Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Willie highlighted that failing to work together may allow the Māori Party to win a seat and go on to prop up a National Government.
Should the two do a deal?
[citation needed for where MT said that there would be no deal and that Willie should go back and talk to his boss. Not moderator intolerance for wasting moderator time – weka]
You say:
“Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements”
You ask:
“Should the two do a deal?”
Yes, the leadership have both agreed there will be no deal. However, I’m asking the public how they feel about it – not flogging it to them as you incorrectly asserted.
Additionally, even though the leadership have ruled it out, Willie (who is also Labour’s Maori campaign strategist) is holding discussions with Green Party candidates on the matter. Hence it’s not a totally dead horse, and it’s Willie that is attempting to flog it.
Labour and GP “working togetehr” is not the same as a deal.
From your link:
Mr Jackson says he’s currently talking to the Greens about their plans to stand candidates in Māori seats, over fears they’ll split the vote and allow candidates from the National-aligned Māori Party to sneak through the middle.
“The reality is the Greens are just talking about the party vote. Our Māori MPs went off the list and they’re looking at just winning their seats.”
He says it’s not a “dirty” tactic, because “National’s been doing it forever” in Ōhāriu and Epsom.
Jackson may talk about an agreement to not stand candidates, but the reality is the GP and Labour candidates each present and promote a different focus in their campaigns.
Yes. And The Chairman is right on this one. On Q&A (just finished) Willie Jackson reiterated the proposal in the Maori seats. He’s in discussions with the Labour leadership and members of the Green Party as we speak.
He is correct. The Greens have got to get over their “no deal” stance –
at least in the Maori seats. Some of those electorates are very tight and the Green’s could end up being the spoiler… thus allowing the Maori National Party to come through the middle and, together with their Pakeha counterparts, taking the treasury benches again.
Simon Wilson thinks the Greens are scared of NZ First being given priority over them should there be a Labour-led government elected. Well, the Greens need to decide what is their number one priority. Is it to be part of a left leaning government that in general terms will reintroduce a government of balance, fairness and justice for all its citizens? Or do they wish to remain in the wilderness with no chance of their more radical policies (and I agree with most of them) ever being put into practice? I know which is the more important. Do you Greens?
Q&A is worth a watch today. Both Willie Jackson and Kelvin Davis showed the Labour leadership how to conduct an interview that will resonate with the punters? Here’s hoping they take notice!
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Also unless there is a significant overhang then Maori as a whole may well be better off under a general left government that does include Maori as MP’s even if the Maori seats are held by a variety of parties. And that left government may come about through campaigning in the Maori seats.
But lets try another scenario on for size. It’s possible that Metiria has dragged a huge chunk of vote towards the Greens from women ( who have always had to deal with WINZ or have a friend who has)
and young people – who have to deal with WINZ/studylink).
If the Greens plus NZF outweigh the Labour vote then we have a whole new game in town. Labour may be on the back foot -perhaps they got rid of Cunliffe too soon.
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Nope. Labour has some damm good policies. It’s just that nobody is listening and that is – in part – because they’re not selling them well. It’s been a bug bear of mine where Labour is concerned for the past 8 years.They seem incapable of condensing them into succinct and simple packages that voters can readily understand.
And they also have some really, really bad ones that puts people off so much that their good ones can’t save them. I.e, their knee-jerk reaction of not supporting raising benefits by 20% despite knowing that National purposefully dropped them 20% below what’s liveable.
RedBaronCV +1
Here is a interesting interview from this morning on RNZ with economist Bill Mitchell, who calls out NZ Labour for being “neoliberal light” and the Greens as being neoliberals on Bikes, which I thought was quite funny….
Most of the Green radical policies will not become part of government policy even if they are in coalition (Lab/NZF/Green). Certainly not the one relating to welfare entitlements.
Probably they will get some of their environmental policies, but not those that will directly hurt Winston’s rural/provincial supporters. So more money for DOC, more public transport and perhaps incentives for electric cars. Also more water quality expenditure.
That’s funny because the most extreme policies proposed by ACT managed to make it into National’s Agenda. Why would you not think that Labour would adopt the Green’s policies as well as those of NZF to put together coherent programme? You seem to suggest that there is a conflict between the green’s policies and those of NZ First but provide no evidence of this.
[2 week ban for wasting my time. Next time, provide a link, and if it’s in a video provide the time. Don’t expect other people to do that work for you. – weka]
Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Weka, I read that to mean that Metiria Turei has declared the parties have already had that discussion and TC is saying that its up to Willie to go back and talk to his boss. Btw, I recall Turei making a statement a day or two ago but not where I saw it. After all there’s been so much said over the past 10-12 days its impossible to remember where one read or saw anything.
I don’t care. It was ambiguous, I asked for clarity. He chose not to clarify. I’m sick of running interference on people’s comments that are misleading. People get 1 chance to make it really clear what they are meaning and what their source is, and they need to do the work on that not expect other people to, especially not moderators. I don’t have the time to do any backwards and forwards on this as a moderator. This is time I want to use writing posts.
This is only going to get worse closer to the election, and probably afterwards, so people need to take more care in how they frame their comments about political parties especially when presenting facts. In an environment where there are very large attempts to undermine the left by misleading statements, spin or outright lies, I have zero tolerance for it here.
TC used that part of his comment to set up a discussion in the way he wanted it to go. It’s deliberate. Which is fine, but it’s needs to be backed up clearly so that people can see it in context and make up their own minds.
We all get there in the end as moderators. Especially when the season of spinners is upon us.
You may have noticed that this is my general policy as well. If people can’t be unambiguous about what they are saying and choose to be obtuse about it, then I will often take the policy of spinning the absolute worst possible interpretation on there spinning and then using that to provide a reason to get the idiots out of my face and out of my valuable time.
It helps clear the deadwood out who are apparently incapable of robust debate because they can’t say what they think and why. I despise the meme pushers who are only interested in pushing a catch phrase and too gutless to stand up to try to defend their use of it.
I find that expressing my worst fears about what I think that they could possibly be saying helps both clear my head, and clears the forums for some better agree to disagree debates.
Be clear about what you are saying folks. The moderators are getting tired as the baseload of comments rises up towards election month. If you try to confuse it, you’re likely to lose your ability to say it here.
Sorry, my intent wasn’t to waste your time. I provided a link. However, I was unaware a time frame was also required for such a short clip. Moreover, the comments aired within the first minute of the clip.
Again, time wasting was not my intent and now that I know, it won’t happen again.
I see that the document that Jonathan Coleman “tabled” when answering the excellent questioning by Julie Anne Genter is now 9 months overdue.
Official Information requests
Document containing advice re Sugar Tax from MOH tabled during question time 13.10.2016
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 13, 2016.
Long overdue.
Document tabled during Question Time on 13.10.2016 which contained advice from the Ministry of Health saying that there is no conclusive evidence around sugar tax.
Document tabled on 13.10.2016 during Question 8 of Question Time re advice from MOH on Sugar Tax
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 14, 2016.
Long overdue. (9 months overdue)
What is most annoying about the idea of sugar tax is that sugar is a highly addictive substance. It’s not like it’s easy to choose differently overnight and the people most affected are low income earners (just check out any WINZ waiting line – full of carb and sugar addicts).
This is particularly offensive because the government has promoted a moderation approach to sugar which doesn’t work.
Essentially sugar tax just takes money from people the government themselves have mistrained people to think a little bit sugar is OK,
I’m getting a bit pissed off with the notion that the behaviour of the poor can be modified by taxing the shit out of them. The middle class don’t care about a sugar tax.
“The Greens are neoliberals on bicycles”. I love it! Serves them right for signing a silly fiscal responsibility agreement with Labour.
Maybe that is now immaterial since the Greens social welfare policy was released ( along with Metiria’s colossal fall from grace with the Right).
Surely the welfare policy would take us out of the fiscal responsibility parameters? After all we can’t have our cake and eat it too, or can we?
Labour plan to maintain a $4 billion plus surplus after their own welfare spend. The Greens costed increasing core benefit rates at $1.4 billion. Hence, they have the fiscal scope to commit to both and still maintain a reasonable surplus, thus still come across as being fiscally conservative.
That’s a good point and its true. They also have a higher ceiling of public spending compared with National who are headed on a track of greater and greater austerity down to 26-27% of GDP. A Labour Green government would be spending an additional $2-3bn in the first year more than National, 4-6bn in the second year and 6-9bn in the third year while National removes itself completely from universal provision in health, education and welfare in favour of so-called Social Investment approaches which rely on big data.
Prof Bill Mitchell mentioned above talked convincingly about why surpluses are bad for people when he spoke in Wellington on Friday. A link to the lecture is here. http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=36534
We really can’t have our cake and eat it to. It’s just a pity that most people, including most economists and politicians, don’t understand that particular truism.
Think of it like this:
You have a cake, it’s sitting there on the plate. It’s a tasty cake so you eat it. After you’ve eaten it it’s no longer on the plate and thus you no longer have it.
Off the coast of Taranaki we have somewhere between 300 million and two billion tonnes of iron sand. This is presently being ‘eaten’ (Extracted and sold offshore) by an Australian firm at approximately twenty million tonnes per year. Once they’ve finished eating it we’ll no longer have it.
This applies to every single resource in a country.
But we can utilise our resources better so that we don’t have poverty. Of course, that would mean that we don’t have rich people either because rich people are the misuse of our resources.
Some resources are renewable and as long as they are used sustainably we can have our cake and eat it too.
I think the key to this is the ownership, i.e. who controls the resources, and I think that only public ownership has a chance of providing open & transparent processes and sufficient control. Private ownership inevitably leads to maximising profits and thus unsustainable use of resources; the cake will be gone before we know it.
Externalities and unintended consequences are passed on to others, be it, in no particular order, the next owners, the public, the neighbours, the next generation, the paying customers, etc. Public ownership is the best option IMO to deal with externalities in a holistic way.
In general, (natural) resources should only be used to benefit society as a whole, not to the advantage of a small minority. If it is owned by the public and used for the public then the profit motive won’t be the dominant force.
SOEs, or whatever shape they might have, will not compete but collaborate because they share the same owners and serve the same mission. Efficiency and productivity are equally guided by the same mission, which is to serve the needs of the whole of the nation, not just a (the) few.
Our current political system is not suited to such Utopian ideals. Our laws, or Constitution for that matter, are not either. And least conducive of all is the stranglehold of (neo)liberalism that still seems to mesmerise our politicians and a large segment of the population.
Is it possible to extend the cohesive bonds of family and local community to a national level? If so, how do we achieve this? And then at/to the next level …
Some resources are renewable and as long as they are used sustainably we can have our cake and eat it too.
Well, no. They’re sustainable within limits. If we exist within those limits then they’re permanently sustainable. If we go outside of those limits then they get whittled down even if they regenerate.
I think the key to this is the ownership, i.e. who controls the resources, and I think that only public ownership has a chance of providing open & transparent processes and sufficient control. Private ownership inevitably leads to maximising profits and thus unsustainable use of resources; the cake will be gone before we know it.
Almost, but not quite. We actually have public ownership of all natural resources in NZ. Even ownership of a house doesn’t convey ownership of the land or anything in it.
But we licence out the extraction of those resources and we don’t put in any restrictions on who it’s sold to. And although we put in place restriction on the speed of the extraction often times that ‘restriction’ means that the entire resource deposit will be completely extracted by the time the licence is up.
Our current political system is not suited to such Utopian ideals. Our laws, or Constitution for that matter, are not either. And least conducive of all is the stranglehold of (neo)liberalism that still seems to mesmerise our politicians and a large segment of the population.
Those licences are, in practice, transfers of ‘ownership’ with little democratic oversight and thus with little control. The OIA is a farce and no help (commercial sensitivity is off-limit); without having the right information it is almost impossible to ask the right questions, which is how counter-intuitive the whole OIA is. IMHO all information relating to publically owned resources must be made publically available without delay and restriction. At the moment the situation is the exact opposite but some people do know!! This is principally un- or even anti-democratic.
One genuine Q: has the ownership of water been sorted here in NZ or is it still “nobody owns the water”?
One genuine Q: has the ownership of water been sorted here in NZ or is it still “nobody owns the water”?
It’s still ‘nobody owns water’. National won’t change that as it would mean that we would charge for it if state ownership was recognised and that would kill off many of National’s donor’s businesses as they’re predicated upon not paying their full costs.
We often hear the catch-cry a vote for Winston is a vote for National. But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
How badly do you think his unwillingness to commit will impact his support?
“Party-Vote for either Mana or TOP = Wasted Vote … in my ever so humble opinion.”
That looks correct. The only guaranteed way to change the government is party vote green or labour and to tactical vote in the electorates to remove the national candidate.
It’s so simple, even voters can understand it.
Only remotely plausible chance of either Party crossing threshold is Harawira winning Te Tai Tokerau … but – despite deal with Maori Party – Davis still odds-on.
A remote possibility, yes, but I can’t see that happening so hold with the opinion of a wasted party vote.
Top are more likely to get a higher vote than Mana, though what percentage of that will come from the left is an unknown.
Left leaning voters who don’t vote green or labour could potentially, in a really tight race, result in a fourth national government. They could, even with a three party coalition, mean more influence for NZ1st than I’m sure most of us would ever want.
I don’t trust them to do the right thing, easy as it is, but I do hope, futile as it may or may not be, for the greater good wins out.
In the 2014 election the Conservatives got almost 4%, and then did the usual thing that our conservative religious parties did and started a standup pissing contest all over each other – probably funded by the National party and performed via the usual sources. Unlike NZ First who had a similar fate back in 2008, I don’t think we will see them this election.
Internet Mana and the Maori party both got slightly less than 1.5%, and I don’t think that their standing in front of voters has improved since then.
Act managed got 0.69%. Which is the same territory that I think TOP will get into. While Seymour has probably been less of a complete dickhead than his predecessors in the role, I don’t think that any strange multi-millionaire will be bothered to prop them up this election.
United Future managed to just edge out the Ban1080 party when they got 0.22%. That definitely puts them in the loopy brigade.
Plus I think that kiwi voters are just plain uninterested in the nutter fringes of politics this time around.
