Poverty Watch 5

23 comments on “Poverty Watch 5 ”

• Comments are now closed

1. BloodyOrphan 1

   29 September 2012 at 10:47 am

   It’s incredible too me that they continue to defend the Left/Ring wing war they theorised into existence in the name of a …

   “Yeah Naaah M8 we need a more “Balanced Perspective”. M8″

   What is it with these people?, can they not see us “Lefties” understand right wing necessities better than they do?

   Yeah M8!, better than you uncivilised, blindfolded intentionaly ignorant denialists M8!
   • mike e 1.1

     29 September 2012 at 11:06 am

     Shonkey can help a few hundred people on the Chatham islands for a publicity stunt!
     But 270,00o children in poverty what problem its their own fault tough they can just stay poor for the rest of their lives their parents shouldn’t be aloud to have sex or breed!
     Michael laws the philandering FWIT!
2. Tibby Jenkins 2

   29 September 2012 at 10:56 am

   National is hellbent on turning our welfare system into a safety net model and, like the US, the govt will have no choice but to feed kids at school. With President Key, and his deputies English and Banks at the helm we’re on course to becoming a mini America with all it’s assosiated social ills. The underclass are being shat on from all angles. Something will give eventually.
3. ak 3

   29 September 2012 at 11:11 am

   Yes, I’d say Campbell’s got the Roughan’ natzy set extremely worried.

   Half an hour primetime showing healthy well-balanced young kiwis actually caring about others and having fun doing it.

   Disaster for the div & conq greed-is-god message. Watch the subtle pressures come on JC.

   Will they go straight to the bottom of the barrel and bring back thrice-failed pond scum Henry? I hope so.
   • BloodyOrphan 3.1

     29 September 2012 at 11:15 am

     Henry should write commedy with John Banks (It’s been done before and better I might add) ….
     “Two Babies in their Prams, going “Yeah Naaaaah M8!”” going for a visit too their M8!’s place “Shon K’K Key” 😛
     Add the “Mama’s” dialogue for a bit of reality.
4. dave brownz 4

   29 September 2012 at 11:54 am

   Yeah I think Campbell is one sided.
   He’s promoting charity as the solution to poverty, instead of ripping the shit out of the rich bastards who live off the masses poverty.
   • BloodyOrphan 4.1

     29 September 2012 at 4:03 pm

     Still worthy of saying, it’s one sided for a reason.
     Good man that Campbell, has a good heart.
5. prism 5

   29 September 2012 at 12:44 pm

   Tonight (Friday), the leftie running dogs of Campbell Live are running a campaign to raise money for the Kidscan charity. They reckon that they can feed 15,000 hungry kids for $1.8 million a year.
   As the champagne socialist in chief said on the show on Tuesday: “It’s a start and it’s better than doing nothing.”

   Is this sneering or pointed satire by this Paul Casserly?

   One thing that can be added to the question at the bottom of the post is –
   When will National decide on a money amount to be the poverty line floor, for individuals and families? (With an amount that would be added for each child – children’s requirements would vary, in 5-year brackets, cheaper to keep toddlers than teenagers in food, clothes and kit required)

   And this floor to be researched by appropriate university teams such as Otago that used to do a food basket cost survey, and compared with work done by Treasury and a reasoned decision that was inflation adjusted with a special measure added to allow for separate housing inflation movement.
6. the pink postman 6

   29 September 2012 at 2:19 pm

   How many of you read Michael Cox;s outragious colunm last week. What a slimy bastard Running down all who are not in the “class” of his rich mates. Im sick to death of his type.Their belief in low wages cut backs in working conditions and their embracement of unemployment are typical of his sort of wealthy parasites.
   • prism 6.1

     29 September 2012 at 2:22 pm

     Where does Mick Cox hang out?
7. Dr Terry 7

   29 September 2012 at 5:29 pm

   It is shame on the Government that charities are obliged to come to the rescue of children living in poverty. But Key and his cohorts are only too happy to let this be. Sure, the charities are essential and doing a great job. But the Government should be doing its bit too.

