The Flag will make us rich

66 comments on “The Flag will make us rich ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Paul 1

   6 August 2015 at 12:26 pm

   More FM and Stuff doing the PM’s job for him and distracting from the real issues.
   I wonder if they asked him about Fonterra, Saudi Arabia, Auckland housing, etc
2. mac1 2

   6 August 2015 at 12:28 pm

   Get the pinpoint accuracy of Key’s predictive language-,’basically’, ‘in the end’, ‘over time’, ‘ultimately’.

   As if I, or he, is going to be around to call bullshit on that one.
   • heather tanguay 2.1

     6 August 2015 at 6:16 pm

     This is complete nonsense, this is just too much
     The community has had enough of this complete rubbish
3. Colonial Viper 3

   6 August 2015 at 12:36 pm

   Just another corporate mantra over another corporate logo
   • Paul 3.1

     6 August 2015 at 12:45 pm

     It is in an interview like this you really see what a shallow person Key is.
     His ‘aspiration’ for this country just seems for us to be a famous brand.
     The mediocrity of his vision is laid bare.
     • dukeofurl 3.1.1

       6 August 2015 at 5:51 pm

       Its worse than that, this is just his latest ‘shallow thoughts’

       At first the new flag was to make us all ‘patriotic flag wavers’ but those lines havent worked.
4. Detrie 4

   6 August 2015 at 12:45 pm

   Yes, it seems every comment he ever makes in public or in parliament on anything is carefully qualified.
   • Hanswurst 4.1

     6 August 2015 at 5:15 pm

     I don’t think it’s so much that it’s carefully qualified as that he just instinctively sprays qualifiers around when giving assurances. in fact it’s laid on so thick that it may well be a nervous habit, since “ultimately”, “in the end” and “over time” all express basiically the same thing.
5. maui 5

   6 August 2015 at 12:48 pm

   Phew, that’s lucky if it’s now worth billions, then lets cut to the chase and make sure we maximise our global reach on the flagpole.

   http://s1134.photobucket.com/user/TheSirPeter/media/nzlogosquiz.png.html
6. Tricledrown 6

   6 August 2015 at 12:56 pm

   The new New Zealand flag Keystyle.
   A pair of pants on fire on a flagpole.
   • Graeme 6.1

     6 August 2015 at 1:15 pm

     A concept I like to see developed to an art form, kind of like dancing cossacks
   • ropata 6.2

     9 August 2015 at 11:16 pm

     Key has told enough porkies to set the whole Jockeys factory on fire
7. tc 7

   6 August 2015 at 1:02 pm

   A depiction of the kiwi being rogered by large corporates, Uncle Sam and China would be an accurate reflection of Keys legacy
8. McFlock 8

   6 August 2015 at 1:08 pm

   Lol

   Economics has been called the “dismal science”, knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. Key just bullshits the value of anything and ignores the price of everything.
   • Chooky 8.1

     6 August 2015 at 7:11 pm

     +100
9. marty mars 9

   6 August 2015 at 1:25 pm

   yay billions – now WE can buy China /sarc
10. Bob 10

    6 August 2015 at 1:28 pm

    While it does sound like a ridiculous statement to make, our Milk, Cheese, Lamb, Wool, Honey (Manuka), Wine, Kiwifruit, Apple and plenty of other exports have a great name globally, having a flag that we can put onto these products with works as an instant visual cue that these are NZ made products ‘could’ be a great way of identifying these products globally.
    Based on the evidence of the completely unscientific Seven Sharp Times Square experiment, we currently do not have a key (excuse the term) visual identifier that sets us apart from Australia: http://tvnz.co.nz/seven-sharp/australia-jack-tame-experiments-nz-flag-in-times-square-video-6350987

    Whether a change of flag would help, only time will tell (and claiming it would be worth Billions over time is a hell of a stretch), but it certainly shouldn’t be completely dismissed either.
    • tc 10.1

      6 August 2015 at 1:47 pm

      So what’s wrong with ‘MADE IN NEW ZEALAND’ cheap, effective and unambiguous.

      wasn’t this one of the ‘100% Pure NZ’s’ objectives ?
      • Bob 10.1.1

        6 August 2015 at 1:59 pm

        Yes, MADE IN NEW ZEALAND is cheap and reasonably effective, but visual cues are recognised much faster/easier by the human eye, and they have the added bonus of not excluding those who are illiterate or who have reading disorders such as dyslexia.

