Why the Right is worried 3: Policy

Written By: - Date published: 11:59 am, October 20th, 2010 - 7 comments
Categories: labour, overseas investment, privatisation - Tags: ,

Policy – In contrast to National’s policy vacuum on the economy, Labour has been focusing its policy work on a major change in direction. It’s obvious that the hands-off approach introduced in the 1980s has failed, leading to mal-investment in housing with an economy stripped of its manufacturing capability and geared for import-dependent consumerism.

Labour and National have both woken up to the fact that the world is entering a new age of international scarcity with China (the only big country with the money and the central planning ability) and big private corporations moving to secure access to key natural resources around the world. In New Zealand, that’s farm land and minerals. The difference between Labour and National on the issue is that Labour is prepared to prevent us losing control of these vital, irreplaceable assets, National isn’t. That’s extremely popular policy. Not because people are xenophobic as the Right claims but because we’re not foolish enough to think that selling the foundations of our economy is a good idea or something that constitutes real investment in this country.

Another issue over which National is on the wrong side of public opinion is privatisation. National hates the government owning things and wants to flog them off, preferably while making its mates richer in the process. The public knows that selling assets, whether state-owned or natural, just results in the profits going overseas forever, often for a poor sale price. If Key rules out any asset sales in a second term, then the concept of privatisation will effectively be dead, which the Right can’t handle. If he won’t rule it out, that alone will be enough to cost National an election-losing 5%+ of the vote.

7 comments on “Why the Right is worried 3: Policy”

  1. Lanthanide 1

    Didn’t Key come out and promise not to never sell Kiwibank, ever? Or something?

  2. tc 2

    The right may well be worried but sideshow aint…..he’s now fulfilled his dream of being PM, enhanced his assets (even though he’s ‘blind’ as to what they are), had some choice trips and expanded the photo album (here’s me on letterman and in afghanistan etc etc) and most of all delivered the gov’t to the nat’s as promised after Blinglish nearly ruined them in 2002 and Brash bretheran’d away the 2005 election.

    It’ll be here’s Goff I’m off if he loses 2011 as this PM gig’s just a bucket list item for clueless.

  3. Armchair Critic 3

    I never get bored of posting the link to National’s policies on its website. That’s correct, there’s nothing there. And that pretty much explains everything.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Cameras on vessels to ensure sustainable fisheries
    Commercial fishing vessels at greatest risk of encountering the rare Māui dolphin will be required to operate with on-board cameras from 1 November, as the next step to strengthen our fisheries management system. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Fisheries Minister ...
    1 week ago
  • Greatest number of new Police in a single year
    A new record for the number of Police officers deployed to the regions in a single year has been created with the graduation today of Recruit Wing 326. Police Minister Stuart Nash says the graduation of 78 new constables means ...
    1 week ago
  • Ensuring multinationals pay their fair share of tax
    New Zealand is pushing on with efforts to ensure multinational companies pay their fair share of tax, with the release of proposed options for a digital services tax (DST). In February Cabinet agreed to consult the public on the problem ...
    2 weeks ago