Strategy and opinion

Written By: - Date published: 8:21 pm, August 15th, 2012 - 150 comments
Categories: election 2014, labour, polls - Tags:

Thanks to Rob Salmond and Josie Pagani, it is now clear that Labour’s pitch to the  centre is an intentional strategy. That is helpful as now perhaps we can have a reasonable discussion about how well it’s working, and what else might work better.

Certainly in the internet age, the days when the campaign committee could  meet to plan Labour’s strategy under high secrecy have changed. I used to call it the “onion committee” – there was the inner layer, the inner inner layer, and the inner inner inner layer. I could be in any or all at any one time depending on events. Now just like having more say on the leadership, we can  all have a say on the strategy. And all in the open. How refreshing. There’s been a lot of good contributions already.

Rob Salmond offers us a few facts/factoids to help the discussion.

He says any focus group or survey-based analysis of the profile of non-voters is largely useless. I agree totally; which is why our database of non-voters in 2005 was comprehensive, not survey based, and was rich in information. What it enabled us to do, and what was crucial in our win, was  to communicate a personal message to previous non-voters that was relevant to their particular circumstances. Relevance was the key. Turnout went up. Labour won.

However in contrast to Rob I  think communication strategies based on surveys of ideological preference are equally useless. The conceptual gap between location on the scale and relevance of message is just too great. Planning becomes guesswork and messaging reactive.

Rob has a background as a poll analyst. In my experience of reading polls and listening to pollsters, which goes back to 1984, poll data is one thing, interpretation of its significance and more importantly how it may be used to shape political communication is another. The latter is far more important.

Talking of Labour’s centrist targets, Rob offers a few ways to “woo these folk.”

Labour can moderate its own policy, alter which policies it emphasizes in the political debate, try to alter voters’ perceptions of National, or try to convince centrists to change their issue opinions and even their ideology.  The last strategy, of convincing voters they are flat out wrong, is a favorite among activists of all stripes, because it requires change by others but no compromise or change on their own part. Among the issues that that strategy, however, is that it is very difficult to pull off on a large scale and in a short timeframe.

None of these  appeal. Neither are they likely to be successful. The most productive option by far is to have something relevant to say to voters. The great tragedy of Josie Pagani’s truck-driver anecdote is that she didn’t appear to have anything to say when he said “no-one is there for me.” But she was absolutely right about something else she said about the last campaign:

We didn’t sound aspirational, we sounded miserable. We were turning up on people’s doorsteps telling them their lives were gloomy. And anyone who has ever been poor knows the last thing you want is someone telling you your life is crap.

In my view, Josie’s drawn the wrong conclusions from her own experience. In what is presumably Rob’s moderating policy option, attacking teacher and beneficiary straw men isn’t aspirational. It’s telling them they’re all crap. And it’s no answer to the truck-driver’s challenge.

The trouble is Labour stlll sounds miserable. Using another of Rob’s options they seem to be trying to alter voters’ perceptions of National, by relentless oppositional criticism of what National’s doing wrong. The problem with this is that it creates the impression that they don’t know what to do about it themselves. National is doing a good enough job of getting it wrong all by itself. It doesn’t need a lot of extra help.

Rob makes a crucial  point about the importance of timeframes. The next election is now a little over two years away. At some stage Labour has to look and sound like an alternative government, with relevant policies and messages that resonate with the teacher, the truckdriver, and the beneficiary. Right now would be a good time to start getting it together.

150 comments on “Strategy and opinion ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. Sunny 1
    15 August 2012 at 8:57 pm

    Can’t wait to hear Shearer’s speech to Grey Power when his Health (!) Spokesperson’s Private Member’s Bill promoting end of life ‘choice’ gets picked from the ballot…

    • Lanthanide 1.1
      15 August 2012 at 10:23 pm

      I’m sure many people in Grey Power would want to have the choice to die with dignity were they to be faced with a terminal illness. People in Grey Power probably think about these sorts of issues more often than the rest of the population.

      • Colonial Viper 1.1.1
        15 August 2012 at 11:05 pm

        I’m sure many people in Grey Power would want to have the choice to die with dignity were they to be faced with a terminal illness

        I know for a fact that they do.

        • Dr Terry 1.1.1.1
          16 August 2012 at 6:18 am

          While I agree that people, of any age, should be enabled to die with dignity, I must add that very sick people often continue to “live with dignity” and give a great deal to those close to them. Thus the question, better enable the ill to die with dignity, or to live a while longer in dignity (with adequate medical assistance)? We need much discernment here.

          • Lanthanide 1.1.1.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 12:38 pm

            I can’t see what’s wrong with giving people the choice.

            • Olwyn 1.1.1.1.1.1
              16 August 2012 at 1:13 pm

              Choice can become weighted in a particular direction, regardless of stringent safe guards. Suppose the choice of euthanasia allows the squeeze on aged and terminal care to tighten. This is not unlikely, since something is no longer deemed necessary if people can do otherwise. A person could find themselves excluded, for some reason or another, from terminal care, but have relatives who would be badly put out financially by having to care for them. Such a person, assuming she meet the safe guard standards, might well feel pressed to “choose” euthanasia out of duty, despite wanting to live on.

              That is one thing wrong with giving them a choice; once choice is legitimised, the board can be tilted in favour of the preference that bean-counters, etc. deem prudent.

      • Sunny 1.1.2
        16 August 2012 at 8:56 am

        My friend, we all face a ‘terminal condition’.

  2. Carol 2
    15 August 2012 at 9:00 pm

    Labour do need to build a narrative about what they stand for, and it should be the platform for launching their policies, and not some superficial PR job. This needs to come from the heart, and shouldn’t be focused on some paint-by-numbers strategy, trying to second guess what will get more people voting for them.

    And, in my view, they shouldn’t be aiming for the crowded centre.

    The world has changed since Labour was last in government. The whole edifice of the cronyist, socially unjust form of capitalism the west has been intensely pursuing for the last few decades is crumbling.

    Labour should map themselves out a brave new direction.

    If they have their own agenda to pursue, they can still do what oppositions should do, and hold the government to account, strongly, critically, decisively and in a timely manner.

  3. Blue 3
    15 August 2012 at 9:06 pm

    “The next election is now a little over two years away. At some stage Labour has to look and sound like an alternative government, with relevant policies and messages that resonate with the teacher, the truckdriver, and the beneficiary. Right now would be a good time to start getting it together.”

    Ummmm….yeah. That’s what we’ve all been asking them to do. What they should have been doing since the moment the leadership contest was over.

    So when are Labour going to start?

    Or are we going to do the whole ‘let’s pull all our policies out as late in the election campaign as possible when we’ve been thrashed in the media and the polls for three years and no one cares because they’ve already decided not to vote for us’ thing again?

    • KJT 3.1
      15 August 2012 at 9:16 pm

      Insanity is doing the same thing again and expecting a different result.

      Didn’t work last election.

      • ak 3.1.1
        15 August 2012 at 9:52 pm

        Didn’t work last election….

        ….except for the last four weeks – as reflected in results. The first time ever that many crucial swing voters saw some Lab MPs, and a committed team on target with fire in the guts. The pro-underdog fire of yore that every kiwi understands and respects.

        Mainly the fault of the now-blatantly and relentlessly pro-tory media. No easy answer there, but again there are lessons from recent history. Mining, Mt Albert, Lenslide.

        But for starters those lukewarm bellies need a torch: compulsory repeated viewing of the ’11 campaign launch film clip might stir whatever juice is left.

        And then take a tip from the marketing party and his slipperiness himself: permanent campaign mode.

    • Dr Terry 3.2
      16 August 2012 at 6:20 am

      When the pleasant Phil Goff was leader, were we not saying and asking much the same as we are now (and still!)?

  4. Colonial Viper 4
    15 August 2012 at 9:34 pm

    I can’t wait for more market-led strategies and solutions from Labour.

  5. peterlepaysan 5
    15 August 2012 at 9:45 pm

    I am not a National Party supporter, but why the hell would I want to vote for Labour?

    Maybe I should join the non voters and the “occupy” group.

    Labour has nothing on offer after nearly thirty years of receding relevance. I tore up my Labour Party membership card post 1987.

    Not much has happened in the last decade to make me want to rejoin.

    I have more success solving cryptic crosswords, sudoku and kenken than I do telling the difference between Labour and National

  6. saniac 6
    15 August 2012 at 9:51 pm

    Yes, Labour can’t be in power to execute its policy without getting more people to vote Labour than currently do. But that doesn’t mean that we have to adopt centrist policies necessarily — it means that we should identify Labour policies that have broad appeal and recast them in terms that are broadly understood. That is quite different from parroting the platitudes of supposed centrists in the hope that they will identify with us.