        Why do you think Apple use a logo on the back of their products rather than the word “APPLE”.
        • One Anonymous Bloke 10.1.1.1

          6 August 2015 at 2:41 pm

          🙄

          Some people (quaint, isn’t it) consider a country’s flag signifies something a little more than commerce.

          That’s one reason there’s already a commercial brand available.
          • Bob 10.1.1.1.1

            7 August 2015 at 10:43 am

            The NZ flag signifies and represents a hell of a lot more than commerce, but that isn’t what this post is about is it OAB?
            • One Anonymous Bloke 10.1.1.1.1.1

              8 August 2015 at 2:58 pm

              having a flag that we can put onto these products with works as an instant visual cue that these are NZ made products

              We already have one, as per the link. The flag represents our national identity, not some marketing patter.
        • tc 10.1.1.2

          6 August 2015 at 2:53 pm

          As I said wasn’t that what the 100% pure brand was all about, clear, consice and like the AB’s strip all black and had a good presence and immediate association with NZ.

          Visually very easily identifiable….whereas a new flag will take yonks before it’s got any immediate impact.

          you also assume this wonderful new flag will be so compelling that all the brand packaging designers will run toward it with open arms….think again.
          • Bob 10.1.1.2.1

            7 August 2015 at 10:45 am

            Correct, but the 100% Pure brand won’t be around forever, once a new marketing agency comes alone that brand is likely gone, which is why the PM did say (so eloquently) “Basically in the end it’s gonna be worth billions over time.”
            The ‘over time’ part is what you seem to have missed.

            “you also assume this wonderful new flag will be so compelling that all the brand packaging designers will run toward it with open arms….think again.”
            They ran to the 100% pure brand didn’t they?
        • dukeofurl 10.1.1.3

          6 August 2015 at 3:07 pm

          The reason why Apple have a logo is because you cant copyright the word apple.

          There is some protection for ‘Apple computers’ but not as much as a logo itself.

          if the apple logo was so great why did they invent a new name like “iphone”

          Your reasoning is faulty
          • Bob 10.1.1.3.1

            7 August 2015 at 10:49 am

            They have copyrighted and fiercely protected the terms iPhone, iPad, iPod etc. why don’t they use those terms on the back of their products?
        • Tracey 10.1.1.4

          6 August 2015 at 5:36 pm

          you know lots of companies use a silver fern in their branding already to do the same thing?
          • dukeofurl 10.1.1.4.1

            6 August 2015 at 5:59 pm

            Thats true. Wines or food just say product of ‘ Wherever’, New Zealand.

            Im thinking meat uses the Silverfern Farms branding.

            Nothing for the overseas market makes much of the flag, just having a new flag wont change anything unless theres a billion dollar branding campaign to go with it.
          • Bob 10.1.1.4.2

            7 August 2015 at 10:51 am

            You know NZ Rugby own the rights to the Silver Fern don’t you? They could charge for that use at any point if they wanted too, so why would you open you brand to unnecessary risk?
        • meconism 10.1.1.5

          6 August 2015 at 8:47 pm

          I don’t know, is it the same reason they stole the idea from the record company of the same name?
    • freedom 10.2

      6 August 2015 at 2:38 pm

      If Americans’ knowledge of the world is some sort of benchmark we are in real trouble 😉
      
    • Hanswurst 10.3

      6 August 2015 at 6:30 pm

      “It shouldn’t be completely dismissed” is a terrible argument. You’re supposed to use facts to back up your decisions, not make decisions haphazardly and use them to work out what the facts might be afterwards. What gets me is that our prime minister is apparently just dreaming up any old thing and using it to sell policy purely on the basis that it doesn’t sound massively implausible.
11. CR 11

    6 August 2015 at 1:33 pm

    Yeah we should just cut the patriotic sovereign nation state what do we stand for crap and issue flag bonds, sell them to the highest bidder on a 5 year contract. Our first new flag could be black with white letters in a white frame…AIG maybe.
12. Sanctuary 12

