too many smart people can be mind numbing)
Also I like Jenny and what she has to say ….so keep going Jenny ….keep fighting for Cunliffe ….and whatever happened to Xstasy ?
Thanks Chooky
I know I do a few long ones but not all about the same thing though. Jenny is very focussed and long. I have to skip – I haven’t the time. Diversity is good, but focus is important and Jenny’s can be excellent but I like detective stories for a long read.
Reply Rosetinted
I like obsessive compulsives myself…and Climate Change is important to be harped on about ( that said I would also be interested in those HAARP conspiracy stories my American friend used to go on and on about until she went off the internet…ha ha) ….Labour Leadership cant be let go of either ….someone has to keep at it like a Rotweiller with a bone!….WATCH DOGS are the answer. I am rather partial to conspiracy theories and Sci fi myself for a longer read.
Now, now CV, better watch what you say or you will be next 🙂
Already thought I was 😉
No, I was asking you to put up evidence, a timeline, anything to examine your claims. After all there were a pile of mics, cameras, and people at that meeting – surely you’d be able to find some kind of support. Something that was so clearly lacking when you made the assertion in the first place and that fool Hutchison wrapped a story around it.
When you did I looked at it with the results I reported. I see you haven’t dealt with that at all in this comment. Have you even listened to that video’s audio track? Or did gathering evidence get lost in your obsessional drive to put your own spin and unsupported assertions on events.
Basically I think that your assertions about what Shearer said are outright fantasy
More rope?
and a nice big martyr sign.
Jenny, out of mole hills mountains are made, your claims about what Dave,(the incumbent),said or didn’t say to the other Dave,(not the incumbent), and in what manner he said it, including that Dave(the incumbent) was trying to Bully Dave(not the incumbent) have become in terms of what has occurred since farcical,
Having read parts of this ‘debate’ what i have so far ascertained is that you will not answer even the most simple of questions, ‘were you in the hall when the interjection by Dave(the incumbent) was made and if so where in the hall were you’,
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
i can assure you that Climate change is and will be an election issue, do you know why, the Green Party will be standing in that election, full stop,
You don’t seem to accept the criticisms leveled at you, no big thing i certainly struggle to do the same, however this morning’s calling for martyrdom of yourself takes the farce to new heights,
Take a deep one jenny, let it go…
Fight the real enemies.
Yeah exactly, the amount of vitriol and invective leveled at Dave(the incumbent), would scorch what remains of the natural hair off of the head of the Slippery little Shyster we have as Prime Minister if leveled at Him,(leaving Him with only a large patch of soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey called Brucie)…
You do realise that John Key already wears a toupée? All that fretting about who he ripped of as an investment banker I guess. Didn’t realise they made toupées from the “soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey” though.
Well said. bad12. Her refusal to state whether she was actually there and if so, where in the hall totally undermined her credibility in my eyes.
But re your request that she identify her posts on climate change, Jenny has put up many comments seeking to make climate change the only issue (usually the first post on Open Mike). In many of these posts, Jenny has at the same time claimed that the Greens have sold out on climate change and attacked them for this supposed sell-out. I gave up reading any of Jenny’s comments on this issue long ago.
Yeah i have read a number of these comments from jenny and commented on the odd occasion about Her little obsession,
Read paragraph 2 of Her little effort today and there is a direct accusation that LPrent is attacking Jenny over the ‘Dave interjection’ because LPrent does not like what Jenny has previously commented on about ‘climate change/election issue’, blah blah and on She goes,
Such Machiavellian Bull-s**t simply does my head in where the is no proof offered to back up such an assertion,
i have no reason what-so-ever to be a Dave(the incumbent) supporter, in fact after the ‘sickness bene on the roof speech’ exactly the opposite, but, give the bloke a ‘fair go’, the training wheels will definitely come off if Labour decide to keep Him as leader and He becomes the Prime Minister but it wont be ummmm aaah that he will be roasted over should this occur…
Et tu Brute????!
Just kidding mate
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
That would be the same LPrent who has written and commented extensively on AGW in these very pages, both promoting good science and knowledge of the realities of AGW and combating CC deniers and idiots.
LOLZ weka, it’s probably time to resort to the rolly eyes icon, Jenny seems to formulate Her comments in the same vein as the wing-nuts do except from a left perspective,
i have a giggle reading some of them and occasionally comment to Her but like a lot of others tend to go yawn and keep scrolling when it’s the same thing over and over…
I find all this stuff symptomatic of trying to paint Shearer in a good light.
The guy is not only a total failure as a leader, he also represents the right wing of Labour.
The substantial difference between the two statements on Thurs night is clear go me.
The future leader Cunliffe made a statement that opposed the Bill outright, taking an implicit repeal position (Must not, cannot and will not stand) not dependent on the review.
Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.
“Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.”
Yeah, nah. Cunliffe said there would be a review, Shearer (allegedly) said there would be a review. That’s it, no contradiction between them at all. Unless, of course, you have the evidence Jenny has failed to provide …
No, of course you don’t have evidence. There were hundreds of people in the hall, a host of big and little cameras and not a single recording of Shearer contradicting Cunliffe. Because it didn’t happen.
I also attended the meeting, and because I was standing on the left hand side and out of view of the stage, spent most of my time watching the crowd.
Posted on the David dynamic on the Daily Blog the next day. Would’ve refrained if I knew what a dissection the interaction would have resulted in.
From my perspective – at the hall – and with full view of all three Davids:
David Cunliffe did not know that David Shearer had arrived, and stood up to speak because the mike and attention were directed to him, as he had been there since the beginning front and centre. He did not appear to be aware of Shearer during his answer, because Shearer was out of direct sightline, and Cunliffe was skillfully addressing the crowd and not the questioner alone.
David Shearer made tentative but silent moves to answer the question, but as usual in a meeting – since attention was already directed to the front – had little chance of being noticed. When a review was mentioned (and I too thought it was Shearer) – the tone seemed supportive rather than corrective or aggressive, but since I don’t know Shearer’s personality and communication skills intimately – my take is completely personal. In the appreciation following Cunliffe’s “it will not stand!” most people missed it – and also – missed the opportunity to notice Shearer and ask for further clarification.
The interaction, while interesting, was typical of what happens during any informal meeting, and happened in the space of a couple of minutes.