    A futher problem is that in all this talk of values and branding and perception, the politics is actually lost. We don’t want power for its own sake. We want it to achieve aims. If there isn’t a programme underpinning the talk, people have to draw their own conclusions from the superficial choices of words and tropes. Perhaps it is unjust to draw the conclusion that the authors of the roof painter speech want to put the boot into the poor. But in the absence of POLITICAL talk — talk about power and policy, why we want it, what we will do with it — then the audience will have to assume that people who use the language of the Right share the aims of the Right.

    As an aside, purely from a pragmatic point of view about communicating in the modern age, people need to understand that you can no longer give a speech to an interest group, tailored for that group, and expect it to stay among a circle of friends. If you’re going to pander to the business community (we’re just like National! only nicer!) or conservative oldies (are the old really that prejudiced, by the way?) whatever you say will come and bite you.Someone outside the intended audience WILL hear and they WILL pass it on. The failure to foresee this furore speaks poorly of the nous of whoever put those words in Shearer’s mouth.

    • Galeandra 6.1
      15 August 2012 at 10:10 pm

      ‘in all this talk of values and branding and perception, the politics is actually lost. We don’t want power for its own sake. We want it to achieve aims.’

      Well said.
      Funny how so many of the inner-sanctum don’t get this yet. No wonder they hate Cunliffe.

    • Bill 6.2
      15 August 2012 at 10:15 pm

      Yes, Labour can’t be in power to execute its policy…

      What fucking policy!

      • Draco T Bastard 6.2.1
        15 August 2012 at 11:35 pm

        The policy that they have to fuck over the electorate in service of the capitalists.

        • Colonial Viper 6.2.1.1
          16 August 2012 at 12:18 am

          But to do so in a nice comfy veneer of caring lefty polish. And you have to admit, life for the bottom half of the population would actually improve a bit more under Labour than it would under National. Surely that’s worth busting a gut for?

          • Descendant Of Smith 6.2.1.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 12:46 pm

            Didn’t in 87 and most beneficiaries were worse off under 9 years of Labour – though they looked after superannuitants a little better.

            On a positive note they did at least reduce the numbers of those on benefit.

            Didn’t do a lot to empower unions.

            Overall I don’t think Labour better has that much going for it. There is no policy to judge them on moving forward. At least it’s much clearer what the greens and mana would do.

  7. Richard Christie 7
    15 August 2012 at 10:27 pm

    The essential obstacle is that due to 30 years of Chicago School economic management the “centre” is now nowhere near where it was years ago.

    They won’t win me back with this strategy.

  8. BillODrees 8
    15 August 2012 at 10:55 pm

    Thanks for your erudite exposition of the current strategy of the Labour Leadership, Mike.

    This has been the strategy since the 2008 loss. At least.

    You are too lenient. Asking the people who have failed so miserably for so long to change is pointless. Asking them to leave is the only option.

    You have just presented the best argument for an immediate succession into the leadership role for David Cunliffe. I’ll buy you a pint when we next meet.

  9. gobsmacked 9
    15 August 2012 at 10:58 pm

    Message versus Messengers

    Even people who strongly disagree can discuss the message. It is much harder to deal with the messengers, because they are people, with egos (and salaries, and self-importance, and more).

    But there is no point pretending that any strategy will work, if it is implemented by the people who delivered failure. It won’t get buy-in from the activists, the ex-Labour voters, the media, anyone. It will be subject to constant suspicion and cynicism.

    Treating this as an abstract exercise won’t work. The old guard must own their defeats (plural), and leave. That is what should have happened under the new leader, but they wanted the illusion of change, not the reality of it. And the leader is too weak (or too close to the old guard) to do what needs to be done.

    If the choice of strategy is really an exercise in self-protection (“how do we keep our jobs?”), then it is a discussion in bad faith. If it is a genuine analysis (“how can we form a Labour/Green gov’t, with policies that we can believe in”), then it should start with half a dozen MPs looking down a camera lens and saying “Our time is up, we will hand over the torch, and we will get out of the way”.

    A few by-elections could kick-start the renewal, and be a great testing ground for innovative policies and modern campaigning. Labour’s energy and prospects could be transformed in no time.

    But I seriously doubt that this will happen, and until then, any discussion of strategy, while well-intentioned, is based on a false premise. The public will not vote for a warmed-over caucus corpse. And they won’t believe what they say.

    • Colonial Viper 9.1
      15 August 2012 at 11:02 pm

      A few by-elections could kick-start the renewal, and be a great testing ground for innovative policies and modern campaigning. Labour’s energy and prospects could be transformed in no time.

      Well, that’s a fascinating idea you float there.

  10. McFlock 10
    15 August 2012 at 11:06 pm

    I thought Labour’s strategists were supposed to be communication specialists.
         
    They want people who did not and will not vote Labour to vote Labour. Without making implying that the decisions to not vote Labour were not wrong.
         
    Maybe there’s another alternative they haven’t thought of yet: say what they will do for the truck driver. Maybe they think saying “eat the rich and Key is a fuckwit” is too negative to get votes. Fair enough. The “strategists'” current line seems to be ‘so pretend the rich give us manna from heaven and that Key isn’t a fuckwit, and proclaim that we agree that the poor and needy are whingers and bludgers’.
       
    There is an alternative: say “we will give you X, we will do Y, we will ensure that you get the fair go you deserve” without belittling anyone else. And keep it up for more than four months so that people know it’s not just a shallow election bribe that you’ll forget to pay. 
         
    But that means you need to have concrete policy, and (dare I say it) know where the money’s coming from, at your fingertips. That last bit is so you can tell the pub braggart to go fuck himself (but with nicer words than that).

    • Draco T Bastard 10.1
      15 August 2012 at 11:48 pm

      That last bit is so you can tell the pub braggart to go fuck himself (but with nicer words than that).

      Na, if it’s the pub braggart if you’re nice he’ll just assume that he won the argument. Ram the facts down his throat and then actually tell him to go fuck himself. He probably still won’t change his mind but the look of surprise on his face should be good for a few laughs. 😈

      • McFlock 10.1.1
        15 August 2012 at 11:53 pm

        The braggart I was thinking of has a penchant for yelling “show me the money”. And using throat-cut gestures in the House.

  11. QoT 11
    15 August 2012 at 11:09 pm

    “Labour can moderate its own policy”

    Well, sure, I guess they could, but at this point it’s hardly an original strategy and I’m not sure how they could do it any more without literally copypasting National’s manifesto.

  12. AmaKiwi 12
    16 August 2012 at 1:10 am

    I speak from personal experience.

    My partner wrote Labour policy statements for two successive elections. In order to protect my partner’s privacy, I will not mention which policy it was. But it was MAJOR, not minor. There were some damn good innovations in those two policy statements.

    Once in power, the party policy meant NOTHING. The MINISTER decided EVERYTHING.

    Labour policy statements are pure, unadulterated bullshit.

    We are asked to compile and write them so we are kept busy between elections, lest we become leaders in some other community organizations and are not there to help with the next election.

    Labour is a TOP DOWN organization. Wake up!

    • Colonial Viper 12.1
      16 August 2012 at 1:15 am

      Once in power, the party policy meant NOTHING. The MINISTER decided EVERYTHING.

      Yeah sounds about right. And most party members go on being nicely compliant and co-operative. Look what kind of party that has given us.

      • AmaKiwi 12.1.1
        16 August 2012 at 1:27 am

        It is also tragic. My partner is an expert in the field my partner wrote policy for. The ministers were not. What a bloody waste of talent.

    • mike 12.2
      16 August 2012 at 1:34 am

      Even if so, they are still the lesser of two evils compared to NAct. Not that that’s saying much.

      • Colonial Viper 12.2.1
        16 August 2012 at 8:22 pm

        In the service of Her Royal Majesty, one must always choose the lesser of two weevils.

    • weka 12.3
      16 August 2012 at 9:07 pm

      Go work for the Greens, it’s a much more egalitarian organisation, and it could do with some socialist lefties to keep it real.

  13. Matthew Hooton 13
    16 August 2012 at 5:26 am

    I hope you don’t mind me helping, but what an opposition should do is choose a high-profile and unpopular target, with which the government is associated and is required to defend, and attack it. The choice of the target should also define a positive message for the opposition.

    The best example of this in recent time is of course Don Brash and his infamous Orewa speech (which readers of the Hollow Men will know I opposed and which I give only as an example of the theory rather than suggesting Shearer follow the same policy path).

    Brash’s positive policy message was “One Law For All” but Bill English had been banging away on that for years. What Brash did was attack the unpopular treaty industry etc, the Labour govt felt obliged to defend it, the public decided which side it was on (National’s), and Brash would have become prime minister had he not been caught flirting with the loony Christian right.

    Note, this did not involve Brash going to the centre. National had a proud record through the 1990s on treaty issues under Jim Bolger and arguably Brash was going to the right. But, in fact, the issue was off the usual left/right spectrum and appealed to both much of the National Party base who had become disenfranchised with the centrism of English and to Chris Trotter’s Waitakere Man.