    6 August 2015 at 1:34 pm

    Sounds like he has been talking to the Warriors marketing department, they wear a new jersey every week.
13. Tigger 13

    6 August 2015 at 2:02 pm

    Imagine how much BP, Nike or Coca Cola would pay if we incorporated their logos on our flag? Or maybe we just make their logo our flag? McDonalds would pay big bucks for that. We can change the name of our country too to Big Mac or McChicken.
    • Paul 13.1

      6 August 2015 at 2:16 pm

      It’s not below Key.
    • Clemgeopin 13.2

      6 August 2015 at 5:07 pm

      “Imagine how much BP, Nike or Coca Cola would pay if we incorporated their logos on our flag?”

      What a splendid idea! Have a different corporate logo each month as our flag. Make the global corporates feverishly bid for the right. Private-Public partnership! We could even permanently incorporate a picture of Key and weasel side by side! See and hear the ching-ching millions, billions, trillions and may be even some brazilians our way! Oh, what joy!
14. hoom 14

    6 August 2015 at 2:17 pm

    26 Million is only the cost of the referendum & consultations.
    The actual cost of reprinting & manufacturing replacements for everything that has NZ flags/images of NZ flag on it currently will be much more.
15. Smilin 15

    6 August 2015 at 2:20 pm

    Just call it Blase faire to go with his Laissez faire austerity ridden ego centric greed and self gratification of how great he thinks he is
16. Tombstone 16

    6 August 2015 at 2:22 pm

    Once again Nats caught up having to explain themselves this time over the dirty rotten Saudi deal and out comes the flag debate with Stuff & More FM happy to do the puppet masters bidding.

    Key says its worth billions! Oh fuck off …. saying it will be worth billions doesn’t make it so & that’s the point that MSM seem to be missing here or willfully ignoring (take your pick). Simply repeating these ridiculous statements by Key doesn’t mean that any of it will actually come to fruition. It’s all verbal diarhea with hacks lining up to smother their front pages in it.

    Now how about the Saudi deal? And what about Auckland housing? Jean Jones closing the doors & unemployment on the rise? What’s happening with Talley’s & how about that $101b national debt? TPPA anyone?

    Get a grip MSM – start doing your jobs.
    • tc 16.1

      6 August 2015 at 2:54 pm

      That is their job, supporting the national gubimmint.
17. Smilin 17

    6 August 2015 at 2:28 pm

    We could have a kiwi rollin up a stokey with “Betta than burning the bush”on it
18. Paul 18

    6 August 2015 at 2:39 pm

    I nominate AIG’s logo as the flag for John Key’s new nation of ‘Absurdistan.*’ ( * from Metro)
    Bad enough not to settle claims fully with the people of Christchurch.
    Yet powerful enough to get their logo on the All Blacks jersey and force the players into an annual pilgrimage to Chicago.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/10057122/Citys-insurance-aftershocks
    http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/national/christchurch-woman-launches-action-against-aig/
    http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/regional/256470/$9m-legal-bill-to-settle-quake-claims
19. Charles 19

    6 August 2015 at 2:54 pm

    If my brain is turned on, and I can never entirely be sure, he is sort of right. It’s bit like that style of management thinking that runs: When your business has reached a critical point of make-or-break, always go out and buy a new company car/fleet, new offices, etc etc. Magic then happens, and the virtual momentum of percieved success (as seen by your clients) results in additional orders and that pushes you over the line. And if it doesn’t, then at least you feel better, while your creditors suffer, which puts you in a better position to start another business… yay! He’d have to be sure something like the TPPA was signed, to back up the appearances – or just be a complete loon.