But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
Well, that would depend on the likelihood of Mana being willing to do a deal to keep National in power, wouldn’t it? And, given that that likelihood approximates to 0, the answer to your question is “No. No, it doesn’t. Have you been drinking?”
National is continuing with the Tenure Review process that involves a massive transfer of state owned precious and highly sensitive high country to their farmer mates who then sell off parts of it to developers at a huge profit. And I mean huge.
Labour’s policy is to immediately stop the Tenure Review process.
Both Qantas and Virgin will start increased security measures as a result – that’s for all of you considering flying shortly – whether to Australia or passing through.
I thank all I hold holy that this kind of plot hasn’t happened here yet.
Looking at the poll tonight Labour are in serious trouble. The support they have lost has seemingly moved over to the Greens who are on 15%, but at 24% Labour are in deep trouble. I’m wondering if their support is likely to fall another 2-3%, and I believe there is a serious risk of this, and meanwhile National continue to hold steady on 47% which is where have been more or less for nearly a decade. THe Labour leadership need to ask why their party has stubbornly remained 20ish points behind National for a decade
To answer the burning question, researchers have long observed that people often conform to majority opinion (i.e. during every election, some people jump on the bandwagon and shift their preference to the leading candidate or the most popular policy).
During elections, and major public policy events, much of the media coverage focuses on the “horse race,” or fluctuations in support for a candidate or policy. Reporting on public opinion not only affects support, but levels of engagement: donations, volunteering and turnout. These bandwagon effects can make polls self-fulfilling prophecies; the predictions of the polls come to pass because the polls not only measure public opinion but also influence public opinion and engagement.
24% (Labour) + 15% (Greens) + 11% (NZFirst) = 50%. The current National Party + mates arrangement is toast on this poll and Colmar Brunton is known to favour the centre-right. I’m not sure what the problem is…?
Hi Scott,
I’m well aware of voting Blocks, but I think that it is more complicated than simple blocks. labour now have andrew little publicly admitting that he has considered resigning. That is almost the worst thing to ever admit less than eight weeks from the election. With the Nats on 47% and Labour on 24% there simply cannot be a mandate for a party returning their worst ever election result to then proceed with forming a government. But the bigger immediate issue for Labour is being seen as a lost cause and voters simply don’t turn out to support a party that is perceived to have lost before polling day. Will this start a bleed of support for Labour?
You say you’re aware of voting block but then go on to single out labour’s vote.
47% plays 39% on this poll, so a swing of 4% ties it all up. Still all to play for on the run in as polls traditionally close up.
Good for the greens. Hope it continues. At least we can now put to bed the doom and gloom of MT’s ‘damaging’ winz admission.
Yawn. the National Party has to get more seats than the pro-New Zealand parties to form a government. Thanks for letting everyone know that you won’t respect the election result if that doesn’t happen.
Of course I’ll always respect the outcome of the election. We live in a democracy. But I can’t see how it is tenable for a party that is currently on track for its worst result to then proceed to form a Government that would deliver three years of stability, economic growth, and investment is social and infrastructure programmes. what I’d love for Labour to understand and importantly address is the core reason why they have been behind National by about 20 points for nearly a decade. I’m also a firm believer in NZ electing the government and Prime Minister. NOt Winston having the final say depending who will deliver to him the best baubles
Andrew little did not deny the poll, but I usually rely more on the poll of polls. The election is now less than eight weeks away, and I can’t see a reason for people of nz to change. The message Labour have been giving is not reasonating with the good people of NZ. I do want to ask my Local MP Grant Robertson , and also candidate Paul Eagle. In truth I don’t believe that Labour are being honest with themselves. This is not just some temporary slump, but a persistent feature for the past three elections and nine years. THere are several reasons, but I just can’t see any game changer ahead for Labour.
I love how honesty from politicians just blows some folks’ minds.
Acknowledging your flaws and asking colleagues whether you’re the best person for the job is actually a good thing – I’m fed the fuck up with incompetent ministers who sign off on shit that fouls up the pay of tens of thousands of people, or even endangers or kills people, and then they go on TV and say that it was someone else’s fault and they themselves are doing a good job. Was it Wilkinson who looked visibly surprised at the thought that she should resign after people died (Pike River ISTR?)?
Fuck it, we actually need politicians who admit their faults, who admit the decisions they made 20 years ago or the decisions they made 20 days ago maybe weren’t the best, or weren’t legal, or weren’t what one would expect of a leader. But they just fucking come clean if it’s relevant. I’ve had enough of bluster.
It isn’t actually more complicated than “simple blocks” though is it? If after the election National, say, can’t command a majority of votes in The House then either the Opposition Parties get to have a go at forming a government or we have a new election depending on the GG. Simply winning the biggest share of the vote doesn’t give any party the right to form a government.
labour now have andrew little publicly admitting that he has considered resigning.
Link?
With the Nats on 47% and Labour on 24% there simply cannot be a mandate for a party returning their worst ever election result to then proceed with forming a government.
In an MMP environment there’s no such thing as a mandate for one particular party over any other. If Peter Dunne could put together a governing coalition with him as the leader then we’d have the first Peter Dunne led government.
It is party strength in the House after elections that decides who is to govern. It is the parliamentary party or parties with the support of the House (and the ability to ensure supply – the money to fund the state’s functions) that provides the government.
Really can’t see the problem?
Let me help.
The problem is that Peters loathes the Greens, and they have completely opposed support bases.
There is no way a Lab/Green/NZFirst coalition can come together.
Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?
“Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?”
Yep.
The New Zealand Election Study has shown that NZF’s new supporters (at 2011 & 2014 Elections) have come disproportionately from Labour.
Colmar Brunton’s 2015 vote-switching analysis suggests that, more recently, NZF have been attracting support from Labour and National supporters in fairly equal proportion … but that still means a particularly large % of current intending NZF voters are former Lab supporters (they certainly greatly outnumber former Nats).
In addition (indeed, as a consequence of the above) … NZF supporters consistently show unusually strong antagonism towards the National Govt in various Issue Polls (eg 2014 attitudes to Key Govt’s Dirty Politics / Asset Sales / TPPA / Flag change etc). Interestingly enough, this antagonism towards the Tories is rivaled only by that of Green supporters.
The problem for you is that the more progressive party on the left is growing its share of the bloc, and the bloc doesn’t seem to be any the worse for it.
But if you cannot see the issue of the main opposition party being on 24% (or less) – they are simply not credible for opposition – little less government.
Hell, you’ve been polishing the national turd for years.
“Main opposition party” is valid in FPP. It’s sad you haven’t figured out that MMP can do a true coalition of equals. It doesn’t need to be 47:1:1:1.
It can be 30:20, 25:15:10, or even 20:20:20.
I just want you bastards out of government, and replaced by something vaguely left wing – the more left the better. I don’t care what the party names are.
On the back of the Barclay scandal and the media finally highlighting the homelessness crisis, this is nothing short of an absolute fucking disaster of a poll.
Trends are obviously what is more important, but the fact any single poll shows National at 47% on the back of the last month of negative headlines for them should be a huge cause of concern for anyone who wants to change the government.
Exactly. If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.
Given the Greens have ruled out going into coalition with National this leaves a very sad coalition with NZ1 as the likely outcome.
“If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.”
Why? I mean, some FPP people think that, but I can’t see any reason why National should have first crack if they’re on 42% and L/G are on 42%.
You haven’t said why James. All you’ve done is assert something without rationale. It’s MMP, why does it matter if there are two parties closer to each other in MP numbers? I could see that as an asset.
If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.
Only if you buy into National self-serving delusion.
You are wrong. MMP has not changed the principle of Government formation. The Governor General determines who will be invited to form a government based on the advice of the prime minister. The PM will advise that he should be invited to form a government. Alternatively he will advise that the Leader of the Opposition be invited to form a government. In either case the support will need to be tested in the House. If the new government loses a confidence motion the new PM would resign.
The governor General would then ask the Leader of the opposition if he could form a government. If he said no, there would be a new election.
So in summary, MMP has not changed those conventions. Someone always gets ‘first shot’.
What you describe is that one person gets asked first and then someone else gets asked second and then we go for another election. But it’s not a first shot at forming the government but just first at being asked if they’ve already done so.
Before the GG asks the parties have already negotiated and have an answer and there’s no ‘first shot’ in those negotiations.
The MMP legislation makes a coalition of say 10 minor parties all on 5.5% equally possible as a coalition of one other party on 45% plus one of the other minors.
In one case you would have 10 parties trying to form a stable govt, the other just 2. While you are correct technically, I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
The one that ends up as government. There’s nothing that the public can do to stop it.
And which one any sane GG would give assent to.
The GG doesn’t get that choice. If there’s a coalition in front of him saying that they can form a government then he has to accept that. If he doesn’t then he’s breaking the constitution.
If the undecided percentage is near 20%, surely it is utterly necessary for a state-funded TV news service to say so? Only 2 parties scored higher than 20%, which makes their speculation about what the make-up of parliament might be a big load of rocking-horse effluent.
I have no idea whether there is any regulatory requirement for such information to be reported, though i suspect probably not…especially if it upsets the narrative.
as indicated previously, these polls are almost worthless….turnout will be the key.
Quite frankly it should not be allowable to discuss a poll in the media unless you state the margin of error and the undecided. Corin Dann needs a strong reprimand.
It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.
The good news is that in principle they’re ‘persuadable’ and are amenable to some event between now and the election causing them to swing. The bad news is we have no idea which direction such a ‘swing’ might be.
“It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.”
Not sure about that. I can think of variables that would swing the balance differently.
To be perfectly straight about it, I’d much prefer the Nats had to go into coalition with TOP than NZ1 … but in reality that’s pretty unlikely.
Also keep in mind that TOP’s stated preference is to stay on the cross-benches and would only sign up to Confidence and Supply if they were the sole cab off the rank.
Interestingly TOP do seem to have doubled from just under 1% to 2% … but that could be equally just noise.
Even more than with NZ1st, a vote for TOP seems like a vote for national.
I don’t understand why any supposed lefties would wilfully and knowingly vote for the enemy.
We can only hope they come to senses on election day, do the decent thing, and resist propping up the nasty party by voting green or labour to change the government.
I this this is akin to the Missing Million arguement. The reality is polls do move around, but the danger for Labour is that they get to a point where they are perceived a hopeless losers like happened to Bill English in 2002. And the consequence of this is voter stay away in droves. GReen support at 15% gives them reason to be optimistic, but it is at the expense of Labour. THe Labour Green block cannot penetrate into Nationals steadfast baseline support that is constantly at 47% in nearly every poll
OK I’m happy with that observation. So let’s assume National lose 5% between now and the election and land up on 42%. The bulk of it will go to either NZ1 or maybe TOP. Still no problem forming a govt.
Even if Labour crawl back up over 30%, National are still in the driving seat.
The problem here is that Peters won’t say if he will treat the L/G vote as a bloc or will consider National the first party to talk to. And NZF voters are ok playing roulette.
Except in the past two major polls which had it at 42%. I can understand you righties getting all excited but what has happened here is that the support for the left has increased slightly and I am sure the right’s support is less than CB thinks.
I’m not so sure it’s completely useless. Mostly useless?
I hate to say it, but I’m thinking it might be showing that the Greens didn’t follow through very well on Metiria’s launch of the social security policy.
But yes. Just a one point snapshot in time. And the way NZ reports on polls is ridiculous (opaque). There should be two sets of percentages. One with undecideds removed from the sum total used in the calculation and one with them included in the sum total used in the calculation.
Might be too soon re the follow up (what’s the time lag on events and polls again?). But I tend to agree that the follow up has been dominated by defense against the reactionary forces. Two weeks seems reasonable, am hoping they’ve got some more cards to play soon though.
I’d have been looking for a shift beyond the specifics of social security to a broader platform espousing the general values that are in accord with the social security policy. So, to steal a phrase, hitting everything with a “for the many, not the few” refrain, as a clear indication that the status quo’s getting binned if the Greens have their way.
More policy releases in tune with the social security one could be in the pipeline (I hope so). But the policies on their own, without the engine that comes from generating a more general groundswell of sentiment within largish parts of society, are limited in their effect.
I’d be interested to hear if they’re engaging in any concerted recruitment drive at the moment – taking full advantage of any momentum they have at the moment and pushing it; getting feet on the ground to fight for every available vote.
It isn’t just this poll. Labour are drifting to utter catastrophe. It is all well and good to talk about the undecided vote, but given the lack of inspiration and passion so far in this election campaign from Labour they’ll probably just not vote at all. I reckon we are heading towards a 65% turn out max.
What is it about neoliberalism that turns Labour PLPs into technocratic, out-of-touch, smug and entitled collections of careerists? They are too fucking arrogant to see what should be obvious – they are in deep trouble and need to PANIC, completely rethink their whole fundamental approach to politics and just… just fucking grow some balls and show us they believe in something other than muggins turn.
Their policy so far has been too technocratic and timid, full of thickets of ifs and buts and maybes. They’re thinking seems stuck in 1990s, wedded to neoliberal economic orthodoxy and, frankly, their main tactic at the moment appears to be relying on National losing.
The Labour caucus is – yet again – completely missing in action, 54 days out from the election. The current crop of Labour politicians are completely useless at politics.
The Greens have outflanked them on the left, exploiting the Corbyn-Sanders effect and showing they might actually understand ordinary folks problems.
NZ First is killing them in the provinces. There vote is is 3-4% higher than this poll, mark my words.
LABOUR FUCKING NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!!!!!
When you recall that Phil Goff, and even the hated Cunliffe, were doing way better than this you really have to wonder.
Little’s best option is to see it through to the election and if Labour are under 35% then he, along with the rest of his front bench can resign with dignity, and give Adern a clean start.
Or they can wind the Party up and make a nice donation to the Greens with the proceeds
I think Labour might be hopeful of holding 25%. I’m thinking that their whole policy platform is simply never going to attract the vote of middle NZ.about 18 months or two year ago I had a good conversation with Andrew Little and we discussed capturing the imagination of NZ. In particular the centre where the election is won. But the influence of the left of the party, the unions, and I suggest also the lack of intellectual grunt that was present when Clark and Cullen were at the helm has prevented this from happening.
Playing musical cheers with the leadership is no good. The next losers up will be Gracinda, and they are lackadasical middle class careerists. All they represent is the inept PLP and their own technocratic ambitions. Little has got a useless caucus that is lazy and politically clueless. Labour has to re-think everything from the ground up, including how and who they select to be MPs, what they stand for and what the party exists to do.
At the moment, they stand for nothing and the PLP is full of under performing chumps like Ruth Dyson (remember her?) Jenny Salesa (who? never heard from her once, unforgivable when there are only 31 MPs) Megan Woods (Ever heard from her either? No? Me neither. Pathetically ineffectual on Canterbury issues and climate change), David Parker (last spotted in 2015 and heading for the exit), Trevor fucking Mallard (a burnt out political joke, it is a disgrace he occupies a valuable seat), Poto Williams (useless at scoring hits on the government, but that is OK because as far as i can tell, she was mainly selected to be spokesperson for political correctness and guardian of identity politics), Clare “vanishing majority” Curren, David Clarke, the invisible man in a caucus of hopeless invisible MPs, etc etc.
Labour has a caucus where six of their MPs are from Maori seats, and apart from Kelvin Davis none of them appear to do anything to justify their existence to the wider electorate. Given that these MPs represent fully 20% of the PLP, this is unacceptable. They need to pull their weight a lot more.
Labour only has 31 MPs. Only a handful seem to do anything, but with 31 MPs they ALL need to be working bloody hard. the rest are taking the piss out of their supporters and one can justly suspect they are lazy mofos in the best paying job they are ever likely to hold.
Well said, it appears that this current bunch of clowns want to lose this election just like last the one and some of the above are more worried about themselves than winning the election so we can bury this neo lib bullshit for good.
Some of these middle class toff’s within Labour need to be shown the door, if we get another piss poor result in this yrs election.
I’ll leave you some words of wisdom from my late grandmother who was born in Blackball and Labour Party member to the day she passed away in Nelson.
“If the Labour Party keeps bringing in these middle class toff’s, these middle class toff’s are going to wreck Labour for good forget it’s history/ roots (aka why it was formed) then it will be the fault of theses selfish middle class toff’s for driving away the workclass (the very backbone/ heart of the party as she would say) vote to possibly the greens or Winnie. Because they are too lazy and leave it up to tieless volunteers of workclass/ less privilege members of the party who believe in the party’s values, the very reason why the party exists, it’s endstate to a better place for a common good, as there is no I in team and the NZ Labour Party will be merely a party in name only by the time I’m passed away.”
Have to agree with you Sanctuary. The PLP – apart from Kelvin – has been entirely missing or misfiring in action. Lazy is one word for it, lacking intellectual leadership and fire is another.
Or perhaps the PLP has looked at the polling which has a corrupt, venal and nasty National still close to 50% at the end of three terms, on track for four or five – and just given up.
Well there is no question in my mind, the fundamental makeup of the NZ electorate has changed in the past decade or so.
Absolutely this is only one poll. At best it represents the Greens gaining a bit, completely at the expense of Labour. And Turei’s laudable outburst of honesty and political guts is almost certainly the reason for that.
NZ1 is categorically NOT a left wing party and counting on them for a left wing coalition is just magical thinking. Peters will do what Peters wants to do, and his parties policies are actually a bit to the right of, and more reactionary than National.
In total the left wing bloc that we can count on still only adds up to less than 40% and it’s been slowly but surely eroding for years. We can rearrange deck chairs to distract the panicking passengers all we like, but until we make an honest appraisal of what is really happening … the numbers will continue to disappoint.
Looking at the Labour PLP there is one thing that stands out like dogs balls – Like it’s Maori MPs, the Labour women’s caucus is not pulling it’s weight.
Having jumped up and down and demanded equal representation even at the cost of party unity, they’ve let the side down by selecting a bunch of useless do-nothings. It is as if getting women MPs into parliament is regarded as job done, rather than getting effective politicians into parliament who are hard workers, generate headlines, score hits on the government, and who happily also happen to be women.
I think you hit the nail on the head there and would throw a couple of the white middle class toff’s the so called political class in as well. My late grandmother had very strong views on the Labour Party’s women and Maori branches/ MP’s, but your comments sum it up very nicely as hers are probably not fit public comment. There is one thing that got grandmother going off like a belt feed mortar was the quota system and her favourite saying was “I bloody well don’t care if we 100 women, maori’s/ Pacific Islanders, LBGT or men as long as they were the best candidates at the time. Because you don’t see any NZ sporting teams have quotas base on race, gender or sexuality because they pick the best team to win also the quota system breeds lazyness and and sense of intitlement.”
Angry Andy was more impressive when he was bloody angry, being agreeable has made him bland, bland and more bland.There is so much going on with the Natz and he’s just quiet about it, he needs to be incendary, whats to lose.
Little is fine and will make a competent PM. The problem here is agitation on the left and with the swing vote, and Labour still not stepping up and trying to play it safe. We don’t do presidents in NZ, the issue here is Labour not Little.
Are you saying that Little could force the caucus and party to do his bidding on positioning and policy? Because I don’t think you are right about that. If the reason Labour are polling low is because they’ve chosen the safe path over the bold one, that’s not all in Little’s hands. The party as a whole needs to change.
I am agreeing with you James. LAbour are getting to the point whereby only their diehard supporters are going to vote. Everyone else will look for somewhere else ( maybe Winston First) to vote, or worse not vote and thereby propping up higher support for National. 100,000 Labour voters not turning out (missing 1.1million) translates into an effective increase in support for national of around 50,000 votes as they pick up a higher % off the overall vote. Also slightly higher support for greens and winston (as a %)
“Is it possible Little will resign in a desperate move to save his seat in Parliament, hoping Jacinda can keep them over 24%? They did this in 1990 with Palmer resigning for Moore six weeks out, and Jacinda is already on the billboards.”
Your dream is your unconscious mind trying to tell you something and Andrew Little is not Andrew Little but an archetype. James, I think you’re on the cusp of something special and it has little to do with 23 September.
WHEN are those parties who want to change this National-led Government going to pay attention and focus on this CORPORATE welfare MOUNTAIN instead of the SOCIAL welfare ‘mushroom’?
Seriously?
Here’s the ‘ball’!
How about picking up the bloody thing and ‘running with it’?
WHISTLE-BLOWER ALERT!
“WHERE’S NATIONAL’S ‘CORPORATE WELFARE’ REFORM?
This is the question I asked SIX years ago – and am still asking:
“PRESS RELEASE: Independent Candidate for Epsom Penny Bright:
“How many billion$ of public monies could be saved by ‘CUTTING OUT THE CONTRACTORS’?
3 November 2011
Where’s National’s ‘corporate welfare’ reform?
Which of the maor political parties are pushing for ‘corporate welfare’ reform and shrinking the long-term dependency of the private sector on our public monies?
Penny Bright
‘Anti-privatisation/anti-corruption campaigner’
2017 Independent candidate for Tamaki.
Exposing the $1.6 BILLION Tamaki ‘Regeneration’ – GENTRIFICATION $CAM.
2011- 2014- 2017 no where near 39 to 42 needed for Labour to govern.
Little and the ( little bit left ) neo liberal centrists have failed and its a bit rich to start talking about quitting when the numbers have been bad for ten years 8 weeks out from a general election that they should be winning.
Another three years of social and political corruption.
And Jacinda is NOT A LEADER IN WAITING !!!!!!!!!!!!!
“The most compelling reason offered Sunday evening for Little not to go sooner was that the party had already made its election year bill boards and campaign ads.
There was no more money for new ones so Little should be safe, was the rationale.”
another fizzer James – he’s staying, imo there is zero reason to change. Stupid polls as accurate as a bush. Only a fool would get worked about this like you are.
I have said it before . I believe that the “polls” are simply another campaign tool. The “result” is that which will (they think) do the most harm to the left.
All would do well to consider that even if you trust these polling results, over 60% of eligible voters do not support the continuation of the current government.
over 60%…and yes thats where the change of government lies and is achievable… what the incumbents will fight with any and all means at their disposal, and they are substantial however they must be careful not to overplay their hand.
The opposition must ignore the noise and carry on engaging at a personal level and have faith in their argument that change is necessary….most believe that already.
“The ONCB poll in late July 2014 had National 46%, Lab 30%. They ended up 5% lower in the election so based on 24% now Labour might get 19%”
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Reality:
Utter Bollocks ! …
CB late July 2014 … Nats 52%, Lab 28%
vs
2014 Election Result: Nats 47% (- 5 from CB Poll), Lab 25% (- 3)
I bet Labour’s internal polling is giving them the same message as it did at this point seven weeks from the general election in 2011 and 2014.
They don’t have enough support to win and their leader does not appeal.
Something must be wrong when they can put up English who still rates poorly as he always has and is still ahead of Labour’s fifth leader in nine years.
A listing of 33 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 16, 2025 thru Sat, February 22, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
Several years ago, as an intellectual exercise, I had the fun of ranking the worst Emperors of the Western Roman Empire (https://phuulishfellow.wordpress.com/2020/09/04/the-five-worst-western-roman-emperors/). I even followed it up with a look at Honorius historiography. But there was still a missing piece of the puzzle. I was limiting myself to Emperors from ...
Prof Jane Kelsey examines what the ACT party and the NZ Initiative are up to as they seek to impose on the country their hardline, right wing, neoliberal ideology. A progressive government elected in 2026 would have a huge job putting Humpty Dumpty together again and rebuilding a state that ...
Kia Ora,I was reading about the history New Zealand Timekeeping and I think I may have identified a factual error on this page from 2006:Page 1. Time past - Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand[The rest of the Te Ara article is included for substack readers]In Europe other markers ...
None of the official measures of child poverty improved in the year to June, 2024. Photo: Lynn GrievesonLong stories short, the top six things that stood out to me in our political economy around housing, climate and poverty in the week to Sunday, February 23 were:Stats NZreported on Thursday ...
1/ Join community / common cause organisations Find organisations you resonate with. Join them and/or donate. In the fight against the state, it’s critical we pool together in all cases. If you don’t have the financial resources, sign up for information & updates. Knowledge is power. These groups, and the ...
Long story short: Aotearoa-NZ now has to make some difficult and probably expensive decisions about how we work and trade with China and the United States, our two largest trading partners. That’s because Donald Trump just overturned 80 years of certainty about how the US deals with and protects the ...
People killin', people dyin'Children hurt, and you hear them cryin'Can you practice what you preach?And would you turn the other cheek?Father, father, father, help usSend some guidance from above'Cause people got me, got me questioningWhere is the love?Songwriters: will.i.am, Justin Timberlake, Taboo, apl.de.ap, Printz Board, Michael Fratantuno, George Pajon, Jr.Where ...
A Bully in a China Shop?It is a mystery what Donald Trump learned when he did his BA in economics at the University of Pennsylvania in the mid-1960s. The Ivy League college has a good economics reputation, but even had Trump been a top student – unlikely or he would ...
The conflict we can see echoing across the world is being imported directly into New Zealand by outside powers and monetary influences that we don't want in our politics. It makes our politics messy and confusing, but untangling the puppet strings can help make sense of how we got here.This ...
Questions1. The poem that offers the immortal words The boy stood on the burning deck is about what?a. Eskimo Nell’s younger brotherb. The Reichstag firec. One of Napoleon’s shipsd. Christopher Luxon’s first year as Prime Minister2. What happens to the boy in the poem?a. Goes on an absolute bender in ...
I decided not to bother listening to the Reserve Bank’s appearance at FEC yesterday morning. After all, the OCR decision had been much as expected and foreshadowed, the forecast tracks etc hadn’t changed much, and – with all due respect to some new FEC members – how searching was any ...
Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedQuote of the day:Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when published“Our primary duty, I believe, is to maintain our water, our lakes, our rivers in a form in nature that supports life, ecosystems, communities, and, indeed, it ...
NZ’s peaceful and historic Hikoi for Maori rights and bottom, London police arrest environmental protestorsPeaceful protesters around the world are being jailed for years for nothing more than turning up or planning a protestAusralian climate change protesters To continue to receive posts like this, consider becoming a free or paid ...
And mama said mmmmh, mmmmhWhy don't the newscasters cryWhen they read about people who dieAt least they could be decent enoughTo put just a tear in their eyesAnd mama saidIt's just make-believeYou can't believe everything you seeSo baby, close your eyes to the lullabiesOn the news tonightSongwriters: Jack Hody Johnson.The ...
Hi,With the United States of America currently going down in a giant ball of flames like the Hindenburg disaster, it seemed like a good idea to get on a blimp. That line is basically meaningless, but it sounded good in my head so I went with it as an opener. ...
(My apologies. The version sent earlier this morning had the audio of last week’s podcast attached. It was good, but not that good. I have now updated with this week’s podcast. This is my error and please accept my apologies.)The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with regular and special guests, including:, Helen Clark and on the week in geopolitics, including Donald Trump’s wrecking of the post-WW II politicial landscape; and, ...
Open access notables Long-lasting intense cut-off lows to become more frequent in the Northern Hemisphere, Mishra et al., Communications Earth & Environment:Cut-off Lows are slow-moving mid-latitude storms that are detached from the main westerly flow and are often harbingers of heavy and persistent rainfall. The assessment of Cut-off Lows ...
On Tuesday, the "Independent" Police Conduct Authority issued an extraordinary report, proposing a complete rewrite of protest law to enable the police to restrict public protests and ban them at a whim. While packaged with several complaints in an appendix, the focus of the "thematic review" was clearly the provision ...
Data released today by Statistics New Zealand showed the urgent problem facing Aotearoa New Zealand in tackling child poverty, said NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi Economist Craig Renney. “Child poverty is estimated by Stats NZ on three measures – before housing costs, after housing costs, and material poverty. All three central ...
It is almost never an (unconditionally) good thing if an official policy interest rate (in our case the OCR) is being adjusted in large bites, whether that is (for example) 175 basis points of cuts in the last six months or 375 basis points of increases in just twelve months ...
Here are your morning catch ups in health, workplace, environment and politics.And then later, amust read critical piece from No Right Turn on the government’s attempt to expand police powers follows. ENVIRONMENTNew Zealand's glaciers have shrunk by 29% since 2000: The grim news - published in scientific journal Nature ...
And when we first came hereWe were cold, and we were clearWith no colours in our skinUntil we let the spectrum inSay my nameAnd every colour illuminatesWe are shiningAnd we will never be afraid againSongwriters: Florence Leontine Mary Welch / Paul Epworth.“What did Gerry say?”To be honest, with multiple people ...
Long story short, I spoke to Core Logic Head of Research Nick Goodall & Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ) CEO Jen Baird for a 15 minute mini-Hoon last night after the Reserve Bank of New Zealandannounced it had cut the Official Cash Rate 50 bps to 3.75% ...
There is a widening fear in Wellington that the Cook Islands – China deal is in danger of becoming a foreign policy crisis. Foreign Minister Winston Peters yesterday delivered a blunt assessment of the situation saying that New Zealand wanted to reset and restate the formal parameters of the relationship ...
Good to see that this year, the New Zealand film societies are celebrating what would have been Sam Peckinpah’s 100th birthday with what they are calling “Peckinpah’s West” – a tribute consisting of screenings of The Wild Bunch and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid. That’s where the good part ...
Tomorrow afternoon, if things go really really badly, I may find myself down to one eye. People who used to sneer at me on Twitter will no doubt say So what's changed? Nothing, that's what, you one-eyed lefty.I don’t mean to be dramatic, it’s just a routine bit of cataract ...
A few weeks ago an invitation dropped into my email inbox to attend a joint Treasury/Motu seminar on recent, rather major, changes that had apparently been made to the discount rates used by The Treasury to evaluate proposals from government agencies. It was all news to me, but when ...
All your life is Time magazineI read it tooWhat does it mean?PressureI'm sure you'll have some cosmic rationaleBut here you are with your faithAnd your Peter Pan adviceYou have no scars on your faceAnd you cannot handle pressureSongwriter: Billy Joel.Christopher Luxon is under pressure from all sides. The reviews are ...
After seeing yet-more-months of political debate and policy decisions to ‘go for growth’ by pulling the same old cheap migration and cheap tourism levers without nearly-enough infrastructure, or any attempt to address the same old lack of globally conventional tax incentives for investment, I thought it would be worth issuing ...
The plans for the buildings that will replace the downtown carpark have been publicly notified giving us the first detailed glance at what is proposed for one of the biggest and best development sites in the city centre. The council agreed to sell the site to Precinct Properties for $122 ...
With the Reserve Bank expected today to return the Official Cash Rate to where it was in mid-2022 comes a measure of how much of a psychological impact the rate has. Federated Farmers has published its latest six-monthly farm confidence survey, which shows that profit expectations have fallen and risen ...
Kiwis Disallowed From Waiting Lists Based on Arbitrary MeasuresWellington hospital are now rejecting patients from specialist waiting lists due to BMI (body mass index).This article from Rachel Thomas for The Post says it all (emphasis mine):A group of Porirua GPs are sounding alarm bells after patients with body mass indexes ...
The Prime Minister says he's really comfortable with us not knowing the reoffending rate for his boot camp programme.They asked him for it at yesterday’s press conference, and he said, nah, not telling, have to respect people's privacy.Okay I'll bite. Let's say they release this information to us:The rate of ...
Warning 1: There is a Nazi theme at the end of this article related to the disabled community. Warning 2: This article could be boring!One day, last year, I excitedly opened up a Substack post that was about how to fight back, and the answer at the end was disappointing ...
This may be rhetorical but here goes: did any of you invest in the $Libra memecoin endorsed and backed by Argentine president and darling of the global Right Javier Milei (who admitted to being paid a fee for his promotion of the token)? You know, the one that soared above ...
Last week various of the great and good of New Zealand economics and public policy trooped off to Hamilton (of all places) for the annual Waikato Economics Forum, one of the successful marketing drives of university’s Vice-Chancellor. My interest was in the speeches delivered by the Minister of Finance and ...
The Prime Minister says the Government would be open to sending peacekeepers to Ukraine if a ceasefire was reached. The government has announced a $30 million spend on tourism infrastructure and biodiversity projects, including $11m spent to improve popular visitor sites and further $19m towards biodiversity efforts. A New Zealand-born ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler “But what about when the sun doesn't shine?!” Ah yes, the energy debate’s equivalent of “The Earth is flat!” Every time someone mentions solar or wind power, some self-proclaimed energy expert emerges from the woodwork to drop this supposedly devastating truth bomb: ...
This post by Nicolas Reid was originally published on Linked in. It is republished here with permission.In this article I look into data on how well the rail network serve New Zealanders, and how many people might be able to travel by train… if we ran more than a ...
Hi,Before we get into Hayden Donnell’s new column about how yes, Donald Trump is definitely the Antichrist, I wanted to touch on something feral that happened in New Zealand last week.Members of Destiny Church pushed and punched their way into an Auckland library, apparently angry it was part of Pride ...
Despite delays, logjams and overcrowding in our emergency departments, funding constraints are limiting the numbers of nurses and doctors being trained. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Tuesday, February 18 are:A NZ Herald investigation ...
Now that the US has ripped up the Atlantic alliance, Europe is more vulnerable now than at any time since the mid-1930s. Apparently, Europe and Ukraine itself will not have a seat at the table in the talks between US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin that will ...
Olivia and Noah and Hana are going to the library!It is fun to go to the library. It has books and songs and mat time and people who smile at you and say, Hello Olivia, what have you been doing this morning?The library is more fun than the mall. At ...
New World Orders: The challenge facing Christopher Luxon and Chris Hipkins is how to keep their small and vulnerable nation safe and stable in a world whose economic and political climate the forty-seventh American president is changing so profoundly.IT IS, SURELY, the ultimate Millennial revenge fantasy. Calling senior Baby-Boomer and Gen-X ...
“This might surprise you, Laurie, but I reckon Trump’s putting on a bloody impressive performance.”“GOODNESS ME, HANNAH, just look at all those Valentine’s Day cards!”“Occupational hazard, Laurie, the more beer I serve, the more my customers declare their undying love!”“Crikey! I had no idea business was so good.” Laurie squinted ...
In 2005, Labour repealed the long-standing principle of birthright citizenship in Aotearoa. Why? As with everything else Labour does, it all came down to austerity: "foreign mothers" were supposedly "coming to this country to give birth", and this was "put[ting] pressure on hospitals". Then-Immigration Minister George Hawkins explicitly gave this ...
And I just hope that you can forgive usBut everything must goAnd if you need an explanation, nationThen everything must goSongwriters: James Dean Bradfield / Sean Anthony Moore / Nicholas Allen Jones.Today, I’d like to talk about a couple of things that happened over the weekend:Brian Tamaki’s Library Invasion and ...
New reporting highlights how Brooke van Velden refuses to meet with the CTU but is happy to meet with fringe Australian-based unions. Van Velden is pursuing reckless changes to undermine the personal grievance system against the advice of her own officials. Engineering New Zealand are saying that hundreds of engineers ...
The NZCTU strongly supports the Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill. This Bill represents a positive step towards addressing serious issues around unlawful disparities in pay by protecting workers’ rights to discuss their pay and conditions. This Bill also provides welcome support for helping tackle the prevalent gender and ...
Years of hard work finally paid off last week as the country’s biggest and most important transport project, the City Rail Link reached a major milestone with the first test train making its way slowly though the tunnels for the first time. This is a fantastic achievement and it is ...
Engineers are pleading for the Government to free up funds to restart stalled projects. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Monday, February 17 are:Engineering New Zealand CEO Richard Templer said yesterday hundreds of ...
It’s one of New Zealand’s great sustaining myths: the spirit of ANZAC, our mates across the ditch, the spirit of Earl’s Court, Antipodeans united against the world. It is also a myth; it is not reality. That much was clear from a series of speakers, including a former Australian Prime ...
Many people have been unsatisfied for years that things have not improved for them, some as individuals, many more however because their families are clearly putting in more work, for less money – and certainly far less purchase on society. This general discontent has grown exponentially since the GFC. ...
A listing of 34 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 9, 2025 thru Sat, February 15, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report shows worsening food poverty and housing shortages mean more than 400,000 people now need welfare support, the highest level since the 1990s. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and ...
You're just too too obscure for meOh you don't really get through to meAnd there's no need for you to talk that wayIs there any less pessimistic things to say?Songwriters: Graeme DownesToday, I thought we’d take a look at some of the most cringe-inducing moments from last week, but don’t ...
Please note: I’ve delayed my “What can we do?” article for this video.The video above shows Destiny Church members assaulting staff and librarians as they pushed through to a room of terrified parents and young children.It was posted to social media last night.But if you read Sinead Boucher’s Stuff, you ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is sea level rise exaggerated? Sea levels are rising at an accelerating rate, not stagnating or decreasing. Warming global temperatures cause land ice ...
Here is a scenario, but first a historical parallel. Hitler and the Nazis could well have accomplished everything that they wanted to do within German borders, including exterminating Jews, so long as they confined their ambitious to Germany itself. After all, the world pretty much sat and watched as the ...
I’ve spent the last couple of days in Hamilton covering Waikato University’s annual NZ Economics Forum, where (arguably) three of the most influential people in our political economy right now laid out their thinking in major speeches about the size and role of Government, their views on for spending, tax ...
Simeon Brown’s Ideology BentSimeon Brown once told Kiwis he tries to represent his deep sense of faith by interacting “with integrity”.“It’s important that there’s Christians in Parliament…and from my perspective, it’s great to be a Christian in Parliament and to bring that perspective to [laws, conversations and policies].”And with ...
Severe geological and financial earthquakes are inevitable. We just don’t know how soon and how they will play out. Are we putting the right effort into preparing for them?Every decade or so the international economy has a major financial crisis. We cannot predict exactly when or exactly how it will ...
Questions1. How did Old Mate Grabaseat describe his soon-to-be-Deputy-PM’s letter to police advocating for Philip Polkinghorne?a.Ill-advisedb.A perfect letterc.A letter that will live in infamyd.He had me at hello2. What did Seymour say in response?a.What’s ill-advised is commenting when you don’t know all the facts and ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff has called on OJI Fibre Solutions to work with the government, unions, and the community before closing the Kinleith Paper Mill. “OJI has today announced 230 job losses in what will be a devastating blow for the community. OJI needs to work with ...
The Golden Age There has been long-standing recognition that New Zealand First has an unrivalled reputation for delivering for our older New Zealanders. This remains true, and is reflected in our coalition agreement. While we know there is much that we can and will do in this space, it is ...
Labour Te Atatū MP Phil Twyford has written to the charities regulator asking that Destiny Church charities be struck off in the wake of last weekend’s violence by Destiny followers in his electorate. ...
Bills by Labour MPs to remove rules around sale of alcohol on public holidays, and for Crown entities to adopt Māori names have been drawn from the Members’ Bill Ballot. ...
The Government is falling even further behind its promised target of 500 new police officers, now with 72 fewer police officers than when National took office. ...
This morning’s Stats NZ child poverty statistics should act as a wake-up call for the government: with no movement in child poverty rates since June 2023, it’s time to make the wellbeing of our tamariki a political priority. ...
Green Party Co-Leader Marama Davidson’s Consumer Guarantees Right to Repair Amendment Bill has passed its first reading in Parliament this evening. ...
“The ACT Party can’t be bothered putting an MP on one of the Justice subcommittees hearing submissions on their own Treaty Principles Bill,” Labour Justice Spokesperson Duncan Webb said. ...
The Government’s newly announced funding for biodiversity and tourism of $30-million over three years is a small fraction of what is required for conservation in this country. ...
The Government's sudden cancellation of the tertiary education funding increase is a reckless move that risks widespread job losses and service reductions across New Zealand's universities. ...
National’s cuts to disability support funding and freezing of new residential placements has resulted in significant mental health decline for intellectually disabled people. ...
The hundreds of jobs lost needlessly as a result of the Kinleith Mill paper production closure will have a devastating impact on the Tokoroa community - something that could have easily been avoided. ...
Today Te Pāti Māori MP for Te Tai Tokerau, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, released her members bill that will see the return of tamariki and mokopuna Māori from state care back to te iwi Māori. This bill will establish an independent authority that asserts and protects the rights promised in He Whakaputanga ...
The Whangarei District Council being forced to fluoridate their local water supply is facing a despotic Soviet-era disgrace. This is not a matter of being pro-fluoride or anti-fluoride. It is a matter of what New Zealanders see and value as democracy in our country. Individual democratically elected Councillors are not ...
Nicola Willis’ latest supermarket announcement is painfully weak with no new ideas, no real plan, and no relief for Kiwis struggling with rising grocery costs. ...
Half of Pacific children sometimes going without food is just one of many heartbreaking lowlights in the Salvation Army’s annual State of the Nation report. ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report is a bleak indictment on the failure of Government to take steps to end poverty, with those on benefits, including their children, hit hardest. ...
New Zealand First has today introduced a Member’s Bill which would restore decision-making power to local communities regarding the fluoridation of drinking water. The ‘Fluoridation (Referendum) Legislation Bill’ seeks to repeal the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 that granted centralised authority to the Direct General of Health ...
New Zealand First has introduced a Member’s Bill aimed at preventing banks from refusing their services to businesses because of the current “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Framework”. “This Bill ensures fairness and prevents ESG standards from perpetuating woke ideology in the banking sector being driven by unelected, globalist, climate ...
Erica Stanford has reached peak shortsightedness if today’s announcement is anything to go by, picking apart immigration settings piece by piece to the detriment of the New Zealand economy. ...
Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. The intention was to establish a colony with the cession of sovereignty to the Crown, ...
Te Whatu Ora Chief Executive Margie Apa leaving her job four months early is another symptom of this government’s failure to deliver healthcare for New Zealanders. ...
The Green Party is calling for the Prime Minister to show leadership and be unequivocal about Aotearoa New Zealand’s opposition to a proposal by the US President to remove Palestinians from Gaza. ...
The latest unemployment figures reveal that job losses are hitting Māori and Pacific people especially hard, with Māori unemployment reaching a staggering 9.7% for the December 2024 quarter and Pasifika unemployment reaching 10.5%. ...
Waitangi 2025: Waitangi Day must be community and not politically driven - Shane Jones Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Peter Dutton has launched a game of one-upmanship after Anthony Albanese at the weekend unveiled Labor’s $8.5 billion health policy that promises near universal bulk billing for GP visits by 2030. Dutton wants to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne Labor yesterday foreshadowed a major Medicare change to address the falling rate of bulk billing, with an A$8.5 billion ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Peter Dutton has launched a game of one-upmanship after Anthony Albanese at the weekend unveiled Labor’s $8.5 billion health policy that promises near universal bulk billing for GP visits by 2030. Dutton wants to ...
CPAG Executive Officer Sarita Divis said CPAG was disappointed the Government’s Budget policy statement in December - which gives an early indication about priorities in May’s Budget - had no mention of child poverty. ...
Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific. – COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone A new narrative is being aggressively pushed by Israel and its apologists to justify resuming the Gaza genocide, conveniently just as an important deadline for ceasefire negotiations draws near. The Israeli “Defence” Force (IDF) is now ...
PNG Post-Courier Prime Minister James Marape has issued a strong appeal to all young men and boys in Papua New Guinea — stop abusing girls, mothers, and sisters. He made the plea yesterday before flying to Australia, emphasising the importance of respecting women and children in society. Marape urged young ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The Albanese government on Sunday will pledge $8.5 billion for Medicare, declaring this would enable all Australians to have access to bulk billing by 2030. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will announce the policy at ...
By Gizem Nisa Cebi The BBC has removed its documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone from iPlayer after it was revealed that its teenage narrator is the son of a Hamas official. The broadcaster stated that it was conducting “further due diligence” following mounting scrutiny. The film, which aired ...
Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific. – OPEN LETTER: By Hassan Abo Qamar Dear Mr Trump, I am writing to you as a Palestinian and a survivor of genocide, who was born and raised in Gaza — a city of love and resilience. I have read your ...
Pacific Media Watch One of the leading Middle East’s leading political and media analysts, Marwan Bishara, has accused President Donald Trump of applying a doctrine of ‘strategic coercion” and “economic blackmail” in his approach to the Gaza ceasefire. Bishara, senior political analyst of the Doha-based Al Jazeera global television network, ...
THE PRIME MINISTERWell look what I would like to say to you about the Man Up protest against a Pride event at an Auckland library on Saturday is that they went too far. You know, at the end of the day, let’s be honest, they went just a bit too ...
In a remarkable last-minute twist, the young immigrant mother at the heart of Fractured, Melanie Reid’s groundbreaking podcast on a case involving a baby’s injuries, has had her deportation order cancelled.Just days before she was set to be removed from the country, Associate Immigration Minister Chris Penk intervened, cancelling the deportation ...
Near-complete darkness. A savage shape to the hills. No words. Corinne presses the accelerator down, the road twisting and ducking before her. “We don’t have to go,” she says again, to Lizzie, in the passenger seat.Soon, the tarseal will turn to gravel, and the road will slip and slide like a ...
This podcast contains discussion about sexual assaultThe protest by Destiny Church at an Auckland Pride event has revisited a rhetoric that many in the rainbow community thought was dead and buried.Much of the response from the general public has been a lashing out against Bishop Brian Tamaki’s ManUp gang.Josiah Pasikale ...
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. This week has felt a lot like 2017. Remember when every other day there was a report of some guy saying something massively, comically, sexist (or worse, just being a flat-out abuser with few professional repercussions) and then out The Spinoff would ...
Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy is the fourth and final film in the series and gives our Bridge the fairytale ending she really, fucking deserves. It’s been 23 years since Bridget Jones’ Diary delivered one of the most iconic single gals in all of cinema (and literature). The world ...
The Junior Taskmaster host takes us through her life in television, from bingeing school holiday sitcoms to making Starstruck. In many ways, Rose Matafeo has been preparing for her role on Junior Taskmaster all her life. Not just because she is the daughter of a teacher, but because she has ...
On the lonely pain of miscarriage. It was my second pregnancy. I already had an 18-month-old toddler. We’d gone through anguish to have her. My daughter’s coming to being had started with a health hiccup that became an alarming question mark. The question had changed. It was no longer the ...
The Pacific profiles series shines a light on Pacific people in Aotearoa doing interesting and important work in their communities, as nominated by members of the public. Today, Symone Tafuna’i.All photos by Geoffery Matautia.Symone Tafuna’i does it all. At only 25, she is a champion sprinter, a sports ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jack K. Clegg, Professor of Inorganic Chemistry, The University of Queensland A thin crystal is bent elastically when pressed with a metal probe. UQ/QUT We are all familiar with elastic materials – just think of a rubber band which can return ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Changlong Wang, Research fellow in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Monash University D.Alimkin, Shutterstock Hydrogen was once sold as a universal climate fix — a clean, green wonder fuel for cars, homes, power grids and even global export. But reality has cooled ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hunter Bennett, Lecturer in Exercise Science, University of South Australia gpointstudio/Shutterstock Imagine you have just finished a workout. Your legs are like jelly, your lungs are burning and you just want to collapse on the couch. But instead, you pick yourself ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mia Schaumberg, Associate Professor in Physiology, School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast You may have noticed that changes in weight are sometimes accompanied by changes in your period. But what does one really have to do with the other? ...
For too long, political and cultural ideologies have held our public service captive, fostering an environment of self-censorship and removing a vital tool for error correction: freedom of speech. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anna M. Kotarba-Morley, Senior Lecturer in Museum and Curatorial Studies / Research Fellow, University of Adelaide Wikimedia/The Conversation Archaeologists in Egypt have made an exciting discovery: the tomb of Pharaoh Thutmose II, a ruler who has long been overshadowed by his ...
The new chair of the Electoral Commission (EC) says he has full confidence in the preparation for the next election, and guidance for selecting polling booth locations is being reviewed. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Partlett, Associate Professor of Public Law, The University of Melbourne A month in, and it is clear even to conservatives that US President Donald Trump is attempting to fundamentally reshape the role of the American president. Trump and his supporters ...
Read Willie Jackson’s excellent Orewa speech https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2017/07/29/breaking-willie-jacksons-explosive-orewa-speech-attacking-don-brash/
Great to see Mr Jackson put serious words to a serious speech.
Self serving wormtongue IMHO!
GP speaking truth to power, even if some voices shake:
At the link, a tweet with graph. Text says:
Aye. Go the Greens!
Now pair this up with a good cartoon…
Text of Willie Jackson’s speech at Orewa Rotary House last night. The event was a fundraiser for Marja Lubeck, the Labour Rodney candidate.
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2017/07/29/breaking-willie-jacksons-explosive-orewa-speech-attacking-don-brash/
Willie Jackson challenges the Greens to work with Labour on winning the Maori seats.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/election/2017/07/end-is-nigh-for-m-ori-party-willie-jackson.html
Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Willie highlighted that failing to work together may allow the Māori Party to win a seat and go on to prop up a National Government.
Should the two do a deal?
[citation needed for where MT said that there would be no deal and that Willie should go back and talk to his boss. Not moderator intolerance for wasting moderator time – weka]
But haven’t other people on this site stated categorically that Labour would ‘never do a deal’
Clearly Willie is attempting to negotiate one.
Clearly you are trying to flog a dead horse.
I’m not flogging anything.
I’m merely seeing what the feeling is out there for such a deal.
You say:
“Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements”
You ask:
“Should the two do a deal?”
???
That’s right. Seeing what the feeling is out there for such a deal.
Hence, your point is?
Additionally, you are aware Willie is having discussions with a number of Green Party candidates on the matter?
“… both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements“
Yes, the leadership have both agreed there will be no deal. However, I’m asking the public how they feel about it – not flogging it to them as you incorrectly asserted.
Additionally, even though the leadership have ruled it out, Willie (who is also Labour’s Maori campaign strategist) is holding discussions with Green Party candidates on the matter. Hence it’s not a totally dead horse, and it’s Willie that is attempting to flog it.
Where do you stand on the matter?
See moderator note above.
Labour and GP “working togetehr” is not the same as a deal.
From your link:
Jackson may talk about an agreement to not stand candidates, but the reality is the GP and Labour candidates each present and promote a different focus in their campaigns.
Yes, but in this case they would be “working together” to do a deal.
And it’s an endorsement he is seeking, not for them to stand down.
Yes. And The Chairman is right on this one. On Q&A (just finished) Willie Jackson reiterated the proposal in the Maori seats. He’s in discussions with the Labour leadership and members of the Green Party as we speak.
He is correct. The Greens have got to get over their “no deal” stance –
at least in the Maori seats. Some of those electorates are very tight and the Green’s could end up being the spoiler… thus allowing the Maori National Party to come through the middle and, together with their Pakeha counterparts, taking the treasury benches again.
Simon Wilson thinks the Greens are scared of NZ First being given priority over them should there be a Labour-led government elected. Well, the Greens need to decide what is their number one priority. Is it to be part of a left leaning government that in general terms will reintroduce a government of balance, fairness and justice for all its citizens? Or do they wish to remain in the wilderness with no chance of their more radical policies (and I agree with most of them) ever being put into practice? I know which is the more important. Do you Greens?
Q&A is worth a watch today. Both Willie Jackson and Kelvin Davis showed the Labour leadership how to conduct an interview that will resonate with the punters? Here’s hoping they take notice!
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Also unless there is a significant overhang then Maori as a whole may well be better off under a general left government that does include Maori as MP’s even if the Maori seats are held by a variety of parties. And that left government may come about through campaigning in the Maori seats.
But lets try another scenario on for size. It’s possible that Metiria has dragged a huge chunk of vote towards the Greens from women ( who have always had to deal with WINZ or have a friend who has)
and young people – who have to deal with WINZ/studylink).
If the Greens plus NZF outweigh the Labour vote then we have a whole new game in town. Labour may be on the back foot -perhaps they got rid of Cunliffe too soon.
Labour also needs to consider why it is so weak that it continually needs the Greens withdrawing to prop it up. Better policies perhaps?
Nope. Labour has some damm good policies. It’s just that nobody is listening and that is – in part – because they’re not selling them well. It’s been a bug bear of mine where Labour is concerned for the past 8 years.They seem incapable of condensing them into succinct and simple packages that voters can readily understand.
The Jackson/Davis interview is now online:
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a
Labour has conceded it is no longer a major party, that now sits only with national
[That was really stupid Red. Your ban’s now permanent]- Bill
[to clarify for others, Red changed their details to circumvent a short ban – weka]
[lprent: Really really dumb.. ]
That interview was terrible. Unconvincing in the extreme.
@Anne
And they also have some really, really bad ones that puts people off so much that their good ones can’t save them. I.e, their knee-jerk reaction of not supporting raising benefits by 20% despite knowing that National purposefully dropped them 20% below what’s liveable.
RedBaronCV +1
Here is a interesting interview from this morning on RNZ with economist Bill Mitchell, who calls out NZ Labour for being “neoliberal light” and the Greens as being neoliberals on Bikes, which I thought was quite funny….
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/201852897/bill-mitchell-modern-monetary
Also here is Ken Loach making it pretty clear that our ‘neoliberal light’ Labour party is a pretty sad state of affairs….
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/audio/201852860/ken-loach-history-doesn-t-stay-still
Turn labour Left!
Most of the Green radical policies will not become part of government policy even if they are in coalition (Lab/NZF/Green). Certainly not the one relating to welfare entitlements.
Probably they will get some of their environmental policies, but not those that will directly hurt Winston’s rural/provincial supporters. So more money for DOC, more public transport and perhaps incentives for electric cars. Also more water quality expenditure.
We don’t need more water quality expenditure. We need farmers to stop polluting and we need a water market to stop over extraction.
As for the Greens welfare policy, it will never happen. They may as well had a policy launch about improving the quality of oats to feed unicorns.
That’s funny because the most extreme policies proposed by ACT managed to make it into National’s Agenda. Why would you not think that Labour would adopt the Green’s policies as well as those of NZF to put together coherent programme? You seem to suggest that there is a conflict between the green’s policies and those of NZ First but provide no evidence of this.
@Jan Rivers
Wayne’s playing standard RWNJ scare tactics. Inventing BS up out of whole cloth to try and scare people into voting National.
To weka
It was in the clip in the link I provided.
It also aired on 3news last night.
By the way, where do you stand on the matter?
[2 week ban for wasting my time. Next time, provide a link, and if it’s in a video provide the time. Don’t expect other people to do that work for you. – weka]
Metiria Turei stated the two (Labour & the Greens) have already had this discussion, both agreeing there would be no deal or endorsements, thus Willie should go back and talk to his boss.
Weka, I read that to mean that Metiria Turei has declared the parties have already had that discussion and TC is saying that its up to Willie to go back and talk to his boss. Btw, I recall Turei making a statement a day or two ago but not where I saw it. After all there’s been so much said over the past 10-12 days its impossible to remember where one read or saw anything.
I don’t care. It was ambiguous, I asked for clarity. He chose not to clarify. I’m sick of running interference on people’s comments that are misleading. People get 1 chance to make it really clear what they are meaning and what their source is, and they need to do the work on that not expect other people to, especially not moderators. I don’t have the time to do any backwards and forwards on this as a moderator. This is time I want to use writing posts.
This is only going to get worse closer to the election, and probably afterwards, so people need to take more care in how they frame their comments about political parties especially when presenting facts. In an environment where there are very large attempts to undermine the left by misleading statements, spin or outright lies, I have zero tolerance for it here.
TC used that part of his comment to set up a discussion in the way he wanted it to go. It’s deliberate. Which is fine, but it’s needs to be backed up clearly so that people can see it in context and make up their own minds.
Well done Weka.
You may have noticed that this is my general policy as well. If people can’t be unambiguous about what they are saying and choose to be obtuse about it, then I will often take the policy of spinning the absolute worst possible interpretation on there spinning and then using that to provide a reason to get the idiots out of my face and out of my valuable time.
It helps clear the deadwood out who are apparently incapable of robust debate because they can’t say what they think and why. I despise the meme pushers who are only interested in pushing a catch phrase and too gutless to stand up to try to defend their use of it.
I find that expressing my worst fears about what I think that they could possibly be saying helps both clear my head, and clears the forums for some better agree to disagree debates.
Be clear about what you are saying folks. The moderators are getting tired as the baseload of comments rises up towards election month. If you try to confuse it, you’re likely to lose your ability to say it here.
thanks for that Lynn.
I am pleased to agree with Karen.
Sorry, my intent wasn’t to waste your time. I provided a link. However, I was unaware a time frame was also required for such a short clip. Moreover, the comments aired within the first minute of the clip.
Again, time wasting was not my intent and now that I know, it won’t happen again.
See you all in a couple of weeks.
Interesting 2 min vid. Methinks someone is losing the plotdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab044/ab0447a54ddece68d6741dd9f34518040b2d35c4" alt="😉"
If that’s a comment directed at my moderation, I’d prefer it be dealt with in the backend.
ffs dial it back a tad, aye? Willie Jackson is losing the plot.
Your comment could be read either way. Good that you clarified.
I see that the document that Jonathan Coleman “tabled” when answering the excellent questioning by Julie Anne Genter is now 9 months overdue.
Official Information requests
Document containing advice re Sugar Tax from MOH tabled during question time 13.10.2016
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 13, 2016.
Long overdue.
Document tabled during Question Time on 13.10.2016 which contained advice from the Ministry of Health saying that there is no conclusive evidence around sugar tax.
Document tabled on 13.10.2016 during Question 8 of Question Time re advice from MOH on Sugar Tax
Request sent to Minister of Health by John Gray on October 14, 2016.
Long overdue. (9 months overdue)
https://fyi.org.nz/search/sugar%20tax/all
Lifting the lid on what they’ve been up to in health is the last thing national want.
What is most annoying about the idea of sugar tax is that sugar is a highly addictive substance. It’s not like it’s easy to choose differently overnight and the people most affected are low income earners (just check out any WINZ waiting line – full of carb and sugar addicts).
This is particularly offensive because the government has promoted a moderation approach to sugar which doesn’t work.
Essentially sugar tax just takes money from people the government themselves have mistrained people to think a little bit sugar is OK,
I’m getting a bit pissed off with the notion that the behaviour of the poor can be modified by taxing the shit out of them. The middle class don’t care about a sugar tax.
“The Greens are neoliberals on bicycles”. I love it! Serves them right for signing a silly fiscal responsibility agreement with Labour.
Maybe that is now immaterial since the Greens social welfare policy was released ( along with Metiria’s colossal fall from grace with the Right).
Surely the welfare policy would take us out of the fiscal responsibility parameters? After all we can’t have our cake and eat it too, or can we?
Labour plan to maintain a $4 billion plus surplus after their own welfare spend. The Greens costed increasing core benefit rates at $1.4 billion. Hence, they have the fiscal scope to commit to both and still maintain a reasonable surplus, thus still come across as being fiscally conservative.
That’s a good point and its true. They also have a higher ceiling of public spending compared with National who are headed on a track of greater and greater austerity down to 26-27% of GDP. A Labour Green government would be spending an additional $2-3bn in the first year more than National, 4-6bn in the second year and 6-9bn in the third year while National removes itself completely from universal provision in health, education and welfare in favour of so-called Social Investment approaches which rely on big data.
Prof Bill Mitchell mentioned above talked convincingly about why surpluses are bad for people when he spoke in Wellington on Friday. A link to the lecture is here.
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=36534
We really can’t have our cake and eat it to. It’s just a pity that most people, including most economists and politicians, don’t understand that particular truism.
Think of it like this:
You have a cake, it’s sitting there on the plate. It’s a tasty cake so you eat it. After you’ve eaten it it’s no longer on the plate and thus you no longer have it.
Off the coast of Taranaki we have somewhere between 300 million and two billion tonnes of iron sand. This is presently being ‘eaten’ (Extracted and sold offshore) by an Australian firm at approximately twenty million tonnes per year. Once they’ve finished eating it we’ll no longer have it.
This applies to every single resource in a country.
But we can utilise our resources better so that we don’t have poverty. Of course, that would mean that we don’t have rich people either because rich people are the misuse of our resources.
Some resources are renewable and as long as they are used sustainably we can have our cake and eat it too.
I think the key to this is the ownership, i.e. who controls the resources, and I think that only public ownership has a chance of providing open & transparent processes and sufficient control. Private ownership inevitably leads to maximising profits and thus unsustainable use of resources; the cake will be gone before we know it.
Externalities and unintended consequences are passed on to others, be it, in no particular order, the next owners, the public, the neighbours, the next generation, the paying customers, etc. Public ownership is the best option IMO to deal with externalities in a holistic way.
In general, (natural) resources should only be used to benefit society as a whole, not to the advantage of a small minority. If it is owned by the public and used for the public then the profit motive won’t be the dominant force.
SOEs, or whatever shape they might have, will not compete but collaborate because they share the same owners and serve the same mission. Efficiency and productivity are equally guided by the same mission, which is to serve the needs of the whole of the nation, not just a (the) few.
Our current political system is not suited to such Utopian ideals. Our laws, or Constitution for that matter, are not either. And least conducive of all is the stranglehold of (neo)liberalism that still seems to mesmerise our politicians and a large segment of the population.
Is it possible to extend the cohesive bonds of family and local community to a national level? If so, how do we achieve this? And then at/to the next level …
Well, no. They’re sustainable within limits. If we exist within those limits then they’re permanently sustainable. If we go outside of those limits then they get whittled down even if they regenerate.
Almost, but not quite. We actually have public ownership of all natural resources in NZ. Even ownership of a house doesn’t convey ownership of the land or anything in it.
But we licence out the extraction of those resources and we don’t put in any restrictions on who it’s sold to. And although we put in place restriction on the speed of the extraction often times that ‘restriction’ means that the entire resource deposit will be completely extracted by the time the licence is up.
QFT
Ta
Those licences are, in practice, transfers of ‘ownership’ with little democratic oversight and thus with little control. The OIA is a farce and no help (commercial sensitivity is off-limit); without having the right information it is almost impossible to ask the right questions, which is how counter-intuitive the whole OIA is. IMHO all information relating to publically owned resources must be made publically available without delay and restriction. At the moment the situation is the exact opposite but some people do know!! This is principally un- or even anti-democratic.
One genuine Q: has the ownership of water been sorted here in NZ or is it still “nobody owns the water”?
It’s still ‘nobody owns water’. National won’t change that as it would mean that we would charge for it if state ownership was recognised and that would kill off many of National’s donor’s businesses as they’re predicated upon not paying their full costs.
“along with Metiria’s colossal fall from grace with the Right”
lol
I didn’t know they had held her in such high esteem…
We often hear the catch-cry a vote for Winston is a vote for National. But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
How badly do you think his unwillingness to commit will impact his support?
Party-Vote for either Mana or TOP = Wasted Vote … in my ever so humble opinion.
Neither are likely to cross either threshold – hence Left vote down plughole in a (hoping against hope) potentially tight Election.
“Party-Vote for either Mana or TOP = Wasted Vote … in my ever so humble opinion.”
That looks correct. The only guaranteed way to change the government is party vote green or labour and to tactical vote in the electorates to remove the national candidate.
It’s so simple, even voters can understand it.
Only remotely plausible chance of either Party crossing threshold is Harawira winning Te Tai Tokerau … but – despite deal with Maori Party – Davis still odds-on.
A remote possibility, yes, but I can’t see that happening so hold with the opinion of a wasted party vote.
Top are more likely to get a higher vote than Mana, though what percentage of that will come from the left is an unknown.
Left leaning voters who don’t vote green or labour could potentially, in a really tight race, result in a fourth national government. They could, even with a three party coalition, mean more influence for NZ1st than I’m sure most of us would ever want.
I don’t trust them to do the right thing, easy as it is, but I do hope, futile as it may or may not be, for the greater good wins out.
Mine too.
When it comes down to the election, I don’t think that Mana, TOP, United Future, Act and probably even the Maori party will get more than 1%.
http://archive.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2014/partystatus.html
In the 2014 election the Conservatives got almost 4%, and then did the usual thing that our conservative religious parties did and started a standup pissing contest all over each other – probably funded by the National party and performed via the usual sources. Unlike NZ First who had a similar fate back in 2008, I don’t think we will see them this election.
Internet Mana and the Maori party both got slightly less than 1.5%, and I don’t think that their standing in front of voters has improved since then.
Act managed got 0.69%. Which is the same territory that I think TOP will get into. While Seymour has probably been less of a complete dickhead than his predecessors in the role, I don’t think that any strange multi-millionaire will be bothered to prop them up this election.
United Future managed to just edge out the Ban1080 party when they got 0.22%. That definitely puts them in the loopy brigade.
Plus I think that kiwi voters are just plain uninterested in the nutter fringes of politics this time around.
But with Hone also unwilling to commit, does it mean a vote for Mana is a potential vote for National?
Well, that would depend on the likelihood of Mana being willing to do a deal to keep National in power, wouldn’t it? And, given that that likelihood approximates to 0, the answer to your question is “No. No, it doesn’t. Have you been drinking?”
Here is another reason to vote Labour-read about it:
http://www.eds.org.nz/our-work/policy/media-statements/media-statements-2017/media-release-nbsp-eds-critical-of-tenure/
National is continuing with the Tenure Review process that involves a massive transfer of state owned precious and highly sensitive high country to their farmer mates who then sell off parts of it to developers at a huge profit. And I mean huge.
Labour’s policy is to immediately stop the Tenure Review process.
Beatriz at Dinner is currently showing at the Film Festival. It’s a little heavy handed but worth a look.
Here’s the trailer.
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
Australian terrorist plot to bring down an airplane foiled:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-29/australia-foils-plot-to-bring-down-plane-pm-turnbull-says
Both Qantas and Virgin will start increased security measures as a result – that’s for all of you considering flying shortly – whether to Australia or passing through.
I thank all I hold holy that this kind of plot hasn’t happened here yet.
How to know that it happened, over there?
Because someone said so…
Not enough. Is it…
Then its best you play it no mind and just run along now….
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/three-terror-raids-carried-out-across-sydney-20170729-gxlgip.html
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/national-security/police-conduct-terror-raids-across-sydney/news-story/43b9e1326594a9b2ed70d334c38f1bbd
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/jul/30/australian-police-foil-elaborate-plot-to-detonate-bomb-on-plane
Why would you think posting different links from the same source proves anything more..
It doesn’t!
Wait to see how many arrested, are released…
Exactly as has happened over there many times, in recent years…
Looking at the poll tonight Labour are in serious trouble. The support they have lost has seemingly moved over to the Greens who are on 15%, but at 24% Labour are in deep trouble. I’m wondering if their support is likely to fall another 2-3%, and I believe there is a serious risk of this, and meanwhile National continue to hold steady on 47% which is where have been more or less for nearly a decade. THe Labour leadership need to ask why their party has stubbornly remained 20ish points behind National for a decade
The polls didn’t get it wrong – they were designed to shape public opinion.
They reflect public opinion. IFIFY
They shape public opinion:
24% (Labour) + 15% (Greens) + 11% (NZFirst) = 50%. The current National Party + mates arrangement is toast on this poll and Colmar Brunton is known to favour the centre-right. I’m not sure what the problem is…?
Hi Scott,
I’m well aware of voting Blocks, but I think that it is more complicated than simple blocks. labour now have andrew little publicly admitting that he has considered resigning. That is almost the worst thing to ever admit less than eight weeks from the election. With the Nats on 47% and Labour on 24% there simply cannot be a mandate for a party returning their worst ever election result to then proceed with forming a government. But the bigger immediate issue for Labour is being seen as a lost cause and voters simply don’t turn out to support a party that is perceived to have lost before polling day. Will this start a bleed of support for Labour?
You say you’re aware of voting block but then go on to single out labour’s vote.
47% plays 39% on this poll, so a swing of 4% ties it all up. Still all to play for on the run in as polls traditionally close up.
Good for the greens. Hope it continues. At least we can now put to bed the doom and gloom of MT’s ‘damaging’ winz admission.
Yawn. the National Party has to get more seats than the pro-New Zealand parties to form a government. Thanks for letting everyone know that you won’t respect the election result if that doesn’t happen.
I think it was Andrew that indicated that in that interview…
Of course I’ll always respect the outcome of the election. We live in a democracy. But I can’t see how it is tenable for a party that is currently on track for its worst result to then proceed to form a Government that would deliver three years of stability, economic growth, and investment is social and infrastructure programmes. what I’d love for Labour to understand and importantly address is the core reason why they have been behind National by about 20 points for nearly a decade. I’m also a firm believer in NZ electing the government and Prime Minister. NOt Winston having the final say depending who will deliver to him the best baubles
You can’t see it. True.
I note your confidence in Colmar Brunton.
Andrew little did not deny the poll, but I usually rely more on the poll of polls. The election is now less than eight weeks away, and I can’t see a reason for people of nz to change. The message Labour have been giving is not reasonating with the good people of NZ. I do want to ask my Local MP Grant Robertson , and also candidate Paul Eagle. In truth I don’t believe that Labour are being honest with themselves. This is not just some temporary slump, but a persistent feature for the past three elections and nine years. THere are several reasons, but I just can’t see any game changer ahead for Labour.
If Colmar Brunton’s track record is any indication (which it probably isn’t), the National Party will get about 42%.
As for Labour, the more Greens in Cabinet the better.
I love how honesty from politicians just blows some folks’ minds.
Acknowledging your flaws and asking colleagues whether you’re the best person for the job is actually a good thing – I’m fed the fuck up with incompetent ministers who sign off on shit that fouls up the pay of tens of thousands of people, or even endangers or kills people, and then they go on TV and say that it was someone else’s fault and they themselves are doing a good job. Was it Wilkinson who looked visibly surprised at the thought that she should resign after people died (Pike River ISTR?)?
Fuck it, we actually need politicians who admit their faults, who admit the decisions they made 20 years ago or the decisions they made 20 days ago maybe weren’t the best, or weren’t legal, or weren’t what one would expect of a leader. But they just fucking come clean if it’s relevant. I’ve had enough of bluster.
Yep
+111
And that’s something that we will never again see from National.
It isn’t actually more complicated than “simple blocks” though is it? If after the election National, say, can’t command a majority of votes in The House then either the Opposition Parties get to have a go at forming a government or we have a new election depending on the GG. Simply winning the biggest share of the vote doesn’t give any party the right to form a government.
Link?
In an MMP environment there’s no such thing as a mandate for one particular party over any other. If Peter Dunne could put together a governing coalition with him as the leader then we’d have the first Peter Dunne led government.
Once I got ‘educated’ on this topic by no other than the SYSOP:
https://thestandard.org.nz/preliminary-rm-results-nzf-jumps-to-9/#comment-1149035
Here’s a little more:
https://gg.govt.nz/office-governor-general/roles-and-functions-governor-general/constitutional-role/constitution
Really can’t see the problem?
Let me help.
The problem is that Peters loathes the Greens, and they have completely opposed support bases.
There is no way a Lab/Green/NZFirst coalition can come together.
Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?
The majority of NZ1st and Greens policies mesh quite well.
Yes there is.
Probably.
NZ1st/Green mesh quite well. NZ1st and labour mesh even better.
NZ1st and National policies don’t mesh at all.
“Besides, if Peters becomes kingmaker, would his supporters really want him to prefer Lab/Green to Nat?”
Yep.
The New Zealand Election Study has shown that NZF’s new supporters (at 2011 & 2014 Elections) have come disproportionately from Labour.
Colmar Brunton’s 2015 vote-switching analysis suggests that, more recently, NZF have been attracting support from Labour and National supporters in fairly equal proportion … but that still means a particularly large % of current intending NZF voters are former Lab supporters (they certainly greatly outnumber former Nats).
In addition (indeed, as a consequence of the above) … NZF supporters consistently show unusually strong antagonism towards the National Govt in various Issue Polls (eg 2014 attitudes to Key Govt’s Dirty Politics / Asset Sales / TPPA / Flag change etc). Interestingly enough, this antagonism towards the Tories is rivaled only by that of Green supporters.
So, in a word, Yep.
Labour are on 24% and you cannot see that the problem is?
Lab down three.
Greens up four.
The problem for you is that the more progressive party on the left is growing its share of the bloc, and the bloc doesn’t seem to be any the worse for it.
Love your optimism.
But if you cannot see the issue of the main opposition party being on 24% (or less) – they are simply not credible for opposition – little less government.
You do realise that there’s three main opposition parties don’t you? And that together they get more support than National and it’s cling-ons.
you are being very generous if you think one of those parties will oppose the Nats after the election.
The only way of ensuring a change of government is getting Labour/Green to 48ish % – Labour 32%, Green 16%.
Any scenario which involves Winston is essentially a flipping the coin to see what happens
you miss the entire point – again.
Oh, I got your ‘point’ – I just didn’t think it had any relevancy.
Unlike like the authoritarians of the Right-wing – the Left doesn’t need nor want a ‘main party’.
Hell, you’ve been polishing the national turd for years.
“Main opposition party” is valid in FPP. It’s sad you haven’t figured out that MMP can do a true coalition of equals. It doesn’t need to be 47:1:1:1.
It can be 30:20, 25:15:10, or even 20:20:20.
I just want you bastards out of government, and replaced by something vaguely left wing – the more left the better. I don’t care what the party names are.
In that case you are going to be very disappointed.
Bold words for someone who’s most optimistic pollster still has them relying on winston peters.
BTW – if there wasnt an issue – why would Little talk about stepping down?
Because Corin Dann asked him.
Well we know that’s not true.
Not sure if you are using humour or telling porkies ?
Do you care about the poor of New Zealand?
Are you concerned by New Zealand’s youth suicide rates?
Corin Dann didn’t ask little about stepping down?
Damned sure I saw a clip where he did…
My recollection, too McFlock. Then, having asked that question, the same interviewer said on TV1 news that Little introduced the topic, IIRC.
Exactly which was a lie.
Its true. Remember media headlines around this? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11865741
Andrew Little’s response to Corin Dann confirmed he has the support of his mps/party.
Polls move around. Better to look at the trend over time.
“THe Labour leadership need to ask why their party has stubbornly remained 20ish points behind National for a decade”
It’s MMP, we’re way beyond that question. More important is the left bloc.
On the back of the Barclay scandal and the media finally highlighting the homelessness crisis, this is nothing short of an absolute fucking disaster of a poll.
Trends are obviously what is more important, but the fact any single poll shows National at 47% on the back of the last month of negative headlines for them should be a huge cause of concern for anyone who wants to change the government.
I am stressed and flattened by this.
This time in 2014 (h/t Swordfish on the National List post) Colmar Brunton had the National Party on 52%. They got 47%.
What does that tell you?
That tells us that the current Poll of Polls with National drifting down to about 42% is probably about right…
And where did it have Labour?
It also tells me that Labour were polling at 28% then and came in at 25% – using your Logic Andrew Little should be sharpening his CV.
Exactly. If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.
Given the Greens have ruled out going into coalition with National this leaves a very sad coalition with NZ1 as the likely outcome.
“If the election gives this result with no left wing party even close to 30% … then National sitting well over 40% would absolutely be expected to have first shot at forming a govt.”
Why? I mean, some FPP people think that, but I can’t see any reason why National should have first crack if they’re on 42% and L/G are on 42%.
“why National should have first crack if they’re on 42% and L/G are on 42%.”
Because National IS on 42% and Labour are 24% and Greens 15%.
Labour (the lead party) on 24% is simply not credible.
You haven’t said why James. All you’ve done is assert something without rationale. It’s MMP, why does it matter if there are two parties closer to each other in MP numbers? I could see that as an asset.
Do you understand MMP?
Yup
Only if you buy into National self-serving delusion.
If Labour were on 42 % and National on 24% – I bet you would be saying that Labour should have the first shot at forming a government.
not so much if act were on 14% and rising.
But national has no friends…
I think that no party should have ‘first shot’. That’s not how MMP works.
It’s the parties that come together to form a coalition that is greater than 50% that forms the government.
There’s no ‘second shot’. There’s ‘have you got it or not’.
You are wrong. MMP has not changed the principle of Government formation. The Governor General determines who will be invited to form a government based on the advice of the prime minister. The PM will advise that he should be invited to form a government. Alternatively he will advise that the Leader of the Opposition be invited to form a government. In either case the support will need to be tested in the House. If the new government loses a confidence motion the new PM would resign.
The governor General would then ask the Leader of the opposition if he could form a government. If he said no, there would be a new election.
So in summary, MMP has not changed those conventions. Someone always gets ‘first shot’.
Yes, the prime minister. Not based on relative percentages at the ballot box, which seems to be James’ position.
What you describe is that one person gets asked first and then someone else gets asked second and then we go for another election. But it’s not a first shot at forming the government but just first at being asked if they’ve already done so.
Before the GG asks the parties have already negotiated and have an answer and there’s no ‘first shot’ in those negotiations.
The MMP legislation makes a coalition of say 10 minor parties all on 5.5% equally possible as a coalition of one other party on 45% plus one of the other minors.
In one case you would have 10 parties trying to form a stable govt, the other just 2. While you are correct technically, I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
And which one any sane GG would give assent to.
Lucky we have only three parties with a track record of cooperation and a fair amount of common ground, eh.
I damn well know which would be accepted by the public.
The one that ends up as government. There’s nothing that the public can do to stop it.
The GG doesn’t get that choice. If there’s a coalition in front of him saying that they can form a government then he has to accept that. If he doesn’t then he’s breaking the constitution.
Colmar Brunton poll (2/3): Refuse to answer 4%, undecided 16% (+1).
https://twitter.com/ColmarBruntonNZ
So 20% unaccounted for. Also what is the margin of error?
your onto it…20% of a weighted (probably incorrectly) result…the poll is almost worthless.
There is only one poll that matters
If the undecided percentage is near 20%, surely it is utterly necessary for a state-funded TV news service to say so? Only 2 parties scored higher than 20%, which makes their speculation about what the make-up of parliament might be a big load of rocking-horse effluent.
I have no idea whether there is any regulatory requirement for such information to be reported, though i suspect probably not…especially if it upsets the narrative.
as indicated previously, these polls are almost worthless….turnout will be the key.
Quite frankly it should not be allowable to discuss a poll in the media unless you state the margin of error and the undecided. Corin Dann needs a strong reprimand.
Now I see that Tracy Watkins repeats the same in Stuff. It is simply not good enough! https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/95260532/labour-bleeds-while-greens-profit-from-metiria-tureis-fraud-bomb
Dann is one of the biggest shit stirrers that the MSM has.
It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.
The good news is that in principle they’re ‘persuadable’ and are amenable to some event between now and the election causing them to swing. The bad news is we have no idea which direction such a ‘swing’ might be.
“It’s reasonable to assume the ‘undecideds’ in any poll result will eventually vote in a pattern similar to all those who have already made up their minds.”
Not sure about that. I can think of variables that would swing the balance differently.
Anyone know if there’s been research on this?
Well personally I might hope they’ll all finish up voting for Gareth Morgan … but that’s not terribly likely is it?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6095/c6095e74b02c07640549ba02419de13b1a080ffa" alt="🙂"
So he can get the nats over the line instead of NZ1st. Thanks for that.
To be perfectly straight about it, I’d much prefer the Nats had to go into coalition with TOP than NZ1 … but in reality that’s pretty unlikely.
Also keep in mind that TOP’s stated preference is to stay on the cross-benches and would only sign up to Confidence and Supply if they were the sole cab off the rank.
Interestingly TOP do seem to have doubled from just under 1% to 2% … but that could be equally just noise.
Even more than with NZ1st, a vote for TOP seems like a vote for national.
I don’t understand why any supposed lefties would wilfully and knowingly vote for the enemy.
We can only hope they come to senses on election day, do the decent thing, and resist propping up the nasty party by voting green or labour to change the government.
Even more than with NZ1st, a vote for TOP seems like a vote for national.
Why?
Their policy objectives have way more in common with the Greens than anyone else.
next election maybedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa872/aa87276782df3ecf6c26f45785e3b2ef549bed17" alt="😛"
I this this is akin to the Missing Million arguement. The reality is polls do move around, but the danger for Labour is that they get to a point where they are perceived a hopeless losers like happened to Bill English in 2002. And the consequence of this is voter stay away in droves. GReen support at 15% gives them reason to be optimistic, but it is at the expense of Labour. THe Labour Green block cannot penetrate into Nationals steadfast baseline support that is constantly at 47% in nearly every poll
Except this time in 2014, when Colmar Brunton had them on 52%.
I wonder how many of those million appear in their sample.
OK I’m happy with that observation. So let’s assume National lose 5% between now and the election and land up on 42%. The bulk of it will go to either NZ1 or maybe TOP. Still no problem forming a govt.
Even if Labour crawl back up over 30%, National are still in the driving seat.
Unless we have an unexpected change.
The problem here is that Peters won’t say if he will treat the L/G vote as a bloc or will consider National the first party to talk to. And NZF voters are ok playing roulette.
Except in the past two major polls which had it at 42%. I can understand you righties getting all excited but what has happened here is that the support for the left has increased slightly and I am sure the right’s support is less than CB thinks.
Um, from memory polls have seen National as low as 42%, what are you on about?
edit, snap micky. Plus one of the recent ones had L/G ahead of National.
nat/nz1 no change for either, lab down, grn up by slightly more, no real change for total labgrn.
Trend’s not looking so hot for labour, but nz1 still likely kingmaker
CB has a bias that reflects the leafy suburbs,and tends to over estimate both national and the greens 3.2 and 1-2.5% respectively.
They underestimate labour,NZ first and the maori party, which cumulatively is 4-5.5% being the overestimate for the former.
Interesting- on the RHS of Colmar Brunton twitter page, it suggests that I might also like (complete with twitter handles:
Corin Dann
Matthew Hooton
NZ National Party
David Farrar
Jordyn Williams
I don’t!
lol
That’s better than looking at where CB is on Labour’s poll of polls trend line (mostly below, I suspect)
Just useless noise.
Apparently:
I’m not so sure it’s completely useless. Mostly useless?
I hate to say it, but I’m thinking it might be showing that the Greens didn’t follow through very well on Metiria’s launch of the social security policy.
But yes. Just a one point snapshot in time. And the way NZ reports on polls is ridiculous (opaque). There should be two sets of percentages. One with undecideds removed from the sum total used in the calculation and one with them included in the sum total used in the calculation.
Might be too soon re the follow up (what’s the time lag on events and polls again?). But I tend to agree that the follow up has been dominated by defense against the reactionary forces. Two weeks seems reasonable, am hoping they’ve got some more cards to play soon though.
I’d have been looking for a shift beyond the specifics of social security to a broader platform espousing the general values that are in accord with the social security policy. So, to steal a phrase, hitting everything with a “for the many, not the few” refrain, as a clear indication that the status quo’s getting binned if the Greens have their way.
More policy releases in tune with the social security one could be in the pipeline (I hope so). But the policies on their own, without the engine that comes from generating a more general groundswell of sentiment within largish parts of society, are limited in their effect.
I’d be interested to hear if they’re engaging in any concerted recruitment drive at the moment – taking full advantage of any momentum they have at the moment and pushing it; getting feet on the ground to fight for every available vote.
“a controversial admission of DPB fraud has given the Greens a massive boost”
There ya go, bro.
Wanted to rent — Secluded Igloo or similar, for next two months. Depressed tenant, Rent paid in cash.
I think the poll was conducted at the beginning of July:
before Turei’s speech.
No that link you post is to an older poll. The Web site has not been updated to include the latest poll.
It isn’t just this poll. Labour are drifting to utter catastrophe. It is all well and good to talk about the undecided vote, but given the lack of inspiration and passion so far in this election campaign from Labour they’ll probably just not vote at all. I reckon we are heading towards a 65% turn out max.
What is it about neoliberalism that turns Labour PLPs into technocratic, out-of-touch, smug and entitled collections of careerists? They are too fucking arrogant to see what should be obvious – they are in deep trouble and need to PANIC, completely rethink their whole fundamental approach to politics and just… just fucking grow some balls and show us they believe in something other than muggins turn.
Their policy so far has been too technocratic and timid, full of thickets of ifs and buts and maybes. They’re thinking seems stuck in 1990s, wedded to neoliberal economic orthodoxy and, frankly, their main tactic at the moment appears to be relying on National losing.
The Labour caucus is – yet again – completely missing in action, 54 days out from the election. The current crop of Labour politicians are completely useless at politics.
The Greens have outflanked them on the left, exploiting the Corbyn-Sanders effect and showing they might actually understand ordinary folks problems.
NZ First is killing them in the provinces. There vote is is 3-4% higher than this poll, mark my words.
LABOUR FUCKING NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!!!!!
When you recall that Phil Goff, and even the hated Cunliffe, were doing way better than this you really have to wonder.
Little’s best option is to see it through to the election and if Labour are under 35% then he, along with the rest of his front bench can resign with dignity, and give Adern a clean start.
Or they can wind the Party up and make a nice donation to the Greens with the proceedsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6095/c6095e74b02c07640549ba02419de13b1a080ffa" alt="🙂"
I think Labour might be hopeful of holding 25%. I’m thinking that their whole policy platform is simply never going to attract the vote of middle NZ.about 18 months or two year ago I had a good conversation with Andrew Little and we discussed capturing the imagination of NZ. In particular the centre where the election is won. But the influence of the left of the party, the unions, and I suggest also the lack of intellectual grunt that was present when Clark and Cullen were at the helm has prevented this from happening.
Playing musical cheers with the leadership is no good. The next losers up will be Gracinda, and they are lackadasical middle class careerists. All they represent is the inept PLP and their own technocratic ambitions. Little has got a useless caucus that is lazy and politically clueless. Labour has to re-think everything from the ground up, including how and who they select to be MPs, what they stand for and what the party exists to do.
At the moment, they stand for nothing and the PLP is full of under performing chumps like Ruth Dyson (remember her?) Jenny Salesa (who? never heard from her once, unforgivable when there are only 31 MPs) Megan Woods (Ever heard from her either? No? Me neither. Pathetically ineffectual on Canterbury issues and climate change), David Parker (last spotted in 2015 and heading for the exit), Trevor fucking Mallard (a burnt out political joke, it is a disgrace he occupies a valuable seat), Poto Williams (useless at scoring hits on the government, but that is OK because as far as i can tell, she was mainly selected to be spokesperson for political correctness and guardian of identity politics), Clare “vanishing majority” Curren, David Clarke, the invisible man in a caucus of hopeless invisible MPs, etc etc.
Labour has a caucus where six of their MPs are from Maori seats, and apart from Kelvin Davis none of them appear to do anything to justify their existence to the wider electorate. Given that these MPs represent fully 20% of the PLP, this is unacceptable. They need to pull their weight a lot more.
Labour only has 31 MPs. Only a handful seem to do anything, but with 31 MPs they ALL need to be working bloody hard. the rest are taking the piss out of their supporters and one can justly suspect they are lazy mofos in the best paying job they are ever likely to hold.
Well said, it appears that this current bunch of clowns want to lose this election just like last the one and some of the above are more worried about themselves than winning the election so we can bury this neo lib bullshit for good.
Some of these middle class toff’s within Labour need to be shown the door, if we get another piss poor result in this yrs election.
I’ll leave you some words of wisdom from my late grandmother who was born in Blackball and Labour Party member to the day she passed away in Nelson.
“If the Labour Party keeps bringing in these middle class toff’s, these middle class toff’s are going to wreck Labour for good forget it’s history/ roots (aka why it was formed) then it will be the fault of theses selfish middle class toff’s for driving away the workclass (the very backbone/ heart of the party as she would say) vote to possibly the greens or Winnie. Because they are too lazy and leave it up to tieless volunteers of workclass/ less privilege members of the party who believe in the party’s values, the very reason why the party exists, it’s endstate to a better place for a common good, as there is no I in team and the NZ Labour Party will be merely a party in name only by the time I’m passed away.”
Rosa Beaurepaire, née Rosa Balderstone.
Have to agree with you Sanctuary. The PLP – apart from Kelvin – has been entirely missing or misfiring in action. Lazy is one word for it, lacking intellectual leadership and fire is another.
Or perhaps the PLP has looked at the polling which has a corrupt, venal and nasty National still close to 50% at the end of three terms, on track for four or five – and just given up.
Yep, rather like a old Black powder rifle going off all smoke, but no shot coming out.
Well there is no question in my mind, the fundamental makeup of the NZ electorate has changed in the past decade or so.
Absolutely this is only one poll. At best it represents the Greens gaining a bit, completely at the expense of Labour. And Turei’s laudable outburst of honesty and political guts is almost certainly the reason for that.
NZ1 is categorically NOT a left wing party and counting on them for a left wing coalition is just magical thinking. Peters will do what Peters wants to do, and his parties policies are actually a bit to the right of, and more reactionary than National.
In total the left wing bloc that we can count on still only adds up to less than 40% and it’s been slowly but surely eroding for years. We can rearrange deck chairs to distract the panicking passengers all we like, but until we make an honest appraisal of what is really happening … the numbers will continue to disappoint.
completely
[citation needed]
You made an assertion of fact. Please provide a link and an argument to support it.
You’re going to have to dig deep: even the NBR is reporting that The party has slumped three points to 24% while the Greens are up four to 15%.
So the Left bloc increased its vote by 1%. Not enough but certainly not the sky about to fall on our heads.
Or perhaps that’s the death rattle of the “centre left” you can heardata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6095/c6095e74b02c07640549ba02419de13b1a080ffa" alt="🙂"
Looking at the Labour PLP there is one thing that stands out like dogs balls – Like it’s Maori MPs, the Labour women’s caucus is not pulling it’s weight.
Having jumped up and down and demanded equal representation even at the cost of party unity, they’ve let the side down by selecting a bunch of useless do-nothings. It is as if getting women MPs into parliament is regarded as job done, rather than getting effective politicians into parliament who are hard workers, generate headlines, score hits on the government, and who happily also happen to be women.
I think you hit the nail on the head there and would throw a couple of the white middle class toff’s the so called political class in as well. My late grandmother had very strong views on the Labour Party’s women and Maori branches/ MP’s, but your comments sum it up very nicely as hers are probably not fit public comment. There is one thing that got grandmother going off like a belt feed mortar was the quota system and her favourite saying was “I bloody well don’t care if we 100 women, maori’s/ Pacific Islanders, LBGT or men as long as they were the best candidates at the time. Because you don’t see any NZ sporting teams have quotas base on race, gender or sexuality because they pick the best team to win also the quota system breeds lazyness and and sense of intitlement.”
Angry Andy was more impressive when he was bloody angry, being agreeable has made him bland, bland and more bland.There is so much going on with the Natz and he’s just quiet about it, he needs to be incendary, whats to lose.
Worst poll result in 20 years (since CB started polling in 1995), and Andrew Little talks of quitting to give Labour a chance.
Im just cannot believe that this is a shock to some people.
I was rubbished when I said that Little might not even make it back with his list position – now its looking quite possible.
Little is a disaster.
I believe the only reason he wasnt rolled is that nobody wants to take over.
Little is fine and will make a competent PM. The problem here is agitation on the left and with the swing vote, and Labour still not stepping up and trying to play it safe. We don’t do presidents in NZ, the issue here is Labour not Little.
He is the ‘leader’ of Labour – He’s quite responsible for this disaster.
And there isnt a hope in hell he will be a PM (assuming you mean Prime Minister).
Are you saying that Little could force the caucus and party to do his bidding on positioning and policy? Because I don’t think you are right about that. If the reason Labour are polling low is because they’ve chosen the safe path over the bold one, that’s not all in Little’s hands. The party as a whole needs to change.
“Are you saying that Little could force the caucus and party to do his bidding on positioning and policy?”
Im saying he’s incapable of that.
lolz. We don’t do dictators on the left.
I am agreeing with you James. LAbour are getting to the point whereby only their diehard supporters are going to vote. Everyone else will look for somewhere else ( maybe Winston First) to vote, or worse not vote and thereby propping up higher support for National. 100,000 Labour voters not turning out (missing 1.1million) translates into an effective increase in support for national of around 50,000 votes as they pick up a higher % off the overall vote. Also slightly higher support for greens and winston (as a %)
Before you overegg your custard, this poll is much better:
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/07/new-zealand-election-2017-the-big-issues-have-your-say.html
Both Greens and Labour lead the Gnats by a substantial margin.
Of course it could all be sampling bias – but so can the major polling companies’ work.
We really need a different sampling protocol if we want to make meaningful assertions based on the results.
From KB …
“Is it possible Little will resign in a desperate move to save his seat in Parliament, hoping Jacinda can keep them over 24%? They did this in 1990 with Palmer resigning for Moore six weeks out, and Jacinda is already on the billboards.”
Thats an interesting option.
lol
So cement in a poor result with a leaderless party in the hope of preserving his job?
Sounds like something a nat would do.
Well, they say that dreams don’t cost much, James…
Noooo – thats not my dream – I want him to stay.
I want National to win – and IMHO Little is helping that.
Another cheap dream, huh?
Well – Some dreams come true you know.
Yeah, but sometimes they are nightmares.
A nightmare for the poor and vulnerable- but does James care?
Hell no.
I don’t know if you are poor or vulnerable Ed – but I don’t care about you in the slightest
Do you care about the poor and vulnerable?
Simple question which you avoided answering.
Is that a no then?
Your dream is your unconscious mind trying to tell you something and Andrew Little is not Andrew Little but an archetype. James, I think you’re on the cusp of something special and it has little to do with 23 September.
Hi James.
The Left vote increased by 1%. National are down five from the same point in 2014.
Facts James.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5451/a5451026536d8d98deec61857a980efe1b2f20c7" alt="😀"
WHEN are those parties who want to change this National-led Government going to pay attention and focus on this CORPORATE welfare MOUNTAIN instead of the SOCIAL welfare ‘mushroom’?
Seriously?
Here’s the ‘ball’!
How about picking up the bloody thing and ‘running with it’?
WHISTLE-BLOWER ALERT!
“WHERE’S NATIONAL’S ‘CORPORATE WELFARE’ REFORM?
This is the question I asked SIX years ago – and am still asking:
https://www.google.co.nz/amp/s/m.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1111/S00095/wheres-nationals-corporate-welfare-reform.htm
“PRESS RELEASE: Independent Candidate for Epsom Penny Bright:
“How many billion$ of public monies could be saved by ‘CUTTING OUT THE CONTRACTORS’?
3 November 2011
Where’s National’s ‘corporate welfare’ reform?
Which of the maor political parties are pushing for ‘corporate welfare’ reform and shrinking the long-term dependency of the private sector on our public monies?
Penny Bright
‘Anti-privatisation/anti-corruption campaigner’
2017 Independent candidate for Tamaki.
Exposing the $1.6 BILLION Tamaki ‘Regeneration’ – GENTRIFICATION $CAM.
2011- 2014- 2017 no where near 39 to 42 needed for Labour to govern.
Little and the ( little bit left ) neo liberal centrists have failed and its a bit rich to start talking about quitting when the numbers have been bad for ten years 8 weeks out from a general election that they should be winning.
Another three years of social and political corruption.
And Jacinda is NOT A LEADER IN WAITING !!!!!!!!!!!!!
STRENGTH UNITY AND BELIEF.
Wow – this is a headline that sums it up….
“The cost of replacing the billboards might be the only thing saving Andrew Little now”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/95260787/The-cost-of-replacing-the-billboards-might-be-the-only-thing-saving-Andrew-Little-now?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
“The most compelling reason offered Sunday evening for Little not to go sooner was that the party had already made its election year bill boards and campaign ads.
There was no more money for new ones so Little should be safe, was the rationale.”
omg NO WAY outfriggingrageous
another fizzer James – he’s staying, imo there is zero reason to change. Stupid polls as accurate as a bush. Only a fool would get worked about this like you are.
Yeah – 9 years of stupid polls (and three elections) – and yet you still havent grasped the basic concept that people dont like Labour.
And some claim that the news media are not biased in favour of the Rort – I mean Right..
Well – it’s not like they want him to stay on because he’s doing such a great job is it ?
Personally I doubt it’s the cost of billboards- more that nobody wants the job.
Does it worry you we imprison so many in our society?
When you have no argument for labour and Little’s disaster poll results – try to change the subject.
Are you perturbed by the level of homelessness in our country?
I have said it before . I believe that the “polls” are simply another campaign tool. The “result” is that which will (they think) do the most harm to the left.
+100
Polls are there to manipulate the result not report it.
They are another tool of the 1%.
The hypocrisy of the rich.
And the right wing media.
And James.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DF8El7AVoAA2NuO?format=jpg
The hypocrisy of Me Tu
And the left wing media
and all those people here that think Labour will get 30%.
The incomprehensibility of comments by RWNJs.
All would do well to consider that even if you trust these polling results, over 60% of eligible voters do not support the continuation of the current government.
Then those 60% needs to get out and vote.
over 60%…and yes thats where the change of government lies and is achievable… what the incumbents will fight with any and all means at their disposal, and they are substantial however they must be careful not to overplay their hand.
The opposition must ignore the noise and carry on engaging at a personal level and have faith in their argument that change is necessary….most believe that already.
Young Master Farrar becomes a little confused …
________________________________________________________________________________________
Tweet
David Farrar
Verified account @dpfdpf
“The ONCB poll in late July 2014 had National 46%, Lab 30%. They ended up 5% lower in the election so based on 24% now Labour might get 19%”
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Reality:
Utter Bollocks ! …
CB late July 2014 … Nats 52%, Lab 28%
vs
2014 Election Result: Nats 47% (- 5 from CB Poll), Lab 25% (- 3)
I bet Labour’s internal polling is giving them the same message as it did at this point seven weeks from the general election in 2011 and 2014.
They don’t have enough support to win and their leader does not appeal.
Something must be wrong when they can put up English who still rates poorly as he always has and is still ahead of Labour’s fifth leader in nine years.
I bet Bill can’t believe his luck.
Who or what will save the NZLP ???