Thanks Molly.
red rattler, AND, the next day clarified that interjection by stating that there will be a full review and we will change the legislation based upon that review,
Mountains out of molehills…
bad12
Well said bad12. Despite the mainstream media ignoring anything to do with anthropogenic climate change (that means it’s man made), there has been some recent serious developments that should mean climate change is once again on the agenda.
As much as these current events about who’s the biggest liar in parliament are entertaining, not much of that performance is going to compare when the effects of climate change start costing us the entire worlds GDP.
In that case, politics will truly become the entertainment branch of industry, and the politicians “performance” will be all too horribly inadequate.
+1
Reader Poll on Stuff.
Support the Party’s housing policy.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/
48% think it’s a really good idea
24% playing the race card
Another of National’s mouthpieces the Herald is also worried about Labour’s new policy on housing and doing a survey.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/
At 9:46am, 2650-2700 votes.
Support: 60%
No: 34%
I’m not sure: 6%
Pretty good support ratio. And since Labour’s policy is in line with Mana and the Greens a thumbs up for all those parties to continue along this vein.
Given the higher income and asset owning profile of The Herald it seems like Labour has picked the right policy. But they’ve got to get out there and sell it right and sell it hard!
Looks like Granny didn’t like the results of that poll. It’s been replaced with another poll likely to give a more comforting result for their Tory masters..
Whoops, meant Stuff, not Granny Herald.
“Would parties’ policies on home ownership influence you to change your vote?”
Yes
612 votes, 45.1%
No
602 votes, 44.4%
Not sure yet, need to hear more
142 votes, 10.5%
They must be really freaking out now
The rwnjs have asked their editors to run a 3rd poll in a day.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/
TV3 News, your pro govt news channel, according to a commenter on this stuffed article says that TV3 did apologise last night for their bold error on Saturday night’s news where they stated that bottles had been thrown at the Palmy GCSB protest when in fact they hadn’t.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/tv/8977658/GCSB-protesters-lay-TV-complaint
I guess if they get their tip off’s from random emails that contain no photographic evidence and they don’t bother to verify the claim, then they are willing to say anything as long as it is sensational and frames the mighty anti GCSB movement as just another flakey protest.
I missed the news last night, did anyone see the apology? Must have been a sheepish one.
Also on that Saturday bulletin they “misrepresented” the truth in regards to the gates at parliament and access for the protesters With repressed mirth they talked about protesters climbing over the closed gates when there was a gate open nearby. The reality was the immediate entrance was closed and 1000’s had to squeeze through the small side gate.
All this on top of the- you-know -what Jonolism story last week (see Jenny at post #1) it looks like they have a real agenda to pursue.
Just as well John Campbell is there to shine a light
Hi, Rosie, I did see it. Very short and a fair way into the bulletin, unlike the original item. Though, to be fair to them, they were pretty open about the nature of the mistake and promised to do better. So I’m confident there will be no more Jonolism on TV3 till, ahhhh, 6 O’clock tonight.
Thanks TRP. Well, lets see what happens at 6pm then:-) With this nationwide march going on today
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1307/S00373/everyday-kiwisto-march-in-protest-at-12pm.htm
and Anonymous bringing down around 11 National Party websites today, it’s all going off lately. Our voices are getting louder and stronger. Soon the media will have to acknowledge the legitimacy of the grievances of NZ citizens and stop being apologists for the govt………….might be a naive view, but you never know!
The reaction at Labour’s housing policy by the right, only tells me how many people would embrace a full annexation by the Chinese.
That is the thing, generally speaking the Slater/Farrar sewer racism is to loath Polynesians, but worship Chinese. This seems to be because they can only see the the world in terms of fearful, Manichean objectification.
Manichean
Actually, what they worship is wealth and power and it’s obvious that China is becoming very wealthy and powerful.
Plus if it wasant for China, neo-liberalism would have fallen over long ago. Capitalists need that huge pool of slave workers in China.
Every boardroom in the world should have a picture of Deng Xiaopeng up in it. He did more than Reagan, Thatcher, Douglas, Hawke, Keating, Mulroney, Tebbit, Lawson, Lamont, Howe, Douglas, Prebble, Lange, Volker, Clinton, Summers, et al ever did for neo-liberal capitalism.
None of us voted Deng in. We did however vote many of the other pricks in.
The Labour party if in government will implement a policy of banning sales of residential houses to people who live overseas and not in NZ.
John Key says this will be in breach of a number of free trade agreements.
Therefore the free trade agreements restrict the ability of our Parliament to pass what laws it wishes – i.e. they directly affect our sovereignty.
The people of NZ have never agreed to have our Parliament restricted in such a way.
The free trade agreements are therefore invalid.
This has been apparent for some time but always ignored. NZ’s Parliament has no ability to enter into any FTA which attempts to limit our voting rights or sovereignty.
This is a sleeping giant.
Re the FTA agreements
Does that mean nzer can buy and own property in China?
large areas of China are polluted by industrial and agricultural carcinogens. Avoid. Also China is in the middle of a massive unsustainable debt fuelled residential property bubble.
Two reasons Chinese might want to trade in their local property for NZ property.
+1 Colonial Viper
No because their local laws don’t allow for private property even for their own citizens. Just the same as our local laws can be whatever we want. Like we insist on clear titles for instance which is a rarity in most countries.
My understanding of it is..
The FTA says (broadly) that kiwis seeking to do doing business in China are treated no worse than any other investor from any other country and not treated any different to their own citizens. There are various exemptions to that.
That means that it is reasonably hard to lease property in China. But that is largely because it is just hard to find suitable places there. It is usually more of a pain getting stuff past border controls or even figuring out how to deal with the distribution networks. At least that is what people I know doing business there say. They often go through distributors in HK even now.
Similarly we can put largely whatever restrictions we want on purchasing property. However we cannot give other citizens from countries better access than we give the Chinese or the aussies and depending on how the FTA’s are written some other countries..
Foreign buyers are not completely banned, from my reading of the policy, and feel free to correct me if i have got this wrong,
Foreign buyers who are not resident in New Zealand can buy land and build upon it within a year, i assume that they then have a year to sell that property or become resident,
i doubt whether any Government we have an FTA with will object to that, the Labour policy simply attempts to shut out foreign speculators buying existing houses…
Yes and there doesn’t seem to be an explanation around that exception. Why would that exemption be any use? I don’t buy the “adds to the housing stock” argument.
vto, but it would add to the housing stock, IF foreign investors are prepared to buy land and build upon it they are entitled to make an amount of profit from selling that house to a person resident in New Zealand,and pay any tax due i might add,
The whole ban on foreign residents buying existing property isn’t a big deal in my opinion and will probably result in demand shrinking by 2-5%, i see no negative in the policy for New Zealands residents and citizens,
The only small niggle i have is that with the Australians being exempt from the proposal we may find that while British and Asian speculators are driven out of the market that the demand from Australian speculators grows as their dollar value and higher wage rates will then make them the ‘wealthiest buyers’ and having British and Asian buyers with more wealth than them may yet prove to have held that Australian speculation in our housing market in check to a certain extent…
Well yes I suppose it could add to the housing stock…. but it kind of defeats the purpose of the policy as foreigners will simply look to get their bolthole by building new rather than buy existing. Overall the effect could be pretty similar to the current result, pre-policy.
2-5% is a significant chunk in my experience. Vary the demand side by that amount and it will have an effect. But also bear in mind that affordable housing requires a multi-pronged solution – this is one of them prongs.
And I have seen with my own few eyes the very real bidding out of young families by a foreign buyer. And this is the other benefit of such a policy…
… it creates more ownership within the community and that makes a community stronger.
The family that was outbid went back to renting, with its attendant greater transience and weaker strength. Eventually they moved away.
The policy has two very positive features;
1. Drives down capital values. High capital values only benefit banks.
2. Leads to stronger ownership etc within the community as opposed to more transient renters.
It is a no-brainer.
vto, no not from my reading of the proposal, non residents can buy land and build on it but cannot hold either the built on land or bare land for more than a year,
The only bit of that i am unsure of is the total actual time they can hold the land, i am going to assume that they have just the 1 year to build and sell, that’s more positive ‘investment’ than allowing non-residents to buy existing houses and then hold them until the price has risen to a point where they are happy to sell and take the profit for doing nothing…
Yep, the Labour policy doesn’t go anywhere near far enough. It should be an outright ban on foreign ownership of anything in NZ.
“It should be an outright ban on foreign ownership of anything in NZ.”
That really is a brave call. It would be fascinating to try. So you mean literally that New Zealansd would have zero foreign direct investment? That has never been acheived in modern times by any nation. But I guess we could be the first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_received_FDI
So in 2015 the list of FDI by size might read:
Rank 151 Tajikistan $US million 1,046
Rank 152 New Zealand Nil
Is that what you actually mean?
Yes. We have no need of foreign money to develop our own economy. Thinking that we do is delusional.
That’s not an argument against it no matter what you think.
OK. If you ban all incoming FDI, won’t you need to ban all New Zealand outgoing FDI because otherwise you will run out of capital?
Are you going to ban imports too or is that still OK?
Nope. Two reasons:
1.) The government can create more money.
2.) I expect other countries to do the same.
I didn’t mention trade but generally I’m supportive of it. It needs regulating of course else we end up with society becoming worse off as we’ve seen over the last few decades.
I expect, over time, that trade will minimise.
And you would have this country’s economy 100% owned and controlled by foreign interests, would you not?
If Shearer gets into trouble with this housing policy banning foreigners he should not get defensive, rather he should attack harder. Show some mettle, show some aggression, take a fight directly to Key and make it hostile. Accuse Key of being a racist. Accuse Key of being deceptive and a liar. And don’t back down.
Shearer should have done this with the bad man ban too.
Too scared of the power of the right wing media.
sheesh CV, if that is so then he should be outski. Is Shearer scared of everyone and everything? Is the Labour Party similarly scared like scaredy cats?
I don’t buy that if it is the reason for his slipper-wearing approach to every issue. If the right wing media are hostile then he should still stand up and not back down to them too.
Like Irishbill says on that other post, middle NZ are not stupid. And where they go the media will generally go too.
After all, why is Shearer there? He only has one life like most of us (apparently) so why doesn’t he grab it by the balls? To be or not to be …….. surely
Spark up Shearer, spark up man.
Not scared of their own dissenting MPs and party members
I thought we had a left wing media?
and pissed the bed and thought it was the springs?
What makes you think that?
OK I confess I can’t demonstrate that the MSM is left wing. I take it back.
I am sure that the MSM is stupid, produces mostly rubbish, and is (with a few exceptions) not worth reading. I think because I find it irritating, I have a tendency to assume it is left wing, but I see now that is unfair of me. So I withdraw and apologise.
+1. Your comments are usually worth reading srylands. I may not always agree with them but at least you explain your reasoning well, even when you are taking the piss.
Ah you have just been reading the fools at KiwiBlog and Whaleoil. While some journos may be left leaning, their bosses running the few remaining media companies are most definitely not – they’re mostly interested in money. And generally you make money by sucking up to the lowest possible common denominator.
That lower standard usually equates to talkback, comments on whaleoil, reality TV, paul henry, and seven#. In other words absolutely convinced of their own moral rectitude despite the occasional lapses into fornication, fighting, bigotry, racism, and beating on the missus while absolutely paranoidly certain that everyone else is getting a better deal out of life than they are. And too stupid or lazy to look stuff up.
Seen a mirror lately?
(I do so love it when someone gives me the straight line..)
Can’t have the real poor getting Computers and Internet, they might learn bad stuff about National and vote this time!..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/budget-2013/8754279/Computer-scheme-funding-halved
I listened to a great episode of the Food Programme (mp3, 13MB 28 mins.) from BBC Radio 4 yesterday, covering food poverty. You can read the programme blurb here.
Food insecurity is a growing issue in the UK, linked with inadequate social welfare, lack of transportation and exacerbated by benefit “reforms”. Similar issues are faced by many New Zealanders as we have seen from the food in schools issue in recent months.
Frustrating time listening to a Mr Wall of an Auckland Real Estate firm attacking Shearer on Morning Report, accusing him of racism, xenophobia and basically not having a clue with the new policy for sales of housing to non-resident foreigners..