    Theoretically, everyone having to renew their stationery and paintwork etc would generate some “extra millions”, or maybe just millions of churn. Money would change hands, put it that way. But if that was something he believed in, by the end of next month he could also end child poverty, raise benefit levels, increase minimum wage/introduce living wage – lots of good direct-action stuff – all under the title of good investments. But this the Nats, afterall.
    • tc 19.1

      6 August 2015 at 2:55 pm

      yes like a stopped clock is correct twice a day.
    • Tracey 19.2

      6 August 2015 at 5:37 pm

      When you have fucked up the economy as these guys have, you need a shiny new brand to con the punters into thinking they are buying something different…

      ssdd
      • Charles 19.2.1

        6 August 2015 at 5:59 pm

        ssddindeed
    • Melanie Scott 19.3

      6 August 2015 at 10:57 pm

      Yes you’ve got it. Can’t remember the book that made me understand that, was it ‘Rogueconomics’, ‘The Death of Money’, ‘Griftopia’ or one about the fallacy of exponential economic growth (can’t remember the name). GDP can be a false indicator of the health of an economy, it could actually be an indicator that things are really far from good, just lots of money changing hands, not ‘healthy economic activity’ at all. A bit like moving the deck chairs on the Titanic.
20. Akldnut 20

    6 August 2015 at 2:57 pm

    Ad in foreign newspapers next week…….
    FOR SALE – 1X brand new (New Zealand) Flag
    Start Price : $100,000,000
    No reserve>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Accept all major credit cards, BANK transfers welcome.
    contact: https://www.national.org.nz/
21. Cemetery Jones 21

    6 August 2015 at 3:22 pm

    I’m thinking kinda like a cross between a ponytail and a wind sock. But with ferns on it.
22. Mrs Brillo 22

    6 August 2015 at 3:28 pm

    Insisting on a new flag to “promote” us reminds me of the old Cockney barrow boys’ saying:
    “When business is bad, paint the cart.”
    • Tracey 22.1

      6 August 2015 at 5:38 pm

      chuckle
23. Tanz 23

    6 August 2015 at 5:15 pm

    Read in the Herald today that Key wants to encourage Chinese investors to buy in the regions so that people’s homes will be worth more. FFS, does he not care about the fact that a basic home in Auckland costs $500,000 grand more than it did five years ago? So now first home buyers won’t even have the back-up of the regions to buy in. Shows where Key’s priorities lie, and it sure the heck ain’t with home-grown Kiwis.
    • Tracey 23.1

      6 August 2015 at 5:39 pm

      He made his money in a career of imaginary stuff… currency trading, raising people’s house values is meaningless unless they are selling and buying into a different market. Smokes and Mirrors baby.
      • dukeofurl 23.1.1

        7 August 2015 at 9:47 am

        As we now know the currency trading out of London where Key was based was rigged.
        They did the same with the interest rates- they are just fractions of cents but it means huge amounts in markets counted in trillions over time.
    • dukeofurl 23.2

      6 August 2015 at 6:05 pm

      Doesnt even make sense, as Key is saying Chinese investors ARENT pushing up prices in Auckland, but they ARE supposed to push up prices in provincial areas ?

      if he did say this its complete and contradictory rubbish, then again……
      • Chooky 23.2.1

        6 August 2015 at 7:14 pm

        he is very shallow you know…doesnt worry about consistency …just being glib…and getting away with things…especially selling off the countries assets
24. CnrJoe 24

    6 August 2015 at 5:33 pm

    From the twitter
    To be fair to the PM, he is thinking in epochal terms: “Basically in the end it’s gonna be worth billions over time.” Micheal Wood

    True, one cent a year could really accrue in geological time. I’m sorry I doubted the PM now.
    G.Tiso
25. Pat 25

    6 August 2015 at 6:52 pm

    awesome….i’ll sell the cows and the farm and buy flags!!!!
26. Clemgeopin 26

    6 August 2015 at 8:16 pm

    In the end, we are all dead!
27. Irascible 27

    6 August 2015 at 8:58 pm

    Key and his Cabinet of Cronies are living on Planet Key if they think a new flag is both a legacy and worth billions of $$ to the country. Total speculator bumpf.
28. Michael who failed Civics 28

    6 August 2015 at 11:17 pm

    The man’s deluded. No wonder he’s our leader.
29. keyman 29

    7 August 2015 at 3:24 am

    this must be the something special flag by key
30. Stuart Munro 30

    7 August 2015 at 7:54 am

    They’re worth billions – fine – lets pay Key’s salary in flags.
31. Thinkerr 31

    8 August 2015 at 8:12 pm

    Are the Australians changing their flag too, then?
32. ropata 32

    9 August 2015 at 11:21 pm

    A goatse flag with the sun shining out of Johnny Keyster’s ass

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS