Tory Translation Service
Written By:
- Date published:
9:39 am, December 17th, 2017 - 211 comments
Categories: making shit up, same old national, Satire, spin -
Tags: attack language, attempted humour, crosby textor, national, social justice, wedge politics
Crosby Texter
I don’t often admit that there is anything that the right do better than the left, but, credit where it’s due, there are a few things. Chief amongst them are dog whistling and wedge politics. These are calculated political silencing tactics that use language to belittle the left and make us appear alienated from the ‘mainstream’.
In all honesty though, the biggest problem I have with it is trying to keep up! The language keeps shifting from one week to the next. One minute I’m a bleeding heart pinko, the next I’m a do-gooder, and now apparently I’m something called a ‘Social Justice Warrior’ – SJW for short. Don’t get me wrong, I like a snappy acronym, but I would love to know who’s making all the calls in this movable feast so I can send them an invoice for constantly having to reprint my business cards.
In the meantime I thought, as a service for all Standard readers out there who don’t have time to swat up on the latest lingo, I’d do a bit of research and come up with a handy glossary for you to bookmark and use whenever your radio dial gets accidentally stuck on Newstalk ZB.
So here goes…
Social Justice Warrior (SJW) – A favourite amongst Trump supporters in the US, it appears to have found its way here and been picked up by people who would never admit they like Mr Orange but don’t mind using his tactics. It means someone who advocates for a just society. Apparently you don’t get a cape with it though. Sad.
Virtue signalling – Another one that appears to have originated in the US. It’s used to describe SJWs (see above) who try to encourage others to act to achieve a just society. Unfortunately it appears to be nothing like bat signalling. It should be though.
Other people’s money – This one’s a doozy. It stems from a Libertarian principle that all tax is theft, borrowed by the centre right to do a little virtue signalling (see above) of their own. They make it sound like they are far more responsible custodians of the treasury than the left because they take less of ‘your money’ than those nasty socialists who just like spending other people’s money. Of course it’s crap. The tax I pay – as my contribution to having a state to educate me, keep me safe, and treat me when I’m sick – does not belong to me any more than my mortgage repayments that keep a roof over my head do. I wonder how far I’ll get, next time the bank puts my interest rate up, telling them that they can’t because I know better how to spend my money than their communist Australian shareholders do.
Choice – When you present two crappy alternatives and let people pick which one they hate the least. Like the blue/black Kyle Lockwood flag vs the Union Jack.
Freedom of speech – A right everyone enjoys unless the speech in question happens to be in, or contain traces of, te reo.
Politically Correct (PC) – Language and actions that SJWs (see above) use and take whenever they want to virtue signal (see above) that they care about other people. Apparently caring about other people’s feelings is a jackbooted tyrannical trend sweeping the globe, oppressing non-PC types by denying them their fundamental human right to be assholes.
Proper job – Often used in contexts such as “Labour MPs don’t know what they are talking about because they’ve never had a proper job.” What they mean is they think working in Parliament is terrible preparation for being an MP. How could working in politics ever hope to prepare you for a career in politics?? Preposterous.
Bludgers – People who want something for nothing – but only if they predominantly vote Labour. Those who vote National and, for example, dodge tax while still expecting to drive on the roads the rest of us pay for, and call the cops the rest of us pay for when they get burgled, are known by a different term – ‘enterprising kiwi battlers’.
Dependency – The notion that Bludgers (see above) are are stuck on welfare because they are onto such a winner. Apparently they have discovered a get rich quick scheme so cunning that even the enterprising kiwi battlers (see above) haven’t thought of it yet. All you have to do is pop out lots of kids, then viola! The state gives you a Rolls, tennis court and swimming pool.
Cindy (Socialist Cindy) – The right’s pet name for Jacinda Ardern that has unfortunately been bought into by some on the left as well – it’s meant to belittle the PM by associating her with a Sindy doll. At least our pet names for National leaders have class. Like DonKey. Ahem… Moving right along…
Spaghetti of entitlements – A brand new term used by National during the mini-budget debate last week. Too soon to be absolutely sure, but given they appear to love tinned spaghetti on pizza so much I assume it roughly translates as “bloody awesome entitlements.”
Hard working New Zealanders deserve… – As opposed to non-hard working New Zealanders (e.g. beneficiaries, pensioners, Todd Barklay) who apparently don’t deserve anything. (See bludgers above)
Socialists – The concept that anyone to the left of Maggie Barry is basically Joseph Stalin. Most Nats are leading experts on the finer points of socialism having studied extensively on the topic via the great works of major contemporary theorists such as David Bennett, and can lecture you at great length on why the Soviet Union failed. Spoiler alert: It’s because socialism doesn’t work!
$11.7 billion hole – The dark cavern between Steven Joyce’s ears.
Anti-democratic – “Wah wah we lost! How is that possible? It’s an outrage. Nobody told us you have to get 61 seats!! That was need-to-know info, dangnabbit!!”
Biggest opposition ever – “We really mean it, give us our Beehive back!”
Shambolic management of the House – A manifestation of anti-democratic (see above) and biggest opposition ever (see above). A natural behaviour particularly prevalent in the male of the species Bastardis pettytoryis – they filibuster, flood the government with written questions, go back on deals, break parliamentary conventions then blame Labour for the mess. It’s basically the adult equivalent of punching your brother in the sandpit then bursting into tears and telling mum that he hit you.
They think they know how to spend your money better than you do – An extension of other people’s money (see above). They are asking you to accept that a $20 per week tax cut for the wealthy would be more effective spending than using the $8.4 billion worth of revenue it equates to for some virtue signalling (see above) SJW (see above) cause like lifting 88,000 kids out of poverty.
What New Zealanders really want is… – Turns out it’s actually they who think they know how to spend your money better than you do.
That’s enough from me for the time being, but perhaps, in true socialist style, you could work collaboratively on making this list as comprehensive as possible by commenting with all your favourites that I have missed out?
211 comments on “Tory Translation Service ”
- Comments are now closed
- Comments are now closed
CommentsOpinions
Recent Comments
FeedsPartyGovtMedia
- Cutting Through An Inundation of Dipshit Racists
Hi,Watching New Zealand from afar offers a strange perspective. It can be a good thing — distance from Aotearoa helped keep me sane while I reported on abuse at New Zealand’s biggest megachurch over the course of a year. It helps fuel my silly podcast. But it can also be ...39 minutes ago - This is bad news
The speech yesterday by Treasury’s Chief Economic Advisor warning that the books are in worse shape than forecasted looks like it’s part of a softening-up process for either more cuts or a longer wait to get back into surplus. The speech was a highly unusual public preview of Treasury’s Half-Yearly ...2 hours ago - Skeptical Science New Research for Week #47 2024
Open access notables Projected increase in the frequency of extremely active Atlantic hurricane seasons, Lopez et al., Science Advances: Future changes to the year-to-year swings between active and inactive North Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) seasons have received little attention, yet may have great societal implications in areas prone to hurricane ...11 hours ago - Chicken Kiev
Chatting in the supermarket this morning, I found I needed to lunge for the chicken drumsticks.Coping mechanisms: who hasn’t felt a greater need for them lately?When it all gets too much, I turn to demonstrating handy butchery hacks.It wasn’t that she’d said anything wrong, our friend, not at all. We ...15 hours ago - The year is 2024 and it’s 1984
This is written in response to the highly significant open letter from a group of economists that was today addressed to Christopher Luxon. The year is 2024, and it’s 1984. The country is reeling from a record Olympic medal gold haul, while the globe grapples with the choice of the ...15 hours ago - The IPCA has failed
Back in 2022, RNZ took an in-depth look at the "Independent" Police Conduct Authority and its handling of killings by police. These are the most serious test of oversight, and you would expect the police's use of lethal force to receive the most severe scrutiny. But despite the police regularly ...19 hours ago - Thursday 21 November 2024
The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti arrived at Parliament on Tuesday – the size is being debated but estimates range from 42,000 to 100,000. The Prime Minister is defending not attending due to some of the organisers being affiliated with Te Pāti Māori. The national gang patch ban came into force ...20 hours ago - ‘These budget cuts are counter-productive and make no sense’
I spoke to former Productivity Chair Nana this morning about the letter he and a group of other economists sent to PM Christopher Luxon to urge the Government to urgently suspend cuts to spending and investment for the sake of the economy, struggling businesses and the wellbeing of vulnerable ...21 hours ago - ACT’s Astroturfing & A Co-ordinated Attack on Te Pati Māori
Unity on the Streets / Unity at the TableAfter the Hīkoi, all three right wing Coalition leaders came together to push the idea that the 42,000 - 50,000 + strong Hikoi was somehow less potent and brave, and more illegitimate than the energy and crowd displayed.Prime Minister Christopher Luxon 20-November: ...22 hours ago - Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for stabilizing temperatures
This is a re-post from the Climate Brink The world is emitting over 40 gigatons of CO2 per year, contributing to an accelerating warming of the planet. The world needs to cut emissions rapidly to be remotely on track to meet our Paris Agreement goals of limiting warming to well-below 2C, and we ...22 hours ago
- I Love My Leather Jacket
I wear my leather jacket like a great big hugRadiating charm - a living cloak of luckIt's the only concrete link with an absent friendIt's a symbol I can wear 'till we meet againOr it's a weight around my neck while the owner's freeBoth protector and reminder of mortalityIt's a ...23 hours ago - Throwback Thursday: Will “Auckland Transport” Survive?
With Auckland Transport’s future up in the air under Mayor Wayne Brown’s proposed CCO reform, we’ve dug way back into the archives, to unearth this post originally published in March 2010. As you’ll see, many of the debates that were being had when AT was first proposed continue to ...23 hours ago - Economists call on PM to suspend budget cuts for the sake of the economy
Nicola Willis’ budget cuts are under fire from economists for having no clear rationale and worsening the recession. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 21: The news at ...24 hours ago
- The end of policing by consent
National has appointed a new police commissioner. And he explicitly rejects policing by consent: Asked if he subscribed to policing by consent, he said he did not. “I don’t talk about policing by consent. I talk about trust and confidence, and it is fundamentally important that the police have ...2 days ago
- The Treaty Principles Bill: A Who’s Who
David Horatio Waterbed SeymourFringe politician and dweeb transformed successfully by ThinkTank money into a well-oiled soundbite robot.Currently programmed to say: Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Was previously programmed to say:I am a proud libertarian andI am a ...2 days ago - Kinleith mill closure shows need for industrial strategy
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to deliver an economic and industrial strategy for regional manufacturing, rather than just expressing sympathy for job losses, following the announced closure of Kinleith mill in Tokoroa. “The closure Kinleith mill in Tokoroa is not just devastating for ...2 days ago
- 27% of kids going hungry, up from 21% in a year
One in four Kiwi children live in households where food runs out often or sometimes. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, November 20: The lead: The official annual Health Survey found sharp ...2 days ago - Transport modelling is an illusion
This guest post by Tim Adriaansen, an advocate for accessibility and sustainable transport, originally published on LinkedIn and cross posted here with permission. People prefer cars, right? Probably not. Here’s why. Granted, most people in English-speaking countries use a car to get around. This simple reality underpins our transport ...2 days ago
- Young Maori take over
Neither Wellington nor Parliament has ever seen anything like it before. The Police said there were more than 40,000 but however many there were, yesterday’s Hikoi to Parliament was a monumental event. It was almost three times the Foreshore and Seabed martch of 2004 and many,many times bigger than ...2 days ago
- Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Aftermath
The euphoria from yesterday’s hikoi may be transitory, but is no less valuable for that. It is pretty rare for the left to feel itself to be in the overwhelming majority, and speaking as the voice of the people. Lest that momentum be lost, the organisers will no doubt be ...2 days ago - Sabin 33 #3 – Solar panels generate too much waste and will overwhelm landfills
On November 1, 2024 we announced the publication of 33 rebuttals based on the report "Rebutting 33 False Claims About Solar, Wind, and Electric Vehicles" written by Matthew Eisenson, Jacob Elkin, Andy Fitch, Matthew Ard, Kaya Sittinger & Samuel Lavine and published by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia ...3 days ago
- What’s the time Mr Seymour?
Mr David Seymour crawling up to the ceilingThe sun don't shine the sun don't shine the sun don't shine at allMamma Pappa say you should go to school, I don't know what forNow that I've grown up and seen the world and all its liesSong: Southside of Bombay"Ake, ake, ake" ...3 days ago - Submit to defend te Tiriti!
The Justice Committee has called for submissions on National's racist and constitutionally radical Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill. Submissions can be made at the link above or by post, and are due by Tuesday, 7 January 2025. But I'd get in quick, in case National grows a spine ...3 days ago
- We need to talk about Kevin
All happy families are alike; each unhappy family has a Drunk Uncle Kevin in there somewhere. If your Kevin is anything like the ones I know, he was getting along happily enough without having to think too much about the Treaty Principles Bill apart from bloody good job, onya guys ...3 days ago - The hikoi
Like everyone else (everyone who wasn't there, anyway), I've spent the morning watching the hikoi march on Parliament. The pictures are astounding: parliament grounds and the surrounding streets are full, and there are still people backed up along Lambton Quay. The police are estimating 35,000 people, and that's a floor ...3 days ago
- Why Govt & NZ Inc should boycott & regulate Facebook
3 days ago - How should we talk about change?
A better world isn’t just possible, it’s desirable. And that’s how we should frame a lot of our conversations around making a greater Auckland. As an example take urban climate action. A climate friendly Auckland: Is free from congestion Enables people to travel how they choose Is filled with ...3 days ago
- AMA + Holiday Webworm Merch!
3 days ago - Discount Code for Webworm Merch!
Hi,So there’s a bunch of new stuff on the Webworm store (www.webworm.store) — just in time for the Holidays. Read more ...3 days ago - Trying to defuse the tension
There were urgent moves yesterday at Parliament to try and defuse the tension building up over ACT’s Treaty Principles Bill. The Bill’s author, ACT leader David Seymour, told reporters that he understood the Justice Select Committee met yesterday to discuss how long it should take to consider submissions on the ...3 days ago
- An Irritable NZ Pawn – David Seymour Admits Treaty Principles Bill will clear the way for deve...
3 days ago - Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Arrival, And Tyler Childers
Politicians like to bang on all about the need to heal society’s racial/economic divisions, but in their actions they’re more keen on stoking those divisions, with the Treaty Principles Bill being the classic example. The Bill seeks to dilute the Crown’s responsibilities to Māori at the same time as it ...3 days ago
- Socially Backwards and Fiscally Forwards: the False Ideological Divide and the “Conservative” Li...
3 days ago - Kaamos: Accepted
I appreciate that A Phuulish Fellow has been fairly quiet recently. That’s a combination of two things – comparatively little in the way of relevant material to discuss (at least until The War of the Rohirrim comes out next month), and my general work on The Secret Non-Fiction Writing Project. ...4 days ago - Here’s how governments could fix their Paris climate commitment failures
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Governments around the world face a conundrum. Virtually none are on track to meet their Paris climate commitments. That includes the United States, which committed to cut its emissions at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 but is only on track for 32-43% cuts ...4 days ago
- Unstoppable.
4 days ago - Katherine Trebeck – An Alternative Economic Narrative
The era of neoliberalism has been destructive on so many levels, with a huge growth in wealth and privilege for the one percent. A hollowing out of the state; fraying of the safety net; inadequate government investment in infrastructure; and continued environmental degradation has resulted in damage on a vast ...4 days ago - In a Manner of Speaking
In a manner of speakingI just want to sayThat I could never forget the wayYou told me everythingBy saying nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me everythingSongwriter: Winston TongNext Tuesday, the subscription price for Nick’s Kōrero will ...4 days ago - Monday 18 November 2024
The NZNO have announced a nationwide strike for December over its pay dispute with Health NZ, who have put a 1 per cent cap on pay rises. The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti and Treaty Principles Bill remain front and centre in the media, with the impacts of the Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke-led ...4 days ago
- Shipley warns Seymour’s bill is ‘inviting civil war’
The divisive Treaty Principles Bill is not just a risk for the National Party, it’s a risk to civil order and unity, warns a National Party grandee. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on ...4 days ago - A clearer network for the City Rail Link?
This post was originally published on Linked In by Nicolas Reid. It is republished here with permission. Auckland is now just a year or so away from having the keystone of its urban rail network complete. As I wrote about here, the City Rail Link will be a literal game changer for ...4 days ago
- National’s support base is wobbling
If ACT leader David Seymour intended the Treaty Principles Bill to drive a wedge into National’s support base, he may well already be succeeding. By midnight on Thursday after the Maori Party haka in Parliament, National MPs were being deluged with emails and messages from their members calling them out ...4 days ago
- 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #46
A listing of 33 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, November 10, 2024 thru Sat, November 16, 2024. Story of the week Our Story of the Week is completely "meta" (no, not that Meta). It's about our exploring how ...4 days ago
- Grifter Eftpos Tamaki at it again
..Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Self-appointed “Bishop” and proto-fascist, Brian Tamaki was at it again on 16 November, blocking Auckland’s southern motorway, SH1.This time, the target of his ire wasn’t the Civil Unions Act; covid lock-downs; mask mandates; or ...5 days ago - Rip up a bill, lead a haka are words to live by
I cannot stop grabbing people by the lapels, or shoulders, or similar, and raving at them about the tiny miracles in my ears.I can hear again! There could not be a more satisfied customer in all the world.In a noisy cafe I am even catching words that Karren cannot, she ...5 days ago - Unintended Consequences
Take the baitYou pay the priceIt's much too lateFor good adviceYou know and I know that our good things' throughBecause there's consequences for what we doConsequences for me and youWriters: Kevin Robert Hayes, David Nagier, Bonnie Adele Hayes.Fallout from the first readingOne News began last night by saying that tens ...6 days ago - Thank you, driver!
Today, Saturday 16th of November, is Auckland Transport’s Bus Driver Appreciation Day! Saturday 16 November marks the third annual Auckland Transport (AT) ‘Bus Driver Appreciation Day’, and this year we are encouraging all of New Zealand to thank their driver or let the bus go first if you are in ...6 days ago
- Totally Normal: Holiday Edition
Hi,If I was to accurately sum up my mental state over the week, I’d just say that I got a huge fright from my own shadow.I’d nipped out for an 11pm neighborhood stroll, just to calm down after a day of stress and screens. The Cure and Fazerdaze’s new record ...6 days ago - We Are Not Listening
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
7 days ago - More lawlessness from National
On Tuesday, sick of government stonewalling, the Waitangi Tribunal issued a rare court order, ordering the Minister of Health to release unredacted documents within 48 hours showing its reasoning for disestablishing Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority. The government's response to the lawful order of a court? Yeah, ...7 days ago
- National’s tyrannical “foreign interference” law
Yesterday, under cover the the biggest political fight of the year, National quietly - covertly, even - introduced anti-foreign interference legislation. The bill is the product of a years-long work-program aimed at countering shit like this and this, and there's unquestionably a need to do something to counter foreign states' ...7 days ago
- The Haka Represents The Best Of Us
A few months ago, I was in an audience watching a Haka-Kapa and as I watched children dance and sing and sway and shout and beat, I couldn’t help but think “The Haka represents the best of us.”Yes, yes - there will be a thousand voices that rush forth to ...7 days ago
- Adding up the climate cost
St Mary’s Bay housing left hanging: Climate risk is systemically underestimated in the climate scenarios used by central banks, and a new report warns 10,000 houses are set to become uninsurable in Aotearoa. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, here’s the top six news items of note in ...7 days ago
- Auckland chafing at Bishop’s housing intensification orders
One of the major problems the Government has in implementing its ‘going for housing growth’ strategy is that it isn’t giving much funding help to councils. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and ...7 days ago - Friday 15 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill continues to dominate political news, with it passing its first reading in the House. Parliament was briefly suspended and Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for 24 hours after leading a haka that was joined by opposition MPs and the public in the gallery. Willie ...7 days ago
- Weekly Roundup 15-November-2024
Happy Friday, welcome to another round-up of interesting stories about what’s happening in Auckland and other cities. Feel free to add your links in the comments! This post, like all our work, is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers ...7 days ago
- Are We The Waiting?
And screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingAnd screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingForget me nots, second thoughts live in isolationHeads or tails and fairy tales in my mindAre we we are, are we we are the waiting unknownThe rage and love, the ...1 week ago - The Hoon around the week to November 15
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on the latest climate news, including from COP29 this week; on the US Presidential elections, Israel vs Gaza/Iran/Lebanon, Ukraine/Nato vs Russia/North ...1 week ago
- First Tea and Toast, now Milo — why do NZ’s best beverages need so much defending?
Only two months ago, Nicola Willis had to step in to stop Health New Zealand cutting tea and toast for post-birth parents, and now Lester Levy is riding to the rescue with a welcome message for all: our health workers can once again drink Milo, and will no longer need ...1 week ago - Gordon Campbell on the folly of making apologies in a social vacuum.
Day One of the Treaty Principles Bill…and everyone got what they wanted, and did what they liked. Heated words were exchanged. Culturally appropriate acts of outrage were performed. David Seymour got to play the victim card. Willie Jackson got kicked out of class. A comically red-faced Mr Speaker bellowed “Order, ...1 week ago
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #46 2024
Open access notables Microbial solutions must be deployed against climate catastrophe, Peixoto et al., Nature Communications [comment]: The climate crisis is escalating. A multitude of microbe-based solutions have been proposed, and these technologies hold great promise and could be deployed along with other climate mitigation strategies. However, these solutions have ...1 week ago
- The PM gets some extremely valuable legal advice for free
You can pay a great deal of money for the services of a KC. So just what would some peerless legal writing from 40 or so of them be worth, do you reckon?Priceless, that’s what. It’s not even the half of it, but this is my favourite part of the ...1 week ago - D-day for the government
The government's Treaty Principles Bill is up for its first reading today - bought forward in a rush in a desperate effort to avoid the hikoi which is currently marching on Wellington. But the Prime Minister won’t be there for it – he’s literally running away to Peru! But he ...1 week ago
- 97% of submissions did not want no-cause evictions, Trump chooses a Russian spy for US Intelligence ...
Good morning, and I’m sorry I’ve been away for a couple of days.I’ve been focusing on the Hikoi, and also testing out sentiment on the Treaty Principles Bill. It’s complicated, and the Treaty Principles Bill will be debated in the House today. The Government’s own lawyers have told them the ...1 week ago - Government must vote down ACT Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to vote down an ACT Party Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights by making it easier for employers to fire workers. Last week ACT MP Laura Trask’s Employment Relations (Termination of Employment by Agreement) Amendment Bill was ...1 week ago
- Seymour causes thousands of unjustified absences by forcing kids to fight for their rights instead o...
The State would like to remind you that they are in control. They manage your employment prospects, and can destroy the job market you and yours rely on by mass-cancelling construction projects, cutting funding, and firing a good chunk of our public servants. They wield the mechanisms that provide scrutiny ...1 week ago - The Weight of the World
As the weight of the world Hangs on your shoulders The weight of the world Starts to take over again And over again All that you once loved, now you hate So slowly relearn how to meditate To have and to hold And never let go Can you feel it ...1 week ago - Thursday 14 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill is set to have its First Reading in the House today, as the Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti continues. More than 40 KCs have written to the Prime Minister and Attorney-General outlining their “grave concerns” about the substance of the Treaty Principles Bill, while an academic and ...1 week ago
- Trump’s return to White House brings the climate’s ‘find out’ phase closer
As we absorb the news of Trump's victory in the US Presidential election, here’s a wrap compiled just before the result of what it might mean for climate action: The UN Secretary General says the prospective departure of the United States would cripple the Paris Agreement, likening it to the ...1 week ago
- Time and Space in the City Centre
Patrick Reynolds is deputy chair of the City Centre Advisory Panel. The header image is from Walthamstow, London The city centre now has a few stretches of street where the space has been repurposed to a people and place focused design from full time traffic use. These are a great ...1 week ago
- An opportunity for a pro-growth tax switch
As the Hikoi against it swells into the tens of thousands, KCs call on National to kill off ACT’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 14: The ...1 week ago - Dealing to the big Aussie banks
The big question hovering over the Select Committee Inquiry into banking is what the Government will do with its findings. If yesterday’s hearing is anything to go by there is a tidal wave of discontent about the four big Australian Banks crashing through the Committee which may force it to ...1 week ago
- 20 fact briefs published in collaboration with Gigafact!
In April 2024 we announced the (renewed) collaboration between Gigafact and Skeptical Science to create fact briefs, short but credibly sourced summaries that offer “yes/no” answers in response to claims found online. Our initial plan had been to publish one fact brief per week on Saturdays but - as happens ...1 week ago
- Instead of axing the HRC, ACT corruptly installed a racist, transphobic “Gay Human Rights Commissi...
On November 5th, the Spinoff published a very interesting article on Stephen Rainbow, the Human Rights Commission’s latest recruitment, and how he came to get the controversial appointment. Naturally because of the excitement of the US election, it’s flown a little below the radar. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/05-11-2024/i-didnt-get-the-hrc-job-stephen-rainbows-human-rights-commission-appointment-just-got-weirderThe article details evidence of the ...1 week ago - Injustice for torture
Between 1950 and 1993 the New Zealand government tortured and abused up to 250,000 children in residential care facilities. Yesterday, following formal findings from a royal commission, it finally apologised for that abuse. The next step is redress and restitution - compensating the surviving victims for the appalling harm they ...1 week ago
- NZ’s global climate rankings plummet as Govt removes agriculture from ETS
The Government has passed legislation to remove agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) while Aotearoa’s reputation on climate action plummets. ...13 hours ago - Failed boot camp experiment must end
As legislation to set up boot camps passed its first reading, the Green Party urged the Government to abandon this failed policy experiment for the good of our rangatahi. ...14 hours ago
- Gender-affirming care must centre evidence and health needs, not political posturing
The Ministry of Health has today released an evidence brief regarding the use of puberty blockers in gender-affirming healthcare, amid moves by the government to limit access. ...15 hours ago
- Release: National doesn’t care about manufacturing
The National Government is walking away from our manufacturing sector with constant reports of closures and job losses. ...16 hours ago - Release: David Parker speech – Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change
David Parker's speech from the University of Auckland's forum on Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change in September 2024. ...16 hours ago
- Release: Youth mental wellbeing no longer a priority for Child Poverty Minister
Louise Upston has revealed her diminished vision for vulnerable youth against a backdrop of snubbed advice, scrapped priorities, shifted goal posts and thousands more children projected to fall into poverty. ...18 hours ago
- Release: National’s lack of climate action taking NZ backwards
National Government’s backward-looking climate policy has seen New Zealand fall seven places on the Climate Change Performance Index to 41 out of 63 countries measured. ...18 hours ago
- Release: Simple reason for drop in emergency housing
When the Government says it has reduced the number of people in emergency housing, what it means is it is stopping people from accessing it in the first place. ...21 hours ago
- Govt’s child wellbeing strategy ‘shallow and shameful’
The Government is turning its back on children by not only weakening child poverty reduction targets, but also removing child mental wellbeing as a priority focus in their Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy. ...21 hours ago
- Release: A historic win for Samoan communities
Labour warmly welcomes the Restoring Samoan Citizenship Bill as it passes its third reading, before becoming law. ...22 hours ago
- Government plan to reinstate live animal exports a “national disgrace”
The Government has taken a giant step backwards by reinstating live animal exports. ...2 days ago
- Pasifika justice as Member’s Bill passes final reading
Teanau Tuiono’s Member’s Bill, the Citizenship (Western Samoa Restoration) Amendment Bill, has passed its third reading and will become law. ...2 days ago
- Release: Minister of Education thinks New Zealand ends at the Bombay Hills
The Minister of Education has shown complete disregard for rural communities and their school bus routes in Question Time today. ...2 days ago
- Economists sound alarm on Government’s slash-and-burn approach
A group of prominent economists has released an open letter to the Government, raising grave concerns about the far-reaching consequences of its fiscal policy. ...2 days ago
- Release: Smoking numbers up under Costello’s watch
National’s repeal of Labour’s smokefree legislation has taken New Zealand further away from achieving a Smokefree 2025 and a smokefree generation. ...2 days ago
- Release: Call for Palestine recognition by NZ, Australian and Canadian MPs
Parliamentarians from Australia, Canada and New Zealand have written an open letter to their respective Prime Ministers calling on them to recognise Palestine. ...2 days ago
- Justice Select Committee opens floor for Treaty Principles submissions
Today, the Justice Select Committee has decided to officially open submissions for the controversial Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Power of the people on full display as hīkoi approaches Parliament
Today, Hīkoi mō te Tiriti arrived in Wellington, with thousands gathering to march in unity against the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Hypocrisy as Te Whatu Ora contractor bill balloons
Te Whatu Ora’s bill for contracting and consulting staff has ballooned by nearly 20 percent under the National Government, breaking a promise they made during the election campaign to cut contractors. ...4 days ago
- Release: Growing pressure to scrap Section 7AA Repeal Bill
The newly released Section 7AA Repeal Bill's select committee report is further evidence that the Government should scrap it. ...5 days ago
- Government’s move to monetise access to nature a slippery slope
The Green Party is voicing serious concerns over the Government’s proposal to charge for access to public conservation land, released today. ...7 days ago
- Green Party condemns the passage of Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party condemns the passing of the Treaty Principles Bill at first reading, and is clear that the fight is not over. ...1 week ago
- Stand Up for Te Tiriti
Te Tiriti o Waitangi is our country’s founding document. It forms the basis of the relationship between Māori and the Crown – and the Aotearoa New Zealand we live in today. ...1 week ago
- Release: Over 15,000 sign Labour’s open letter to Luxon
As the hīkoi to Parliament continues, Labour has sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in a last-ditch attempt to get him to kill the Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Fast Track Bill threatens environment, climate and reputation
The fast-track legislation passing its second reading in Parliament is another step towards environmental ruin. ...1 week ago
- Greens join King’s Counsel in calling for Treaty Principles Bill to be abandoned
The Prime Minister must answer the call from a group of senior lawyers of the King’s Counsel to abandon the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Chris Hipkins’ apology statement to state and faith-based care survivors
...1 week ago
- Release: Labour formally apologises to state and faith-based care survivors
Labour joins with the Government in unreservedly apologising for the abuse, neglect and trauma including torture in state and faith-based care and for ignoring the voices of survivors for too long. ...1 week ago
- Green Party stands in support of survivors of abuse in care
Today, the Green Party stands alongside the survivors of abuse in state care and faith-based care as the Government issues an historic apology. ...1 week ago
- Green Party calls for conscience vote on Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party has written to the Speaker of the House requesting he enable a personal vote on the Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Govt move to exclude journalist risks chilling effect
The Green Party is alarmed by the Government’s move to exclude a journalist from covering this week’s apology for the survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care. ...2 weeks ago
- Without action, an apology will be empty air
For tomorrow’s apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care to hold any water, the Government must not pursue the same policies that drove the abuse in the first place. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Concerns remain over tobacco interference
Concerns about the tobacco industry’s ability to interfere in government policy making remain, despite the inability of the Office of the Auditor-General to investigate the Government’s decision to halve the excise tax on heated tobacco products. ...2 weeks ago
- Urgent wake-up call on climate
The Climate Change Commission’s latest advice indicates Aotearoa needs to be stepping up on climate action. ...2 weeks ago
- Green MP’s Meme-ber’s Bill set to save the world
Break out the punchlines and dust off your meme folder: Green Party MP Kahurangi Carter’s Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill was pulled from the Ballot yesterday. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Poroporoaki: Ta Robert (Bom) Gillies
Kua hinga te manawa kairākau o Te Rua Tekau Ma Waru Tiwhatiwha te po! Kakarauru i te po! Ka rapuhia kei hea koe kua riro! Haere e te Ika a Whiro ki o tini hoa kua ngaro atu ki te Pō ...2 weeks ago
- Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principles Bill
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principle...