Mr Wall talked about NZ being built on immigration when he should have known that the Labour policy cøncerned overseas, non-resident owners. He did not know that similar laws were current in several countries but pronounced on how hard the new law would be to enforce “because in most of the cases he dealt with (20 per year, high end sales) he didn’t even know who the parties in the deal were.” Several times he said that he “didn’t know about that” but still continued to make comments.
How did they ever pick him for his ability to add to our sum general knowledge?
Finally there were two good comments from listeners who heard the same self-serving ignorance both of Labour’s policy and the outside world.
Mr Wall is not above the racism he accuses Shearer of…
http://www.thedenizen.co.nz/wellbeing/on-my-top-shelf-graham-wall/
My God……..I recognise the guy……..one of those mouthy know it all (according only to blatant self-interest and sense of superiority) yuppie pricks. Vanity !!!!
LOL – thanks for the Denizen link. What a dork! He must have been down on real estate sales and desperate for income.
I initially got angry at that RNZ interview – and then decided that if I was looking to buy real estate in Auckland, Wall would immediately go on my “don’t touch with a barge pole” list – as slimy, ignorant and untrustworthy. Talk about how not to sell yourself!
He merely reflects his clientele.
RNZ’s supremely impartial and instructive Mr Wall again……..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/8981806/Hotchins-mansion-on-brink-of-sale
RNZ’s supremely impartial and instructive Mr Wall again……..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/8981806/Hotchins-mansion-on-brink-of-sale
RNZ pridefully holds itself as the centre of mature, technically informed expression. That is becoming more of a laugh everyday.
Who the hell in RNZ devised to have a Mr Wall from Wall Real Estate vent his self-interested spleen about policy concerned with foreign non-resident buyers ? Any bets that Mr Wall is a mate or a mate of a mate of someone in RNZ who could jack it up for Mr Wall and his ilk ?
His company deals extensively with the very people the policy is concerned about. Oh no, the policy is all racist shit according to the patently self interested Mr Wall. A policy he’d expect to hear from the racist Invercargill taxi rider he spits, in his mock rounded vowels.
RNZ has allowed Mr Wall to publicise himself as the go-to man when/if such a policy is implemented. It is outrageous that RNZ presents that sort of contribution from the likes of Mr Wall as expert, well-informed, uninterested.
Well done RNZ. Dumbing down is the order of the day.
That one is hardly worth the effort of raising the spittle to direct His way, when asked about the fact that Kiwi’s cannot buy property in China the liquid excrement flowed,
”Oh i don’t know what goes on in China” says He, jesus doesn’t such utter sh*t make you see violent shades of red…
North
Don’t concentrate your spleen on our only public broadcasting service that still is standing after the right-wing earthquake. If there’s something wrong mention it but don’t drop s..t from a great height. Someone in government may be listening and the next thing we know, is that Radionz is being downsized because the public find it unsatisfactory – and it’ll all be your fault! Then we’ll all be sorry. I have the feeling that the gubmint often runs on anecdote when it matches the direction they would like to take.
Listen to some other sites (commercial or student) and let us know how they are. That would be interesting as I don’t do that much. By the time that the good vibes from advertisements for elkhorn nostrums or whatever have been heard a few times it’s goodbye from me.
If I don’t like things on Radionz I’ll probably let them know and why. Why don’t you do the same instead of dissing them so strongly.
A strange response there Rosetinted.
I CANNOT agree that my comment – “RNZ……becoming more of a laugh everyday” (the wheeling in of sham commentators I mean, obviously), nor my suspicions as to how/why Mr Wall was asked to comment/rant in the first place, nor my sardonic thanks to RNZ for the brilliance of its impartial, informative invitees (not)…..amounts to venting my spleen or dropping shit from a great height.
I AM NOT about to take seriously your fear that my comment may activate the dark forces to cancel RNZ.
I AM NOT about to take your direction to listen to “other sites (commercial or student)” and report back to you, firstly because I can’t handle the constant inane guffawing one finds on such “sites”, and secondly because you don’t seem to have expended the effort to do so yourself.
I AM about to ignore the busybody in you. You who misrepresents how I said what I said, and then, just by the way, fails to venture any view on the question.
If then it’s a case of my styles your riles…….tough. Rile away !
Thans for your reply North. A little thought would have made it shorter and sweeter but there you are. It takes all sorts.
Shorter ?………from you ? Hahahahaha.
Styles and riles again methinks. Same answer.
Shorter ?………from you ? Hahahahaha.
Styles and riles again methinks. Same answer.
The deadline for submissions re the consitiutional review is the 31st (tomorrow).
Does anyone know for sure, if that means today is the last day to get one in, or tomorrow is the last day to submit?
Really don’t have much time today (shouldn’t be here….)
Thanks in advance
Hope this helps from http://www.ourconstitution.org.nz/How-to-make-a-Submission
“Send your submission
Please send us your submission by 5pm 31 July 2013.
You can make a submission in a number of ways:
Make a submission online
Fill out the quick submission form and post it to us.
Email a submission to constitutionalreview@justice.govt.nz with “CAP submission” in the subject line. You can attach documents to your email.
Or you can post a submission to:
Submissions
Secretariat, Constitutional Advisory Panel
C/o Ministry of Justice
DX SX10088
Wellington
To make a valid submission you must supply your name. If you are submitting on behalf of an organisation please supply the name of the organisation.
If you have questions about how to make a submission, please call 0508 411 411.”
Cheers VV.
Youre a champion.
I’ve only got a rough outline and I really need to sit down and spend a couple of hours on it.
Time I’ve got tomorrow but not today.
Go well – I am in a good mood today amd knew where to go.
A Herald-poll shows that the majority of respondents support the children of Beneficiaries being included in the Working for Families Tax Credit scheme,
Admittedly only a small poll of 700 but a small ray of light nonetheless,” If beneficiaries want working for tax credits they can get a job”, those words which finally severed any desire for me to either support or vote for Labour,
Just how much denigration can the children of beneficiaries be expected to weather, tax their meager income for spurious reasons, directly cut their meager income for even more spurious reasons, then deny them income from a government redistribution where hand over heart that government dared suggest that the children of families with $60,000 of income were more deserving,
Indulging in the above doesn’t make ‘bad parents’, indulging in the above makes bad parenting a f**king government policy…
WFF should be scrapped and employers should pay people what they’re worth.
