Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
7:00 am, July 20th, 2019 - 131 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Not to be missed event, The 'Syria Speaks Hui'
The Leftist Daily Blog gives solidarity to the "Syria Speaks' Hui
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2019/07/19/the-liberal-agenda-syria-speaks/
The Centrist Standard) only posts pro Assad opinion.
https://thestandard.org.nz/category/international/war/syria-war/
The Far Right have issued death threats against the organisers of the Syria Speaks Hui, (which have been passed on to the police in the interests of attendees safety).
*My edit. J.
Trouble with Syria is that the U.S., Britain, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E., and France have diplomatically and militarily supported Al Qaeda, ISIL, and al-Nusra.
To true morrissey …. although I should thank jenny for leading me down the road to learn a lot about the christchurch sub-uber racist killer.
Which she tried to blame on Assad … in a sickness on top of sickness kind of way.
Here's some real info from a little internet digging
****************************************
Reading NZ papers on wikileaks I learnt John Key was in Obamas company , giving a speech , immediately after Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik, killed 77 people in 2011.
Key took the opportunity to call for more resources and surveillance to counter and stop future terrorist attacks … Cynically.
The budget for spooks and security went from $56 Million in 2011 … up to over $ 150 million now.
They brag about how they have made us safe https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2017-12/GCSB%20and%20NZSIS.PDF page 39 …
But apparently while 'making us safe', they were not looking at people like Anders Behring Breivik … who our killer admired in posts on known ‘extreme’ chat rooms … and he wanted to achieve a similar kind of racist immortality.
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2017-12/GCSBandNZSIS.PDF
Here’s your UN compact! … was one of the many twink scrawled message written on one of the assault rifles in Christchurch … a message that ricochet back at the tRumps … and our Nacts… who effectively gave ammo to a sick mind.
Vote buying and stoking a toxic minority … Invaders!
To lift the topic ,,,,,,I’ll finish with a bloody good powerful Aussie rock song about Aussie racism and exploitation …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0OPPUGJAj4
Jenny – How to Get there?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
20 July 2019 at 7:25 am
Not to be missed event, The 'Syria Speaks Hui'
The Leftist Daily Blog gives solidarity to the "Syria Speaks' Hui
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2019/07/19/the-liberal-agenda-syria-speaks/
The Centrist Standard) only posts pro Assad opinion.
/category/international/war/syria-war/
The Far Right have issued death threats against the organisers of the Syria Speaks Hui, (which have been passed on to the police in the interests of attendees safety).
That does tend to happen when you include nine live links and an email address, yes.
Just the regular necessary reminder that most of the economics profession is dedicated to pushing ideas that are flat-out wrong, but happen to benefit wealthy people and screw the not-wealthy. Hence their symbiotic relationship with the "conservative" part of the political spectrum.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/7/19/20699366/interest-rates-unemployment-globalization-minimum-wage-deficit
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2019/07/four-economic-myths-plus-one/
A truly silly column by Fran O'Sullivan in the Herald where she offers the opine that the PM should not have annoyed the hosts by making representations over the deportations of Kiwis, but instead raise the matter of New Zealand banking rules.
The thing is the PM is now in the position to quote their words back at them when they representations on behalf of their banks.
And to have raised the matter of banking with the Oz government would have been to undermine the sovereignty of our regime in this matter.
Fran O'Sullivan discards herself as a piece of rubbish. She does not understand the horrendous, indeed Attrocius destruction of Human Life that Australians have carried out on their Country – and continue to carry out.
Concerning Australian Strong arm Deportation
Contrary to little Fran,
I do not see that we need to accept any deportation attempted by the Australian Government.
As far I know, New Zealand has never undertaken to off load citizens from an unfriendly nation.
Any attempt to fly any aircraft or sail any ships into our waters without permission will be deemed a violation.
Any attempt to fly any aircraft or sail any ships into our waters without permission will be deemed a violation
How about an 18 ton spacestation that went down yesterday.
The time has come, however, for Tiangong-2 to be deorbited and, naturally, destroyed in the process. The China National Space Administration indicated that the 18-meter-wide station and solar panels will mostly burn up during reentry, but that a small amount of debris may fall “in a safe area in the South Pacific,” specifying a rather large area that does technically include quite a bit of New Zealand (160-190°W long by 30-45°S lat).
https://techcrunch.com/2019/07/18/chinese-space-station-tiangong-2-is-about-to-burn-up-over-the-pacific/
Glad we live in safe area in the SP
Feeding Racism.
How the (Centre) Left's support for the Assad regime has helped feed and spread the growth of fascism beyond Syria's borders.
And those supporting Israel's annexation of the Golan heights and East Jerusalem … also supporting the removal of Assad (but failing) …
The right wing white race nationalists only prefer Assad to Islamists. The secular left wingers prefer a secular dictatorship to one based around Islamist theocracy. Compaining about that is in service to the former – the White House and its UK poodle and Israel.
Israel and the USA do not care for ME democracy – being onside with Sisi and the Riyadh Crown Prince and the censorship of al Jazeera.
‘
While the Centre Left still, even now, courts racism and fascism, Leftist webcaster, Democracy Now, offers a different perspective.
“For Sama”
Racism and fascism is a good description of the governments in Israel and the USA at the moment.