    Note also that Brash did not bother attacking Helen Clark and Labour in his Orewa speech. They were too popular. But by forcing them to defend the treaty industry he damaged their reputation.

    Similarly, in the early 1990s, when he was leaving National, Winston Peters attacked Fay Richwhite and others involved in the winebox. They were undoubtedly unpopular but National appeared to defend them by refusing to have an inquiry. Again, that worked pretty well for Peters and note that while his message was framed negatively – “Fay Richwhite are crooks” – there was also an underlying positive message: “Winston Peters will make the rich pay their taxes”.

    Earlier, on a bigger stage, David Lange followed the same path when he attacked nuclear ships. National and the US defended nuclear ships. Labour’s vote increased between 1984 and 1987.

    Another example was Helen Clark launching against Roger Kerr and the Business Roundtable when she first became prime minister. National said it was terrible she wouldn’t meet him. Guess who won that battle for hearts and minds.

    Or the Greens attacking biotechnology in 2002.

    Shearer did something of this earlier this year when he attacked Chinese investment in farms. That worked for him.

    Note, these initiatives were not timid – they didn’t involve cute stories snuck into speeches. Brash, Peters, Lange, Clark etc SHOUTED their message. The phone Mike Moore talks about was taken off the hook.

    Also note, the target can be anything as long as it is unpopular, bound to be defended by your opponents and says something about you by your choice of it. A National opposition can attack “overbearing unions” or “political correctness gone mad”. The obvious one for Labour is “big business”.

    But that’s enough help from me. I trust it is taken in the spirit intended. Our democracy depends on having a strong Labour opposition in the decades ahead.

    • Sam 13.1
      16 August 2012 at 6:54 am

      Why should the strong opposition you talk about be Labour?
      Seems to me that Labour is moribound, cannot get out of the quagmire it has created for itself.
      Meanwhile Russell Norman, the de-facto leader of the oppsition, is espousing new ideas, giving constructive crticism and targetting National’s follies very effectively.
      The way the Greens are going, they will usurp Labour as the 2nd largest party in parliament and become the strong opposition that is so sorely needed.
      Watch question time – Russell Norman sticks to facts, does not resort to personal attacks and in a lot of people’s eyes, he is the mainstay of opposition to the government.
      By contrast Labour is still just going after “the man’ and failing miserably.
      Labour must start espousing its positions, stick up for the working man and start spelling out where the new jobs will come from, don’t just attack the government on the rate of unemployment.
      Tell the people of New Zealand where the jobs will come from , that is aspirational and gives people hope and something to aim for.
      Real leadership is pro-active.
      Just being re-active to what the government is doing is not leadership.
      And then getting mired into the “same-sex” marriage and other irrelevant issues is so distractional, these issues are not high on the list of priorities in suburban and rural NZ and does not make people out there rush out and want to support Labour.
      Al this sort of Member’s Bill does is to prove to the general public that Labour is still not relevant to their hopes and aspirations.
      Party discipline should have seen that sort of Bill be held over till after winning an election.

      • Kotahi Tāne Huna 13.1.1
        16 August 2012 at 9:09 am

        Oh noes! It might make bigots uncomfortable!

        The vacuum does not have a queue of bigots waiting to fill it: they vote National, and in any case I think you are inflating their numbers. Projecting?

        The problems have been well articulated: wooing the centre means abandoning all pretence of left-wing policy. There is a vague cypher where the leader should be.

      • Colonial Viper 13.1.2
        16 August 2012 at 10:42 am

        And then getting mired into the “same-sex” marriage and other irrelevant issues is so distractional, these issues are not high on the list of priorities in suburban and rural NZ and does not make people out there rush out and want to support Labour.
        Al this sort of Member’s Bill does is to prove to the general public that Labour is still not relevant to their hopes and aspirations.
        Party discipline should have seen that sort of Bill be held over till after winning an election.

        Sam – I’m forced to agree with your analysis here. Imagine if the Bill was drawn 6 months before Election Day. National would have a ball using it as a distractor to throw Labour’s key election messages off course.

        • Carol 13.1.2.1
          16 August 2012 at 1:46 pm

          Nah. If the opposition was standing up strongly for social and economic justice, the private members bills wouldn’t be a so-called distraction, but one plank in a raft of policies.

          The distractions are celebrity & (over-heated) sports “news”, crime etc being foregrounded.

          And here we have a Green MP private members bill drawn from the ballot today, focusing on income issues:

          http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10827366

          Green MP Catherine Delahunty’s members’ bill to extend the Working for Families’ in-work tax credit to beneficiary families will be considered by Parliament, after it was drawn from the members’ bill ballot.

          • Sailor Sam 13.1.2.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 3:46 pm

            And is this Delahunty Bill not exactly the same as what Labour campaigned on before the last election?
            And look what happened there!
            I hope that Labour will side with the government and throw it out at the first reading.
            If they don’t I rest my case and Labour will stay irrelevant amongst suburban and rural working families.

          • Colonial Viper 13.1.2.1.2
            16 August 2012 at 5:09 pm

            Nah. If the opposition was standing up strongly for social and economic justice, the private members bills wouldn’t be a so-called distraction, but one plank in a raft of policies.

            Oh I agree with you. Except at the moment we have one plank, and we are missing most of the rest of the raft.

      • Robert M 13.1.3
        16 August 2012 at 12:00 pm

        Mathew the problem is simple and straightforward. All the parties are aiming their policy at securing the votes of dumb white men. That is why Orewa and the whole Sinclair/Long/ Brash strategy was hopeless. The real 30% of middle class people left in NZ are effectively disenfranchised in NZ.
        If NZ is too have hope it must return to strong support of USA foreign policy, expel Tim Groser, Move away from the growing orientation towards China and start building an unlimited 24hr society where noone listens to the interventionist do gooders and their anti drink, anti pokies, anti smokes chants.

        • Murray Olsen 13.1.3.1
          16 August 2012 at 5:19 pm

          Sure thing Bobby. When will you be joining the US Marine Corps to show your strong support for US foreign policy?

    • chris73 13.2
      16 August 2012 at 8:36 am

      This advice is probably the best the Labour has received in a very long time but of course it’ll be ignored

    • ad 13.3
      16 August 2012 at 8:48 am

      Your general point about full-throated and concerted attacks is really good.

    • Anne 13.4
      16 August 2012 at 9:21 am

      You were doing well Matthew Hooton until you got to the last sentence. Had you been happy to stick with: our democracy depends on having strong opposition parties, I would have taken more notice of the rest of the post – despite a few questionable conclusions.

      Anyway, the opposition parties – including Labour – have already chosen a very high profile and unpopular target. It’s called Asset Sales.

      • Anne 13.4.1
        16 August 2012 at 9:50 am

        Oookay: I think your last sentence may have been ‘tongue in cheek’.

        Doesn’t alter the fact we’ve got a really cool target already mate. 😎

    • Bored 13.5
      16 August 2012 at 12:40 pm

      Matthew,Our democracy depends on having a strong Labour opposition in the decades ahead. reads to me like “I prefer National but Labours OK so long as they dont examine or change the broken mess that is our “democracy” and the corporate power structures that give me nurture”.

    • Lanthanide 13.6
      16 August 2012 at 12:46 pm

      You can see the Greens have been doing this quite a lot recently.

      Attacking RoNS is one angle they’re working on.

    • newsense 13.7
      16 August 2012 at 3:24 pm

      ‘big business’ or ‘big foreign business’ where foreign = the USA, cos for some reason nobody is allowed to be the least reluctant about big business from China.

      Also China = the future and Labour by signing the China free trade agreement was looking like the forward thinking, CGT, super debating , train supporting party, which the Nats are stealing.

      Key’s son playing little league, his achievement as tourism minister is that there are now more direct flights to Hawaii for the rich New Zealand tourists like him who want to live there and not here and he genuflects to Warner Brothers, changing our laws to suit them. The FBI using our police to raid dotcom, assets sales, and secret free trade negotiations. A government not for Kiwi Mums and dads, but for foreigners.

      actually the change our laws for big business- warners/TPCC and Sky City thing….(let alone no competition for Sky, but they’ll never be able to run that!)

      Matthew does seem to be advocating wedge politics is it?? And he didn’t charge anything for that advice….

      who is the Labour party strategist these days anyway?

    • Colonial Viper 13.8
      16 August 2012 at 5:10 pm

      Thanks Matthew. Perhaps the Labour strategists can get some coaching sessions from you.

  14. Dr Terry 14
    16 August 2012 at 6:33 am

    I think certain words are well past their use by date, such as “äspirational” and “centrist”. At least Labour could begin to revise its vocabulary in the effort to speak more meaningfully. The word “äspirational” is, of course, very much used by, and identified with Key and it gives me the creeps. “Centrist” is a nebulous word, and hints at compromise with the Right (as Labour sometimes appears to be doing!) Let’s look for new words that mean something and serve to excite!

    • Bored 14.1
      16 August 2012 at 9:12 am

      A little bit of spade calling precision might be a good start, some things like “the poor” do exist.

  15. Rob Salmond 15
    16 August 2012 at 6:35 am

    Thanks for the post, Mike. I have mainly responded at pundit: http://pundit.co.nz/content/gently-worn-laundry

    But on one nit-picky point, I know about the database you created in 2005, and I think it was a good thing to develop. But I do not thunk it caused the turnout increase. As we have discussed before, I think some of the messaging the party sent on the basis of that database was harmful rather than helpful in terms of turnout. In my view the reason turnout increased from 2002 to 2005 was mainly that 2005 was close while 2002 was a walkover. There is a lot of political science evidence that close elections get higher turnout.

    • Bored 15.1
      16 August 2012 at 9:06 am

      I think expertise and “political science” an absolute waste of time. Labour lost. I’m commercial, when my sales people fail despite the buying signals being easily realised I fire them. They are of no use, merely a cost. Cruel, but I dont pretend to be a welfare organisation…(I fund that willingly through tax).

      There are over a quarter of all voters who did not “buy”. Nobody sold them a credible motivating vision, worked out what it would take to get them to make the effort to vote. Is what Labour are saying that those votes dont matter, that only those sitting in the “centre” can come to the table?

      • Rob Salmond 15.1.1
        16 August 2012 at 9:39 am

        Bored: I am not making the claim you suggest. Everybody’s vote matters, whether they voted last time or not. They just matter in different ways, depending on the voter’s previous choices. As for your view that expertise is an absolute waste of time, I respectfully disagree.

        • Bored 15.1.1.1
          16 August 2012 at 12:23 pm

          Rob, you might note that I don’t think much of the strategy of picking off the easy wins individually, i.e centrist swinging voters. I note again it did not work for the last couple of elections, so ergo……..

          My criticism of expertise is deliberately sharp: experts I have heard defined as people who know more and more about narrower and narrower fields, until they know everything about nothing.
          In the case of economists enough said, in the case of political scientists and strategists I am seeing the same pattern emerge.

          I would contend that the issue with Labour (they are not alone) is that as an organisation they have deferred to “professionalism” and “expertise”. Both traits proscribe broad debate, both traits frame language, both traits use “method” rather than intuition, experience, and wisdom to make decisions.

          • Carol 15.1.1.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 4:08 pm

            I don’t think the problem with Labour’s approach is the use of “experts” per se, but the kind of experts they choose, and how often they use them.

            There’s too much focus on polling & focus groups, and using this to try to second guess which demographics to target and how.

            Various kinds of experts can be more valuable and innovative if they are regular in communication with each other.

            This obsession with polling and focus-group is a market-derived strategy that became more prominent with the rise of neoliberalism.

            As many have said on this site, Labour needs to develop more heart-felt and substantive principles and values as part of a narrative and framework for developing it’s policies.

            • Bored 15.1.1.1.1.1
              16 August 2012 at 4:36 pm

              Thanks Carol, I may be a little blunt: your strategy on how to use “experts” shows wisdom the “experts” might learn from..

          • AAMC 15.1.1.1.2
            16 August 2012 at 8:18 pm

            “it massively devalued the role of politicians. In the face of this retreat from the dynamic idea of progress and changing the world, politicians became instead managers of society as it is, and they came to see their job as being to simply leave the world to go on as it is—with all its inequalities and imbalances of power. And in response to that, we, the electorate, began to turn away from the politicians and scorn them because we felt their loss of self-confidence.”

            Adam Curtis on “managerialism”

            http://www.e-flux.com/journal/in-conversation-with-adam-curtis-part-ii/

      • Colonial Viper 15.1.2
        16 August 2012 at 5:30 pm

        I’m commercial, when my sales people fail despite the buying signals being easily realised I fire them. They are of no use, merely a cost. Cruel, but I dont pretend to be a welfare organisation…

        You evil capitalist 👿

        Yeah, so I’d do exactly the same 😛

    • just saying 15.2
      16 August 2012 at 9:06 am

      I don’t know if you will revisit this thread. If you do, I’d like to ask a couple of questions relating to the blog post you’ve linked to. I started to fill in the “paperwork” for commenting at the Pundit, but found it required much more individual information than I considered it wise to give.

      Were you a part of the strategy team, even as an informal consultant, for Goff’s tenure as Leader of the Opposition? The reason I ask is that, apart from proposing the opposition actually do its job and oppose, the path you are suggesting sounds very similar to the Goff strategy.

      Do you think that a centrist (third-way) path enacted by a future Labour government is likely to be the best response to the problems facing the country? Do you think that a centrist Labour government would probably be a reasonably good response? Do you think the NZ’s interests might be better served by a future Labour government enacting a greater degree of leftist social-democrat policies?

      What I’m wondering is do those encouraging Labour to turn rightward to where the centre has come to settle, believe that the resultant policies for a future Labour government are likely to be very, or at least a reasonably good way of dealing with the problems facing the country?

      • Kotahi Tāne Huna 15.2.1
        16 August 2012 at 9:14 am

        The problem with the “third way” is that it doesn’t exist outside of the minds of “strategists” (most of whom probably wouldn’t recognise a strategy if they fell over one). Keynes or Friedman? What “third way”?

        Sun Tzu said all that needs to be said about leadership and motivation four thousand years ago.

      • just saying 15.2.2
        16 August 2012 at 9:28 am

        I’m not as eloquent as some here. Maybe this question is clearer.

        Assuming some magical universe where Labour is gauranteed a majority that allows it to govern alone no matter what:

        How far from the “centrist” policy platform you think is strategically optimal for Labour to follow, are your personal views about the policies it would be optimal for Labour to follow – for the greatest benefit to the country, according to your own values and beliefs?

        What would be different?

        • Kotahi Tāne Huna 15.2.2.1
          16 August 2012 at 9:34 am

          What defines “the centre”? Why, it’s in between the left and the right, of course. To ask your question another way, how much influence should the failed, inhuman “policies” of the right have on the Labour Party’s position?

      • Rob Salmond 15.2.3
        16 August 2012 at 9:44 am

        just saying: (1) I did two days of volunteer work for the Goffice in Budget week 2009, and again for Budget 2010. And I published some supportive blog posts on pundit during the term. Other than that, no. (2) This question would take a long time to answer properly. The best I can do in blog comment form is: in some areas I personally think a more leftist approach is superior, in other areas I agree with the centrist sentiment.

        • just saying 15.2.3.1
          16 August 2012 at 10:01 am

          Thanks for answering Rob. I’d be really interested too, in hearing which areas!

          Another question, if you strongly disagreed that the path that you believe voters are most likely to vote Labour for, was in the best interests of the country would you still propose Labour follow it if you also believed that a National government might be a little bit worse?

          Do your recommendations for Labour’s strategy include consideration for the best interests of the party in the long-term or are they confined to the best interests of Labour leading the next government (obviously assuming that is a good thing)?

          Thanks Rob

          I do like and respect Pundit, I just don’t want to fill-in those forms.

          • Rob Salmond 15.2.3.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 10:25 am

            Happy to answer questions, just saying, but I can’t really go issue-bu-issue without going policy-by-policy, and I’m not about to write a blog comment manifesto! On your other questions: (1) I think getting elected is important, and standing for something real is important, too. So I do not think Labour should aspire to be epsilon to the left of National, because then it is basically useless. But I also do not think there is much virtue in being ideologically pure if you are always unable to deliver your platform. I would rather we deliver all of a generally good platform than none of a great one. (2) Yes, the long term good of the party is important to me, well beyond whatever political event happens to be next.

            • Colonial Viper 15.2.3.1.1.1
              16 August 2012 at 11:16 am

              It’s a well reasoned strategy, Rob, so how’s it working out for Labour so far. And who is going to put your hoardings up.

              • Rob Salmond …
                16 August 2012 at 11:27 am

                CV: As I said in my pundit post, so far the left is up 5 points (4 for Labour, 1 for Greens) from the election. Not too bad, so far. And I think rumours of the permanent departure of Labour’s activist core are exaggerated.

                • Olwyn …
                  16 August 2012 at 11:49 am

                  Some perspective is needed here. Labour is where it has been for the past three and a half years; floating up and down within a width band around 30% that barely exceeds the margin of error. Within those years it has not, from memory, recaptured the giddy heights of 34%, when it lost the 2008 election. For most of them Key was the golden boy, so it was perhaps to be expected, but not any more. Yes, the Greens are doing well, but Labour can hardly take credit for this. And activists have neither unlimited patience nor unlimited flexibility regarding Labour’s positioning and policy.

                • Colonial Viper …
                  16 August 2012 at 11:51 am

                  And I think rumours of the permanent departure of Labour’s activist core are exaggerated.

                  This is a good sentence to examine closely.

                  • Bored …
                    16 August 2012 at 12:30 pm

                    I think we might want to look at what a Labour activist of today actually looks like, who they represent, and more importantly what they represent.? Do they represent the guiding principles of Labour http://www.labour.org.nz/about-us first and foremost, or do they represent a specific interest group primarily and the principles as an afterthought? It might prove very revealing to go over the MPs and party hierachy from that viewpoint.

  16. Phil 16
    16 August 2012 at 7:14 am

    The issue for me is that the “Center” is now so far to the right that the political shape of NZ politics is incredibly skewed.
    Any attempt to identify with Labour values, and I mean true social democratic Labour values not the current neo liberal manifesto, leaves you adrift in a blank space almost a political void.
    Maybe we should Occupy the left rather than moan about our current cosy location.
    Anyway, if nothing changes we can at least blame our lack of progress on the Christchurch earthquake.

    • Carol 16.1
      16 August 2012 at 7:57 am

      The issue for me is that the “Center” is now so far to the right that the political shape of NZ politics is incredibly skewed.

      Agreed. And the left should be working to shift the dominant discourse leftwards. It should be building a narrative that is the framework for policies. That narrative should be attacking the international corporatocracy and supporting the interests of the (less powerful) majority of Kiwi communities and individuals: working and non-working people (the young, the elderly, the sick, disabled and unemployed).

      And this support should be in the form of stimulated fulfilling, satisfying, sustainable and affordable lifestyles.

    • Bored 16.2
      16 August 2012 at 9:07 am

      +1, the Labour guiding principles seem well at odds with their “advice”.

    • David H 16.3
      16 August 2012 at 11:09 am

      And don’t forget the other ‘good’ excuse the Nacts use. The global financial meltdown. Conveniently forgetting that it was Key’s banking buddies that were at the heart of it, and still are, what with the rorts still being exposed now.

  17. chris73 17
    16 August 2012 at 9:24 am

    Ok so I’m going to spell out to people here just how Labour could woo me to vote for them on the basis that even though its only my thinking chances are there are many (thousands?) who hold similar opinions to mine

    So at the moment my view of Labour is that its trying to be too inclusive, by this I mean its trying to appeal to the middle class, the working class and to those on benefits.

    The problem being that if benefits are raised then the lower paid workers will see their friends, neighbours etc etc being paid more for no extra work, if minimum wages are raised then the middle class will think employment will suffer etc etc

    So I think the Labour party is spreading itself to thin by trying to be all things to all people.

    Labour don’t seem to be able to share power, they had the greens and treated them shabbily, instead of shearing power and “giving” those on the benefits to the greens they kept the greens on a short leash (and are now reaping what they’ve sown)

    So if Labour were to go back to its roots and focus on the lower class working man and woman and let the greens look after those on benefits (after all they’ll both be in govt) it would be a tremendous start

    So concentrate on raising the minimum wage, state you’ll keep the 90 day bill, champion mining and stop suggesting WFF for the unemployed (let the greens suggest it)

    There are other issues, of course, but the other major one is that Labour has no teamwork which makes it hard to support.

    Had the Labour caucus supported Goff I think Labour would have won, hell if the Labour caucus had just not said anything Labour probably would have won
    (ie T. Mallard, C. Curran, K. Faaoi, C. Carter etc etc)

    Either support your leader or at the very least don’t say anything

    • Kotahi Tāne Huna 17.1
      16 August 2012 at 9:27 am

      Who cares about attracting your vote? I don’t imagine for one instant you are sincere about it.

      Why would Labour keep a bunch of Tory policies to please a Tory, given that said policies are an abject miserable incompetent failure?

      • chris73 17.1.1
        16 August 2012 at 9:41 am

        “Who cares about attracting your vote? I don’t imagine for one instant you are sincere about it.”
        – I dunno, maybe a party that wants to be in power? Also consider that if I think this way maybe thousands of others think in a similar way as well

        “Why would Labour keep a bunch of Tory policies to please a Tory, given that said policies are an abject miserable incompetent failure?”

        – Raising the minimum wage is tory policy? The 90 day bill hasn’t caused the sky to fall in and I’m guessing the Labour party might have some links to mining

        Or failing that try listening to Josie Pagani

        • Kotahi Tāne Huna 17.1.1.1
          16 August 2012 at 11:24 am

          “Hasn’t caused the sky to fall in” – that’s the new benchmark is it? Funny, I thought it would make more sense to test it against the actions of employers.

          • Kotahi Tāne Huna 17.1.1.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 11:41 am

            PS: the many thousands of people who think the way you do are National supporters too. They respond to dog whistles and hate speech, not sound policy positions.

            • chris73 17.1.1.1.1.1
              16 August 2012 at 11:48 am

              PS That way of thinking is why Labour is not in power and is leaking votes to the Greens

              • Kotahi Tāne Huna …
                16 August 2012 at 11:52 am

                Um, Labour up four points since election. Greens up 1. Are you sure of your facts?

                PS: I am not the Labour Party.

                • chris73 …
                  16 August 2012 at 12:01 pm

                  and whos in charge, Labour or National?

                  • Kotahi Tāne Huna …
                    16 August 2012 at 1:22 pm

                    lol do you call what National are “in charge”? They had four years to implement their flagship policy and it’s a trainwreck, not to mention the rest of the incompetent shambles.

            • Sailor Sam 17.1.1.1.1.2
              16 August 2012 at 4:01 pm

              I am not a National supporter anymore, looking for the alternative.
              So far NZFirst is a favourite, followed by the Conservatives
              If you go an like this and push non-Labour people away, you and people like you are the reason that Labour will lose again.
              Labour needs to become inclusive and make me want to support it.
              Labour needs me more than I need Labour.
              THus Labour needs to broaden its base again, not just rely on a few activists and focus groups.
              It needs to support the working people of this country, not the vocal minority.
              It also needs to promote job growth and spell this out with cold hard facts, not grandstanding for any particular audience, that does no longer work in the internet/social media age.

              • Kotahi Tāne Huna …
                16 August 2012 at 4:08 pm

                What is it about Winston First and the Conservatives that appeals to you?

                What makes you think that Labour should change to suit you? Should it also try to appeal to ACT voters?

                Oh, and which organisations of “working people” is it again that are affiliated to NZ 1st and Colin Craig? Remind us all which workers’ group has voting rights at the Winston and Colin Craig show…

                • Kotahi Tāne Huna …
                  16 August 2012 at 4:22 pm

                  PS: Perhaps you should also include the following piece of info in your calculations: I vote Green as often as I vote Labour…

                • Sailor Sam …
                  16 August 2012 at 10:23 pm

                  With comments like that you are not going to win over uncommitted voters, the very ones you need to become government again.
                  Shows how stupid you are, going once again onto personal attacks.
                  When will you ever learn, revelling in personal attacks, that is why theLabour party is rapidly becoming irrelevant.
                  Look at Russel Norman – in spite of being attacked personally by both Labour and National, he responds with sensible questions and answers on issues.
                  He does not rip people’s throats out, unlike you and others like you withing Labour.
                  You should be trying to win me over, that would be constructive.
                  But no – you don’t want me – that is fine – but rot in opposition then.
                  Pathetic and so utterly, utterly stupid!!

  18. KJT 18
    16 August 2012 at 9:37 am

    Does anyone at the top in Labour still believe this statement?

    “Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes that you can do these things.”

    It shows how much to the radical right that political discourse has shifted.

    That statement was made by a, Republican! US president. Eisenhower.

    Not too long ago these things were considered “the centre” even by conservatives.

    It is the Neo-Liberals who are radical.

    Trying to be a pale imitation of National is a total abandonment of principle and what Labour stands for.

    • just saying 18.1
      16 August 2012 at 9:46 am

      I remember former Whitehouse strategist Dick Allen saying that when he started out, the number of people who shared his (even-more extreme for the time) rightwing views could have met in a phonebox.

      NZ of course, now has the pleasure of Allen living in NZ for many months of the year at a one-percenter’s enclave outside Queenstown.

  19. aerobubble 19
    16 August 2012 at 10:46 am

    Family tax credits lower wages, since ‘middle NZ’ gets support.. So out comes the far
    right National party who works out that most NZ families pay no income tax, haven’t
    seen their figures, and it does not take into account GST, taxes on savings, etc and
    argue that businesses and high incomes (who benefit from lower wages) should get
    bigger tax cuts. National obliges, and borrows and raises GST, all to placate the
    freeloaders who are already gouging middle NZ, thanks to Labour family tax credits.

    So when you ask me can Labour win the next election, I say, will it matter. Well
    maybe, since we all agree the landscape has changed, oil ain’t getting cheaper.
    CGT is an example of this change, targeting the rent seekers capital gain tax free windfall.
    So yes, Labour are moving the right way, but no Labour haven’t got there head around it yet.

    Take ACT’s inspired policy of noise old cars that obviously make driving dangerous,
    a half dozen fly past my home from 6.30am onwards every so often, and I wonder
    how say someone on a moped, or even in another car, would actually be able to
    have their horn heard by the drivers in these very noisy engine noise vehicles. It
    was bad law, parliament without a separate upper chamber lets too much bad law
    onto the books, governments would not be held to ransom by one seat parties. Charter
    Schools for extremist would have proper teachers if reviewed by a upper chamber.
    So when I hear Banks and Dunne suggest that no back door for single electorate
    seeks to get list MPs will hurt democracy, you know it’ll be the opposite.
    There’s good and bad, there are good changes that make a system more stable,
    and good changes that make a system more unstable, there are bad changes
    that make the system more stable, and… I think you get it. Stability that crushes
    democracy should not be replaced with instability that lets one seat jokers hold
    government to ransom, as Banks and Dunne both are. That’s why we need a
    upper chamber.

    • weka 19.1
      16 August 2012 at 9:34 pm

      Aero, any chance you can change the formatting of whatever you are writing your posts on so that the sentences scan properly?

  20. captain hook 20
    16 August 2012 at 11:56 am

    I am going to spell it out here that chris 72 is just an agent provacateur filling the net with interminable garbage to confuse and baffle people without actually saying anything.

    • chris73 20.1
      16 August 2012 at 12:09 pm

      Nope sorry you got that wrong, try again.

    • fatty 20.2
      16 August 2012 at 12:33 pm

      chris 72 just regurgitates what he/she reads on kiwiblog.
      chris 72 is Farrar’s stomach bile

      • chris73 20.2.1
        16 August 2012 at 12:43 pm

        I know it may come as a surprise but there are people out there with completely different views to your own and if you listen to different opinions it actually improves your own view of things

        • fatty 20.2.1.1
          16 August 2012 at 1:25 pm

          Cheers for the pep-talk.
          The fact that I’ve pulled you up on rehashing kiwiblog shows that I am aware of other opinions. It gets a little boring after a while…don’t be afraid to develop your own thoughts

          • chris73 20.2.1.1.1
            16 August 2012 at 2:21 pm

            Then it may well surprise you to know that I don’t go to kiwiblog very often. The main blogs I go to are this and whaleoil but hey if you want to keep on believing it then good on you.

  21. gobsmacked 21
    16 August 2012 at 1:39 pm

    Some welcome contributions from Matthew and Rob here (no, not sarcasm!).

    To respond – and develop my earlier comment, which of the following would Rob call “expertise”, or Matthew call a “strategy”? Would you describe these as the decsions of an “expert strategist”?

    – using the party’s blog to go on repeatedly about Simon Lusk, David Farrar, Cactus Kate, etc

    – arranging a bike race against a right-wing blogger, just weeks before the election

    – making something up about BMWs and an Auckland car dealer, which nobody believed

    – going on repeatedly about the number of bodyguards the PM has

    – selling tickets on TradeMe and generating a heap of negative publicity

    … and so on, and so on, for the past four years.

    How many votes were won? How many were lost? That’s what it’s all about, right?

    Abstract strategy discussions are meaningless, while the same “strategists” remain. If Rob Salmond wants to spend hours on detailed analysis, to develop a strategy, and then hand it over to proven failures who will fuck it up, then that’s his call. But life is short – so why bother?

    Mallard (and Hodgson before him) were Labour’s election strategists. There has not been one single word to acknowledge failure – and of course, nothing has changed.

    And nothing will.

  22. Michael 22
    16 August 2012 at 2:21 pm

    Pete Hodgson’s strategies resulted in three election wins for Labour, including its best, in 2002. Even better, he didn’t descend into bigotry to win (cf the Orewa speech, etc, from NACT). Labour lost in 2008, and again in 2011, because it abandoned its base between 1999 and 2005, even though that base saved its arse in 2005, after its new middle-class friends deserted it as a result of being seduced by NACT’s promises of tax cuts.

  23. Blue 23
    16 August 2012 at 2:28 pm

    @gobsmacked ” There has not been one single word to acknowledge failure ” Its no longer “failure” its “not acheived” 🙂

  24. F*#k'd Off 24
    16 August 2012 at 3:38 pm

    Step 1. Get rid of both Rob Salmond and Josie Pagani!
    Step 2. Decide if the party is Left wing party or another middle of the road Chardonnay wishy washy middle class pandering party?
    Step 3. After determining which side you represent, you target the 880,000 people that didn’t vote or declare you’re no longer the Labour party!

    Do that before the end of 2012!!

  25. bomber 25
    16 August 2012 at 4:21 pm

    When Labour Party strategists are shitting on the largest left wing blog in the country – you know there are deep problems with being able to identify the target – If I was running Labour Party strategy – http://tumeke.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/if-i-was-running-labour-party-strategy.html

    • blue leopard 25.1
      16 August 2012 at 4:47 pm

      @ Bomber

      I suggest you get that invoice sent

    • Colonial Viper 25.2
      16 August 2012 at 5:59 pm

      Speaking truth to Stupid*. Very nice.

      *Yes, stolen from The Newsroom, I know.

    • ad 25.3
      16 August 2012 at 6:10 pm

      I don’t always agree with you but really appreciated the supportive comments. Which the NZHerald have picked up nicely.

    • gobsmacked 25.4
      16 August 2012 at 6:34 pm

      Bomber wrote:

      If I was the Labour Party strategist, I would be on the phone to the Standard daily. I’d be touching base with Idiot/Savant once a week. Calling Morgan Godfery, Gordon Campbell and Julie Fairey for a fortnightly catch up and I’d be taking Russell Brown and Chris Trotter out for a monthly coffee!

      I’d like to suggest a simple blog post on the Standard – a quick round-up of left/liberal/anti-Nat blogs, and where they stand on the Shearer/Pagani line.

      An incomplete list, in addition to the names Bomber mentions …

      Critical (to put it mildly): Dim-Post, Imperator Fish, Brian Edwards, QoT, Twisted Hive, Bryce Edwards, KiwiPolitico, and no doubt others I’ve missed.

      Cheering: Um … Rob Salmond. Anyone else?

      So a large and varied group of people, who would disagree about many other things, have all independently reached the same conclusion. Shearer/Pagani have successfully united the left … against them.

      • QoT 25.4.1
        16 August 2012 at 7:58 pm

        Shearer/Pagani have successfully united the left … against them.

        Shit, gobsmacked, I think you’ve hit on their real strategy. Piss off the entire spectrum of lefties and liberals and the centre will HAVE to come running back to vote for them!

        • KJT 25.4.1.1
          16 August 2012 at 8:18 pm

          Pagani and co seems to want Labour to be the National party.

          Why don’t they just join NACT?

          Or. Is it just job security for something that quacks and his fellows.

        • Colonial Viper 25.4.1.2
          16 August 2012 at 8:19 pm

          Sarcasm becomes you.

          The current beltway set seem intent on seeing how many times they can poke the Lefty wasp hive with a sharp stick. Before something very unpleasant (to them) occurs.

  26. AAMC 26
    16 August 2012 at 8:31 pm

    This has very likely been covered in the posts above, no time to read them all, but, how exactly do we define center and does our morality play any part in this, or is it just a game where we compete for votes?

    Lets say the Nats continue their push towards challenging The Golden Dawn party for 1st place in the race to Right Wing extremism, and they continue to bring the electorate with them. Would Labour’s pitch to the middle continue, as it has, to move Right with them?

    Are there not core principles that override concepts of the center, messages that you proclaim proudly, in order to motivate the “center” to look in your direction? If you’re always chasing the center as defined by the National Party, they will always be leading you by the nose.

    When Edward Bernays made smoking acceptable to American women, he did so against the tide of prevailing norms, he drove the narrative.

    Lead if you want to inspire anybody to vote for you! If not at this moment in History, with Austerity pushing Europe and the rest of the World further into Depression, the platform for the narrative is being handed to you on a silver platter, when?

    • gobsmacked 26.1
      16 August 2012 at 9:29 pm

      Lead if you want to inspire anybody to vote for you! If not at this moment in History, with Austerity pushing Europe and the rest of the World further into Depression, the platform for the narrative is being handed to you on a silver platter, when?

      Yes, yes, thrice yes.

      That’s why Labour’s people have to change – not just the strategy. Labour are stuck with the “spending our money” stigma, because they’ve failed to make the case for investment as a public good. Spending is seen as frittering – on themselves.

      Their own behaviour has contributed mightily to that perception. In an absurd role reversal, Key is seen as the “decent bloke” who gives his salary to charity*, and Labour MPs are seen as the ones who spend freely on porn and plane tickets. They (or at least, some of them) have a sense of entitlement which puts them firmly on the other side of the divide. Not surprisingly, the poor (working or not) see little connection between their own lives, and their MPs’.

      When the Socialists came to power in France recently, the first thing Hollande did was honour an election pledge – to cut the Cabinet’s salary by 30%. Can you imagine the NZ Labour caucus doing that? Can you imagine Shearer ordering them to do it?

      I am quite sure that Labour’s cosseted insiders have NO idea how much damage Mallard’s scalping did, out there among the struggling (ex) Labour voters. No policy or strategy can compensate for headline stupidity. They must GO!

      *never mind the absence of evidence for this, it’s widely believed

  27. captain hook 27
    16 August 2012 at 9:09 pm

    politics in New Zealand at the moment is organised similar to lynch mobs but the Labour Party has to tell the country that it can create jobs and work.
    that is what people want.
    by aping the neanderthal tories and putting the onus onto the unemployed and cloaking employment in the weasel language of personal decision the party is evading its responsibility to the truth and well being of the people.

  28. Bob 28
    17 August 2012 at 12:26 am

    Mike, I think you will find it was the free shuttle to the voting booths in South Auckland with the lure of free KFC that helped labour to win in 2005, not to mention the case of the one property that had 26 labour voters, what are the chances? Why not just employ this strategy again?

    • Murray Olsen 28.1
      17 August 2012 at 12:48 am

      Even if what you say is true, how many votes would Labour have gained through this tactic? It can hardly be called a strategy. 
      I also don’t like the racism inherent in your stupid comment. Who decides on how they vote for a feed of KFC? NActional pays much better bribes anyway, but I suppose in your universe the rich didn’t vote NAct in exchange for tax cuts or cheap access to public assets. Come on, be upfront about it, be proud of your racist views. 

      • Bob 28.1.1
        17 August 2012 at 1:16 am

        Hi Murray,

        Before you start calling me a racist, how about you have a read through the Hansard for September 11, 2008 http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/portfolios/prime_minister/2008/sep/11/rt_hon_winston_peters#field_20 (my apologies, can’t access the official Hansard, I can only find this transcript, I also thought it was 2005), where it states “Hon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN: That indeed is what that email says, although, of course, Mr Glenn tried to claim to the Privileges Committee that he had no recollection of the context around the Auditor-General’s requirement of a $158,000 repayment—a claim about as credible as his statement that he paid Mike Williams large sums of money, apparently to buy KFC for hundreds of Pacific Island people in Māngere.”

        We all know Owen Glenn didn’t lie about his donations to Winston Peters, so why would he lie about this.

        I get the feeling that your own racial indefferences may have lead you down the garden path to calling me a racist a little too quickly there Murray.

        • Colonial Viper 28.1.1.1
          17 August 2012 at 1:22 am

          Second hand information about what Owen Glenn may or may not have said, and out of that what may or may not have been accurate. Fuck you are full of it.

        • Murray Olsen 28.1.1.2
          17 August 2012 at 1:23 am

          What on earth is a racial indefference?

          • Bob 28.1.1.2.1
            17 August 2012 at 2:00 am

            You attitude towards racial matters, seems you where very keen to label me a racist when I was quoting from historical records, perhaps your own racist stereotyping coming through?

            • Colonial Viper 28.1.1.2.1.1
              17 August 2012 at 2:06 am

              Sorry mate your choice of (dubious) quote and your pretense at not seeing the perpetration of stereotypes marks you out damn clearly as a racist.

              • Bob …
                17 August 2012 at 2:18 am

                CV, you do realise that you are exactly the type of person Josie Pagani was referring too? What have I said that is remotely racist? Differing in view point to yourself , Yes, Racist, No. All we need is for me to get a lifetime ban and her entire point about this website would be complete in one short thread.

                • Colonial Viper …
                  17 August 2012 at 3:06 am

                  All we need is for me to get a lifetime ban and her entire point about this website would be complete in one short thread.

                  Bob, to be clear, you are an asshole, not a martyr.

                  CV, you do realise that you are exactly the type of person Josie Pagani was referring too?

                  🙄

        • gobsmacked 28.1.1.3
          17 August 2012 at 1:45 am

          “why would he lie about this?”

          He may not have lied (because intent cannot be proved), but he was most certainly wrong.

          Buying KFC for hundreds of people, in order to get their votes, is a crime (“treating”). So if it happened, the following would be true:

          1) Hundreds of people would be witnesses, having received the bribe. Not one has ever been found, by any journalist or anyone else. I know for a fact that media enquiries were made – it would have been a huge news story, after all. But … Nothing.

          2) The crime would have been committed by the President of the Labour Party. If Labour’s opponents believed there was any chance that it was true, then a complaint would have been laid (just as Trevor Mallard laid the complaint about John Banks). National would have loved to nail Labour’s President, with huge political implications (“stolen election”, etc). They didn’t even need to do it officially – plenty of National/ACT proxies available, and more than willing to do it.

          3) Owen Glenn has – of course – since turned against Labour, and he had every incentive to back up his story with evidence (e.g. financial transfer, phone records, etc – as happened with the Peters donation). He has never done so, nor does he repeat the story any more.

          All this was pointed out at the time, but obviously it didn’t get past your wishful thinking, Bob.

          But you have defamed Mike Williams, so an apology is in order.

          • Bob 28.1.1.3.1
            17 August 2012 at 1:56 am

            Reposting what is already in public domain via a transcript of the Hansard is hardly defamation, should I say Murray Olsen has defamed me by calling me a racist?

            • gobsmacked 28.1.1.3.1.1
              17 August 2012 at 2:00 am

              See your comment at 12:26.

              And I note you cannot rebut any of the points made, so that ends the matter.

              • Bob …
                17 August 2012 at 2:14 am

                1) Hundreds of party faithful that are recieving gift would hardly bite the hand that feeds them (literally and figuratively), what incentive is there for them to talk to the media? In the Hansard it shows that Taito Phillip Field had seen the story in the news, so they obviously had something to run with.

                2)The National party already had the Labour party on the ropes for illegal pledge cards and NZ First on the ropes for the $158,000 donation, maybe they got cocky, or thought it harder to prove than than the pledge card rort.

                3)Owen Glenn turned on Labour through this whole process, not before. Has anyone asked him about this since? No reason to repeat it on TV out of the blue without being prompted.

                • Murray Olsen …
                  17 August 2012 at 2:17 am

                  Why would party faithful need to be bribed? Party faithful tend to vote for the party come hell or high water. You’re not making any sense at all.

                  • Bob …
                    17 August 2012 at 2:23 am

                    Maybe they were starting to feel disenfranchised with the labour party, could be why they didn’t turn out last election as well.

                • gobsmacked …
                  17 August 2012 at 2:26 am

                  You’re very confused, Bob. Let it go.

                  The original comment by Glenn was made in a TV interview in 2008. Williams immediately denied it. This was before the 2008 election.

                  National did not need to prove it (again, see Mallard/Banks). A complaint would have caused major embarrassment, at the perfect time (pre-election). And anyone could have tried it. Nothing happened.

                  As for the “bribed” voters, given that Labour’s vote has fallen markedly from 2005 – 2008 – 2011, including in South Auckland, then many of those people would be disaffected ex-Labour voters. Again … not one has spoken. A shuttle bus, you said? For hundreds? To KFC? Not one employee, not one eye witness, not even a whisper to the media. Ever. Wow.

                  You have simply heard what Glenn said and assumed that because Glenn suggested it (let’s assume that’s true, though we can’t know), therefore it subsequently happened. That’s nonsense.

                  • Bob …
                    17 August 2012 at 3:13 am

                    Fair points Gobsmacked, it does seem implausible that no-one would come forward after all this time, it is just hard to see why Owen Glenn would make such a statement without some element of truth to it.

                    • Colonial Viper …
                      17 August 2012 at 3:14 am

                      Yeah because taking a thin one liner and turning it into an entire meal is your speciality.

                    • Bob …
                      17 August 2012 at 3:26 am

                      CV, at least I have a premis to my claims, still waiting for you to point out where I was being racist………..oh that’s right, you just had no arguement so you went straight to insults, take some pointers from Gobsmacked, at least s/he puts a case forward to back up his/her comments.

                      Do you actually have any ideas yourself? I have just read through all of your replies above and they are simply one-liners either agreeing with a statement or attacking the writer (I am guessing that is your way of not agreeing), no actual ideas of your own to put out for the world to critique. Are you scared you will be alone in your thoughts? Or are you simply a troll living in a comfortable left wing blog?

            • Murray Olsen 28.1.1.3.1.2
              17 August 2012 at 2:09 am

              Say what you like. I find the idea that South Aucklanders decide their vote on how much KFC they get to be racist. You promulgated that fantasy, therefore I say that you have racist views. If you feel defamed by that, cry me a river.

              • Bob …
                17 August 2012 at 2:20 am

                Murray, I don’t feel you have defamed me at all, I was simply using your statement as a reference to show Gobsmacked how precious s/he was being.

                • Murray Olsen …
                  17 August 2012 at 2:27 am

                  Gee, now I’m on your side. You’ve convinced me. I don’t like KFC but I’ll settle for a good feed of scallops or maybe even kina.
                  In fact, all you’ve convinced me of is that you’re a troll coming in here to try and get a reaction that you can talk about on some other blog to enhance your martyr complex. For some unkown reason, this happens a lot in the small hours.

                • gobsmacked …
                  17 August 2012 at 2:37 am

                  You have specifically alleged corruption. That’s serious.

                  You’re now suggesting that the National Party turned a blind eye to corruption. That they believed it happened, but did nothing. That’s also serious.

                  Either you believe a serious crime happened, or you don’t. Which?

    • Colonial Viper 28.2
      17 August 2012 at 1:18 am

      Mike, I think you will find it was the free South Canterbury bailouts with the lure of profitable quick flip power assets that helped National to win in 2011

      fify

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ’s trans lobby is fighting a rearguard action
    Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    5 hours ago

  • Your mandate is imaginary
    This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    10 hours ago

  • 14,000 unemployed under National
    The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    13 hours ago

  • Bryce Edwards: Discontent and gloom dominate NZ’s political mood
    Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    13 hours ago

  • Taking Tea with 42 & 38.
    National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    14 hours ago

  • Beware political propaganda: statistics are pointing to Grant Robertson never protecting “Lives an...
    Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”. As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    14 hours ago

  • Winding back the hands of history’s clock
    Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    14 hours ago

  • Paula Bennett’s political appointment will challenge public confidence
     Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
    Point of OrderBy xtrdnry
    15 hours ago

  • Business confidence sliding into winter of discontent
    TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    16 hours ago

  • Gordon Campbell on the coalition’s awful, not good, very bad poll results
    Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
    Gordon CampbellBy lyndon
    18 hours ago

  • New HOP readers for future payment options
    Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
    Greater AucklandBy Matt L
    19 hours ago

  • 2024 Reading Summary: April (+ Writing Update)
    Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
    A Phuulish FellowBy strda221
    1 day ago

  • At a glance – Clearing up misconceptions regarding 'hide the decline'
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    Skeptical Science
    1 day ago

  • Road photos
    Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 day ago

  • Bryce Edwards: Paula Bennett’s political appointment will challenge public confidence
    The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 day ago

  • NZDF is still hostile to oversight
    Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago

  • Winding Back The Hands Of History’s Clock.
    Holding On To The Present: The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
    Bowalley Road
    1 day ago

  • Sweet Moderation? What Christopher Luxon Could Learn From The Germans.
    Stuck In The Middle With You: As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
    Bowalley Road
    1 day ago

  • A clear warning
    The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago

  • Poll results and Waitangi Tribunal report go unmentioned on the Beehive website – where racing tru...
    Buzz  from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example.  This shows National down ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 day ago

  • Listening To The Traffic.
    It Takes A Train To Cry: Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
    Bowalley Road
    1 day ago

  • Comity Be Damned! The State’s Legislative Arm Is Flexing Its Constitutional Muscles.
    Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
    Bowalley Road
    1 day ago

  • Ending The Quest.
    Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
    Bowalley Road
    1 day ago

  • Will political polarisation intensify to the point where ‘normal’ government becomes impossible,...
    Chris Trotter writes –  New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago

  • Bernard’s pick 'n' mix for Tuesday, April 30
    TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:30am on Tuesday, May 30:Scoop: NZ 'close to the tipping point' of measles epidemic, health experts warn NZ Herald Benjamin PlummerHealth: 'Absurd and totally unacceptable': Man has to wait a year for ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago

  • Why Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating in the country
    Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago

  • Worst poll result for a new Government in MMP history
    Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago

  • Pinning down climate change's role in extreme weather
    This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
    Skeptical Science
    2 days ago

  • Serving at Seymour's pleasure.
    Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago

  • Webworm LA Pop-Up
    Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    2 days ago

  • “Feel good” school is out
    Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago

  • 6 Months in, surely our Report Card is “Ignored all warnings: recommend dismissal ASAP”?
    Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy. Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    2 days ago

  • Bread, and how it gets buttered
    Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago

  • Bryce Edwards: Why Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating in the country
    Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    2 days ago

  • Justice for Gaza?
    The New York Times reports that the International Criminal Court is about to issue arrest warrants for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over their genocide in Gaza: Israeli officials increasingly believe that the International Criminal Court is preparing to issue arrest warrants for senior government officials on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago

  • If there has been any fiddling with Pharmac’s funding, we can count on Paula to figure out the fis...
    Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago

  • FastTrackWatch – The case for the Government’s Fast Track Bill
    Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago

  • Bernard’s pick 'n' mix for Monday, April 29
    TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago

  • Gordon Campbell on Iran killing its rappers, and searching for the invisible Dr. Reti
    span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
    Gordon CampbellBy lyndon
    3 days ago

  • Auckland Rail Electrification 10 years old
    Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
    Greater AucklandBy Matt L
    3 days ago

  • Coalition's dirge of austerity and uncertainty is driving the economy into a deeper recession
    Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago

  • Disability Funding or Tax Cuts.
    You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago

  • Of the Goodness of Tolkien’s Eru
    April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
    A Phuulish FellowBy strda221
    3 days ago

  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #17
    A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 21, 2024 thru Sat, April 27, 2024. Story of the week Anthropogenic climate change may be the ultimate shaggy dog story— but with a twist, because here ...
    Skeptical Science
    3 days ago

  • Pastor Who Abused People, Blames People
    Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago

  • Vic Uni shows how under threat free speech is
    The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago

  • Winston remembers Gettysburg.
    Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago

  • 25
    She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8.  The universe was ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago

  • Fact Brief – Is Antarctica gaining land ice?
    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
    Skeptical Science
    4 days ago

  • Policing protests.
    Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    5 days ago

  • Open letter to Hon Paul Goldsmith
    Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago

  • Bryce Edwards: FastTrackWatch – The Case for the Government’s Fast Track Bill
    Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago

  • Luxon gets out his butcher’s knife – briefly
    Peter Dunne writes –  The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago

  • More tax for less
    Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago

  • Real News vs Fake News.
    We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago

  • Another way to roll
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Share ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago

  • Simon Clark: The climate lies you'll hear this year
    This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
    Skeptical Science
    5 days ago

  • Cutting the Public Service
    It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    5 days ago

  • Luxon’s demoted ministers might take comfort from the British politician who bounced back after th...
    Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious:  we live in a troubled ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago

  • This is how I roll over
    1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago

  • The Waitangi Tribunal is not “a roving Commission”…
    …it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisition   NOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes –  The High Court ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago

  • Is Oranga Tamariki guilty of neglect?
    Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same? Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago

  • Three Strikes saw lower reoffending
    David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago

  • Luxon’s ruthless show of strength is perfect for our angry era
    Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago

  • 'Lacks attention to detail and is creating double-standards.'
    TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago

  • One Night Only!
    Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago

  • What did Melissa Lee do?
    It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago

  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #17 2024
    Open access notables Ice acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment: In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
    Skeptical Science
    6 days ago

  • Maori Party (with “disgust”) draws attention to Chhour’s race after the High Court rules on Wa...
    Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago

  • Who’s Going Up The Media Mountain?
    Mr Bombastic: Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
    Bowalley Road
    7 days ago

  • “That's how I roll”
    It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    7 days ago

  • “Comity” versus the rule of law
    In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago

  • Aotearoa: a live lab for failed Right-wing socio-economic zombie experiments once more…
    Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder. In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    1 week ago

  • Water is at the heart of farmers’ struggle to survive in Benin
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére Sosou Market gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
    Skeptical Science
    1 week ago

  • At a time of media turmoil, Melissa had nothing to proclaim as Minister – and now she has been dem...
    Buzz from the Beehive   Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 week ago

  • Minister acknowledges passing of Sir Robert Martin (KNZM)
    New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago

  • Speech to New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Parliament – Annual Lecture: Challenges ...
    Good evening –   Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago

  • Accelerating airport security lines
    From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago

  • Community hui to talk about kina barrens
    People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago

  • Kiwi exporters win as NZ-EU FTA enters into force
    Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago

  • Mining resurgence a welcome sign
    There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago

  • Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill passes first reading
    The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Government to boost public EV charging network
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure.  The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Residential Property Managers Bill to not progress
    The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Independent review into disability support services
    The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Justice Minister updates UN on law & order plan
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Ending emergency housing motels in Rotorua
    The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Trade Minister travels to Riyadh, OECD, and Dubai
    Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Education priorities focused on lifting achievement
    Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • NZTA App first step towards digital driver licence
    The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say.  “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Supporting whānau out of emergency housing
    Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Tribute to Dave O'Sullivan
    Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Speech – Eid al-Fitr
    Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Government saves access to medicines
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff.    “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Pharmac Chair appointed
    Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Taking action on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
    Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says.  “Every day, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • New sports complex opens in Kaikohe
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Diplomacy needed more than ever
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges.    “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address, Buttes New British Cemetery Belgium
    Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service.  It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – NZ National Service, Chunuk Bair
    Distinguished guests -   It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders.   Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
    Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia.   Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • PM announces changes to portfolios
    Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

  • Supporting better financial outcomes for Kiwis
    The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-01T14:35:37+00:00