Clearly you are content on getting your advice from a fund manager, not a climate scientist. Perhaps that is why you believe humans cause 100% of the climate change we are experiencing, when Nasa say otherwise. Oh and just about every other scientists I ...
Where in either of those clips does Bill Nye claim humans have induced 100% of climate change? Here, I'll help you. From NASA: "The panel also concluded there's a better than 95 percent probability that human-produced greenhouse gases such as carbon ...
I asked you for evidence that mankind causes 100% of climate change. The clip was interesting as far as CO2 was concerned, but didn't address my question to you. Do you have evidence that mankind is solely responsible for climate change?
...says someone who thinks 100% of climate change is man made.
You're spinning yourself in circles trying to defend Ardern. It really is quite simple. If the plan to not issue any further permits had been Labour policy at the election, Ardern would not have refused to rule out more drilling. You're trying to suggest ...
So you are of the view that humans cause 100% of climate change? I'd really like to see you're evidence for that!
https://thestandard.org.nz/who-gives-a-hooton-about-climate-change/#comment-1492286 If she refused to rule out more drilling, she was ruling out an end to drilling. Unless you're happy to live with her weasel words.
Kat 1. Ardern is on record as ruling out an end to drilling in September 2017. [No she did not. Back this up or you will attract attention for troll like behaviour - MS] 2. Cabinet did have zero input into the decision. The decision was made despite ...
If I was in power in NZ, not much, until the larger emitters played ball. Human induced climate change is only part of the total picture, and NZ's emissions are a miniscule content. My priority would be the health and welfare of NZ'ers, not building my ...
You should perhaps have waited for my response to your post (https://thestandard.org.nz/who-gives-a-hooton-about-climate-change/#comment-1492325).
"Want to read Labour policy which I have set out in the post and tell me how the ban is inconsistent with labour policy?" I didn't claim it was. But what Ardern's comments show was that it wasn't Labour policy. Any number of things could be 'consistent ...
The oil and gas exploration decision was not about climate change, it was about political expediency, deflecting from a disastrous period for the government politically, and virtue signally to smooth the way for the PM's trip to Europe. The lack of ...
Yes, I vote. But I do not 'support' any one party. I vote based on who I believe is best equipped to run the country. The country is currently run by a Labour led coalition that is prepared to indulge in corporate welfare and subsidise wealthy home buyers ...
It's not a broken promise, but it is proof that the decision to ban was NOT Labour policy pre election. Given the lack of consultation with industry, the absence of analysis, the fact that advice from government departments was ignored, and that there was ...
No. I don't recall ever having done so.
Sniff. https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/govts-foreign-buyer-ban-will-destroy-the-housing-market-collins/ar-AAymaWw?ocid=spartanntp Twyford lost again.
Ah the old 'the economy made them do it' canard. P use is a personal choice. It is doesn't discriminate based on socio-economic status, and not all people in low socio-economic conditions use drugs.
"I wouldn’t be surprised to find that some of them were." Evidence please. "But not necessarily the people living there at that time." Of course it's possible. "I’m fine with that. We just need to extend more help to them." I'm fine with extending help to ...
It's not a Serco prison. Davis won't be interested.
The first clip you cite is edited - have you seen the full discussion? YouTube is full off clips in which supporters of one side or the other claim their ‘man’ won the day. Here’s an example for you: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-kUy4LxxuFQ. It’s puerile....
When the substance of the article is a Facebook post (and one that is contradicted by another earlier post) it’s not unreasonable to suggest there aren’t two issues to be contemplating!
...also from the ETu Facebook page... “Great work by our Compass delegates from Auckland Hospital who argued for improved union rights at the Select Committee hearing in Auckland yesterday.“ Sounds like ETu should get their stories straight!
This is just a failed attempt to distract from the latest hits to labour’s catch and release policy: https://i.stuff.co.nz/auckland/104439499/dozens-of-auckland-prison-guards-call-in-sick-after-organised-violence-from-gang-member-inmates. https://i.stuff....
Well said.
1. Stealing a piece of pizza is not a qualifying crime. 2. Using a more offence (eg grievous bodily harm) while stealing a piece of pizza is not the same as stealing a piece of pizza. 3. Felony petty theft does not carry a 25 year sentence.
OAB when you critique someones opinion with such personal rhetoric, you can expect to be treated with equal disdain. Your reference is an article written in January 2010. The first sentence reads "Raising GST to 15 per cent would..." WOULD. That should ...
The ignorance being displayed by some here is astonishing. It's Angry Andy's own tag and release dog whistle club at its worst.
You can learn more about the three strikes law at https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/justice-statistics/three-strikes-statistics/. And about public opinion on this issue at http://sst.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Three-...
"It will mean that he is sentenced according to conventional methods so that, for instance, he does not get 25 years jail for stealing a piece of pizza." 1. The offences that qualify for the the 'three strikes' are very specific. "There are 40 qualifying ...
."Belief has nothing to do with good policy." And yet Andrew Little is implementing a catch and release policy based on his belief. It is certainly not based on evidence. "They’re not. They get locked up." And under Labour, let out again early to reoffend....
Your running around in circles, Mc Flock. Here, try this. Labour’s great socialist plan to build 100,000 houses has had to call in the private sector to rescue it. Socialism fails. Constantly.
Recent Comments