SPC to keep things simple, and to avoid the running into the pitfalls of Godwin's Law. I reserve accusations of racism and fascism to;
1/ Those like Philip Arps who openly self identify as fascists, racists/white supremacists/anti-semites/Islamophobes etc.
2/ Those like David Irving who cover up or excuse genocide.
3/ Those like Bashar Assad who commit genocide
As for the governments of the US and Israel
A war of choice launched by the US against Iran, (which would be a genocidal war), in my opinion, would elevate Donald Trump from xenophobic racist to fascist.
I think that it can be reasonably argued, and it has been, that Benjamin Netanyahu is guilty of committing genocide against the people of Gaza. Which by my definition would also qualify Netanyahu as a 'fascist'.
Given that the term "fascist" has been around for a hundred years it seems silly to try and re-invent the meaning of it now.
Trying to impose order on a chaotic world can seem soothing to some, I guess.
The term ‘fascist’ might well have been around for a hundred years* But in the age of the internet Godwyn’s law rightly warns against the devaluation of the designation of 'fascist' to anyone who disagrees with you.
Godwyn himself has since said that this should not be used to avoid using this description where it is apt and justified.
This obviously makes necessary to define the term in a concise manner where it is accurate.
You might disagree with me that my determination that those who commit or excuse genocide fit this designation. personally I think it is accurate.
*The term fascist has been around for over 2,000 years referring to fasci or sticks carried by Roman Senators which when bound together could not be broken. The symbol of which was adopted by the modern fascists.
It might pay to remember that the ancient Roman Empire which the modern fascists so admire was a brutal slave society.
Fascism is a form of political and social organisation. It is not primarily about genocide.
Godwyn himself has since said that this should not be used to avoid using this description where it is apt and justified.
Exactly. So why don't you do that?
Jenny, the problem you run into when you use words that already have well-established meanings to mean different things is that nobody then has any chance of figuring out WTF you're on about.
In this particular case, genocide and fascism are separate things. Some genocides were carried out by fascist governments, some were not. Some fascist governments have been genocidal, some have not.
Instead of re-defining a word or language to suit one’s narrative one should re-phrase and re-frame one’s narrative to avoid ambiguity and confusion as much as possible. That is a golden rule in and of communication, especially on a blog site. The problem is that not all people have an equally good grasp of language, which on its own is not a major issue and can be ‘corrected’, but when they dig in and refuse to accept their ‘lingual faux pas’, it can become a major one.
It seems to me that some commenters here are only interested in writing their own comments but not in taking on-board comments by others. In fact, they often become defensive and aggressive or evasive when challenged …
Genocide and fascism are two different things?
The most notable aspect of fascism is the use of genocide.
At the very least genocide could be called a sub-set of fascism.
I have termed (at various times), the Assad regime as "a fascist style regime" because of its of genocidal air campaign against its own citizens.
Another notable feature of fascist style regimes is the maintenance and operation of mass detention and death camps.
Of which the Assad regime has several, the most notable of these being Saydnaya on the outskirts of Damascus.
You say that I am redefining the meaning of the word fascist. Well one thing I know for sure, a fascist is no longer an ancient stick bearing slave owning Roman Senator.
Next you will be telling me that I would be wrong to label General Pinochet of Chile a fascist. Or General Franco of Spain a fascist. Because they don't meet your Hollywood characterisation of German fascists.
You say that I shouldn't define fascists as people who commit genocide.
What would you call people who commit genocide?
Why don't you do some research on the term "fascism" while putting aside the genocide thing for a while? Learn what the term means and then come back. Even just reading the wiki page would be help you heaps.
Next you will be telling me that I would be wrong to label General Pinochet of Chile a fascist. Or General Franco of Spain a fascist.
While Pinochet certainly displayed some elements of fascism, fascist really isn't a good descriptor for Pinochet's flavour of pseudo-populist ultra-nationalist despotism. Furthermore, while Pinochet had a weak spot for mass-murder of his opponents, the fact that it was his political opponents he was murdering rather than attempting to eliminate a particular ethnic/cultural group makes genocide an inaccurate descriptor for Pinochet's murders.
Fascism certainly is a good descriptor for Franco's particular nasty flavour of ideology. However, like Pinochet, genocide is a poor descriptor for Franco's mass murderous activities since it was targeted at political opponents rather than elimination of ethnic/cultural groups.
You say that I shouldn't define fascists as people who commit genocide.
What would you call people who commit genocide?
Genocidal is a pretty good descriptor for those who commit genocide. Rwanda is an example of genocide without fascism.
Andre, You say that the word "fascist" has a well-established meaning. (which I have got wrong).
If the 'meaning' of the word fascist is, 'well-established' then you would have no trouble telling us what it is.
I await your reply.
Which of course you won’t give, despite it being so “well-established”.
FFS, check a dictionary or the wikipedia link I gave you above.
https://wikidiff.com/genocide/fascism
A couple more for you Jenny-Armenian genocide by Turkey and the Rape of Nanking by Japan.
Indeed. Even though the Japanese Empire, did not explicitly share the Italian and German fascist icongraphy and language, (harking back to the glories of the Western Imperial slave society of ancient Rome). Following the Rape of Nanking, the Japanese imperialists (rightly in my opinion) were termed fascists.
In its brutality and carnage on the same scale as the destruction of Homs by the Assad regime.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2016/feb/04/drone-footage-homs-syria-utter-devastation-video
One of many main problems jenny … is who are you asking to win your war….. surely not the people commiting genocide in Yemen ??
And even if we were to believe your good war / we must kill more and add more deaths …. to stop a genocide logic.
Lets look at the 'care' towards civilians you are asking for …. a recent war crime shows a good example …of your good war, being nothing but a uncaring death and refugee machine.
So who are you calling on to kill more ?? Turkey is your best option for dragging it out at the moment.
In their campaign against Isis the US has slaughtered civilians also identified by the Assad regime as enemies.
I have never denied Reason, that the US has committed massive crimes against the people of Syria in fact I have written about them long before you. As soon as the Amnesty report came out. I wrote on these pages about this crime.
The US is in Syria for its own reasons. The US has never unleashed the same fury against the Assad regime that it has unleashed against perceived enemies of the US. In the two air strikes against regime resources the US gave the Assad regime, (through its Russian ally), advanced notice of both attacks. And notably, no regime forces were ever killed or wounded in these two attacks. The US didn't exercise such niceties toward the civilian population of Raqqa.
The West and particularly the US has a fetish against anyone (but themselves of course) having weapons of mass destruction, WMDs. As horrible as these weapons are, most of the regime's slaughter of civilians has been conducted with so called "conventional weapons" which the US has raised no real objection to, and has certainly not acted to stop.
You are not anti-war, if you are not anti-Assad's war.
It is actually you reason, who is calling to kill more.
In your comment above you are of course alluding to Idlib.
Idlib had previously with Turkish support been declared a deconfliction zone.
Lately the Turkish government of Erdogan has made its peace with the Assad regime and their Russian ally, giving the green light for the regime and Russia to continue their genocidal campaign against the Syrian people into Idlib.
Completing the encirclement Erdogan has ordered the closing of the border to civilians fleeing the impending slaughter, leaving them no where else to go.
Reason you are cheering on this slaughter to begin.
And even when the regime conquers Idlib, the killing will not stop. This is a regime that is currently rounding up and "disappearing" thousands of civilians in the areas it has already retaken.
‘
Don't support fascism. (It really shouldn't have to be said).
Jenny , you just cant stop your bullshitting your one sided propaganda can you ?? …
Things like your wild conspiracy theories about the Christchurch racist mass murderer … or the murder of British Labour MP Jo Cox … both being caused by Assad / Syria ….
Leave you with sub-zero credibility…. You've proven you'll write any shit.
My comment was about a 100 mile deep strip running the length of the border with Syria ….
Perhaps Turkey was promised it … and Israel the Golan Heights too… in a pre-arranged divy up upon the destruction / balkinization break up of Syria …. which was all on course and following the script of Libya ,,,
before the Isis / al nusra tide was repelled.
Regarding Idlib and ignoring your asshat blather ….The problem with Idib is all the foreign fighters / mercenaries, ,,,which their home countries do not want them to returning too.
New Zealand had 1 ,,,,, and there was a big fuss about him …. Britian and France have hundreds,
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/isis-recruiter-who-radicalised-london-bridge-attackers-was-protected-by-mi5-232998ab6421
Both the brits and frogs have previously stated they would rather have their radicalized citizens killed than returned … do your own internet search.
So I imagine the best result for the sponsors of your peaceful bloodbath would be to block their return … yet pretend moral outrage when they lose their last Jihad battles.
Personally I believe quite a few could be de-radicalised ,,,,,, so unlike you I'm not into more war / killing….
And I heard that you stayed with people …. like the fine ones in this video … during your time in syria ;(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULtNYSUqYHw
The video link about Raqqa very specificly disproves one of your
Assad is not a racist (anti-Zionist maybe), and whether a one party (not based on race, ethnicity or religion) tyranny posing as socialist qualifies as fascist is debatable (a matter of technical definition). Resorting to methods (bombing in civilian areas and economic blockade) used by the Allies during WW2 is not genocide, though war crimes are/were involved. Each would claim they did it to defeat a fascist threat (and Islamo-fascism was ultimately the alternative posed to the regime, not a democracy).
I would also argue that Netanyahu has not committed genocide, albeit collective punishment and war crimes. An ethnic state asserting its will by force is racist and fascist.
As for Trump, his white race nation, "the will of our God and our nation be done" assertion of economic and military power (including sanctions against those nations that refuse to enforce sanctions against targeted states) is fascist in its belligerent exercise of power.
SPC you object to me identifying the Assad regime "fascist" as inaccurate and a redefinition of the word. Yet you have no hesitation of identifying Assad's opponents as "Islamofascists".
The crimes of Isis are dire and extreme, but don’t reach by numbers anywhere near the sheer scale of the crimes committed by the Assad regime.
You criticise me for redefining the word fascist and then make your own redefinition, fascism is the "beligerant exercise of power".
In my opinion your definition is too tame and too broad.
Fascism is something much worse than this.
In my opinion you have fallen into the Godwyn trap.
But even using your definition Assad is a fascist.
Er no, I disagree whether the term fascist is accurate for Syria's Baath regime and explained why (I did not discuss redefintion of the word fascist but mentioned the technical use of the term, as distinct from the colloquial use which both of us are doing). Many have called Moslem terrorists intent on imposition of their rule Islamo-fascists. And not just Islamic State, but also al Nusra.
And I did not redefine fascism as "belligerent exercise of power" but noted that such was practiced by fascist regimes – fascist in its "belligerent use of power" (either domestically and externally).
Yes the Assad regime did exercise "belligerent use of power", but not until it was subject to a conspiracy to depose the regime (its earlier use of gunfire to intimidate democratic protesters in Damascus was commonplace tyranny).
What I find notable SPC is that in his recent extended interview on Democracy Now in which Noam Chomsky covered a wide range of issues, imperialism, the rise of fascism in the ’30s, the campaign against nuclear weapons in the ’80s the Iraq war, the war in Yemen. the war in Libya. But during this extended interview where he was given the complete floor to say whatever he wanted Noam Chomsky never mentioned, (apart from a mention of Israel annexing the Golan Heights). Chomsky never mentioned, not even once, the war in Syria.
This could represent one of two things;
1/ That Chomsky is changing from his previous held position of endorsing the US regime change conspiracy theory spread by the Assad regime and its supporters.
2/ That Chomsky has not changed from his previous position, but knows that it is indefensible, and that Democracy Now will challenge him on it.
I would like to believe that it is the first case not the second.
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/7/5/an_hour_with_noam_chomsky_on
Thanks for that learned theory about Chomsky's "indefensible" position on Syria. Do you think he should come out in support of Al Qaeda and the Al Nusra Front?
Don't you think it worthy noting SPC that a learned scholar like Noam Chomsky did not feel confidant enough to make a comment on Syria before people who he knew would challenge him on it?
Chomsky did not feel confidant [sic] enough....
???????
Chomsky is not some cowardly politician. And he has never supported a "regime change conspiracy theory."
Chomsky is not some cowardly politician. And he has never supported a “regime change conspiracy theory.”
Morrissey
https://www.newsdeeply.com/syria/community/2016/04/14/how-noam-chomsky-betrayed-the-syrian-people
Quoting wacky blogs does nothing for your argument, Jenny. The ridiculous sight of a lightweight like “analyst Sam Hammad” calling Noam Chomsky, of all people, “conservative, orientalist, and incoherent” is almost as ridiculous as the shrieking charge that he “betrayed” anyone.
Sam Hammad is a 'lightweight'
Ironic then that the most common go to source, for Assad apologists on this site, is 9/11 Truther and comedian Jimmy Dore
YOU WANT THE TRUTH? A CORRESPONDENCE WITH NOAM CHOMSKY ON SYRIA
Posted on April 30, 2017 by Sam Hamad
When I read Manufacturing Consent as a teenager, in the summer of 2002 to be precise, at the beginning of War on Terror fever, I never thought that one day its most esteemed author, Noam Chomsky, would accuse me of supporting al-Qaeda. In the following exchange, he does exactly that, as well as accusing me of supporting Daesh. That makes it three times, by my count, that he’s issued this most scurrilous and ironic smear, with his initial accusation of my support for Daesh coming in a response he gave to a friend who had sent an article I wrote criticising his stance on Syria for Muftah……
https://herecomesthetumbleweed.wordpress.com/2017/04/30/you-want-the-truth-a-correspondence-with-noam-chomsky/
Sam Hammad is a 'lightweight'
Agreed.
The difficulties presented by polarisation
"And even if it is an immediate disaster, visible on day one, there are few guarantees that leavers would admit their error and seek once more the embrace of Brussels. As Charles Grant of the Centre for European Reform puts it, “Just because babies are dying, does that mean they’ll say we were better off in the EU?” Aren’t they just as likely to blame the beastly Europeans for inflicting such a hellscape on an innocent nation? After all, even Boris Johnson once thought Britain could leave the EU and keep its seat on the European council of ministers. The Brexiters will cry, “How we were to know that leaving the EU meant leaving the EU?” And if they don’t blame Brussels, they’ll blame someone else: foreigners, minorities, anyone but themselves."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/19/upside-no-deal-crashing-out-country-brexit
Exchange Brexit for climate emergency …..the same process is in play
Whaleoik's lawyer begs to be allowed off the case but judge refusing his client's illness or bankruptcy as further delaying tactics. Sheds light on how the slob has been gaming the court system for years. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/07/18/687813/lawyer-let-me-off-whaleoil-case
he looks like he is in for (another) hard life lesson – most of which are of his own doing and could have been resolved years ago if he was reasonable.
No sympathy for his current legal predicament.
I feel for his children, but that's it.
Massey University’s Dr Andy Towers, from the School of Public Health, wants minimum pricing for alcohol as part of a campaign to make it socially unacceptable for poor people to drink – saying “Sub-groups” who continue to smoke, even though it’s socially unacceptable and expensive, they’re addicted. The same would happen with alcohol if minimum unit pricing came in”
Mimimum pricing would of course have no impact on the craft beers and wines drunk by the well to do, for whom drinking would presumably remain socially acceptable in more upmarket locations and more exclusive private clubs (a bit like in Teheran behind the walls of the well to do).
The Panopticon Society rears its head via Public Health policy academics, their cohorts in criminology presumably justify targeting of the underclass without religion with fear and obey policing intimidation.
The enemies of equality and freedom come out in public like this because they have no shame.
If Andy Tower stuck his head out the window he would realise poor people can barely pay for their rent, pay off their tertiary loan and save a deposit to buy a home and this is why less young people drink. We have the highest rent to house value in the world and the second most expensive property to wages in the world.
Using "price to signal that drinking is unacceptable" (and reserving it as a privilege for those whose drinks prices will remain unchanged) is of an alliance between the haves and those who want to control the behaviour and lives of the common folk. His agenda to describe poor people who drink as addicts is telling.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/114298788/a-change-to-minimum-unit-pricing-of-alcohol-will-reduce-harm-says-researcher#comments
If this study was accurate it would appear that the people who drink to much are the old rich ones.
Manual workers apparently drink much less than wealthy professionals. Price increase aren't therefore likely to have any effect.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/may/01/wealthy-professionals-most-likely-to-drink-alcohol-regularly-figures-show
There is an article linked to the story on Stuff the about a study by Andy Towers himself coming to the same conclusion that the increase in drinking is by those is by those over 50 – so he should know minimum pricing would have no impact on that.
Using "price to signal that drinking is unacceptable"…
Unacceptable to whom? Seriously, apart from devout Muslims, who wants to "signal that drinking is unacceptable?" Some technocrats in government departments in universities, maybe? I was at a pub last night and drinking seemed pretty acceptable to everyone present.
ISTR a low minimum pricing/quantity deters kids when there's not age restriction (e.g. single cigarette sales I think were banned before tobacco became R18). Keeps it just outside the reach of their pocket money.
But I suspect that as the price of alcohol goes up, the more people bring homebrew to parties for their friends. Maybe with a nod and a wink, maybe gratis. None of my business.
Foreigners' unpaid medical debts revealed. And this is just for the Auckland region.
More than $35 million in unpaid debts by foreigners treated for healthcare in Auckland has been written off in the past three years.
Acting Health Minister Julie Anne Genter and the DHBs declined to comment. But in Counties Manukau's OIA response, it stated significant resource goes into determining a patient's eligibility status, and then seeking payment.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2019/07/foreigners-unpaid-medical-debts-revealed.html
Here's a possible solution. Require them to have insurance when entering the country, making it available for those that don't already have cover. No insurance, no entry.
Yesterday I heard a worker at the Maori agency [sorry forget its name] say the problem with Maori babies being taken is that the department will not build/get more housing so Mother AND child can be helped away from their bad life situation.
Such a simple solution to the problem … it must be correct and so beyond the comprehension of beaurocrats
While being one solution, the problem is more complex than that.
You are correct as I now know if I had not already realised from reading the article listed below
Add this (link below) to your reading list, John.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/114346832/mori-four-times-more-likely-to-have-children-removed-study
On the other hand. Rather than removing mother and child(ren) from the family home how about removing the abusive partner?
Set them all up in say one of these….https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/homed/houses/114172252/adult-dorms-a-look-inside-aucklands-newest-coliving-arrangement …and let 'em slug it out.
Sorry Rosemary .. a great idea but hamstrung I am sure by eager lawyers to proect the rights of those abusers.
"lets them slug it out" is not a solution IMO but compounding on the problem.
Here's one organisation doing that: https://gandhinivas.nz/our-houses/
Since writing the above I have been to the following ,,,,
https://www.nzcpr.com/new-zealands-maori-child-welfare-problem/#more-29704
or you could check this if you prefer ….
https://www.nzcpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Research-Paper-Child-Abuse-Brian-Giesbrecht.pdf
It is related to a counry on the other side of the world but I think as I read it often applying to here.
Rather long but full of background for somebody who only has seen two very small parts of that country …. Vancouver and Niagra Falls…. as a tourist 🙁
The links are to the NZ Centre for Political Research, which despite it's institutional name is a right-wing political think tank.
I tried to read the second link but could only get through the introduction by Muriel Newman, and the first page before deciding to skim for any nuggets of information. The report by a retired Canadian judge is indicative of the further harm that can be caused by those in authority. His mention of the residential schools being a 'dumping ground' for children of abusive alcoholic parents, ignores the reality that many were taken from intact and loving environments, and put into these abusive institutions.
His reference to FASD is without context for the conditions in which alcohol is used as a release from despair for whole indigenous communities.
I don't think he adds anything new to the conversation, except provide evidence of the level of assumptions that must be made in order to continue to justify the status quo and the harm that occurs.
This refusal to consider perpetual harm and the long-term consequences of government and societal actions on the indigenous community is obstructive to effective solutions.
Of course it is….
/
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/114118908/man-charged-with-murder-of-10monthold-baby
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/113881098/breaking-homicide-investigation-launched-into-toddlers-death
https://www.sunlive.co.nz/news/215384-name-suppression-toddler-murder-accused.html
In Australia they spend more on seizing children … due largely to poverty of their homes / parents …… than would be needed to just lift them out of poverty.
Families are paying a toll for the settings of society …. any civilized evolving society should adapt to overcome serious problems … like affordable housing for all its citizens.
I could well believe market ideology is the main impediment to fixing the failures harming NZ society.
Joint Statement of The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Public Health Service (FDA & CDC), July 7, 1999
The Process of Public Policy Formulation: The Case of Thimerosal in Vaccines
EMERGENCE OF THIMEROSAL AS A CONCERN
Not sure how may of the vaccines on the NZ schedule contain thiomersal as formulations and preservatives are constantly evolving but as ever it’s disappointing that Philu is still spreading his antivac. drivel….
First, there is no mercury in vaccines, and never was. And thiomersal is not banned, anywhere.
Let’s start with the beginning. Thiomersal is a powerful antiseptic, that, even in tiny doses, (nanogram levels) blocks the growth of bacteria. Up until the anti-vaccination movement invented some tropes about thiomersal, we had less expensive, multi use vials for many drugs, including vaccines. Thiomersal prevented bacterial growth, which is much more dangerous than the imagined danger of thiomersal.
The claim that it is mercury is silly and shows of an ignorance of chemistry. Thiomersal is not a fancy name for “mercury” it is the proper chemical term for ethyl mercury, an organic compound attached to the mercury molecule. They do not disassociate in the body, and is quickly eliminated through the kidneys.
Table salt is sodium bonded to chlorine. Elemental sodiums is explosive. And elemental chlorine, a gas, is deadly. Yet when they are combined, they became a stable salt. And it does disassociate (unlike thiomersal), although the ionic forms of the sodium and chlorine are not dangerous.
Reducing chemistry to the basic elements is not how biochemistry works. It’s the whole molecule that matters, not the individual parts. So thiomersal does not add to the mercury burden of a human being, unless you have some nobel prize winning research that shows that somehow the mercury atom cleaves from the organic molecule in water. And we have no evidence of that.
Moreover, there simply is no research whatsoever that has established a link between thiomersal or anything, up to and including autism.
What’s next on your list Phil…fluoride in the water ? or is it back to the 5G ?
I could very well be missing something here Higherstandard, and everyone else in the world knows the source of your quoted text, but help me out here and provide a link.
Please?
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=thiomersal&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Sorry Higherstandard, that simply takes me to generic search page…which particular paper are you quoting from?
Thimerosal: clinical, epidemiologic and biochemical studies.
CONCLUSION:
The culmination of the research that examines the effects of Thimerosal in humans indicates that it is a poison at minute levels with a plethora of deleterious consequences, even at the levels currently administered in vaccines.
One Two do you have any medical qualifications to make that claim to us?
One Two do you have any medical qualifications to make that claim to us?
Not unless he's been holding out on us this chap below does have some medical knowledge though…
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/why-the-latest-geier-geier-paper-is-not-evidence-that-mercury-in-vaccines-causes-autism/
It may all be rather pointless discussion though ….. as I said above I not sure if any vaccines in the NZ schedule use thimerosal as a preservative anymore. If philu wants to tell us whether they do he can search it up on the Medsafe website.
Had a wee look.A bunch of different credible sites say thimerosal has not been in any New Zealand childhood vaccines since 2000, and is not currently in any vaccines of any kind in New Zealand (although flu vaccines overseas are commonly cited as still possibly containing thimerosal). Haven't spotted anything that gives a date on when the last vaccines containing thimerosal were phased out in New Zealand.
There's an odd absence of triumphant articles claiming reductions in illnesses previously attributed to thimerosal due to the removal of it, however.
The chemtrails took over where the evil vaccines left off. Stay in your caves, comrades!
Also, the links in that SBM piece all appear to be dead. But searching for Geier debunked brings up plenty of relevant info.
As if it wasn't blindingly obvious how you manage to maintain yourself at such a stunted level of ignorance.
To the point where you openly…and seemingly without a sense of shame or awareness… share your base level technique…
Andre keyword search:
[subject matter] | [persons name] | [debunk]
Bravo. Shameless.
I can't believe anybody still references that guy. But there it is before my eyes. Stunning.
Ooooh, sounds like this time it's going to need more than a hug and a kiss and a make-up sesh.
CONCLUSION:
If you read the linked material… you should have managed to figure out that I had forgotten to used the <blockquote> on 11.1.1.3
Mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired oxidative-reduction activity, degeneration, and death in human neuronal and fetal cells induced by low-level exposure to thimerosal and other metal compounds
Conclusion
Low-dose Thimerosal in pediatric vaccines: Adverse effects in perspective
That concludes the background detail around the toxins which triggered US governmental intervention more than 20 years ago, leading toward so called ‘settled science’…
I’ll be posting about closed door sessions held by the IOM who were hired by the CDC to provide desired outcomes…which the CDC had paid service fees to receive.
Leading to reports (including 2004) which were based on inconclusive studies which can’t ever show ‘safety’…the 2004 report also essentially removed any required for future necessary lab research.
The handful of studies are cited globally including in NZ as ‘settled science’….
16000 more beneficiaries since Labour won the treasury benches, and hardship grant's up from 270,000 which were a disgrace under National to 490,000 per year now. Jeez this politics of kindness is great isn't it, and all the while the neoliberal machine keeps thundering along…
Don't be so mean. Everything is absolutely wonderful. Beloved leader says so so it must be true.
On the other hand she said that her meeting with the Australian PM had been a great success. Perhaps she was talking about her future career after she get bounced from her current role next year.
I heard a suggestion that she and Clarke were going to become stand up comedians. She was practicing for that and her prepared patter at the meeting certainly seemed to cause much hilarity for the Australians didn't it? Scott Morrison and his colleagues were openly laughing at her complaints about the deportations.
ha – at least you're not trying to bully the baby anymore you sad sack of doggy doos
I don't believe I ever attempted to bully Jacinda Ardern.
What on earth are you dribbling on about, you sad little git?
yeah you’re real ignorant alright – make your idol t.rump look genius level
There are some details at
https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/statistics/benefit/latest-quarterly-results/all-main-benefits.html
The main increase is in job seeker support and it would be interesting to know why given that many employers are struggling to find staff.
Like the Key government, and the Clark government before it, it's going to take over 2 parliamentary terms for the shine to come off this one, no matter the actual results.
And it goes both ways:
The shine WON'T come off inside two terms no matter the actual results – and the shine WILL come off after two terms no matter the actual results. Which points at an electorate detached from, and maybe unaware of, actual results. Depressing really. It results in an excellent government killed off by fear of low-energy light bulbs, and a terrible government surviving fiscally unnecessary public sector austerity.
The Ardern-Robertson Budget accountability framework will at least show the annual results on poverty alleviation to hold them to.
I have a sneaky feeling the media will warm to that task.
Meanwhile, at the other end of the pay scale
Cream at the top for public sector chief executives
Public sector salaries are once again under the spotlight after the announcement that Christchurch City Council's new chief executive will earn almost $500,000. But are they really that bad? DOMINIC HARRIS investigates.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/114345078/cream-at-the-top-for-public-sector-chief-executives
A good read.
National MP and climate change spokesperson Todd Muller, supports the government's low emission vehicle rebate policy.
Simon Bridges and the National Party oppose it.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/shows/2019/07/the-pitch-national-s-climate-spokesperson-supports-govt-electric-vehicle-policy-despite-party-opposition.html
I would dispute Todd Muller's disapproval of old cars as at 87 I have been driving for over sixty years, all sorts of vehicles from Trucks to 50cc motorcycles with few problems. Most of which were old and now have a 14yo WV which looks like new to me when washed and waxed, an import. Careful driving and responsible attention to road and conditions rather than arbitary rules.
Driving experience is important and I am sure this started for me as my grand dad drive our 1937 Morris 8 with me beside him sitting on Nan's lap …. not that I would reccomend that 🙂 [no seat-belts in those days]
Plus cycling to school in the easy days before the roads were littered with cars during WWII.
Then there are JAG's speed changes. A good driver slows when the road suggest it and driving in America it was a constant worry looking out for endless speed restriction signs … apart from motorways which are a delight to drive on often above the limi when safe as no cars around and long distances to be covered.
It seems silly to reduce speed limits when all new imported cars are capable and safe at well over the limits.
Regrettably there are too few responsible drivers and car owners like yourself.
Fresh regulation occurs when the system overall is failing. (usually 😉 )
With the road toll and urban air pollution as it is, we need new regulation.
Western Elites Spruik Media Freedom While Torturing Julian Assange In Belmarsh Supermax.
Jim Mora, Chris Knox, Denise L’Estrange-Corbet, Graham Bell, Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and other such worthies are amused no end by Assange’s persecution and suffering, but serious people, like the Australian psychologist Dr Lissa Johnson don’t see the funny side….
Thanks Morrissey, interesting ‘perspective’, but Prof. Nils Melzer is just "one academic, and like lawyers, I can provide you with another one that will give you a counterview."
Hold. Hold. Wait for it…
Ha, ha, ha, Mr. Kram. Thanks for spoiling this lovely afternoon with that repellent flashback.
Deeper look at some of the aspects of the simple question – worthwhile read imo
The Grauniad?!?!?!?!?
WTF, marty?
http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2019/894-dump-the-guardian.html
Or you could read the article Marty linked to. It was quite interesting.
Yes, I know that. Just be careful, that’s all. The Grauniad is dodgy, to say the least.
http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2019/894-dump-the-guardian.html
yet you refuse to accept the truth – when will you front up moonbreen
And yet, and I can't stress this enough, that particular link to the Guardian was incredibly pertinent to the times we live in, the rise of fascism from the dustbin of history. Or so we thought – maybe we just hadn't wanted to notice that the lid wasn't shuit on the dustbin.
You want to bitch about the Guardian not meeting your approval. That's your thing. Ok. I'm fucking worried about if there's anything I can do to stop these bastards, because they will end up killing us all quicker than climate change ever would. Physics doesn't care if we live or die. Fascists actively want to kill all non-fascists. Not just over there, over here, too.
We need to maximise inclusion. That means learning new things about how our behaviour excludes or intimidates groups of people, even if innocently intended.
Putting up with the paradox of tolerance meaning that we have to exclude people with whom there is no compromise on exclusion isn't enough. That's the pointy bit of the pyramid. But the wider bit, about avoiding unintended exclusion, That's what the pointy bit sits on.
So what are your specific thoughts on the Guardian article? Given that you know that the article was quite interesting, what are your thoughts on the topic?
Kirk out
verb
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Kirk%20out
National Party embedded journalist, Stacey Kirk, kirks out of journalism. This is yet another example of a right wing media person throwing their toys and quitting because the National Party are in opposition.
True to form, her letter of resignation is nothing more than a John Key puff piece, mentioning him, oh, a dozen or so times.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/114165092/conflict-scandal-eventually-progress–its-a-hard-road-making-a-difference-but-thats-politics
It's the ones who make no attempt to stay neutral who don't last. Bye Stacey, your partisan scribblings will not be missed.
Watch now for the announcement she has joined the National Party press team. She will have returned home.
Great news. Though it says she's going to "a new public service career".
I read that as her imagining she's been doing public service work thus far, and is embarking on what she imagines is new public service work, ie press secretary for the National Party.
One of the comments after her piece on John Key suggested she left because she didn't get the political editor job after her mate Tracy Watkins left.
Here's who did:
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/114251734/stuff-appoints-new-political-editor-to-lead-parliamentary-team
Another RWNJ.
Notice that the puff piece from Kirk used a bold photo of Key and English and a small one showing mostly Jacinda's hair.
Sad that a replacement will probably be a Trump trained mouth.
Love how she frames her whole departure as if she's rilly smart and getting out on top just like that John guy whose loafers she tongued for so long.
Heh heh, Ozzies passing themselves off as the 4th Island of NZ again…
http://www.dailyviewsonline.com/cultura/Nuova-Zelanda-leader-dice-che-CI-manca-di-interesse-in-Asia-Pacifico-h16263.html
Interesting. US govt working to get someone out of Swedish jail.. https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/114384085/trump-weighs-in-on-rapper-asap-rocky-we-hope-to-get-him-home-soon
The things a million dollar inaugural gift to tRump can buy.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will not halt a pesticide linked with brain damage from being sprayed on crops, the agency said Thursday in response to a lawsuit.
Chlorpyrifos, known on the market as Lorsban, is used on a wide variety of crops, including corn and cranberries, and farmers often call it a last line of defense against certain insects.
A federal appeals court in April gave the EPA 90 days to decide how to deal with the pesticide.
Environmental groups have long contended it’s dangerous and have spent years suing the EPA to end its agricultural use. Studies have linked chlorpyrifos to learning and memory issues and prolonged nerve and muscle stimulation.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/453777-epa-allows-continued-use-of-pesticide-linked-with-brain-damage
Bolton invokes Hague Invasion act.
https://twitter.com/DeepPolitics/status/1152100676069154817
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act
Whilst lawful under US legislation, is it ethical?
Nothings changed except for the removal of a cloak of respectability
Won't be much trouble getting new planes for the NZDF now that the Prime Minister and journalists got stranded in Melbourne when their official RNZAF 757 broke down with a computer malfunction.
Bet the PM ditches our own military service next time and just goes commercial.
Get it together RNZAF!
Here's Jacinda (about 7 mins in on the clip in the link below) talking about the planes
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2019/07/prime-minister-jacinda-ardern-won-t-compare-climate-change-to-world-war-ii.html
Bernard Hickey calls out Jacinda
https://twitter.com/bernardchickey
Instead of raising benefits, the Minister of Finance would do better to bully and force seasonal employers to put their wages up, because that is where the workers are needed.
Instead we open the doors to foreigners with temporary visas just to get the apples and grapes in. So unemployed NEETS don't see enough attraction to work in season areas.
With Brexit, the US-China trade crisis pulling Chinese economic demand down, and now Iran heating up, and having one of the top two most exposed housing markets in the OECD, I see plenty of reason for the Minister of Finance to keep plenty of debt capacity in reserve.
Agree, wages for seasonal workers need to increase. However, a number of seasonal workers end up back on the benefit when the season is over. Additionally, higher benefits puts upward pressure on wages.
There is scope for loosening the purse strings a little and the extra expenditure will result in savings re improvements in social ills along with increased tax revenue via the economic stimulus due to the increased benefit spend. Nevertheless, loosening the purse strings is merely one option. Cuts could be made elsewhere.
Seems Grant has a blank cheque to tackle Mycoplasma bovis.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2018/06/grant-robertson-signs-blank-cheque-to-tackle-mycoplasma-bovis.html
And of course, there is that massive military spend.
Alternatively, they could look at taxing this lot (in the link below) a bit more
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/114345078/cream-at-the-top-for-public-sector-chief-executives
Cool.
https://twitter.com/physicsJ/status/1141963963451621376
Justin Pemberton talks to Kim Hill this morning about the film Capital In The Twenty-First
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/audio/2018705001/justin-pemberton-capital-in-the-twenty-first-century
this is heartbreaking
https://twitter.com/hashtag/insulin4all?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Ehashtag
Insulin manufacturers have basically done a Shkreli. Incrementally, rather than in one hit, so it didn't quite get the attention.
https://www.vox.com/2019/4/3/18293950/why-is-insulin-so-expensive
There's also a lot of expensive stuff that comes with it – injector pens, needles, blood glucose monitor, test strips etc. I pay a small fraction of what all that costs, thanks to what US right-wingers contemptuously dismiss as "socialised medicine." They'd much rather have ideological purity, readily available at the low, low cost of lots of dead poor people.
Playing footsie with the murderous Assad wasn't such a good idea.
As she runs for the Democratic nominee for president, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) also faces a primary challenge for her seat in the House. But if recent filings made by her political team are any indication, she’s not sweating.
Gabbard raised just $11 in the second quarter of 2019. That number does not factor in a $31 contribution refund, which means her campaign committee ended in the red during that three month period.
The committee spent just $8,828.59 during the quarter—almost all of which was on financial compliance—leaving it with just over $30,000 cash on hand.
The absence of any fundraising or spending on her House race has left political observers with the impression that Gabbard may not return to Congress at all if her White House bid falls short. By contrast, during this quarter in the 2018 election cycle, Gabbard brought in more than $225,000 in net contributions, per federal filings.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/tulsi-gabbard-raised-negative-dollar20-for-her-house-campaign?
Fuckers are lining up their ducks.
https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/1152360605665452032