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- NZ must pursue independent foreign policy
The Green Party says the need is greater than ever for Aotearoa New Zealand to pursue an independent foreign policy. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Winston Peters must apologise
The Deputy Prime Minister should apologise to the public servant he named and blamed for something they did not do, and for misusing the rules of Parliament. ...2 weeks ago
- Government action provides Southland farmers more time to meet plan requirements
The Government is taking action to ensure Southland farmers and growers are not affected by unreasonable regional farm plan deadlines, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard say.“Cabinet has agreed to provide more time for farmers and growers to comply with regional rules ...14 hours ago - Bill reaffirms Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending
The Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Bill had its first reading at Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending, Minister for Children Karen Chhour says. “In recent years we have seen an unacceptable spike in youth offending. “This Bill makes ...15 hours ago
- Critical milestones for earthquake buildings review
Fairer, more sensible rules about managing earthquake risks are a step closer with the passing of legislation and the appointment of an independent chair to provide expert advice, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The Government is committed to reinvigorating our cities and regions to support economic growth, ...15 hours ago
- State of the art radiology machine for Auckland
People in Northland and Auckland will benefit from a new machine for cancer treatment installed at the Regional Cancer and Blood Service at Auckland City Hospital. The MV5 linear accelerator, or LINAC machine, officially opened today targets cancer tumours with pinpoint accuracy. Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says this new, ...16 hours ago
- Foreign Minister to visit Europe
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Europe for high-level talks with France, Germany and the United Kingdom next week. "Since taking office almost a year ago, the Coalition Government has emphasised the importance we place on New Zealand's traditional and likeminded diplomatic and ...16 hours ago
- First arrests made under gang patch ban
Police have made their first arrests under the new gang patch legislation, with two gang members arrested, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “Just before 11 this morning, Police in Wairoa apprehended a gang member for wearing a patch to the supermarket. He has been arrested and will now face enforcement ...18 hours ago
- Better support for victims of sexual violence
The Government is proposing two major changes to name suppression laws that will put the views of victims of sexual violence first, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “We are committed to restoring law and order and these two proposed changes will help ensure the victims of crime are put at ...18 hours ago
- Government moving forward with Regional Deals
Cabinet has agreed to invite all regions to submit proposals for Regional Deals between central and local government that drive economic growth and deliver the infrastructure our country needs, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop say. Inviting all regions to propose a Regional Deal that boosts ...19 hours ago
- MSA pilot participant update
One of the ten young men selected to participate in the Military-Style Academy Pilot has allegedly reoffended. Children’s Minister Karen Chhour is disappointed but says it would be naïve to think that none of these young men would reoffend. “I’m saddened that this young person has not taken this opportunity ...19 hours ago
- Attendance rates increase, again
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that school attendance is continuing to rise. In Term 3 of 2024 51.3 per cent of students attended school regularly, an increase of 5.3 percentage points from 46 per cent in Term 3 of 2023. “This Government has prioritised student attendance and it is ...21 hours ago
- Improving the lives of young New Zealanders
Ensuring New Zealand is the best place in the world for children and young people is the vision at the heart of the Government’s new Child and Youth Strategy, Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louise Upston says. “Childhood represents a huge opportunity to set people on a positive path towards living ...24 hours ago
- Government continues work to reinstate livestock exports by sea
The Government is reinstating the trade of livestock exports by sea while ensuring the highest standards of animal welfare, says Associate Minister of Agriculture Andrew Hoggard.“The Government will introduce legislation changes to reinstate the trade, enhance oversight, and strengthen requirements for exporters to identify risks and manage the welfare of ...2 days ago
- Speech to the National Quality Forum 2024
Tēnā koutou katoa – it is a pleasure to be here today. I would like to begin by acknowledging the important leadership role you all play in ensuring a quality health system New Zealanders can trust. There is enormous clinical expertise in this room covering a wide range of disciplines. ...2 days ago
- New Zealand’s COP29 National Statement
Tēnā koutou katoa. Mr President, Excellencies, Delegates. New Zealand, and all nations represented here today, are already dealing with the impacts of climate change. Our households, businesses, and economies are bearing the costs of its effects. The choices we make now will shape the severity of these impacts for generations ...2 days ago
- Latest Quarterly Investment Report released
The Government has released its second Quarterly Investment Report (QIR) which shows substantial work still to be done by agencies to improve investment reporting and meet the Government’s expectations, Infrastructure and Acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “New Zealand has significant infrastructure and investment needs. The Government is determined to get ...2 days ago
- New Zealand supporting loss and damage fund
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced New Zealand will contribute NZ$10 million to the new Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage while at the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan. “New Zealand is joining the global effort to address the significant challenge of responding to ...2 days ago
- Gang crackdown begins at stroke of midnight
The free ride for gangs is over when the clock strikes midnight tonight, with tough new laws officially coming into effect, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Police Minister Mark Mitchell say. “Gang patches will no longer be able to be worn in public. To earn the right to wear a ...2 days ago
- LGFA increases borrowing capacity to support high growth councils
The Government is welcoming the decision by the Local Government Funding Agency to increase access to financing tools for fast growing councils to support greater investment in critical infrastructure, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says.“Communities across the country are facing an infrastructure deficit and significant population growth is projected in ...2 days ago
- Temporary Traffic Management costs revealed
The Government has revealed that over the past three years, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has spent an eyewatering $786 million of taxpayers’ money on road cones and temporary traffic management (TTM), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“When I became Minister, I was surprised to learn that that NZTA did ...2 days ago
- Jurisdiction of Disputes Tribunal to double
Legislation that will double the financial jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal from $30,000 to $60,000 has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. “We need to improve court timeliness and access to justice so that Kiwis and get on with their lives. Court delays affect everyone, the ...3 days ago
- Protecting New Zealand from foreign interference
Legislation that will specifically criminalise foreign interference and strengthen espionage offences has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “It is normal and appropriate for states to interact and work to influence one another. This encourages cooperation and can have mutually beneficial outcomes. “However, the reality ...3 days ago
- Significant milestone for Canterbury Road of National Significance
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news that the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board has approved funding towards pre-implementation and early works on the State Highway 1 (SH1) Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance (RoNS). “Reaching this significant milestone is a reflection of our Government’s ...3 days ago
- Health survey results to help drive change
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says findings from the annual Health Survey highlight the need to continue driving better health outcomes for New Zealanders. The New Zealand Health Survey is an annual snapshot of key metrics measured from July 2023 – July 2024. Findings released this morning include: In 2023/24, ...3 days ago
- Final push needed to get to Smokefree 2025
A renewed effort to get people to quit smoking will build on what has worked to date and target the groups who most need support, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said today. “The latest New Zealand Health Survey results show the daily smoking rate at 6.9 per cent and we ...3 days ago
- New diplomatic appointments
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced four new diplomatic appointments. “Our diplomats play an important role in ensuring New Zealand’s interests are maintained and enhanced across the world,” Mr Peters says. “It is a pleasure to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign ...3 days ago
- Next steps for Regulatory Standards Bill
Regulation Minister David Seymour has today announced the next steps in the Government’s plan improve the quality of regulation by opening consultation on a proposed Regulatory Standards Bill. “New Zealand's low wages can be blamed on low productivity, and low productivity can be blamed on poor regulation,” says Mr Seymour. ...3 days ago
- Red Tape Tipline goes live
Minister for Regulation David Seymour has today announced that the Ministry for Regulation’s Red Tape Tipline is now live. “We want to hear about your red tape horror stories. From today, New Zealanders will have a say on how they are regulated through an online portal,” says Mr Seymour. The ...3 days ago
- Youth Parliament 2025 announced
The Minister for Youth Matt Doocey has today announced the eleventh Youth Parliament will be taking place in 2025. “Youth Parliament offers a unique youth development opportunity to young people from across New Zealand to experience the political process and learn about how government works,” says Mr Doocey. “The two-day ...4 days ago
- Police stats show promising change
After nearly a year in Government, Kiwis have seen significant change across law and order with promising early results shown across some Police statistics, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “In August 2023, I told New Zealanders that if they had not started to see a change in public safety within ...4 days ago
- Better coordination of anti-scam efforts
With the launch of Fraud Awareness Week, the Government is committing to new coordination efforts across industry and government to combat online scams, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly says. “Online financial scams are a growing problem for New Zealand. New data released today shows that Kiwis lost nearly ...4 days ago
- Minister to consider 7AA select committee report
Minister for Children Karen Chhour will consider the recommendations made by the Social Services and Community Committee in its report back to Parliament on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill. “I want to thank the people who made submissions and those who appeared before the committee in ...4 days ago
- Defence Minister to attend ASEAN meeting
Defence Minister Judith Collins will this week attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus in Vientiane, Laos. “We need to take every opportunity to engage with our international partners, given the increasingly unstable geo-political situation,” Ms Collins says. “New Zealand has a long-standing commitment to this ...4 days ago
- Launching the White Ribbon Ride
The Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence, Karen Chhour, was on hand to wish riders well at the start of the North Island leg of the White Ribbon Ride in Whakatāne this morning. The ride helps mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, ...5 days ago
- Construction to begin on next stage of Papakura to Drury
Construction on the next stage of the SH1 Papakura to Drury project will begin early next month, with the contract for works awarded to Fulton Hogan, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. "SH1 Papakura to Drury is a key project that will drive economic growth and productivity, reduce congestion, and enable people ...6 days ago
- NZ signs trade deal with Costa Rica, Iceland and Switzerland
Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has signed a pioneering trade agreement that prioritises New Zealand’s sustainable exports at a ceremony during APEC in Peru today. “The Agreement on Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS), between Costa Rica, Iceland, and Switzerland was concluded in July of this year and opens up significant ...6 days ago
- Government and iwi work together on aquaculture
Five new Aquaculture Settlement Areas will help ensure Ngāi Tahu shares in the opportunities aquaculture offers for Southland’s economy, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. “The Aquaculture Settlement Areas (ASAs) I’m announcing today set aside space so the Crown and Ngāi Tahu can assess their potential for aquaculture development. ...7 days ago
- Government launches review to ensure electricity market is fit-for-purpose
The terms of reference for a review of the performance of the electricity market have been released. The review, initiated by the Coalition Government during the power crisis in winter will look at whether current regulations and market design support economic growth and access to reliable and affordable electricity, Energy Minister ...7 days ago
- Speech to Social Investment Hui: Jack and his whānau need our help
Kia ora koutou katoa. Nau mai, haere mai, piki mai. Ki te mihi atu ahau, ki te manwhenua nei, Te Atiawa, Ngāti toa rangatira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Thank you, Andy, for your introduction. Let me acknowledge you as the new Chief Executive of the Social Investment ...7 days ago
- Minister of State for Trade heads to Brisbane for PACER Plus meeting
Minister of State for Trade Nicola Grigg has travelled to Australia to attend the PACER Plus Ministers Meeting in Brisbane. “Trade plays a critical role in driving employment, economic growth, and improving the standards of living in the Pacific Region. The Government is strongly committed to supporting Pacific Island countries ...7 days ago
- Proposals to modernise conservation released
Toitū te taiao – Our environment endures The Government is consulting on proposals to modernise New Zealand’s conservation management system, aiming to protect relevant natural areas while supporting sustainable growth in tourism and regional economies, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka says. “Today, the Department of Conservation – Te Papa Atawhai is ...7 days ago
- Knowing superstitions aren’t real doesn’t stop us behaving superstitiously – why?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephanie Gomes-Ng, Senior Lecturer of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images Former New Zealand prime minister John Key has three white rabbits painted on his helicopter, a nod to his “massively superstitious” habit of repeating “white rabbits” three times at ...48 minutes ago - Government slammed for pushing ahead with boot camps while trial still under way
The coalition has "absolutely no intention of listening to the evidence that comes out of their experiment", Labour MP says. ...2 hours ago - Smoke and mirrors in heated tobacco debate
Labour claims Government is ‘cherry-picking’ smoking trends data to hide decade-first increase in daily smokers The post Smoke and mirrors in heated tobacco debate appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago - Treasury bangs the drum on ‘unsustainable’ superannuation
The Government’s economic adviser is sending a message it doesn’t want to hear – superannuation is increasingly unaffordable The post Treasury bangs the drum on ‘unsustainable’ superannuation appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago
- Victims of sex offending welcome shift on name suppression laws
A man abused by a former political figure is "immensely relieved" at a government proposal to end secrecy around sex offenders' identities. ...2 hours ago
- This week three parties stood together – can they withstand the storm to come?
There is plenty yet to play out, but the next election is at this rate shaping up as trio versus trio, writes Toby Manhire. A subplot of this week’s historic hīkoi mō te Tiriti has been the sight of the three opposition parties presenting a unified front. Te Pāti Māori ...2 hours ago - All 33 malls in Auckland ranked from worst to best
From the low lows of abandon empires to the high highs of a mall done just right. This is the second in the Malls of New Zealand series, where we rank the malls in major centres. Next week: Wellington. A note from the editor: This is the hardest ranking we’ve ...2 hours ago
- The cost of being: A clothes-mad 20-something who walks everywhere
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a 27-year-old apartment-dwelling marketing exec explains her approach to spending and saving. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here. Gender: Female. Age: 27. Ethnicity: Pākehā. Role: Marketing exec at ...2 hours ago
- NZ’s membership of Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance in jeopardy
Senior ministers in the coalition suggested NZ’s membership will be re-evaluated if it restarts offshore oil and gas drilling The post NZ’s membership of Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance in jeopardy appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago
- Raw Politics: Six months in a leaky Bill
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon did not meet the Treaty Principles Bill hikoi crowd, sees “nothing” of merit in the Act-proposed law but the Parliament his Government dominates will spend six months debating a “divisive” measure.That’s because he has accepted there needs to be “aeration” of people’s views on the Treaty, ...2 hours ago
- Taken to the brink, Govt is now close to selling big Whakapapa ski field
Bidder Whakapapa Holdings walked away from the sales process last year, but says it’s now ‘95% there’ on a purchase agreement – so who blinked first? The post Taken to the brink, Govt is now close to selling big Whakapapa ski field appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago
- Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 22 November
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp');Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions.The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 22 November appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago
- Daily crossword, Friday 22 November
The post Daily crossword, Friday 22 November appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago
- China likely to strengthen regional relationships in response to another Trump term
Opinion: Recent discussions in Shanghai provide some insight into what’s likely to be on the table The post China likely to strengthen regional relationships in response to another Trump term appeared first on Newsroom. ...2 hours ago
- Nuclear winters know no borders
Opinion: The immediate horror of nuclear weapon explosions – the blinding flash, crushing blast wave, and radioactive inferno – is well documented.But what nuclear-armed nations either don’t grasp or won’t admit, is far more chilling: how their weapons could devastate even countries thousands of kilometres from any mushroom clouds.The collapse ...2 hours ago
- This week’s bestselling books – November 22
FICTION1 Kāwai: Tree of Nourishment by Monty Soutar (David Bateman, $39.99)Sample dialogue, all from one chapter:“That can’t be,” replied Taona doubtfully.“You were right. The pā is unnervingly quiet,” Taona murmured.“The Hākuwai,” Motukia breathed. “Our grandfathers told us they rarely saw the Hākuwai in daylight,” Motukia muttered.“Their fight would have been futile ...2 hours ago
- Burma the flying elephant
After about two and a half years of planning and waiting, New Zealand’s last elephant has moved to her new home at Monarto Safari Park in South Australia.Burma and her “human herd”, that is, her keepers, arrived last week, and she’s settling in well, according to Auckland Zoo’s Andrew Coers.“Something ...2 hours ago
- Watts nears a landmark deal on global carbon trading
A framework for global carbon trading under the Paris Agreement is finally nearing completion at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan after years of halting talks.Climate Change Minister Simon Watts is one of two ministers tasked by the COP29 hosts with landing a long-sought deal on Article 6 of the climate accord, ...3 hours ago
- Grattan on Friday: Marles plays a defensive bat on nuclear as the government rushes to get though la...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Richard Marles is an ambitious man who hasn’t given up the dream of one day reaching the top job. But, despite being deputy prime minister, his profile is much lower than that of Treasurer Jim ...8 hours ago
- Fears Māori will pay heaviest price if police carry guns
"Overwhelmingly, those people who die will be young Māori men," the spokesperson for People Against Prisons Aotearoa says. ...9 hours ago
- NEW POLL: Kiwis Overwhelmingly Support MPs’ Expenses Transparency Law Change
62% of respondents support the extension of the OIA to cover MPs’ spending, compared to just 13% opposed and 24% were unsure. ...10 hours ago - The House: Meanwhile, a week of passing law
The political week has been packed with worthy distractions, but all week Parliament has focused on passing new laws. Here are the highlights. ...10 hours ago
- The biggest difference between Hīkoi mō te Tiriti and past hīkoi: More support from non-Māori
Analysis - The diversity of voices during the hīkoi was noticeable - from tangata moana to young immigrants to elderly Pākehā from the South Island. ...11 hours ago
- The House: Samoan citizenship restoration – ‘It means we belong to this land’
When the bill to restore NZ citizenship to some Samoans passed this week, Parliament's galleries were full to the brim with members of the community. ...12 hours ago
- More Delays In Action On Use Of Puberty Blockers With Children
Women’s Rights Party Co-leader Jill Ovens says the Ministry has put New Zealand children at risk by continuing to allow “off-label” prescribing of puberty blockers at far higher rates than other similar countries. ...12 hours ago
- Police Minister adamant he wasn’t aware of gang members training at gun clubs
That is despite two papers from police that raised the matter with him. ...13 hours ago
- Shorten declares himself ‘a proud moderate’, saying Australians ‘in the middle’ shouldn’t ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Bill Shorten has declared himself “a proud moderate” in a valedictory speech declaring parliament has the responsibility to ensure the extremes of left and right do not set the terms of political debate. Shorten, ...13 hours ago
- New ‘best practice’ principles for superannuation products are coming. We asked a panel of exper...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matt Garrow, Editorial Web Developer Studio Romantic/Shutterstock We all know how important it is to save enough money for retirement – but what about spending it wisely when we get there? Even for those who have built up a suitable ...13 hours ago
- Government accused of betraying Kiwis’ trust over lack of consultation on live exports
The government has always vowed to reinstate live exports by sea, which was banned by the previous Labour government. ...14 hours ago
- 7 things you can do if you think you sweat too much
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Freeman, Associate Professor of Dermatology, Bond University ERIK Miheyeu/Shutterstock Sweating is our body’s way of cooling down, a bit like an internal air conditioner. When our core temperature rises (because it’s hot outside, or you’re exercising), sweat glands all ...14 hours ago
- Phenergan for under 6s is now banned due to hallucination fears. Here’s what to use instead
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nial Wheate, Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Macquarie University Australia’s drug regulator has issued a safety warning over the medicine Phenergan and related products containing the antihistamine drug promethazine. The Therapeutic Goods Administration said the over-the-counter products should not be given to children ...14 hours ago
- A new stage adaptation of Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs is a delightful homage to theatrical storytelli...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Campbell, Lecturer, Performing Arts, UniSA Creative, University of South Australia Matt Byrne/STCSA Jack Maggs is a delight and a homage to theatrical storytelling in Australia. Based on Peter Carey’s bestselling novel, Jack Maggs follows the ex-convict as he lands ...14 hours ago
- The government has introduced laws for its social media ban. But key details are still missing
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daniel Angus, Professor of Digital Communication, Director of QUT Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology Ron Lach/Pexels The federal government today introduced into parliament legislation for its social media ban for people under 16 years. Communications Minister Michelle ...14 hours ago
- Archives NZ, National Library to cut 27 roles
The Department of Internal Affairs wants to bring the two organisations under the joint leadership of the Chief Archivist and National Librarian. ...14 hours ago
- Gang patch ban: Members warn of potential for violence to ‘erupt’ as new laws enforced
"I can't see this lasting unless they have a budget to lock fullas up in jail which I think is absolutely stupid, really it's ludicrous," Ngavii Pekapo, who set up a Mongrel Mob chapter 54 years ago, says. ...15 hours ago
- ACT leader David Seymour raises doubts about Waikato medical school
Government documents show ACT leader David Seymour told the government he was "dissatisfied" with a cost-benefit analysis. ...15 hours ago
- National’s Erica Stanford allegedly calls Labour’s Jan Tinetti a ‘stupid bitchR...
The Education Minister has apologised in Parliament for her remark. ...15 hours ago
- Labour backs new Police Commissioner – but warns against routine arming
The alternative to policing by consent would be a police state, which New Zealanders don't want, the party says. ...16 hours ago
- Youth on boot camp pilot re-offended five weeks after release
Children's Minister Karen Chhour said while it was disappointing, it would naïve to think none of the participants would lapse. ...17 hours ago
- In photos: People of the hīkoi, and why they marched
Hikoi mō Te Tiriti has come to an end, going down in history as the largest march to Parliament in Aotearoa. ...17 hours ago
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
LoL!
I was listening to Joyce on the radio the other day and I was struck how much they are still in denial. He was mansplaining to the new government with the patient bemusement of an office manager explaining to the office junior how to use the photocopier. The correct govt. response to that is of course to say you don’t give a shit what he thinks so he might as well stop wasting everyone’s time.
To be fair the denail extends to the senior members of the right wing MSM, who still interview Bill English as if he were PM.
Snowflake. Defn: A term implying that left wingers are delicate and weak. Usually used by a man (and face it, they are almost always men) who bursts into tears every time someone uses Te Reo Maori.
YES! And who cry that they have been piled on whenever someone gives a little bit back.
Yes ENZO that was a very good list and thenks for that thought provoking translation to them as we do see the ‘thin vale’ of veneer the right wing really do have to get their point across with the most gullable amongst us but the bullshit does not fool most.
Excellent list.
I would also add the Bill English favourite, the “average wage” or “average income”.
As in Paul Goldsmith’s helpful info during question time on Tuesday:
Which is not to be mistaken for the median income, but probably is read as the median by many people. The average wage can go up if the salaries of the country’s top earners go up, while the lowest wages flatline, or even decrease.
Inequality is most obvious when the top and bottom 10% of wages are compared. Which is what Willie Jackson is referring to in his answers to Goldsmith:
Also see the definition of “proper job” in the above post. Many Tories also refer to any job that doesn’t give a big profit to the wealthiest people, as not being a proper job: eg any jobs in the public sector.
I do think Jackson could have answered the question better by exposing the “average wage” obfuscation.
I don’t think the right are any worse than the left. I presume the irrelevant to New Zealand ‘Tory’ is intended as some sort of slap.
A few other examples:
“Looks like a bit of concern trolling here.”
https://thestandard.org.nz/james-shaw-a-stocktake-on-climate-change-action-in-aotearoa-livestream-announcement-11am/#comment-1426579
“He’s the face of new hateful scum we can expect to see heading the national party in the not-too-distant future.”
https://thestandard.org.nz/doofus-of-the-week-4/#comment-1426849
“Interesting that john key slithered into Parliament earlier in the week ”
https://thestandard.org.nz/doofus-of-the-week-4/#comment-1426781
Also already on this thread:
“I was struck how much they are still in denial.”
” He was mansplaining…”
Go away. No one likes you and no you can’t come around after school.
I don’t think I want to aspire to your heights of popularity.
“These are calculated political silencing tactics that use language to belittle the left and make us appear alienated from the ‘mainstream’.”
As I said, it’s not just the right that do it. Thanks for illustrating my point so well.
Your welcome. I am going out to be fabulously popular for a while, but I’ll be back later to taunt you some more.
Pete, what makes you think you aren’t alienated from most commenters here?
Sometimes appearances are bang on.
I don’t feel alienated from anyone here. Inclusiveness of a range of diverse opinions in political discussion is good for democracy. Trying to exclude opinions you disagree with is anti-democracy.
Obviously a small number make a fuss if I comment here, but there’s no indication it is anything like most commenters.
I’d say most commenters stay out of the pile ons, which are a tactic of a regular few who somehow seem to think it might achieve something useful. It doesn’t.
lol
So you take silence as a sign of your lack of alienation? There is another possibility.
It depends on how much you distract from genuine discourse Pete. It’s fair to say that you and your fellow trolls largely only degrade the signal to noise ratio.
Pete we like what you said there,
‘Trying to exclude opinions you disagree with is anti-democracy.’
Did you complain abouit national also being ‘Un-democratic”?
Our Environmental centre sent 105 emails to PM John Key over four years before the 2014 election asking for discussions and communication with his office, and over that time not one was answered or a meeting offered and since we never got anything aback leading up to the 2014 election we sent a OIA request to the PM’s office to have them supply a copy of all documents we sent John Key over that four year time.
Three days before the 2014 election we got a copy of all emails sent to John Key over the four years and the details all came from ‘Wayne Eagleson’ chief officer for the PM’s office.
But sadly he failed to advise why we never ever got any replies asked from the PM John key so was that democratic Pete?
What would you have done after sending 105 emails over four years on behalf of 2500 of our community’s people who had signed the petition’s who were ignored by the Prime Minister of NZ?
“Did you complain abouit national also being ‘Un-democratic”?”
I criticised the National government quite a lot. One example is complaining about them refusing to address the MMP threshold, which being set ridiculously high deliberately excludes not just opinions but also excludes representation. I have been very critical of not lowering the threshold.
I wouldn’t have sent 105 emails over four years trying to do the same thing. Ministers and Prime Ministers and parties and governments get many emails and ignore or don’t act on a lot of them.
If it wasn’t working and it was important to me I’d try to find other ways of getting attention. If it was on environmental issues I’d have tried the Minister of Environment. Have you tried the new Minister for the Environment? It’s Eugenie Sage.
Pete,
You didn’t answer the question,
“was it democratic of the PM not to respond to even one email”
Then you referred to ‘all ministers recieve many emails and dont ‘act’ on any of them.’
So is that being democratic?
When you stated earlier that “Trying to exclude opinions you disagree with is anti-democracy.”
Never mind how many emails we sent even though they were representing many (2500) in our community we said earlier.
They were on different issues.
You seemed to conclude they were only on the same issue?
What made you think that?
Quote; Pete george,
“I wouldn’t have sent 105 emails over four years trying to do the same thing. Ministers and Prime Ministers and parties and governments get many emails and ignore or don’t act on a lot of them.”
Being right wing PG takes Tory very personally, poor wee petal.
Tell him he’s welcome after school, just give him the wrong address.
“the right wing MSM” is another – it’s funny how some on the left seem to think the media is hopelessly biased right, and some on the right seem to think the media is hopelessly biased left.
Because some people don’t want too, or can’t understand simple things like statistics. Nor do some want to look at who owns the media – this is not a free press, indeed it is very far from a free press.
The ones on the right think the media should be biased even more to the right than they already are.
Perhaps ‘mansplaining’ is a perfect example of ‘virtue signalling‘? As well as being blatant sexism?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TJyQpRfaGnw
I’m not sure about the second point, could you please tell everyone here what sexism is and how that fits into the term “mansplaining”?
Sexism: discrimination on the basis of sex.
The accusation of ‘mansplaining’ is casual sexism. It is used to shut down debate by playing on the gender of the accused.
No, it isn’t.
Oh wow, that’s another one:
“tone deaf”, the treatment of a pathological inability to empathise with other people as a mere inconvenience in certain (usually optional) areas of life.
‘Tone deaf’ – that’s another one. A bit like dismissing someone’s opinion by calling them a ‘snowflake’. It’s so much easier than actually debating the facts.
Nah. “Snowflake” means they’re being too sensitive so you can ignore their pain or anger. “Tone deaf” means there are essential aspects of the debate that they are unlikely to ever understand.
See if you can find a common factor in these examples.
I believe the term ‘snowflake’ originates from the tendency of some groups to claim ‘offence’ or ‘triggering’ or the need for ‘safe spaces’ to avoid being confronted with concepts and ideas they may find uncomfortable. It is also a tendency to use these claims to shut down debate, and to restrict the rights of others to hear these same concepts and ideas.
And if you’re content with unsubstantiated anecdotes, this will scratch your itch: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/caroline-turner/mansplaining-and-womanspl_b_9995262.html
“They do it too” 😆
I’ll ignore what you “believe”, because I have friends with ptsd and know what you call “uncomfortable” includes things like flashbacks, anxiety attacks and insomnia.
As for “Mansplaining” and “womansplaining”, interesting. Womansplaining is the assumption that men have little knowledge of domestic chores. Mansplaining is the assumption that women have little knowledge of anything that isn’t a domestic chore (actually, that exception might be unreliable). Even when the guy knows the woman is an expert in the field he is explaining.
So, yeah, interesting that mansplaining and “womensplaining” are both products of the patriarchy. A bit like how men are “victims” because car manufacturers think we’ll drop another $50k on a car because an attractive woman is standing by it.
Unsubstantiated anecdotes (oh, “women claiming something happened to them, therefore take it with a grain of salt”). OK, how about this story about a guy telling the costume designer for Indiana Jones what inspired the costume (links to twitter thread in story). Or maybe this video where the facilitator speaks over the actual physicist to the point that the audience asks him to let her get a word in edgeways.
You’re avoiding answering the point I’m making.