   This must be the most callous government we ever had. May it rest in hell.
   • BloodyOrphan 7.1

     29 September 2012 at 5:30 pm

     Well said bud.
     (I personaly prefer “Rest In Peace” as they don’t haunt u afterwards, but well said)
     (U gotta remember the children sometimes)
   • Draco T Bastard 7.2

     29 September 2012 at 10:37 pm

     Sure, the charities are essential and doing a great job.

     Charities should never be essential. In fact, IMO, the existence of charities to help cover for poverty is proof that the society has failed.
     • xtasy 7.2.1

       29 September 2012 at 10:49 pm

       +1
       • lenore 7.2.1.1

         30 September 2012 at 10:42 am

         + another 1
         • mike e 7.2.1.1.1

           30 September 2012 at 9:32 pm

           While this is true doing something is better than doing nothing and labour haven’t covered themselves in glory in the recent past on this one.
           Campbell’s highlighting of the issue is what’s needed as the Lame stream media are brushing it under the carpet.
8. Jokerman 8

   29 September 2012 at 7:54 pm

   A Good Article Thank You (to the author)
9. xtasy 9

   29 September 2012 at 10:45 pm

   With all respect, what Campbell did on his show last week does more appear to be a double purpose effort, one to actually support a charity feeding hungry school kids, but at the same time intensively “marketing” his show and his profile. I am sure the ratings went up and more advertising revenue will flow from this.

   It is a worry when NZers must increasingly rely on charity for meeting essential needs, be this for kids going hungry, homeless left on waiting lists at Housing NZ, future beneficiaries to rely on outsourced “service providers” to help them find work. This is “american” or “US” style “welfare”, which is all part of the agenda to dismantle the so far state supported welfare system.

   And what are 250,000 dollars going to achieve. Fair enough, it is appreciated, and hopefully will provide lunches to school kids. But say a lunch costs about $ 3 a head, that is 83,333 meals for how many thousands of kids? It may last for a couple of weeks to feed the most needy, and what comes after that?

   We have a government offering unaffordable tax cuts to the ones on higher incomes, at the same time hiking GST, which affects middle and low income earners more, thus re-distribute wealth from bottom to top, and then rely on Campbell Live and Kidscan to feed the hungry school-children of parents struggling to pay rents, mortgages, growing utility costs and so. What about increasing the minimum wage perhaps?

   People are being taken for a ride with this, that is my impression.
   • BloodyOrphan 9.1

     29 September 2012 at 10:49 pm

     All well said xtasy, Campbell will always push his brand,
     and we need too regulate but the Gnats’ are spineless.
     • Draco T Bastard 9.1.1

       30 September 2012 at 12:26 am

       They’re achieving exactly what they want to achieve – a wealth transfer from the poor to the rich. I’m pretty sure that that proves that they’re not “spineless”.
   • lenore 9.2

     30 September 2012 at 10:48 am

     I totally agree but I would have felt worse if Campbell had done the programmes and the public didn’t respond at all. What was interesting was the lack of knowledge about poverty in our own backyards particularly by the kids in the decile 10 / private schools. Why are they so ignorant? Because their parents are ignorant? Or their parents are milking the system as it is and don’t want to raise the consequences of this? Or the parents are justifying the tougher times “it’s the economy” etc.
     However despite this, their kids wanted to do something and I think – maybe we should change our voting laws to ages 18 years and below and remove us adults from the picture altogether
     • fatty 9.2.1

       30 September 2012 at 11:40 pm

       “What was interesting was the lack of knowledge about poverty in our own backyards particularly by the kids in the decile 10 / private schools.”

       Its pretty difficult to have an understanding of socio-economic conditions throughout NZ when you are young. I grew up in a Christian family and believed that everyone ignored God, rather than simply not believing that God was real. Those kids probably think that other kids parents can’t afford top quality shoes, but I doubt they’d even consider that parent’s can’t afford food.
       For decile 10 kids, food is there, when they want it, its not something that warrants questioning. Just like how Trotter stated that even adults in NZ have the same blind spot due to a life of privilege.

       “maybe we should change our voting laws to ages 18 years and below and remove us adults from the picture altogether”

       I’d back that…us adults have proven that we do not deserve democracy

Links to post

1. Poverty Watch 5 « The Standard | The Safety Net (International) | Scoop.it: posted on 30 September 2012 at 9:26 am

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS