Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
9:37 am, May 29th, 2018 - 18 comments
Categories: national, Simon Bridges, social media lolz, the praiseworthy and the pitiful, you couldn't make this shit up -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about peopleâs relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
who the fuck cares?
/agreed
Sabine at 1…………..agree who the fuck cares….
But surely his team of comms people can’t think these pics are helping his profile at all.
Its beginning to look like pics for a rural calendar with a urban model. I can see that sitting in the marked down bin by early February.
C/p and contrast with Jacinda, who is out there being seen with real people facing real problems (farmers) or people celebrating achievement………………………………
and again, who cares đ
lol, i honestly don’t believe he is gonna be kalif at the place of the kalif ever.
I mean essentially he is simply a overhyped Iznogoud
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iznogoud
So remind me, who is Soimon’s ‘Wa’at Alahf’?
I’m not sure which of these animals are alive.
Why does Jacinda want to kill these beautiful cows?
Lol.
Like Key, “just horsin’ around”.
It’s an interesting contrast:
Bridges is pretty much rubbish – but his party’s vote holds up.
Labour’s party vote was awful, but a change of leader damn near doubles it.
What to make of this?
National supporters are (ironically for people on the right) extraordinarily class conscious and vote for their perceived economic interests. They might not like the leader but leadership doesn’t affect how they vote.
Labour voters (though on the whole being poorer) are less class conscious and are more inclined to vote on emotional and feel good messaging.
I find this very alarming – because the former is solid and immovable, while the latter flaps all over the place and is highly susceptible to manipulation.
“National supporters are (ironically for people on the right) extraordinarily class conscious and vote for their perceived economic interests. They might not like the leader but leadership doesnât affect how they vote.”
Thanks for telling me why I vote the way I do – but you would be wrong.
Solid and immovable – like constipation?
Labour has the skitters!
James – stop kidding yourself – you’re an authoritarian; it’s obvious why you vote National.
He picking up his speech material from the back end
Please please Mr Bridges. Please stay. (Fancy this being allowed in the Herald!)
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12060759
You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink and you can put Bridges in the Opposition but you canât make him lead.
Which one is the “nay-sayer”?
Where the fuck is ‘surly’ John key?
Sigh, Man with plastic horses!