The words we are discussing are constructs, frequently used to shut down dissenting opinion. They are used by the right (‘snowflake’), and the left (‘mansplaining’) to label people rather than formulate and present a reasoned argument. Your use of the expression ‘patriarchy’ is, ironically, another example, because the word is used in an attempt to demean the opinion of men by labelling them.
Finally, what afflicts your friends may be difficult for them, but it should not shut down free speech. And therein lies the problem. In the name of alleged ‘hurt’ or ‘offence’, people are attempting to curtail free speech, and that is a dangerous development in any free society.
Hi McFlock
Here’s a slightly tongue in cheek opinion piece that touches on what I’m referring to.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/11/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/.
frequently used to shut down dissenting opinion
[citation needed]
How does describing your behaviour silence you? It might convince others that you aren’t worth listening to, but that’s their freedom of expression.
You say that ‘mansplaining’ is used to label people. No, it isn’t – it’s a description of behaviour, like ‘boorish’ or ‘ill-mannered arrogance’ or ‘bullshit’.
And by the way, if your “debating” points are nothing but boorish, ill-mannered arrogance and bullshit, you’re going to get talked over, ignored and probably shouted down in pretty much every environment except therapy and television.
My advice is, when this happens to you, come back with a better argument. Apologising for your behaviour doesn’t go amiss either.
“How does describing your behaviour silence you?”
It doesn’t, unless the description is used to silence opinion. As it is in cases like this https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/08/01/depaul-university-bans-ben-shapiro-from-campus-for-triggering-students-n2200657.
“if your “debating” points…”
There’s the tell. Currently there is an attempt by a small elite to capture the ability to define how these debating points are interpreted, and then shut them down if they deem them to be offensive. Or ‘boorish, ill mannered arrogance’. That isn’t for you to define. If you find an opinion boorish or ill mannered, that’s your problem. But it doesn’t make the opinion invalid.
In the pub, a smack in the mouth isn’t entirely out of the question.
In Iraq, they throw shoes.
Ben Shapiro hasn’t been silenced: he just isn’t welcome in certain venues. I expect people stained with Breitbart get that a lot. He’s free to say what he wants, and has a national platform to do so.
The “small elite” you speak of. Fox News, perhaps? Charles and David Koch? The orange serial rapist who’s trying to ban certain words at the CDC?
Oh, and by the way, if you don’t open your home to every Jehovah’s Witness who knocks, according to you, you’re silencing them.
Yeah nah.
It doesn’t. All people did, out of common courtesy, was write “trigger warning” so that people who might have traumas reopened by that content could choose to not be exposed to it. Safe spaces are the same thing, areas where people are asked not to be dickheads to other people.
Flipping it around and saying that person X is being oppressed because they might be excluded from the group if they decide to be a jerk in that place is one of the more abjectly hypersensitive pieces of hypocrisy from the group that coined the term “snowflake”.
Words have consequences. If a person can’t state their case well or without being a jerk, people tend to not like them. That’s not “silencing” them. Cancelling events isn’t “silencing” them. It’s just refusing to act as their amplifier. They have other amplifiers. That’s why people who have never met them don’t like them in the first place.
“Ben Shapiro hasn’t been silenced: he just isn’t welcome in certain venues. ”
He’s been silenced at those venues. And it just so happens that the venues people are being banned from are institutions of learning, where the free exchange of ideas is supposed to be/used to be encouraged. Now it is increasing deterred in order to protect the ‘feelings’ of those who are afraid of having their opinions subject to scrutiny. So much for enlightened liberalism.
And how is providing a platform to, for example, that milo guy an “exchange” of ideas? He’s not providing his audience anything new. He’s certainly shown himself unwilling to change his own view, he relishes in the alienation. There’s no “exchange”. There’s just outrageous statement and protest, so he gets headlines and increases his notoriety – and his fanbase of terminally-insecure “alphas”.
Here is an example of free speech being shut down by labelling people ‘fascists’ or nazis’.
https://www.sott.net/article/360365-Opinion-The-left-is-alienating-its-allies-by-shutting-down-free-speech
This type of illiberal behaviour may suit the flabby anti-intellectualism of some, but anything that removes free speech simply takes us back to the days when Catholic Bishops persecuted Galileo for holding heliocentric views.
“And how is providing a platform to, for example, that milo guy an “exchange” of ideas? ”
I’m assuming you mean Milo Yiannopoulos? Who I haven’t referred to.
But as you raised him, he has a point of view, and a following. It is not for you to judge whether or not he has a hearing.
“All people did, out of common courtesy, was write “trigger warning” so that people who might have traumas reopened by that content could choose to not be exposed to it.”
No, the concept of ‘trigger warning’ is used to shut down debate. Or in this case to shut down a speaking event. In the public square it is deplorable. And most likely counter-productive.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/05/trigger-warnings-can-be-counterproductive
“Safe spaces are the same thing, areas where people are asked not to be dickheads to other people. ”
Safe spaces are being declared at the expense of the free exchange of ideas. What started out as isolated corners are being turned into permanent and imposing spaces. Here’s how that is occurring: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-furedi-safe-space-20170105-story.html.
“Safe space activism stems primarily from the separatist impulses associated with the politics of identity, already rampant on campus. For some individuals, the attraction of a safe space is that it insulates them from not just hostility, but the views of people who are not like them. Students’ frequent demand for protection from uncomfortable ideas on campus — such as so-called trigger warnings — is now paralleled by calls to be physically separated too. Groups contend that their well-being depends on living with their own kind.”
Anyone who wants to know what Shapiro or Yiannopoulos thinks need only read The Daily Wire or Breitbart. Neither of them are being silenced by being denied access to any particular venue.
You, however, seem to think people are obliged to build them a pulpit and listen to them in silence.
Newsflash: they aren’t.
Now, I’ve read your argumentum ad nauseam three or four times now. Further repetition won’t make it any more persuasive.
As for your disdain for ‘safe spaces’ – who are you to impose association upon others? Try going to the reading room at a library and mouthing off sometime.
It is if it’s my property. He has a point of view, but you talked about an exchange of ideas. Exchange. Give and take. Debate. It’s up to the property owners to decide whether that applies in the case of specific individuals.
As for what you think safe spaces and trigger warnings are, your links were unimpressive. Oh, and when you’re claiming what something is and looking for links to support your random assertions, a protip is to find something other than opinion op-eds if you’ve already pulled the holier-thant-thou “unsubstantiated anecdotes” card.
Fact is, by empowering more voices, safe spaces increase the amount of free speech.
Other examples of safe spaces include Parliament, where certain types of free speech will get you ejected, and courtrooms, where certain types of free speech will get you incarcerated.
I look forward to Hornet’s rigorous intellectual take-down of these attacks on Liberty. Or is it only an attack on Liberty when women and minorities do it?
“As for your disdain for ‘safe spaces’ – who are you to impose association upon others?”
I’m not. But that, precisely, is what some are trying to do in the name of these ‘spaces’.
“It is if it’s my property.”
Which it isn’t.
“He has a point of view, but you talked about an exchange of ideas. Exchange. Give and take. Debate.”
Which is called Q&A, and forms a regular part of speeches by Ben Shapiro etc.
“It’s up to the property owners to decide whether that applies in the case of specific individuals.”
And they are being bullied into submission by groups who would silence free speech, such as in the examples I posted. You seem to support this, though you haven’t explained why.
what some are trying to do
No, they aren’t. Nothing is being imposed at all. Your desire to impose “your” opinions upon others is being exposed, though.
“Fact is, by empowering more voices, safe spaces increase the amount of free speech.”
Impossible. Safe spaces restrict speech in those places.
“Other examples of safe spaces include Parliament, where certain types of free speech will get you ejected, and courtrooms, where certain types of free speech will get you incarcerated.”
Examples? I doubt very much you are referring to anything even remotely relevant.
“Or is it only an attack on Liberty when women and minorities do it?”
No! It is an attack no matter who does it. Remember Milo Yiannopoulos is a member of one of those minorities (he is gay). As is Ben Shapiro (a Jew). Kate Smurthwaite is a woman and a feminist. I could go on. All have been banned from academic campuses by those who don’t like what they say, rather than attempting to debate what they say.
“No, they aren’t. Nothing is being imposed at all.”
When people threaten violence to shut down an event, then yes, they are engaging in bullying to shut down free speech.
https://bogustimes.com/2017/09/19/middlebury-college-policy-shuts-down-free-speech/
https://capitalresearch.org/article/threat-of-antifa-violence-shuts-down-antifa-documentary-premier/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2849/uk-islamist-intimidation-free-speech
But it belongs to someone, and what happens on it is their choice.
And whether preaching to the choir counts as an exchange of ideas is up to the property owners.
Bullied, now? Sounds like you’re trying to label students airing their concerns in order to silence them. Again, who’s “silencing” the breitbart crowd? Universities recognise students as stakeholders in how their campuses operate. Just as you might ask your flatmates if they want to let jehovah’s witnesses into the house.
Ah, so it started out as “the university banned Shapiro!!! !!! !!!!!!!”, but now it’s “people” and Antifa threatening violence, which has sweet f.a. to do with safe spaces.
Watch those goalposts very carefully.
Since when, pray tell, are Antifa a “small elite”? Small, sure. Elite? Pfft.
The opinion you’ve rote-learned isn’t serving you very well. Why not come back with a better argument?
“Bullied, now? Sounds like you’re trying to label students airing their concerns in order to silence them.”
No, I’m calling their attempts to silence others as bullying. Which it is.
” Universities recognise students as stakeholders in how their campuses operate. ”
Yes, and these campuses should recognise their students freedom to listen to, and engage with, speakers of their choice. The free exchange of ideas has been the role of universities for centuries, but there is an elite who want to shut that down.
“Ah, so it started out as “the university banned Shapiro!!! !!! !!!!!!!”, but now it’s “people” and Antifa threatening violence…”
The references to violence were in response to your comment here https://thestandard.org.nz/tory-translation-service/#comment-1427826. Clearly you were unaware of these examples.
“…which has sweet f.a. to do with safe spaces.”
Actually it is closely related. Safe spaces are places where people go to be protected from speech they find harmful to their feelings. When these spaces are enlarged or exploited to silence other voices, then that is an intrusion on free speech.
As an aside, there is compelling argument that safe spaces actually do more harm than good.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/more-mortal/201605/when-safe-spaces-become-danger-zones
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.” -Ralph Waldo Emerson
When these spaces are enlarged or exploited to silence other voices…
You keep asserting that ad nauseam. It’s a lie. Where safe spaces exist they enable voices to be heard. Meanwhile, your purported ‘victims’ have the entire internet and all the public spaces of the world to recite their mantra.
All together now:
Harmful to their feelings.
Actually, having to constantly re-litigate and explain basic concepts of privilege, human rights and freedom of expression to butt-hurt alt-right loudmouths is harmful to the conversations people want to have.
Especially when having such conversations in public will get you run over on the street by the “good people” chanting “Jews will not replace us!”
Hang on, you said “And they [the colleges] are being bullied into submission by groups who would silence free speech,” and now you say that the silencing is the bullying? You’re having difficulty keeping your bullshit straight.
Oh bollocks. Find me an athiest lecturing in the first years of Oxford University.
But more to the point, your position is that my wish to watch a live sex show in a lecture theatre overrules the university’s right to accept and decline speakers as it chooses and anyone else’s objections (purely for the intellectual merit, of course. It’s illustrative of various compositional motifs in Art History. Or practical biology. Whatever. There can even be a Q&A session afterwards).
“You keep asserting that ad nauseam. It’s a lie. ”
No it’s not. Here, this piece may help you. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/13/university-safe-spaces-dangerous-fallacy-do-not-exist-real/
“Where safe spaces exist they enable voices to be heard.”
No, they are places where only one voice is heard. There is no dissent, no critique allowed. That is anti-intellectual. And it damages those who it seeks to help.
““And they [the colleges] are being bullied into submission by groups who would silence free speech,” and now you say that the silencing is the bullying? ”
Where?
“But more to the point, your position is that my wish to watch a live sex show in a lecture theatre overrules the university’s right to accept and decline speakers as it chooses and anyone else’s objections (purely for the intellectual merit, of course. ”
A live sex show is not free speech. But it may well result in a free exchange of ideas!
Dude, seriously? I linked to one and directly quoted the other. Pretending that you’re too stupid to see where you suddenly changed your mind about who was being “bullied” does not mean it didn’t happen.
Look, I’ll do it again, only I’ll quote and link the quotes:
And here’s the other position you gave me:
So even if we assume you’re arguing both are correct, basically your argument that colleges choosing to not have some individuals speak on their campuses it “the bullying bullies are bullying so they can bully”.
Grow the fuck up.
How are you going at finding examples to demonstrate the centuries of unrestricted speech at universities? Got any athiests lecturing in the 14th Century, maybe? Anyone at Harvard or Oxford in 1944 publicly arguing that the Nazis should win WW2?
You are confused. The comments you are referring to say this:
1. The Universities are being bullied into submission by threats of violence and property damage.
2. The ones doing the bullying are the students. https://thestandard.org.nz/tory-translation-service/#comment-1427850
These are entirely consistent.
“How are you going at finding examples to demonstrate the centuries of unrestricted speech at universities? Got any athiests lecturing in the 14th Century, maybe? Anyone at Harvard or Oxford in 1944 publicly arguing that the Nazis should win WW2?”
So you’re argument has now reduced to ‘they did it too’?
But the colleges are the ones doing what you call “silencing” and what a normal person would call “not providing a forum so you go elsewhere”. The protestors are protesting.
So if silencing is bullying, and protesting is bullying, then the bullies [protestors] are bullying [protesting] the bullies [colleges] into bullying [rejecting/”silencing”] the angry young men and their demagogues [the breitbart crowd].
As for “they did it too”, you argued that something new was happening:
You can’t even provide examples within decades. Nor have you suggested that the breitbart crowd would say anything unexpected to their audience, or change their own opinions, so so much for “exchange of ideas”, anyway.
You can parrot lines quite well, but like any parrot you have difficulty understanding what you actually say.
The protestors are protesting. “
What you describe as ‘protesting’ is threatening violence, actual physical intimidation, and disrupting people going about their lawful business. But your euphemism is a nice sidestep.
“So if silencing is bullying…”
The actions deployed to silence are bullying.
“As for “they did it too”, you argued that something new was happening”
No, I didn’t. I said that the free exchange of ideas has been the role of universities for centuries. You seem to be arguing that because that hasn’t always occurred we should allow violence and intimation to set the agenda. That isn’t good enough. And neither is your line of argumentation.
“A vibrant society permits heretic views to be expressed. A country where the state – or universities for that matter – determines what is a permissible thought and what isn’t is a dictatorships, not a modern democracy.
History shows that it is fear and intolerance that drives suppression of free speech, rather than free speech causing fear and intolerance. Those who attempt to suppress free speech, tend to do so out of fear and intolerance. Censorship is a crude tool used to replace healthy counter-argument. ”
https://www.nzcpr.com/freedom-of-speech-in-new-zealands-universities-under-attack/
Instead of actually debating ideas that span topics from the conventional to the taboo, a generation of American students don’t engage, they just get enraged. In doing so, many students believe that they have a right to literally shut other people up. This is not only a threat to the First Amendment, but also to American democracy.
http://time.com/4530197/college-free-speech-zone/
I know, I quoted you saying it, remember?
so you admit your statement was false
No, just that your prissiness about unlmited free speech is factually incorrect, so the point you were trying to demonstrate with your prissiness is therefore completely unsupported.
My line was simply that your line about “centuries” yadda yadda was bullshit. You can abandon it or provide and example that supports it, up to you.
Violent movements and violent speech provoke resistance. Again, if I have a party, I might not invite the guy who always starts fights. Similarly, a campus renting out a podium to neonazis or whatever will need to fund extra security.
BTW, I note the discussion has gone from having “safe spaces” through to “threatening violence, actual physical intimidation”. As OAB pointed out, shifting goalposts much?
“so you admit your statement was false”
No, and you haven’t argued that.
“No, just that your prissiness about unlmited free speech is factually incorrect”
No, it isn’t. And I have posted many examples of writers bemoaning the loss of said free speech.
“My line was simply that your line about “centuries” yadda yadda was bullshit.”
You have argued the ‘they did it too’ line, which is weak. That there have been restrictions at some places and some times in the past does not make the current sad state of affairs acceptable.
“Violent movements and violent speech provoke resistance.”
So you are labelling every speaker who has been banned or disinvited as using ‘violent speech’?
“Again, if I have a party, I might not invite the guy who always starts fights. Similarly, a campus renting out a podium to neonazis or whatever will need to fund extra security. ”
Ben Shapiro, a ‘neo-Nazi’? That’s a good one.
Your arguments are very weak, McFlock. They seem to rely on the idea that speech that offends should not be permitted. That is, frankly, intellectually ‘flabby’.
Here is a short list of just some speakers who have been banned, disinvited or bullied out of speaking on Campuses in recent months:
Janet Mock – TV host and transgender rights activist.
Nicholas Dirks – American academic and the former Chancellor of the University of California
Emily Wong – Physician at Massachusetts General Hospital
Jason Riley – Journalist
Suzanne Venker – Author and Social Critic
Are any of these speakers members of ‘violent movements’, McFlock? Or guilty of ‘violent speech’?
skipped through your list, didn’t immediately know any of them. Rather than parroting the list, what was your source for it?
As for the supposed centuries of free exchange of ideas, like I say, if you can support it you are free to do so. So far you haven’t. Oh, and Shapiro comes under “whatever”. Different fuckwit, different label.
No, I’m sure everyone on your list still can comment on whatever issue they care. Just not on those properties where the owners choose not to give them a podium, for whatever reason. Have any actually been “silenced”? Are they mute? Imprisoned in communicado? Living in a cave somewhere, without so much as a 3g cellphone?
“what was your source for it?”
Various, but there is a summary at https://www.businessinsider.com.au/list-of-disinvited-speakers-at-colleges-2016-7?r=US&IR=T, and a ‘disinvited database’ here https://www.thefire.org/resources/disinvitation-database/#home/?view_2_sort=field_6asc.
“Oh, and Shapiro comes under “whatever”. Different fuckwit, different label.”
Shapiro is a Jew. No Nazi hate speech there. He is also a moral conservative. Is that why you’re content to have his opinion shut down?
“No, I’m sure everyone on your list still can comment on whatever issue they care.”
Not at an increasing number of campuses and other places where freedom of speech used to be accepted. And the reason? An increasing and alarming level of giving in to those unable to tolerate an alternative point of view.
“Just not on those properties where the owners choose not to give them a podium, for whatever reason. ”
No, not just on those properties.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2017/08/white-supremacists-are-waging-a-war-against-public-space/536724/
“The attack also threatens public space, an amenity that is both scarce and necessary for democracy. The idea of the public square is under attack. And the extremist alt-right is waging a campaign to shut down the public square, using both violence and intimidation, especially under open-carry laws. Public space as public sphere is a concept that dates back to late 19th century Britain. “
You say “conservative”, I say “fuckwit”. If he’s the sort of guy who requires an extra half million dollars of security, I wouldn’t want him on my property, either.
So now white supremacists are snowflakes wanting safe spaces? We might have gotten somewhere with the discussion if you didn’t keep moving around so much.
But the point remains that your conservative folk can still comment. Nobody is obliged to give them a forum.
And to pretend that altright fuckwits actually killing people is the same as people protesting the mouthpieces who legitimise those fuckwits is pretty fucked up on your part.
“You say “conservative”, I say “fuckwit”.”
Name calling because you disagree with someone?
“If he’s the sort of guy who requires an extra half million dollars of security, I wouldn’t want him on my property, either.”
The only reason any security is required is because of bullies who want to shut down free speech.
“So now white supremacists are snowflakes wanting safe spaces?”
You didn’t read the article.
“But the point remains that your conservative folk can still comment.”
You’re moving the goal posts. My point has been about the exercise of free speech in spaces such as college campuses. I have shown from multiple sources that is under threat. That’s simply not acceptable in a free society.
I call a fuckwit a fuckwit. Whether I disagree with them is another matter.
For it to be under threat, it needs to exist. How you doing at finding those examples of 13th century athiest lecturers?
You have shown nothing. At best you have pasted opinion pieces from foilk who are just as shrill as you are, and yes, I did read the article that equated peaceful protest by the left with vehicular homicide by a white supremacist.
“I call a fuckwit a fuskwit…”
Because you disagree with him. It’s obvious.
“For it to be under threat, it needs to exist.”
Easy. Shapiro et al could freely speak at college campuses until the cry babies bullied these campuses to disinvite them. There you have it. It existed. Now it doesn’t. Case closed.
“You have shown nothing.”
And there your ignorance is exposed. My sources are from across the political and social spectrum. They evidenced examples of speakers being banned/disinvited from campuses. That you could support censorship of that kind is sad. Actually, no it’s disgraceful.
“I did read the article that equated peaceful protest by the left with vehicular homicide by a white supremacist.”
So you didn’t read it then. The point of the article was to give an example of a white supremist group trying to shut down free speech. So you have that in common with them. Proud?
[yawn]
you couldn’t let xmas go by without being a fuckwit? I’m not calling you a fuckwit because I disagree with you, but because you’re an idiot who’s convinced they’re a genius because they can look up altright talking points on the interwebs. Not everyone I disagree with is a fuckwit. Som, like Bill or Weka, I have serious respect for even when we disagree. You, on the oither hand, are a fuckwit whose idea of an xmas gift to themselves is to argue online. I didn’t even switch on a computer until getting home ten minutes ago.
BTW, cry babies can’t bully. It’s kind of the opposite of what bullies do. And you reckon that “cry babies” have something “in common” with actual murderers. That’s part of what makes you a fuckwit.
Great, now I’m grumpy. Merry christmas, arsehole.
“…you couldn’t let xmas go…”
So, rather than address the points I’m making, you complain that I posted on Christmas Day.
“cry babies can’t bully.”
Yes, they can. Some of the worst bullies are cry-babies.
Love the way you claimed I didn’t address your comment, then responded to the bit where I did exactly that.
The difference between a protest and how white supremacists attack free speech is that when Shapiro was barred from De Paul university, he shifted to another venue that very night. White supremacists kill people. Shapiro still speaks. Heather Heyer can’t, because she’s dead.
“Love the way you claimed I didn’t address your comment, then responded to the bit where I did exactly that.”
I said you hadn’t addressed the “points I was making”, not the comment. Now, finally, you have tried.
“The difference between a protest and how white supremacists attack free speech…”
Is only one of degrees. The principle is the same…an attempt to stifle free speech.
If you seriously doubt this is a real issue, I invite you to read this piece about Monash http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-28/monash-university-adopts-trigger-warning-policy/8390264. In particular read the comments by Marguerite Johnson about the impact these restrictions would have had on 1970’s feminists trying to get laws around rape trials changed.
So are your comments about bullies and crybabies without any point, then? Good to know.
Again, moving to a different venue doesn’t “stifle” free speech. Killing the speaker does. If you think the only difference between the two is one of degree, you’re a fucking moron.
And once again you link to opinions that are unsubstantiated and frankly irrelevant even to the trigger warning policy outlined in the article. As the students’ union put it, trigger warnings aren’t about stifling the content, just warning people rather than ambushing them with it. Even the professor whose opinion you agree with warns her students about explicit content. She was just cautios about codifying it into university policy – in other words, she thinks it should be done, but doesn’t want the university to think it should be done, too.
“So are your comments about bullies and crybabies without any point, then?”
No.
“Again, moving to a different venue doesn’t “stifle” free speech.”
Yes it does. At the venue where the bullies win. And when the bullies win, we all lose.
“And once again you link to opinions that are unsubstantiated…”
The ‘opinions’ in the article are opinions. The facts were substantiated.
“As the students’ union put it, trigger warnings aren’t about stifling the content, just warning people rather than ambushing them with it.”
That’s not what the Marguerite Johnson concluded.
As it’s clear you haven’t read the article fully, I’ll quote from it:
“But while she considers herself a progressive educator, she too objects to the idea of a university administration codifying when trigger warnings are to be given. For a start, she thinks Monash University’s threshold of “emotionally distressing” sets the bar ridiculously low. “Life is potentially inevitably, regularly, emotionally distressing,” she said. “The world is emotionally distressing and I find it quite absurd that the universities may see themselves as the guardians of emotionally distressing situations. “We are not preparing them for the real world.” She believes warning students about texts interrupts the way they approach and interpret works. “If we are warning them all the time, then we are creating a preconceived notion that this material is going to upset me,” Associate Professor Johnson said. While in recent years criminal law students at Harvard University have objected to the discussion of sexual assault law because it could cause victims distress, Associate Professor Johnson said it is the very fact that material might disturb students that can benefit society, pointing to the reform of sex assault laws in Australia. “Those young feminist students in the 70s who were reading law and looked at the way women were represented in the law, who studied rape cases, who then went on to be lawyers who advocated to change the legislation about rape in court — if they hadn’t experienced the horrors of reading the materials as students, how would they know what to fight against, how would they know what to kick against?” she said.”
“Even the professor whose opinion you agree with warns her students about explicit content.”
Exactly. So why the trigger warnings? Because weak minded people can’t tolerate hearing things they don’t agree with.
Here’s another piece, this time written by a student.
http://www.news.com.au/national/im-a-student-heres-how-free-speech-died-at-university/news-story/748b6979096c523fb7c8cbc89fef7102
Here’s a recent Guardian article on the same matter.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/dec/26/jo-johnson-universities-no-platforming-freedom-of-speech
How do you feel about attempts to ban a gay rights activist and veteran feminist writer because of their views on transgenderism?
Was that a “no, they had no point”, or a “no, you’re wrong, they had a point which you addressed”?
And it seems the aussie academic who gives trigger warnings in her own classes is apparently quibbling about the threshold set by university policy, not that the policy shouldn’t exist.
As for student groups wanting whatever speakers “no platformed” from their campus, that’s their right to express that opinion. And the university can agree with them or not – that’s the university’s right as property owner.
The crybaby bullies, lol. What did they do at school, whinge until people gave them lunch money? The students and faculty can still say what they want. They just won’t let outsiders come in to be jerks.
Germaine greer hasn’t been silenced. That’ll be the day.
Ben Shapiro has a speaking schedule for 2018.
I can think of one person who hasn’t been saying anything lately, because she was murdered by a nazi while she was legally protesting. That’s the difference between “silencing” and “not providing a platform”.
“Was that a “no, they had no point”, or a “no, you’re wrong, they had a point which you addressed”?”
It was a ‘no’ there was a point.
“And it seems the aussie academic who gives trigger warnings in her own classes…”
No, she doesn’t.
“As for student groups wanting whatever speakers “no platformed” from their campus, that’s their right to express that opinion.”
It’s not their right to suppress other opinions.
“The crybaby bullies, lol. What did they do at school, whinge until people gave them lunch money? The students and faculty can still say what they want. They just won’t let outsiders come in to be jerks.”
Jerks being people you disagree with.
“Germaine greer hasn’t been silenced.”
Please don’t misquote me. I didn’t say she was ‘silenced’. I said she was ‘banned’. University campus’s are places for a free exchange of ideas. It is obvious there is a group of ‘cry babies’ who want to suppress that. You are clearly on their side.
“That’s the difference between “silencing” and “not providing a platform”.
Euphemisms are lovely, aren’t they. But let’s be clear. You stand on the side of a group of people who are attempting to suppress freedom of speech. When Germaine Greer, a lifelong feminist activist, speaks on Campus, attendance is not compulsory. No-one is forced to listen to her. Yet the very idea that she could have an opinion that challenges some of the little darlings is enough to have her banned from an academic institution. And you side with those who find that acceptable.
“I can think of one person who hasn’t been saying anything lately, because she was murdered by a nazi while she was legally protesting. ”
So you draw the line at murder? What about plain old violence (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/opinion/how-violence-undermined-the-berkeley-protest.html)? What about physically assaulting people attending an event (https://www.dailywire.com/news/3704/exclusive-csula-police-look-away-protesters-joshua-yasmeh)?
Your own position is philosophically bankrupt.
Reiterating the same statements does not suddenly make them true.
You have not demonstrated centuries of free speech at universities.
You have not demonstrated how making someone move venues stops them speaking.
You have not demonstrated that universities are not permitted to control who comes onto or simply gets podium time on their campus.
Any violent protestors will face the force of the law, but the point is that nazis actually kill people. That’s “silencing” them. Locking someone up in communicado is “silencing” them. Making someone move venue is “mildly inconveniencing” them.
Unless you come up with something new, I probably won’t bother responding in this thread. You’re a whiny little moron who wants to play victim so much that it’s nauseating. By your logic, I’ve been bullied into being silenced, woe is me 🙄
“You have not demonstrated how making someone move venues stops them speaking.”
Another misquote. It is an unfortunate habit of yours. And again you misunderstand. If speech is free, it must be truly free.
“You have not demonstrated that universities are not permitted to control who comes onto or simply gets podium time on their campus.”
Another misquote. (Again?) I have never claimed universities don’t have that right.
“Any violent protestors will face the force of the law, but the point is that nazis actually kill people. That’s “silencing” them. Locking someone up in communicado is “silencing” them. Making someone move venue is “mildly inconveniencing” them.”
Nazi’s aren’t the only people who kill people, McFlock. Totalitarianism has been reflected in a number of different political systems, the most deadly of which has been those from the left. And it can begin with simple, minor inconveniences. Have a read of Hannah Arendt’s ‘The Origins of Totalitarianism’, or Sinclair Lewis’s ‘It can’t happen here’. Naieve, in fact foolish, appeasement such as you exhibit is how it takes hold.
Today’s white supremacists pose as defenders of free speech.
This sentence seems appropriate for some reason.
That is an extremely good piece, thanks. I found this comment interesting “Life After Hate counters violent extremism by helping people disengage from white supremacy or, better, never join in the first place.”. Nowhere does Picciolini advocate suppressing free speech or banning speakers from the ‘public square’. His approach is to change attitudes, not ban opinions he now disagrees with. Good on him.
Oh, and you might enjoy this:
“But I suppose Ms Roxon’s scorn for those who care deeply about freedom of speech merely reflects the spirit of an age characterised by the rise not just of an alarming new intolerance of the views of those who do not subscribe to the current preferences and values of a conceited, self-anointed cultural elite, but an intolerance of their right to express those views at all.”
https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2012/10/in-defence-of-freedom-of-speech/
Starting a new sub-thread.
I doubt very much whether any of them are “banned from academic campuses”. They are welcome to enroll and join the student body I’m sure. Perhaps in doing so they might establish some credibility and some of them might become faculty members.
However, as outsiders, if they want to book a venue and host an event, the property owners have the right of refusal. I want a church funeral with an enacted production of Io Pan* as the centrepiece, with actors and other interested parties standing in for any clergy who don’t wish to participate.
*Io Pan, it should be noted, comes with a bunch of trigger warnings.
I laughed at the great god Pan. I didnae, I didnae!
“I doubt very much whether any of them are “banned from academic campuses”.”
Then you’d be wrong. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/12105101/Free-speech-rankings-over-half-of-universities-have-banned-or-censored-ideas.html
“However, as outsiders, if they want to book a venue and host an event, the property owners have the right of refusal.”
And those who would restrain free speech are threatening violence in order to facilitate these decisions.
No, I’d be right, since your link mentions no individuals who are banned from academic campuses, but merely focuses on whether their lecture tour is welcome.
“The campaign follows a series of attempts by students’ unions to ban speakers, including Germaine Greer…”
And here’s some more:
http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2016/02/23/public-college-bans-conservative-speaker-shapiro-after-liberals-protest.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2015/10/23/a-conservative-speaker-was-uninvited-from-campus-and-then-re-invited/?utm_term=.9ba8c40cb59b
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/10/students-censorship-safe-places-platforming-free-speech
The final one is particularly well written, and touches on the ‘safe space’ tyranny, and the triggering of students who saw the words ‘Trump 2016’ painted at their Campus.
What part of argumentum ad nauseam are you having trouble with?
Are you so stupid you think repeating yourself makes your argument more plausible?
Perhaps I overestimated your capacity for understanding.
Of course it is mansplaining, most right wing voters are men.
I prefer whitemansplaining, as it is far more accurate. Old whitemansplaining even better. Given the huge numbers of white babyboomer males who vote National (or Republican).
And the denial of old white men can/will only last so long …
Us Westie, white boomer males, actually voted for a Gay Labour candidate. The first in New Zealand.
Just saying.
‘Tory Translation’ is alliteration. RWNJ Translation doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.
I guess you’re aware that RWNJ is another example.
Pejoratives are acceptable as long as they alliterate? That would make Socialist Cindy ok? (I don’t like that term either).
‘The left do it too’ is another example of what Enzo is talking about. Because it implies that the left are just as bad as the right and therefore we can just carry on with what we are doing. But there are distinct differences between what the left and the right do (I’m guessing the distinction is lost on you, but then I seem to remember that you argued that Dirty Politics was people on the internet saying mean things to each other).
Timely comment from a US pundit: https://twitter.com/scalzi/status/942181682010091520
“Folks, if you roll up with ‘both sides are equally bad’ these days, I’m gonna know you’re a fucking idiot whose understanding of political issues is about as deep as a single baked potato crisp. I literally have no time for you, Pringle pal.”
Lol, thanks, I’ll remember that for next time.
It’s impossible to measure who is as bad or worse, but there are plenty of examples in this post and comments that the left can hardly be smug about their purity.
It is relevant to look at both sides of the divide sling crap at each other, because ‘if they’re doing it we should throw it back harder and dirtier’ leads to justification, retaliation and escalation.
It’s irrelevant who does it worse at any given time, that’s not measurable anyway, but far too much shit flies in both directions, and it’s unnecessary, unhealthy and sightly for a modern democratic society.
And given the shit I get for pointing this out it suggests the immaturity is nowhere near abating.
Mrs Grundy has spoken.
Promoting false equivalences is seldom popular. But your life should surely have taught you that by now.
You don’t seem to have learnt about making stupid accusations.
It’s not a false equivalence when it’s largely true. That has been well and truly proven on this thread.
Are you aware of a ‘my shit doesn’t stink’ syndrome? That’s also prevalent on both the left and the right – to be clear, I’m not claiming it’s equal, just saying that it’s common on both sides of the political spectrum.
Useful idiot is useful. Cui bono?
No one benefits when the left and the right throw shit at each other an claim their own shit doesn’t stink.
No no, they are no useful idiots.
I was disappointed when Key didn’t set a better example as PM. I’m hoping that Jacinda Ardern, and a new generation of younger
politicians, will be more positive and constructive in Parliament.
Holding opponents to account is important, when justified, but the priority for any MP should be contributing to the greater good of Parliament and the country as they can.
I think that most voters don’t like political shit fights, and are likely to reward a better standard if any major party wants to show the way.
Key didn’t set a better example? A better example than whom? “It seems” that weasel words are the only ones you’ve got.
This was my pivotal moment:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/29/vortex-online-political-debate-arguments-trump-brexit
PG and I have crossed debating swords many times over the years but on this I largely have to agree with him.
We have been sitting watching your comments ‘pete george.’
Some are fairly balanced and thats fine, but you are now becoming angry and abusive using words like ‘stupid”
We are realising that you just may be also blogging as one or more other names, because your phrasing of words to attack others appears the some as three other attack bloggers now.
So we will keep monitoring your nasty responses from now on.
We want ‘constructive comments’ here to help our Government and collectivelly ourselves going forward, and we hope you will join us with this thought in mind.
We woud rather be positive rather than snipe at others here.
Yes we saw you mention this some time back as snipping at others being unhelpful so we hope you will keep to that thought.
Join the willing who are wanting real positive change for all.
An odd comment.
I’ve openly identified myself in commenting under my own name for quite a few years now. Apart from a couple of little bits of fun using a pseudonym a long time ago (one here, one on Redbaiter’s blog) I have only posted or commented under my name.
What other identities did you think I used? It would be funny to know.
Who is the ‘we’ youre posting on behalf of?
I’m fairly positive about the new government, albeit with some concerns. They set an unnecessarily ambitious 100 day commitment – better to do things well than hurried, it was a huge task setting up a new government when they hadn’t expected to be in that position.
Pete,
That was resonable response Pete,
Our feeling is that when you get defensive (fairly easily) you go on a attack mode very similar to three other attack bloggers, and that was what spiked our concern.
If you are only one blogger fine, I will accept your word.
I have asked you for your feedback on 4.1.1.1.2.1 on a subject you raised on ‘democracy’ thanks.
In fact it’s surprising easy to find examples that demonstrate unequivocally that the right are much worse than the left.
The illegal seizure of Nicky Hager’s computers springs to mind – the vile Tory scum whose kleptocracy has exploited NZ for the last decade have not suffered comparable harassment.
More’s the pity.
To be fair, I don’t think that really answers the point PG was making. He’s right that we on the left also label, denigrate and use wedge politics. All of these things happen frequently in discussions on this site, and not only when rebutting a right wing commenter.
You’re right that the Nats and the police tried to take down Nicky Hagar and shut him up, and of course we saw the whole dirty politics machine flourish and rule for far too long under Key and Co. That’s all the more reason to try not to fall into that kind of crappy behaviour ourselves. I don’t often agree with Pete Best, but I do support his hope that a new generation of politicians, under the guidance and example of Jacinda Ardern, will maintain higher standards.
That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t push back when attacked, or identify and criticise damaging ideas, comments or behaviour, just that we should keep the focus on the ideas, comments and behaviour.
I agree with Grey Area, below, that the politicians and commentators on the right tend to be worse than the left when it comes to lying and personal attacks, but that doesn’t mean we should stoop down to that level. It’s not the only way to win an argument – it’s not even the best way.
I am less concerned with winning the argument than with maintaining the legal principle that wrongdoing not go unpunished. There has been a great deal of wrongdoing over the last few decades, and I see no particular reason it should be swept under the rug.
Interesting comment but which wrongdoings would you pursue and investigate and put large effort and resources into? Assuming, of course, that legal deadlines, or whatever they’re called, have not expired. What would it achieve; justice for the sake of justice or is there more to be gained? What about wrongdoings that we don’t (yet) know about, the ‘pretty legal’ stuff that has not yet been unearthed?
I have a feeling that injustice is a significant deadweight cost to society. We should of course pursue most of them – we have arrived at a very bad place, where criminally obtained funds are routinely secreted in NZ.
People talk about the sociopathic tendencies of capitalism, but these are significantly lower, almost manageable in a well-regulated society committed to justice. In the war of all against all created by the Key Kleptocracy, not so much.
“I don’t think the right are any worse than the left.”
At least you framed this an opinion because I think you’re wrong. The left are not blameless but the right are far worse. Enzo’s post was describing a whole language used to denigrate or undermine those on the left whereas you provide a few examples of a bit of name-calling or derogatory language to show that “look, they do it too!”
You hear the same thing when people accuse National MPs of lying: ” Labour do it too!” or “all politicians lie!”
Do politicians on the left lie? I’m sure some do some of the time. But some National figures seem to lie so much, especially Key in the past, that we are left wondering if they ever tell the truth. Lying just seems to be the default position for a lot of National Party MPs and I don’t think you can say the same about MPs on the other side of the House.
As the Alt-Right Playbook clip link below says about controlling the conversation: “Everybody does this sometimes. It’s just that the Right have made it central to their entire platform”.
“The left are not blameless but the right are far worse. ”
No. The left think the right are far worse. However the right think the left are far worse. It’s closer to somewhere in the middle.
How many of the Left ones need the clever translations given in the post, PG? I think you may have missed the point (again..)
“It’s closer to somewhere in the middle.”
No it’s not. As I attempted to say it’s a matter of degree. Who have been the biggest exponents of Dirty Politics in New Zealand PG?
It’s National. And if you can’t or won’t see that and want to reassure yourself that “they all do it”, go ahead. I’m not saying political parties on the left are paragons of virtue but if you can’t see the difference between the National Party and the others lined up against them, I can’t help you.
Your beige, middle of the road reasonableness doesn’t cut it. Wrong is wrong and needs to be called for what it is.
Being the biggest party by quite a margin then yes, National have been guilty of some dirty politics for sure. So have Labour, although some of that dirt has been internal. Remember the strife over the Shearer Cunliffe years?
In the shit for size stakes though I’d put NZ First/Winston Peters right up there. His MO has been innuendo, claims of leaks, accusations, claiming to have evidence that never eventuates, trying to destroy political careers.
And when someone does a dirty leak on him he races to court. He has been known to threaten defamation too.
I recognise an understatement when I see it! A very subtle attempt to downplay National’s central role in orchestrating DP from the ninth floor in the Beehive, for example.
Your whole comment lacks credibility and simply is a diversion to make your point about “the middle” where most things happen, according to you.
“orchestrating DP from the ninth floor”
And no equivalent of that behaviour from the left. None. False equivalence provides succour for wrongdoing. History is littered with beige enablers.
Well, to be fair to Pete, he did say that Labour where very busy at backstabbing within the party. At times they did resemble some kind of ‘suicide cult’ but they seem to have regained their senses. But yes, it is a false equivalence, of course.
Again, that was the dramatic media portrayal, not necessarily accurate.
Yes, good point! I must confess though that I did also succumb to the media portrayal and also to the commentary here on TS, which seemed to be quite in sync with MSM …
“History is littered with beige enablers”
Is that a deliberate joke, or accidentally funny? Another example of what this post is about, but proving it isn’t the sole domain of the right. But this one is contradictory trying to claim that a beige ineffective non-entity is to blame for dirty politics from the Beehive.
How many journalists did Labour prosecute Pete?
How many dirty deals with skycity, warner bros, chinese spies has Labour made?
How many cases of staff abuse, payoffs, and coverups has the MSM avoided?
How many statistics did Labour actively suppress/stop measuring/falsify?
How many OIA delays and redactions did Labour commit to avoid their obligations to the cizens of Aotearoa?
How many bullshit farms in the desert and holiday highways did Labour build?
How many families did Labour throw into poverty and homelessness?
Has Labour done anything to compare with the Nats rampant demolition of chirstchurch and failure to properly compensate their victims, and their casual dismissal of democracy at ECan?
But the MSM isn’t making a fuss so it’s not real eh?
FFS there is no comparison, you fake beige equivocator.
“National’s central role in orchestrating DP from the ninth floor in the Beehive”
This is a bit off topic but is worth addressing here.
If you have evidence that that is true, and evidence of who did all the orchestrating, please provide a link.
I’m well aware of what Slater has done at Whale Oil, what has been labelled ‘Dirty Politics’ – I think more well informed than you probably are, I know things that are not public information.
The involvement of Jason Ede from the Prime Minister’s office is also document. Or at least to some degree.
It is also documented that John Key had direct communications with Slater, but I think there are scant details of to what extent.
But as far as I’m aware there is a lack of evidence about who else other then Ede was actively involved in what Slater did to any extent.
It’s reasonable to assume that Key and Wayne Eagleson had some knowledge of what Slater did, and perhaps some involvement some of the time, but to what extent?
It’s well known that all past governments have run black ops. It can be assumed that most details are not made public. So it’s impossible to know to what extent they do it.
Slater is well known as a blow hard who exaggerates the degree and importance of what he does. He also tries to hide some of what he does.
Slater has also had political agendas quite separate to National and to the Key Government, this was very apparent when they cut off communications and he frequently complained about it and lashed out because of it.
So i think a lot of details are unclear or unknown.
Slater openly plays dirty, and also secretly plays dirty, that’s well exposed.
Ede worked with Slater, but as far as I’m aware the extent of this is not publicly known. To some extent he may have gone rogue, operating without approval of his seniors. How much DP was sanctioned by or orchestrated by the PM’s office? Please provide details.
The speed with which the PM and National cut off links with Slater after DP broke suggests that they may have been uncomfortable with the extent and type of dirt being dished out of WO. Slater’s reaction to being cut off as too toxic is well documented.
There have been suspicions expressed, allegations and assumptions. But a lot is unknown or unproven.
Hager was inaccurate about some things, and he was far from comprehensive.
WO ran hit jobs, some of which were mercenary, on a wide range of targets – at times with the help of the PM and National, at times I think independent of them’
For example it would be outrageous if the PM’s had any involvement in the Len Brown hit job, but I have seen no evidence that national were involved at all. Also WO’s attacks on businesses and business people, and academics, and probably also on Colin Craig.
Just claiming PM=DP, or Labour dirty politics, amounts to lazy general partisan labeling and dissing.
Please provide details and evidence of who was complicit in DP from the PM’s office not documented in ‘Dirty Politics’ – preferably of specific agendas.
It’s well known that all past governments have run black ops.
Liar. You assert it ad nauseam (the only debating method you are capable of) and every time you do you’re lying.
“Labour is trying to avoid the fallout from the so-called “H-bomb” it has dropped on John Key as it emerges taxpayer funds have been used in the attempt to find dirt on the National Party leader.”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/696924/Labour-tries-to-dodge-bomb-fallout
“The Smiling Assassin: Pete Hodgson’s mastery of the dark arts of politics goes back a long way, but his latest scalp – Pansy Wong’s – was taken in a ‘sting’ operation that came pretty close to perfection.”
http://bowalleyroad.blogspot.co.nz/2010/11/perfect-sting.html
black ops
Wikipedia.
You have provided
onetwo examples which don’t meet the definition. So my point stands: you are a habitual liar.Edit: Hodgson’s take-down of Wong is democracy working as it should: he exposed her corruption, she had to resign. He didn’t make any attempt to hide his involvement, liar.
Re: Wong: Holding opponents to account is important, when justified.
The problem with being a habitual liar is that it’s hard to keep track of all your lies.
Pete George said:
“Ede worked with Slater, but as far as I’m aware * the extent of this is not publicly known . To some extent he may have gone rogue, operating without approval of his seniors. How much DP was sanctioned by or orchestrated by the PM’s office? Please provide details.”
Whaaaaaaat?
*My bold
a reply to OAB
“The problem with being a habitual liar is that it’s hard to keep track of all your lies.”
And what interests and amazes me is that it has become so normal, as in the first impulse seems to be to bullshit – whether it is Prime Ministers, heads of government departments sucking up to their ministers, some members of the Rock Hopper Force, those in the media and spin doctors (although many of them are just lazy and a bit fik), or just your average recidivist crim fighting back against the world.
It’s what eventually takes them down.
Even more interesting is when you get a bullshitting Rock Hopper Force attempting to take down a bullshitting crim, or a bullshitting ‘journalist’ trying to take down a bullshitting politician, or a bullshitting member of the civil/public service not liking a change in regime.
Fucking interesting to watch. If it wasn’t so serious it’d be amusing, because so many of them have it down to an art. They all try it on to the bitter end as we see in so many instances
Concern trolling is really neither left or right although I think RWNJs tend to do it more. I really can’t be bothered going on a National party aligned site and doing it but if I did it would be something like “I’m really worried about how pathetic JLR was today moaning about having to wait for his lunch. It might put people off voting for National and it takes the focus off Bill English”. If I did it would be concern trolling and it would be a lie because I really don’t give a fuck about National and I am very glad they lost and I hope they don’t win for a long time if ever. So concern trolling is lying it is not about expressing an opinion it is being deceptive and pretending you care when you don’t.
Great post Enzo!
‘Social Justice Warrior’ became prominent during Gamergate and as such is associated with some of the worst misogyny on the internet. It’s broadened out since then but I think it’s worth keeping the connection clear so that people using the term disparagingly understand its genesis and context. Funnily enough it still often gets used by people who are sexist.
You do know that at it’s core Gamergate was about corruption in the gaming journalism industry right?
As I looked through Overton’s window,I asked myself,was there a binary connection between cognitive dissonance and the categorical imperative?Without engaging in virtue signalling or positive reinforcement,I found myself trapped in a void of academic oneupsmanship, that had no clear pathway to resolving the paradox of patent verbosity as opposed to latent simplicity.
Then I realised that I was a victim,in fact I was my own worst enemy. Quantum superposition and Ockhams razor would have to put on the backburner,as I had to mow the lawns.
Thanks. Now my eyes are bleeding and I’m on the verge of an aneurysm.
+1 A likely case of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and choosing the blue pill, therefore remaining trapped in your cognitive matrix. If only you could perceive a wider reality beyond flatland, and locate your historical metanarrative, perhaps by reading https://twitter.com/RealPeerReview 😝
Thankfully we haven’t yet begun to hear “The New Zealand People ….. ” – as in
“The American People” or the “Australian People …..” as a preface to anything where right wing policy is about to be pumped by politicians, spin doctors and media.
True. I do get awfully sick of that hoary old cliche “hard-working New Zealanders”, which usually serves as a handy precursor to an enthusiastic round of bene-bashing.
Oh, and if you’re particularly pious “families and children” — I’m looking at you, Bob McCoskrie.
Ignore PG as these National clingons cant get over loosing can they.
The worst thing we can do is respond to them as they are being judged how effective they are by the responses they get from us, which is showing their effectiveness in disrupting our continued comments to each issue.
The torys they hate us discussing our issues, and contributing to our cause, and their weapon is to disrupt and divert so ignore them PG, Alwyn. James and co.
We need to make a full list of these ‘disrupters’.
Pity they can’t contribute to positivity but then they really can’t get over loosing can they.
If you start making lists, they’ll just call you a dirty Communist preparing to purge dissenters. It’s horribly predictable.
Hey wensley that is a fair point,
But hasn’t National already done this too?
Remember when he discovered that the Government agency for ‘intellegence had 88 odd disenters on a list they were keeping under ‘surviellence’ back in 2014?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11911084
“Whats good for the goose is good for the gander too”?
Proper job –
Jamie. Lee. Ross.
Bishop same category, Barclay would have been too …
We need someone in the house like the guy at the top, to tell them to “get some hair, and get a real job”
It’s all an attempt to control the conversation.
This too.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/daily-stormer-nazi-style-guide_us_5a2ece19e4b0ce3b344492f2?m3a
The biggest bludgers are those collecting $300 or $400 a week in super while still working (costing us $4B each year equivalent to the entire social welfare bill).
And if National had been re-elected they would have double dipped, a $20 a week tax cut plus the bump in super derived from the said tax cut.
Also those getting National Super while having plenty of private wealth and income.
While those of us now working and paying taxes are told there will be no National Super for us when we retire.
They seem to think it all went into a big kitty to be saved and then paid out when they retired. But it got spent. All of it.
There’s a really good reason for this, basically so long as the pension is available to everyone there’s more political will for it to stay around until you’re old enough to collect it. It’s in your and my long term interest for it to be universal.
Besides, people who are earning more are paying more tax and helping more to pay for it
Yes, for the 5 years I was still working while being paid Super, my pension and my tax were about the same so essentially I was paying my own pension!
You were just like Winston Peters and his partner then, who by coincidence is also a Jan.
Winston is currently getting his
1. Salary as deputy PM
2. His pension from his first time round as an MP, tax free of course.
3. A very generous collection of tax free expenses.
4. National Superannuation
As the old song goes
“Nice work if you can get it”
Well, to get that work these days you need to understand that being in government requires coalition partners.
That is certainly true.
Winston has got two partners hasn’t he?
He has allowed Labour a few positions but has specified what they are allowed to say and do.
Then there are the Greens. They are allowed to look through the window but they aren’t allowed into the house.
Done very well for himself hasn’t he?
Pity about New Zealand of course.
lols at your use of “allowed”.
One day you tories will understand the concept of coalition partners. Partners are people who are your equals, and have valid opinions even if those opinions differ slightly from your own. You can work with them to achieve common aims, “common” meaning that they are those opinions which you all share to a mutually acceptable level.
To put it another way, you seem to think a coalition means someone has to go on top. Really, you can have more fun with a sort of three-way spooning arrangement. Sure, there’s only one pm, but you share different positions, rather than struggle for dominance.
“One day you tories will understand the concept of coalition partners. Partners are people who are your equals”
A partner inside Cabinet is not equal to a partner outside Cabinet.
Deputy Prime Minister is not equal to a Minister outside Cabinet.
You are confusing positions with the people who occupy them; a common right wing disease.
Nice diversion!
As JanM has noted, such only pay for their own super.
Back in 1983 I advocated to Anne Hercus that super should be for those who have retired, Labour went with the surtax on other income (which is unfair on those who have saved).
I would vote for any party that put a retirement test on receipt, there is so much good that the $4Bpa could do in public health, education and housing.
Yep SPC,
But I am on Super and cant live on $300 – $400 a week can you?
When we get to 70+ our costs increase, Dental, medical as all these casts are not subsidised by a workplace insurance policy at our age so either we go and get very sick from blood poisoning from rotting teeth or ggo without medical treatment so we are screwwed if we dont find any ‘supplimental’ income.
I only have a small income of less the $100 a week outside my $300 super a week and life is hard now believe me.
Cheers
The $4B pa would go some way to affording better health funding (including dental) and support for the aged which is the important thing for those who have retired.
The $450/700 to assist with the winter power bill months will help out.
At some point there might be a need to provide assistance for home renovation grants (interest free repayable out of the estate) to assist people to keep their homes up to standard on low incomes.
“The $450/700 to assist with the winter power bill months will help out”.
Maybe next year. According to the MSD website you will only get about 60% of the amount in 2018.
Just another little gap between the promises Labour made and the reality.
You would of course have been better of next year if the current lot hadn’t cancelled National’s tax cuts.
Well, I guess you voted for them so you will be happy at getting a lower income than you would have had under National’s policies.
Very good!
This is not a brand new term; Joyce used the same expression in July: https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/334938/labour-s-plan-labelled-convoluted-spaghetti-of-entitlements.
Plus:
– “won” – as in “National won the popular vote” (no they didn’t – they won more votes than any one other party, but that’s not the same thing);
– “majority” (misused by those in denial when explaining their claim that National won the election);
– “coalition/government of the losers” (used as an extension of the above);
– “fiscal hole” (still being used, although the $11.8 billion tag seems to have been dropped).
100% RB.
National = live in a fantasy world.
The rightists are a lot better at sledging than the left, and have been for a while.
The left just need to get hard, and get baiting more effectively.
Don’t waste your breath figuring out more ways to be offended.
Get out there and go on the offensive.
We are in power. Use it.
Oy, PETER GEORGE
Quibbling over quotes?
Do the heavy work.
Have a read: “The Hollow Men.” “Dirty Politics”
So, prove it wrong, pretty please: “National ~ Bribers, Liars, Born-to-Rulers”
Heavy work? I own and have read Dirty Politics. I’ve done more than most to confront WO and Slater and associates on not just dirty politics but dirty business and dirty litigation as well.
They reacted by taking their hypocrisy to courts, and went as far as trying to imprison me for standing up to them. It was hopeless but I think they were serious. It was heavy handed for sure.
What sort of heavy work have you done on this?
Oy Pete
Great reply, thank you.
That would be heavy work for sure that you’ve done.
Honour to you for your courage. Taking that stand. Go well.
I never dreamed that was your story.
Seeking a balance in the quotes? Maybe that’s needed
We could disagree on this, I dunno, but the big lies and deceit seem to come largely from one side.
Believing that’s so, I’m doing my best to fight it.
But life is short. Best to live it, stay positive.
very true every word Ed,
WE are in power now so all you national clingons; – suck it up. get over it.
What about left on left slurs.
I’ll start with my all time favourite “purist”
or Ad’s one ‘moist” 🙂
As for Tory slurs “Snowflake” is the one I hear a lot now.
You wil know when I really want them to toughen up.
Nice list. Very comprehensive 🙂
Lol what about Marxist Leninist – although you are a middle or unaffiliated rather than left aren’t you Adam. You’re in the new catagory like cv aren’t you.
Anyway I may be wrong. .
[You’re teetering right on the edge of a ban now Marty. And you can thank my current tiredness for the fact I can’t be doing with the rigmarole of processing it all as the reasaon for you merely ‘teetering’] – Bill
reply to wrong comment? 🙂
left on left whistling is quite common:
“neoliberal” = “not as left wing as me”
“watch this youtube link” = “I can’t explain it in my own words, and it’s easier for me to drop a link to an hour’s worth of barely relevant monologues by someone who is possibly unhinged, just so you hear the twenty second soundbite I agree with from someone other than me”.
“free thinker” = “thinks gravity is a deep state conspiracy”
Yeah got too excited by my wit ☺
Cool Marty Mars.
You always add welcome flair.
marty mars making up shit again, well at least you’re consistent.
I was happy to be wrong if that was the case and you did try to insult me, a leftie, by saying I was very Marxist Leninist didn’t you which fitted in with your post so WHAT exactly is the problem? I legitamitely thought you were not aligned with conventual political labels.
Scroll up marty.
https://thestandard.org.nz/tory-translation-service/#comment-1427408
Yeah i read your bold. Can you tell me what line I’ve crossed please?
Edit. Don’t bother I’ve sent you an email.
Pointless fucking personal abuse that serves no good purpose and adds nothing to any debate or conversation. You want to waste any more of my time?
There was zero abuse in the comment you bolded on imo. And I bow to your moderator status and will take some time out now to see if I want to continue to contribute to this forum. Thank you, please don’t waste anymore valuable time with me.
And as part of my review I will think about the feedback you have given me.
I don’t want to let myself down and/or contribute to an unattractive environment. No doubt my irritation is contributing to both those outcomes. Sorry for that.
Respect!
MCWs is conspicuous by its absence.
Yes Bill; – must be on a promise today at the annual ‘National Clingons’ xmas party?
“passionate” and “compassionate conservative” are two other right-wing terms. Now I know what each word means, ordinarily, but what does a right-winger mean by them, or what particular advantage is sought?
A business writing article says this- “Saying, ‘I’m passionate…’ has become a hackneyed expression that EVERYBODY uses. It’s Numero Uno in The Hit Parade of Clichés. Straight in. With a bullet.
Perhaps that’s the answer- it says nothing, means nothing, sounds profound.
Compassionate conservatism as applied to Reagan and George W Bush is now dead, seen off by Trump. Bill English’s biography awards him that description in its 2016 title.
It’s an oxymoron. Right wing rhetoric and right wing actions show this.
As JK Galbraith wrote, “The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” – John Kenneth Galbraith.
100% mac1,
Good references there.
I guess when your right wing Party is snaeled in corruption as the national party is clearly even today, the only way is to ‘pretend’ to be on a high moral plane and that may be why we see a resurgence of right wing moral superiority.
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/AUDIO-Fiery-weekend-political-panel-hosted-by-Mark-Sainsbury/tabid/506/articleID/53685/Default.aspx
I’m not sure how this govt is especially socialist? I’d be more inclined to view them as “Nat Lite”.
The real question here is what constitutes the left these days? Strikes me a lot of what people view as the left is really the fake left represented by parties who make all the appropriate sounds and then simply continue the same policies as their supposedly “different” right wing counterparts.
I guess keeping people tribal and fighting for their respective flags whilst being shafted by both sides is a good way of ensuring the real issues are ignored and the sheeple stay in their pens and off the streets.
Right sparky;
Look at our family, In 1999 we were green party voters and members, then by 2002 we were Labour voters through 2008 then we split to NZF/Labour so today we are back into backing the coalition Government.
Back in 1996 we were national party voters.
So you hit the nail right squarly on the head there.
My heart is socialism always and saw Robert Muldoon as a socialist then, and now compared to the current national mob he clearly was by compassion,.
Today we would never go near the National Party aggressive uncaring style of politics.
“They think they know how to spend your money better than you do –
An extension of other people’s money (see above). They are asking you to accept that a $20 per week tax cut for the wealthy would be more effective spending than using the $8.4 billion worth of revenue it equates to for some virtue signalling (see above) SJW (see above) cause like lifting 88,000 kids out of poverty.”
Never got this
It’s change the lower tax brackets. Middle income people are earning more due to pure inflation etc
Of course it captures the wealthy. But only the same amount as anyone else.
And how is it different from rich people getting a baby bonus for a year, a winter payment and a free years tertiary for their kids?
Which ironically works out more
100% Chis well said.
Taxing income is still inequitable when the true capitalists live off a vast pool of capital wealth that just sits around accumulating and devaluing the real work done by wage and salary earners. Tax land and capital not workers
I say it’s totally acceptable to point out the faults of national people especially if they believe that there dum bigot views on how our NZ society should be is totally un humane racist unequal and because they are greedy the try an con us that racking up debt and selling all the assets is good for everyone they cheat and lie to get there way. So in my view these people have waved the right of any compassion from ECO. Ana to kai
Agreed eco. The truth about the Nats is ugly and needs to be starkly exposed. Pete George acting all scandalized about rude words is just a waste of space.
100% Ropata. Hit the spot there. Kia ora.
Funny. This post is about ENZO acting all scandalized about rude words.
So you don’t understand what the post is about. Or you’re being deliberately dishonest. I think it’s the latter.
I think I need to add another definition for GASOH. 😉
Like Brash and Te Reo.
They used to be able to say nigger lover
Then they said politically correct.
Then liberal.
its hard to keep up but it is very powerful (for them).
We say Tory, neo liberal, I don’t think it gets worse than that.