OR keep WFF AND make employers pay people what they are worth.
O would go along with that – you just have to recognize that some people are not worth much (professionally) – you have a $1 skill – you can sell it for $1.
Simple.
@ James,
Actually you point out a weakness in Lanthanide’s comment. What one is paid is not a reflection on what they are worth. If this is so, the person looking after, for example, your sick mother in hospital, or someone growing food that you eat, would be considered worth less than a lying and cheating fraudster in the financial system commanding oodles of bonuses whilst undermining the entire functioning of our society.
However, is there anyone working who doesn’t deserve to be paid wages or a salary that covers their living costs?
It appears that rather a lot of employers think this is o.k.
Sure, as long as you recognise that some employers are so shit, workers should be paid bonuses for putting up with their BS.
Fair enough – I agree on that point. My wife works for the Auckland Council and they are terrible – she deserves more for putting up with them (Not that she will get it mind).
But at lease we have been able to agree that some people simply do not have skills that are worth much and are compensated as such.
Not nice – true – but reasonable.
@ James,
So you reckon it is reasonable to have jobs that do not cover the living expenses of the worker?
I don’t.
Hope you don’t expect government welfare costs to go down anytime soon if you think a job needn’t cover living costs.
You can wish all you like but if workers are paid more than their marginal output value the business goes bust.
You must have no experience in running a business. I can tell you that the equaion is simple. Some workers produce more than otehrs but at the margin there will be a worker who is producing marginally more than his/her wages. If wages are regulated upwards beyond that break even point that worker has to go.
How can you not see that?
Probably because once you’ve read more than one or two simplistic libertarian Hayek/Friedman internet raves, it becomes hard to go back to such a trite view of the world.
Something is clearly wrong with the way we do things, working out new ways that have better results will never be solved by continuing to believe that old answers are working.
If a country continues to follow rubbish notions of what can and can’t be done, then, Srylands, they go bust like America, Greece, Britain, Ireland and New Zealand (we are all in massive debt are we not?) or become dependant on power-grabbers who have an obsession with gaining materially and whom have very little concern for the wellbeing of people.
If someone is growing carrots, and the owner can’t afford to pay him or her a living wage, then put the price of the carrots up, Noddy.
No, wait, I have an idea, we can’t put the price of carrots up because we have decided we can’t (or people won’t buy them for that price) so we will just put the workers wages down.
…Oh, what? the worker can’t afford to pay rent and food? I know we will give him handouts. Or better yet we will give him a loan to buy his own house. That way the workers will feel wealthier than they really are and won’t complain!
….Oh what? the worker can’t afford to pay back the debt?
~ Oh I know we will just borrow off other countries to cover up the little problem
…Oh What?? That didn’t work?
~Oh I know, we will bundle the debts up into little packages and sell them as AA investments
…Oh What?? people aren’t repaying their mortgages and the banks have gone bust?
~Oh I know, we will get the workers to pay for the bailout ….
The reason that wages are low is because employers want more profit than is possible. Or perhaps technology has lead us into this place of not-enough-profits-for-neccesities. Or perhaps it is that those with capital prefer to speculate on futures markets (thereby raising the prices falsely). Perhaps we need to change the way we organize ourselves.
The invisible hand can go and fuck itself for a start.
It fails at this point:
“We can’t put the price of carrots up because people won’t buy them for that price.”
Stop growing carrots. Sell house in Levin. Buy vineyard in Martinborough. Make wine. Run cool concerts in summer. Incentivise workers with profit sharing scheme. Everyone is happy.
Import carrots from Tasmania.
All the workers applaud by an invisible hand-clap 🙂
Well I might have agreed with you had you left out the bit about importing the carrots from Tasmania. If people won’t buy the carrots at a decent price and haven’t land to grow them themselves then they can jolly well go without.
I’m unsure what makes you think that the invisible hand has any time for niceties such as applauding…(perhaps the same notion that leads you to believe the invisible hand sorts our organizational problems out for us….)
The srylands market mechanism controls food prices by making people go hungry.
That is what happens in NZ today.
but…but…Colonial Viper…you missed something there…
People go hungry (or into debt) so that some others may experience the freedom to do what they want regardless [of whether they are screwing anyone else]…especially they should be able to make as big a profit as their heart’s desire, and that is what is really important now, isn’t it?
Self interest properly understood would mean that the wealthy elite would not let things get too out of balance. The example of the French Revolution should not be so far from their minds, for instance. The wealthy elite enabled Roosevelt to act during the Depression, making significant concessions to the masses, while essentially saving the system of capitalism.
Unfortunately what we have now amongst the elite is self interest misunderstood.
They’ll bury themselves and us with them over the next 20-30 years.
PS a lot of these “rich” people are going to find themselves very poor in the coming years, as their paper wealth becomes worthless for exchange for real goods and services.
“The srylands market mechanism controls food prices by making people go hungry.”
So why are there so many fat people and most of them are the poor?
@ C.V
Although I understand what you are getting at, and the form of self interest you speak of is certainly healthier than the narrow self interest that has come to be the rule of the day, I really don’t think that a society that believes in an organizing principle of self interest is going to get far.
Societies come together for the benefits that mutual help and cooperation provides. Trying to ignore cooperation and turn the main organizing principle into one of self interest is never going to get far because it goes against the reality of why we clump together in the first place (or more scientifically speaking; that we are a ‘social animal’); i.e. working in groups leads to a better quality of life for the whole tribe; if this wasn’t the case, people wouldn’t bother.
Surely a far more productive organizing principle is to focus on the very qualities that leads to the intended aim–a better quality of life–not those that lead us to pull apart?
@ Srylands,
cos they can’t afford personal trainers, silly.
srylands: you are as ignorant about human nutrition as you are misguided about everything else.
BL: 🙂
In olden times people believed that what was good for their nation was good for themselves. Eg. “For King and Country”. In earlier times they believed in the good of their tribe, their clan, etc.
These days the Left has become so intellectually and rationally clever that there is little remaining for people to believe in.
@CV
lolz (you have to laugh …sometimes…)
Are you sure you’d like that?
See, I’m quite happy for people to be paid what they’re worth but the rich won’t like it because they’d owe the rest of us billions of dollars.
+1 Lol. Brilliant. Cheers for that link.
+1 all it does is artificially subsidize employers much a like the accomodation supplement subsidizes and therefore inflates rent. I’d imagine that if supplements wern’t propping up the rental market an investment property would become a whole lot more unattractive. I’d dare say it would take more heat out of the housing market than investor retsrictions…
Aha, also interest payments can be deducted from PAYE so why wouldn’t the middle class pile into ‘investment housing’ en masse with such subsidies,
Don’t tho expect Labour to change any of that, they are after-all fighting with National for a slice of that middle classes vote and good luck to them,
National wont touch Working for Families either in spite of the Slippery little Shyster when in opposition venting fit to burst a blood vessel that WfW is ‘Communism’…
@Lanthanide
+1
This is the real issue; ensuring people are paid a wage they can live on.
I will add though, that if NZ is going to move into supplementing wages with welfare, as it appears to be doing, then NZers need to be clearly informed and realise the extent of this welfare and drop the whole stigma of receiving welfare.
If governments are going to support landlords and employees by supplementing their requirement to charge higher rents than people can afford and wages that people can’t afford, then governments are going to have to quit the whole anti-welfare memes that they consistently encourage in order to get votes.
If governments persist in ensuring that those on welfare are obligated to feel shame for receiving help, (and as Cricklewood pointed out this help immediately transfers into support for businesses and landlords) then governments need to also ensure that employers and landlords are made to feel obligated to provide wages and ask for rents that are affordable without requiring governments to make up the shortfall.
In my opinion the issue of ‘welfare costs’ needs to be transformed into an issue of ensuring good jobs are available to all. This is the most positive and effective way of clearing up the matter for all NZers.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts:
“….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
Thanks for the links Molly,
I agree thoroughly and have been realising lately that the belief that one is worth more when one is paid more is really a problem for social cohesion. I also think it is hard for humans to not believe that they are worth more when paid a lot more than others.
Trouble is, this is a false belief, noone is worth more just because they are paid more. Every human is worth the same, unless perhaps a human who is doing a great deal of good for others, in which case, perhaps they are worth more…to society at least.
As the information you have shared points out most astutely; some of the people providing the most important services are paid the least and some who are destroying our society are being paid the most. Kind of scuppers the idea that a person is worth more depending on the pay they happen to receive.
Agreed. And part of the problem is the “neoliberal” propaganda that private profit-focused businesses contribute more to society than than public sector work. Also undervalued is most of the work that cares for, educates, helps, heals and nurtures people.
@ Karol
Exactly!
I hope we can start to move in a more positive and pragmatic direction than the belief in neoliberal propaganda has been allowing us to.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts:
“….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
Wow.
How Serco runs the United Kingdom
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jul/29/serco-biggest-company-never-heard-of
An excellent Must Read now up on the Herald Online (Opinion) by Gerard McGhie
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10905042
Two current issues need a great deal more transparency – the GCSB legislation and the Trans- Pacific Partnership negotiations, writes Gerald McGhie.
[ From an earlier Herald articile : “Gerald McGhie is a former career diplomat who served as ambassador to Moscow and Seoul, High Commissioner to Port Moresby and Commissioner in Hong Kong. Now retired, he is a past director of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs and was chairman of the New Zealand chapter of Transparency International.”
Bomber on “Native Affairs”. Chur Bomber, an excellent spokesperson for the left.(we all have some shortcomings).
+1 RT, got the message across loud and clear without wasting words, UP’s to Bomber it’s nice to know that i aint alone out here…
So – why has ‘Bomber’ banned me from posting comments on his ‘Daily Blog’?
Try asking him and see what he says?
Penny Bright
Penny, i detect from the double post a level of anger, so much so that you have been unable to delete one of them,
Your question is self evident, coz it’s His blog and he can, just as in the final analysis LPrent can give someone a spanking here at the Standard for behavior one day and ignore the same behavior from another the next,
Bomber probably got sick of some of your more Loooooong efforts at posting a comment, i quite often do here on the Standard and simply skim such efforts as i scroll my way down the page…
Question Time today – should be interesting after the two week break and what has happened in that time.
Shearer has his usual – twice (1 and 11) and Peters also has one at Q6. Norman is still on the “Dunne” case(Q2), and Parker is on ‘house price’ duty (Q4). Hipkins is going to give us another’Minister of Education’ moment; and Eugenie Sage is on water safety/quality.
The rest are Nat Patsy questions.
Questions to Ministers
1.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
2.Dr RUSSEL NORMAN to the Prime Minister: Did his Chief of Staff, Wayne Eagleson, advise Parliamentary Service that United Future Leader Hon Peter Dunne had agreed to cooperate with the Henry inquiry and had consented to releasing his electronic phone logs; if so, why?
4.Hon DAVID PARKER to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by his statement that “High house prices matter because many New Zealanders spend a large portion of their incomes on housing and that has helped fuel household debt and contribute to damaging imbalances in the economy”?
6.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
7.EUGENIE SAGE to the Minister for the Environment: What percentage of sites identified as a river in the Suitability for Swimming indicator report released yesterday were categorised as “Very Good” or “Good” and therefore were safe for swimming?
9.CHRIS HIPKINS to the Minister of Education: Does she agree with the Minister of Finance that “The Government is focusing on ensuring that every teacher put in front of our children is competent”?
11.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
?
Pretty hard hitting stuff all round, but especially from Shearer.
Why is it that the Greens, with far less parliamentary experience, almost always seem to do far better in parliament? Are Labour actually trying?
I just despair, MO.
For me, NRT put it quite succinctly in this post http://www.norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/oh-ffs.html
By bringing up their housing policy, all Shearer and Parker did is open themselves up to Key etc making disparaging remarks, as nice soundbites for the MSM Fran Mold may be back in the fold, but there was so much more they could have been winning hits on but …………………
I dunno about that. Do you stand by all your statements?
Alan Ray designer of CTV building has taken legal action to stop surveillance of his professional background. Ask the GCSB they’ll know. What a cheek. Its wonderful how these bare-faced scammers as he was, though within the law, can evade taking responsibility.
I remember that he was known for designing buildings so they just achieved building requirements, therefore being efficient no doubt (utilizing a particular commodity or product with the least waste of resources or effort) which is usually judged in NZ as being cheapest.
Joelle Dally wrote an article for stuff in which his name is given as Alan Ray. Other sources spell his name as Alan Reay. Poor journalism on someone’s part.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/christchurch-earthquake/7217699/Engineer-re-lives-inspection-of-CTV-over-and-over
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/everything-is-fixed-says-key/
ICC says they should open the Cricket World Cup at a ground that doesn’t exist yet and is mired in controversy.
seems lgit
http://rebuildingchristchurch.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/the-icc-bowls-an-underarm-at-the-people-of-christchurch/
Olympic stadiums don’t exist when a city is to host a future olympics either. Yet it all works out in the end.
I’m sure they’ll have deadlines by which time if sufficient progress isn’t made, the match will be moved elsewhere.
“Olympic stadiums don’t exist when a city is to host a future olympics either. Yet it all works out in the end.”
Massive public debt, under used and under maintained facilities, hundreds of millions of tax payer provided corporate subsidies, etc.
Yeah, sure they do but usually the city hasn’t got another ten years or so of recovering from massive earthquake damage to do as well.
We just have to hope that the Black Caps dont get bowled out for -57..
A very engaging NZ expert spoke on Radionz this morning. He is into DNA sequencing and tracing evolution through tests that can be done. Very interesting. Says NZ is very important and that we and the Galpagos Islands are important sites in the world. Though he can’t get funding in NZ and we don’t seem enough about our environmental history and present situation to support needed study. So he’s working in Australia. He says that the kiwi is originally Australian!!
Dna sequencing expert interesting insightful
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon
Tuesday 30/7/13
Feature Guest – Professor Alan Cooper (27′ 54″ )
10:07 Director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of
Adelaide. Alan’s a former Wellingtonian who is leading groundbreaking research which uses ancient DNA to record and study evolutionary processes in real time, especially those associated with environmental change.
He says that many clever talented people come from NZ but can’t get work or funding. And I started thinking yes, we came, we saw, we conquered the land and over-ran Maori and have settled into taking what we wanted that we could sell. We are pragmatic, we are ‘practical’, we have ‘common sense’.
We don’t have a real love for our country or each other in society or it would pervade government as well. We are happy if we can get lots of money together, live in a gated community and rumble about the lazy b..s unemployed and the over-fertile women looking to the government to carry their responsibilities.
The country was developed as a land speculation scam where people either came out of desperation from a Britain in recession, enticed here with extravagant promises and unreal scenarios of being in the tropics of the South Pacific, or sold land that hadn’t even been made available by Maori, or if it had, had not been formalised and paid for.
And we were unable to find a working system between landowning farmers, business and unions just as we were reaching a more advanced state of development. Which had largely been achieved through the experience overseas from WW2 and the more sophisticated refugees and new wave of immigrants after the war. Then came defensive reaction to Britain joining the EU and fear that we would be locked out of replacement markets for our primary produce. So we dropped all our protections to show our sincerity and determination to have free borders and dropped the country in a huge cow pat.
Along came neo liberalism, the right wing jumped right in and are prepared to go to jackboot stage as they seek to mould a country to their own personal wishes and interests. Now we have dropped our progressive tax system and brought in high GST that impacts on nearly all financial transactions, and apart from the most wealthy, the middle class are squeezed and the poorer get the toothpaste tube when it is almost flat.
And no hope for better economic management from either major political party which would return us to an enterprising nation having employment for us all which would automatically produce better conditions – that is the final nail in the coffin.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10905495
Andrea Vance’s phone records were given by Datacom to Henry inquiry without request and Henry sent them back !!! carter apologises … question time in the house in 20 mins shd be fun !!
there is a fault in the House system .. no volume being broadcast … not questions time yet as offering congrats to baby george in UK …
Do you know what you are fighting for?
A new age friend of mine (yeah, I know), made the statement recently that the problem with protesting against something is that it is inherently negative and doesn’t say what one actually wants. I generally find these kinds of statements to be idiotic and existing in a vaccum that is disconnected from political reality, but I do take the point that being anti- something without being pro- something can be a problem sometimes (depending on context). On the other hand, sometimes you just have to stand up and say fuck off.
I was thinking about it more today and realised that most activists I know and follow do seem to know what they want as much as what they trying to stop. And the more I think about it the more I am struggling to see protests that have been important to me where we were fighting against something without there being a clear sense of fighting for something as well.
So I thought I would ask. When you are protesting something are you thinking about what you want as much as what you don’t want? Am particularly interested in how activists have seen this over time as specific issues have been addressed and then things have moved on.
Any examples of purely ‘anti’ protests?
I’d also like to know to what extent the whole negative/positive thing gets discussed as strategy in activist circles. Is the whole anti/pro dichotomy a complete nonsense?
Weka, I think it entirely depends on what the situation is, and that there doesn’t necessarily need to be a flip side, what one desires, as an alternative, to what one doesn’t desire. You talk about a dichotomy and as humans I wonder if we often fall into the trap of dichotomous thinking. If you don’t want this then you must want that, kind of thinking.
Why must we justify our objection to something by introducing a nice and positive counter solution to make others feel better about what we do? (I’m thinking of your new age friend here) Sometimes the only thing that needs to be said is “No”. Of course we always need to fully understand why we fight for a certain outcome otherwise it is a meaningless effort.. I’d be surprised that anyone wouldn’t have a full grasp of the holistic value of what they are objecting to as they are marching along and chanting. But then again I have met serial protesters while out a protest. I was speaking with another woman a couple of years ago who said she hadn’t seen me out before. I replied, that I can’t get to everything and like to save my energy for a real and focused fight. We also have differing empathies and allegiances. I wondered if this person was more like a rent-a-crowd stand in, “what ever’s going, I’m in” kind of thing. Maybe this is an example of being purely “anti” without giving much thought to why, and what is beyond. I believe this example is an exception and most folks out protesting have a firmer grasp of their issue than this.
During some protests the “positive” speaks for itself alongside the “negative” and are interwoven. Oppose the GCSB bill?/ (Negative) You want to retain your most basic right to privacy. (Positive) Look at all the placards in the photo’s online. Those two themes appeared equally in the protesters forms of expression.
Can’t speak for strategy discussion in activists group,(in recent years at least) just my observations. As it is I am unavoidably surrounded by folks not of my ilk, right wingers, non voters and the odd new ager and the odd ultra conservative religious person. I find they will always make the same kind of statement as your friend. I agree that they “exist in a vacuum that is disconnected from political reality” . I find these kinds of statements infuriating for many reasons but the main one is that because this ignorance and judgement about protesting means for they are enabling the “enemy” for want of a better word. Inaction of the masses leads to the loss of democracy. So you know what I reckon, keep doing what you do and don’t be sidetracked by those who would make believe you’re “negative and therefore that’s a problem” because you make a stand.
I was anti-tour and pro-equality, I was anti-foreshore and seabed legislation and pro-Māori rights, I am anti-exploitation and pro-environment. I don’t think the anti bit undermines the pro bit, they both co-exist. They have a relationship and are both entwined and you can’t have one without the other. In other words being anti-something is not possible without being pro-something even if at the time we don’t express it as such or aren’t even conscious of it. For me it is part of the fabric of existence and the dichotomies are inherent within the system, and manifested as a human attribute much like the almost automatic ability to catagorise or anthropomorphise what we experience around us.
Anti-anti democracy – and ‘everything’ that flows from anti democratic tendencies in society. And as two negatives make a positive 🙂
Less trite answer? I think if some future vision isn’t borne in mind and modes of organising built around values of that future vision (eg, always pushing more democratic means of organising while resisting authoritarian habits), then protest becomes (sometimes) winning battles against the backdrop of a war that will inevitability be lost.
GOT SOME BIG BITES ON KIWIBLOG OVER THIS POST!!
(Over 21 ‘dislikes’ – so must have jammed a few buttons on full! 🙂
MEDIA ALERT: Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright:
“Will National Party MP Nikki Kaye do the right thing and vote against the GCSB Bill?
“Over 500 signatures have been collected, in Auckland Central, for a petition to National MP for Auckland Central Nikki Kaye, which says:
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
We, the undersigned, call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, we hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage our families, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
“These petitions are now with the overnight courier, destined for Parliament, and should arrive in time for the National caucus meeting, which, as I understand it, should be meeting at 10am, Tuesday 30 July 2013.”
“If there is ONE thing that politicians understand – it is VOTES!
My very strong recommendation is that as many people as possible, email all National MPs, Peter Dunne (now ‘Independent’), and the DEFENDANT – ACT Party Leader and MP for Epsom, John Banks, who supported the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill, at it’s first reading, and urge them NOT to support this Bill, ” says Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright.
WHO VOTED FOR THE BILL AT IT’S FIRST READING:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/debates/debates/50HansD_20130508_00000024/government-communications-security-bureau-and-related-legislation
A party vote was called for on the question, That the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill be reported back to the House by 26 July 2013, and that the Intelligence and Security Committee have authority to meet at any time while the House is sitting (except during oral questions), during an evening on a day on which there has been a sitting of the House, and on a Friday in a week in which there has been a sitting of the House, despite Standing Orders 188 and 191(1)(b) and (c).
Ayes 61 New Zealand National 59; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.
Noes 57 New Zealand Labour 33; Green Party 13; New Zealand First 7; Maori Party 3; Independent: Horan.
Motion agreed to.
____________________________________________________________
CONTACT DETAILS for current NZ MPs:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/mpp/mps/current/
_____________________________________________________
THE MESSAGE MPS CANNOT IGNORE:
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
I call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, I hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage my family, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
http://www.occupyaucklandvsaucklandcouncilappeal.org.nz
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation’ campaigner
2013 Auckland Mayoral candidate
+1
An important documentary by Selwyn Manning, to be aired on Face (Sky & analogue TV) on Monday night (5 Aug 8pm)
It is the result of investigations about the Ahmed Zaoui case, and the background we have never been told. It apparently raises significant questions about our intelligence services:
The frequency of the double saved comments is increasing damnit. I actually have a fix for it (full MD5 to replace the existing check, increased size of the recent comment queue, an increased timeout, and flushing to auto-mod if it times out).
BUT I coded it into a plugin designed for wordpress 3.6 – which last time I looked had just made it to RC2….. Ummm. wait I think..
BTW: If anyone is interested. The timeline of revisions is really intense at present. But they’re starting to close more tickets.
http://wordpress.org/news/2013/07/wordpress-3-6-release-candidate-2/
Oops. The momentary outage was my doing a apt-get upgrade rather than a apt-get update….. php upgrade meant the site was off for a minute.
I thought you’d been cyber-bombed by the key gestapo
Ok stopped fiddling. Showing a 12% increase in performance overall.
But I’m getting not enough on the post with 700 comments damnit..
Can’t find any comment on it above……………Geoffrey Palmer on Campbell Live. A powerful statement. Had “Churchillian” flashing across my head a coupla times. Which surprised me.
So, so significant. He gave a clear, stern admonishment to New Zealand that democracy and our rights are under threat.
Let’s see the ShonKey Python response – the level of response will say SO much.
In a Vaudeville moment I see ShonKeyPython giving Jamie-Lee Ross his next gig ???
Yes. I watched Palmer on Campbell Live. He was very good. Very clear. Good journos everywhere would’ve been nodding their heads in agreement. So would most of the viewers I expect.
Despite his impressive calibre, he just wasn’t the right fit as a Labour Leader though 😉
His awkward dancing at a Pacific Islands forum did him in. Times have changed. John Key’s awkward dancing just seems to generate smiles, and even his planking probably increased his poll support. 🙂
These things are clearly important to voters.
Anyone out there remember Equiticorp?
Some of us have worthless share certificates to remind us.
It begs the question how this individual has been allowed to get near the finance markets since…
Allan Hawkins was apparently sentenced for six (6) years for 7 charges of fraud and conspiracy in 1993.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10905449
Or is this just par for the course behaviour of our captains of industry?
OK, I suppose fraud can be considered an “industry” nowadays.
That’s an example of what I complained of a day or so ago – (I was referring then to ShonKey Python and the MSM, especially television) – they’re fucking around with the nation’s psyche, our democracy, our values.
Sadly that sort of stuff is business as usual in the public sense now. Our morals have been deadened.
That would be par for the course.
Of course, he supposed to have paid his debt to society and turned over a new leaf.
Clearly Hawkins needs to be denied access to any more leaves. I never thought we’d hear from him again in the business world.